Studies Say This About Progressives....

[SuperDemocrat]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

I don't think it is a change but more the fact people are starting to notice some pecular un-liberal behaviors by the supposed liberal party in the United States. When the FCC director warns that democrats are gunning for conservative media it tells me that quite a few of them may say they support freedom of speech but really don't.

the left would counter with something like 'conservatives' do the same thing but that is something we may expect from a conservative party. I wouldn't expect this kind of behavior from the liberal party. I think people are starting to notice that there is a quite a huge contadiction in the democratic party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.

I've notice similar things such as when you disgagree with people in the social science departments. They automatically find that your motives were 'racist', 'sexist', or just about any derogatory term. This is why people don't disagree with these people because they are so damn afraid of being likened to the most evil human beings in the world.

" This is why people don't disagree with these people because they are so damn afraid of being likened to the most evil human beings in the world."


Clearly....not all of us.
The 'people' to whom you refer are the whiny, fearful, lock-step Liberals.

Courage, second only to gratitude, is one of the least common of the good character traits.


Neither of which is found in the Liberal constellation.

 

[NYcarbineer]

When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.

I've notice similar things such as when you disgagree with people in the social science departments. They automatically find that your motives were 'racist', 'sexist', or just about any derogatory term. This is why people don't disagree with these people because they are so damn afraid of being likened to the most evil human beings in the world.

" This is why people don't disagree with these people because they are so damn afraid of being likened to the most evil human beings in the world."


Clearly....not all of us.
The 'people' to whom you refer are the whiny, fearful, lock-step Liberals.

Courage, second only to gratitude, is one of the least common of the good character traits.


Neither of which is found in the Liberal constellation.

Insults in lieu of a substantive argument. The classic key symptom of idiocy.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Academia hides research results that support conservative and traditional doctrines. They can do this, because Liberals/Progressives are in charge.

Why is academia so infused.....infected.....with Liberals?


"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better.


They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth. [In their writing, they] have pretended that brilliance and originality can best be conveyed in a secret, Mandarin language that absolutely no one, including themselves, can possibly understand…and this obfuscation of language has been employed to hide a considerable lack of brilliance and originality and to avoid the consequences of making oneself clear."

“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler



Get it? Liberals 'blacklist ' conservatives, traditionalists, etc., from making a living in academia......just as communists did in Hollywood well before the anti-communist blacklist that is claimed by Liberals; communist Dalton Trumbo bragged about doing so.

There are more liberals in education because conservatives don't give a shit about educating others as a career.

They don't want to pay for education that others paid for them.

Spoken like a true government school grad.

What is your point?

"What is your point?"


Jeezzzz.....you must be as dumb as asphalt.

My 'point' is clear and evident, written in English, and found throughout this thread, the one to which you voluntarily subscribed.

Here, repeated, as you no doubt had to sit through many iterations of summer school for repetition.....


1. "....58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational."



2. " As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world,then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out."



3. Liberals 'blacklist ' conservatives, traditionalists, etc., from making a living in academia......just as communists did in Hollywood well before the anti-communist blacklist that is claimed by Liberals; Dalton Trumbo bragged about doing so.
...Liberal social scientists opt for any strategy other than inclusiveness, almost as if they were old-fashioned segregationists. ....so many of their beliefs conflict not so much with tradition as with reality.



4. When academic 'research' "...is in thrall to a political program like progressivism, realities cease to matter for many in the field. The goal becomes to close ranks to defend their thesis against reality.

And politicians depend on social scientists for public policy advice. Ominously, traditional families’ resistance to the policy changes fueled by such studies attracts hostility precisely when those families are more successful than others."MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside from EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

I don't think it is a change but more the fact people are starting to notice some pecular un-liberal behaviors by the supposed liberal party in the United States. When the FCC director warns that democrats are gunning for conservative media it tells me that quite a few of them may say they support freedom of speech but really don't.

the left would counter with something like 'conservatives' do the same thing but that is something we may expect from a conservative party. I wouldn't expect this kind of behavior from the liberal party. I think people are starting to notice that there is a quite a huge contadiction in the democratic party.

"quite a few of them may say they support freedom of speech but really don't."

I strongly recommend this book by a Liberal:

"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech,"
by Kirsten Powers

You can find it in your local library.


THEN.....study the true import of "Net Neutrality" and

"Obama plunges toward Internet surrender to globalists"
Read more at Obama plunges toward Internet surrender to globalists

 

[P@triot]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

 

[Correll]

When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.

If conservatives choose not to go into social science education, THEY'RE to blame,

if anyone is to blame, which btw is probably nonsense.

Standard lib hypocrisy.


They see a group dramatically underrepresented in a field.


IF the group is a traditionally disadvantaged minority, say BLACK, the reason MUST BE racism and they are outraged.


If the group in question are conservatives, or whites, then they immediately search for other reasons.


All completely unaware.


Liberals: All the self awareness of a Turnip.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.

If conservatives choose not to go into social science education, THEY'RE to blame,

if anyone is to blame, which btw is probably nonsense.

Standard lib hypocrisy.


They see a group dramatically underrepresented in a field.


IF the group is a traditionally disadvantaged minority, say BLACK, the reason MUST BE racism and they are outraged.


If the group in question are conservatives, or whites, then they immediately search for other reasons.


All completely unaware.


Liberals: All the self awareness of a Turnip.

Near impossible to find conservatives in main stream news outfits, too....and for the very same reasons: not hired, not promoted, not given a voice.
Same in academia.

 

[NoNukes]

You speak of unintelligent liberals using poor spelling.

 

[NoNukes]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

 

[Correll]

You speak of unintelligent liberals using poor spelling.

The accusation is not lack of intelligence but closed mindedness.

 

[Correll]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

You are stupid enough to think that just calling something a lie, is making a point.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

"Coulter' SQUIRE(???????) is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her."

SQUIRE?????

WHAT?????



Surely you meant 'scholar'....you moron.

 

[NoNukes]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

"Coulter' SQUIRE(???????) is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her."

SQUIRE?????

WHAT?????



Surely you meant 'scholar'....you moron.

Technical glitch. My phone auto corrected quote to squire.

 

[NoNukes]

I've been saying for the past five years or so that the left has morphed into full-on fascism. If everyone doesn't Nazi goose-step in perfect synchronization with everything they desire, those people are viciously attacked.

With each passing day, the left has become more unhinged, more radicalized, and more disgusting. The good news is that it's pushing rational people to conservatism. Even Ronald Reagan couldn't create the Tea Party. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid sure did!

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

You are stupid enough to think that just calling something a lie, is making a point.

Pointing out a lie is making a point. You are the stupid one.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

"Coulter' SQUIRE(???????) is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her."

SQUIRE?????

WHAT?????



Surely you meant 'scholar'....you moron.

Technical glitch. My phone auto corrected quote to squire.

So......we agree?

Coulter....a scholar?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...the left has morphed into full-on fascism."


Aside for EXACTLY how far they are ready to go to fulfill their dreams and doctrines, there are no real differences between these six in their endgames:

Fascism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Nazism and Communism.

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

You are stupid enough to think that just calling something a lie, is making a point.

Pointing out a lie is making a point. You are the stupid one.

I notice that in neither of your posts did you state any 'lie.'


Where you saving up to list those of Obama?

 

[NoNukes]

Bingo. I've been reading "The Road to Serfdom" by Friedrich Hayek and that's exactly what he covers. The left desperately wants you to believe that fascism is "right-wing" but it is the polar opposite. It's complete totalitarian control (which of course is the opposite of right-wing).

The left is so ashamed of their political ideologies that they attempt to pin them on the right. Speaks volumes. If one is so ashamed of something that they attempt to accuse the people they hate of it, then they probably shouldn't be supporting it.

I can't recall the last time I found a Liberal/Progressive speaking about reading any books.

"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter


You may have read many of the ones I have.....but my top three, to prepare one to understand the world in which we live....
1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork




2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg




3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West



They provide the context for the world you live in.

Coulter' squire is a total lie, and you are stupid enough to quote her.

You are stupid enough to think that just calling something a lie, is making a point.

Pointing out a lie is making a point. You are the stupid one.

I notice that in neither of your posts did you state any 'lie.'


Where you saving up to list those of Obama?

Some people are intelligent enough to figure it out. Sorry that you cannot.