Summary of Evidence Released - What It Says

[Faun]

Hillary and the FBI collaborated with a foreign spy working with Russians, a spy they assessed to be a lying anti-Trump extremist desperate to prevent Trump from becoming President ... like they were...

Sure, dope. That's why they got a warrant on a guy that wasn't even with the campaign any longer just 20 days before the election.

Or why the FBI didn't leak a word to the public about their investigation into Trump/Russia; while they very publicly opened investigations into Hillary's email server ... twice ... once after early voting had already begun.

What more proof is needed to show how rightarded conservatives are?

The NYT published the fact that Hillary was using a private email server. It wasn't the FBI that made it public information. The investigation into her emails began only after it had already become public knowledge.

On the other hand, the last thing the FBI wanted was for the public to learn that it was conducting espionage against the Trump campaign.

LOL

You're such a retard.

How would the NY Times know about an FBI investigation unless the FBI told them?

Go back and read it carefully. I didn't say the NYT knew about any FBI investigation. How could it when there wasn't any investigation at that point.

Which brings us back to the FBI was investigating both candidates but only publicly announced the one on Hillary. To the brain-dead right, that's the FBI trying to get Hillary into office over Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

Hillary and the FBI collaborated with a foreign spy working with Russians, a spy they assessed to be a lying anti-Trump extremist desperate to prevent Trump from becoming President ... like they were...

Nope, Hillary retained an American law firm.

It's called a "cut out" and it's used to try and hide guilt. Sorry.

Call it what you want, she retained an American law firm. No laws against that. And that American law firm hired an American research firm. No laws against that either.

That law firm paid a British spy for the dossier. That is against the law. That spy in turn paid Russian spies for malicious gossip to put in the dossier. That's also against the law.

Stop lying. That law firm paid an American corporation. There is no law against that.

ROFL! You actually believe that because they used surrogates to make the purchase that they are off the hook?

 

[bripat9643]

Sure, dope. That's why they got a warrant on a guy that wasn't even with the campaign any longer just 20 days before the election.

Or why the FBI didn't leak a word to the public about their investigation into Trump/Russia; while they very publicly opened investigations into Hillary's email server ... twice ... once after early voting had already begun.

What more proof is needed to show how rightarded conservatives are?

The NYT published the fact that Hillary was using a private email server. It wasn't the FBI that made it public information. The investigation into her emails began only after it had already become public knowledge.

On the other hand, the last thing the FBI wanted was for the public to learn that it was conducting espionage against the Trump campaign.

LOL

You're such a retard.

How would the NY Times know about an FBI investigation unless the FBI told them?

Go back and read it carefully. I didn't say the NYT knew about any FBI investigation. How could it when there wasn't any investigation at that point.

Which brings us back to the FBI was investigating both candidates but only publicly announced the one on Hillary. To the brain-dead right, that's the FBI trying to get Hillary into office over Trump.

You obviously have reading comprehension issues.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't have anything against the research, I do have problems with it's lack of veracity. The fact that very little of it was corroborated SHOULD make it illegal to use to get a warrant on ANYONE.

The FBI thought differently and verified some of the dossier involving Page, which is whom they sought to spy on.

As I said, very little of it had been corroborated. I'm glad we can agree on that.

Great, now if only you, or Nunes, or anyone, could prove the evidence supplied from it to the FISC included unverified material, you might have a case to make that the FISA warrant wasn't warranted.

It's all unverified, turd. Congress asked McCabe for the verification, and he couldn't produce a thing.

Stop lying. I already posted the parts that were verified.

They were three nothing burgers.

 

[Faun]

Nope, Hillary retained an American law firm.

It's called a "cut out" and it's used to try and hide guilt. Sorry.

Call it what you want, she retained an American law firm. No laws against that. And that American law firm hired an American research firm. No laws against that either.

That law firm paid a British spy for the dossier. That is against the law. That spy in turn paid Russian spies for malicious gossip to put in the dossier. That's also against the law.

Stop lying. That law firm paid an American corporation. There is no law against that.

ROFL! You actually believe that because they used surrogates to make the purchase that they are off the hook?

Off the hook? They were never on the hook. The law firm paid an American-based firm to do research. That's legal. So legal, that they haven't been charged with a crime because it's legal. Anything you believe beyond that is on you.

 

[Care4all]

In barely 6 months of investigations we have 4 indictments of Trump team members and 2 guilty pleas. With both Papodopoulos and Flynn admitting that they lied to the FBI about ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

We know there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. We know that these crimes relate directly with Russia. The only question is.....how many such crimes exist, by whom and for how long.

Which is why the Mueller investigation will continue.

You dont' know any such thing, moron. Flynn lied about talking to the Russian ambassador. I don't recall what Papawhatshisname lied about, but it wasn't about "ties between the Trump campaign and Russia."

There is no evidence that the Trump campaign has committed any crimes whatsoever. There is none. nada, zilch.

You don’t anything either dude.

Denial from fake messiah is not an evidence. Denial from fake messiah is not a verdict ( copied this from someone here ) ...... It takes time but Mueller will get there.

If Trump did not commit crime:
1. Why he is so scared?
2. Why is he acting like he committed crimes?
3. Why not stop lying and stop interfering then let the justice do the job? If he didn’t then he is cleared if he did then like everyone else he is not above the law. He should pay for his crimes.

FAIR ENOUGH?

In other words, you can't name a crime Trump or his administration committed. Who cares about your rationalizations for lying?

Well dude. Why don’t you answer my 3 questions?

Then explain why he is going all over the place scared like a puppy screaming no collusions no collusions no collusions. Normally people shut the fuck up.

1. He isn't scared
2. He isn't acting like he committed any crimes.
3. Why would anyone cooperate with a witch hunt?

cuz the TRUTH will set you free... and this investigation can come to an end....

unless of course, Trump does have something to hide.....?

 

[Faun]

The FBI thought differently and verified some of the dossier involving Page, which is whom they sought to spy on.

As I said, very little of it had been corroborated. I'm glad we can agree on that.

Great, now if only you, or Nunes, or anyone, could prove the evidence supplied from it to the FISC included unverified material, you might have a case to make that the FISA warrant wasn't warranted.

It's all unverified, turd. Congress asked McCabe for the verification, and he couldn't produce a thing.

Stop lying. I already posted the parts that were verified.

They were three nothing burgers.

To you. To a FISA court, they were worthy of issuing a warrant.

 

[bripat9643]

As I said, very little of it had been corroborated. I'm glad we can agree on that.

Great, now if only you, or Nunes, or anyone, could prove the evidence supplied from it to the FISC included unverified material, you might have a case to make that the FISA warrant wasn't warranted.

It's all unverified, turd. Congress asked McCabe for the verification, and he couldn't produce a thing.

Stop lying. I already posted the parts that were verified.

They were three nothing burgers.

To you. To a FISA court, they were worthy of issuing a warrant.

If that's true then FISA needs to be abolished.

 

[bripat9643]

You dont' know any such thing, moron. Flynn lied about talking to the Russian ambassador. I don't recall what Papawhatshisname lied about, but it wasn't about "ties between the Trump campaign and Russia."

There is no evidence that the Trump campaign has committed any crimes whatsoever. There is none. nada, zilch.

You don’t anything either dude.

Denial from fake messiah is not an evidence. Denial from fake messiah is not a verdict ( copied this from someone here ) ...... It takes time but Mueller will get there.

If Trump did not commit crime:
1. Why he is so scared?
2. Why is he acting like he committed crimes?
3. Why not stop lying and stop interfering then let the justice do the job? If he didn’t then he is cleared if he did then like everyone else he is not above the law. He should pay for his crimes.

FAIR ENOUGH?

In other words, you can't name a crime Trump or his administration committed. Who cares about your rationalizations for lying?

Well dude. Why don’t you answer my 3 questions?

Then explain why he is going all over the place scared like a puppy screaming no collusions no collusions no collusions. Normally people shut the fuck up.

1. He isn't scared
2. He isn't acting like he committed any crimes.
3. Why would anyone cooperate with a witch hunt?

cuz the TRUTH will set you free... and this investigation can come to an end....

unless of course, Trump does have something to hide.....?

If the purpose of the witch hunt was to find the truth, you might have a point, but the purpose is to impeach Trump, and it won't stop until it achieves its goal or someone puts a stop to it.

 

[Faun]

Great, now if only you, or Nunes, or anyone, could prove the evidence supplied from it to the FISC included unverified material, you might have a case to make that the FISA warrant wasn't warranted.

It's all unverified, turd. Congress asked McCabe for the verification, and he couldn't produce a thing.

Stop lying. I already posted the parts that were verified.

They were three nothing burgers.

To you. To a FISA court, they were worthy of issuing a warrant.

If that's true then FISA needs to be abolished.

Your brain is abolished. Nothing needs to be done to with FISA.

 

[Faun]

You don’t anything either dude.

Denial from fake messiah is not an evidence. Denial from fake messiah is not a verdict ( copied this from someone here ) ...... It takes time but Mueller will get there.

If Trump did not commit crime:
1. Why he is so scared?
2. Why is he acting like he committed crimes?
3. Why not stop lying and stop interfering then let the justice do the job? If he didn’t then he is cleared if he did then like everyone else he is not above the law. He should pay for his crimes.

FAIR ENOUGH?

In other words, you can't name a crime Trump or his administration committed. Who cares about your rationalizations for lying?

Well dude. Why don’t you answer my 3 questions?

Then explain why he is going all over the place scared like a puppy screaming no collusions no collusions no collusions. Normally people shut the fuck up.

1. He isn't scared
2. He isn't acting like he committed any crimes.
3. Why would anyone cooperate with a witch hunt?

cuz the TRUTH will set you free... and this investigation can come to an end....

unless of course, Trump does have something to hide.....?

If the purpose of the witch hunt was to find the truth, you might have a point, but the purpose is to impeach Trump, and it won't stop until it achieves its goal or someone puts a stop to it.

LOL

The investigation is headed by a Republican, who was picked by a Republican, who was appointed by a Republican, who was voted into office by Republicans.

 

[charwin95]

In barely 6 months of investigations we have 4 indictments of Trump team members and 2 guilty pleas. With both Papodopoulos and Flynn admitting that they lied to the FBI about ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

We know there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. We know that these crimes relate directly with Russia. The only question is.....how many such crimes exist, by whom and for how long.

Which is why the Mueller investigation will continue.

You dont' know any such thing, moron. Flynn lied about talking to the Russian ambassador. I don't recall what Papawhatshisname lied about, but it wasn't about "ties between the Trump campaign and Russia."

There is no evidence that the Trump campaign has committed any crimes whatsoever. There is none. nada, zilch.

You don’t anything either dude.

Denial from fake messiah is not an evidence. Denial from fake messiah is not a verdict ( copied this from someone here ) ...... It takes time but Mueller will get there.

If Trump did not commit crime:
1. Why he is so scared?
2. Why is he acting like he committed crimes?
3. Why not stop lying and stop interfering then let the justice do the job? If he didn’t then he is cleared if he did then like everyone else he is not above the law. He should pay for his crimes.

FAIR ENOUGH?

In other words, you can't name a crime Trump or his administration committed. Who cares about your rationalizations for lying?

Well dude. Why don’t you answer my 3 questions?

Then explain why he is going all over the place scared like a puppy screaming no collusions no collusions no collusions. Normally people shut the fuck up.

1. He isn't scared
2. He isn't acting like he committed any crimes.
3. Why would anyone cooperate with a witch hunt?

1. Yes he is.
2. Yes he is.
3. He doesn’t have to. All he need is shut the fuck up because it’s not helping.

 

[bripat9643]

You dont' know any such thing, moron. Flynn lied about talking to the Russian ambassador. I don't recall what Papawhatshisname lied about, but it wasn't about "ties between the Trump campaign and Russia."

There is no evidence that the Trump campaign has committed any crimes whatsoever. There is none. nada, zilch.

You don’t anything either dude.

Denial from fake messiah is not an evidence. Denial from fake messiah is not a verdict ( copied this from someone here ) ...... It takes time but Mueller will get there.

If Trump did not commit crime:
1. Why he is so scared?
2. Why is he acting like he committed crimes?
3. Why not stop lying and stop interfering then let the justice do the job? If he didn’t then he is cleared if he did then like everyone else he is not above the law. He should pay for his crimes.

FAIR ENOUGH?

In other words, you can't name a crime Trump or his administration committed. Who cares about your rationalizations for lying?

Well dude. Why don’t you answer my 3 questions?

Then explain why he is going all over the place scared like a puppy screaming no collusions no collusions no collusions. Normally people shut the fuck up.

1. He isn't scared
2. He isn't acting like he committed any crimes.
3. Why would anyone cooperate with a witch hunt?

1. Yes he is.
2. Yes he is.
3. He doesn’t have to. All he need is shut the fuck up because it’s not helping.

1. Nuh uhn
2. Nuh uhn
   
3. Nuh uhn

Why should he shut up about a witch hunt against him?

Get used to the Mewlier witch hunt being attacked daily until Mewler is run out of DC on a rail.

 

[jc456]

so why was the trump campaign surveilled? good point.

It wasn't, dope.

McCabe said without they would never have gotten the
And going on 2 years now no evidence of a crime warranting an investigation exists.

And the Democrats turned to treason, collaborating with a foreign spy they assessed to be a lying extremist...

In barely 6 months of investigations we have 4 indictments of Trump team members and 2 guilty pleas. With both Papodopoulos and Flynn admitting that they lied to the FBI about ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

We know there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. We know that these crimes relate directly with Russia. The only question is.....how many such crimes exist, by whom and for how long.

Which is why the Mueller investigation will continue.

Hey Skyler, tell me how an indictment for tax evasion dating back to 2006, before Obama was even elected, proves 'Collusion'...

You're such a liberal crotch sniffing, traitor supporting joke...

Bwuhahahaha

Says the poor fool that quoted as 'fact' in the Nunes memo that the FBI didn't disclose that possible political motivations of the Dossier......

.....with Nunes just admitting that yes, the FBI did include that information.

You've been duped.

And of course, you're ignoring both Flynn and Papodopoulos who have plead guilty to lying to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russia. There is no debate that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. There is no debate that these crimes relate directly with Russia.

Which is why Mueller will continue to methodically dig into the crimes of the Trump team.

Where did Nunez "admit" that? Please post a link. They plead guilty to lying, and nothing else. As usual, you only prove that you're a lying douchebag.

They admitted they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russia.

As for the link on what Nunes admitted.....I already did. Here's the quote:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said Monday that the FBI had disclosed possible political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.

Look it up in this thread or online.

Hahahahahaha, nice ploy you got going for you. you mention something, someone asks you for a link and you say go search. you're useless now. on ignore you go.

 

[jc456]

It wasn't, dope.

In barely 6 months of investigations we have 4 indictments of Trump team members and 2 guilty pleas. With both Papodopoulos and Flynn admitting that they lied to the FBI about ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

We know there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. We know that these crimes relate directly with Russia. The only question is.....how many such crimes exist, by whom and for how long.

Which is why the Mueller investigation will continue.

Hey Skyler, tell me how an indictment for tax evasion dating back to 2006, before Obama was even elected, proves 'Collusion'...

You're such a liberal crotch sniffing, traitor supporting joke...

Bwuhahahaha

Says the poor fool that quoted as 'fact' in the Nunes memo that the FBI didn't disclose that possible political motivations of the Dossier......

.....with Nunes just admitting that yes, the FBI did include that information.

You've been duped.

And of course, you're ignoring both Flynn and Papodopoulos who have plead guilty to lying to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russia. There is no debate that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. There is no debate that these crimes relate directly with Russia.

Which is why Mueller will continue to methodically dig into the crimes of the Trump team.

Where did Nunez "admit" that? Please post a link. They plead guilty to lying, and nothing else. As usual, you only prove that you're a lying douchebag.

They admitted they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russia.

As for the link on what Nunes admitted.....I already did. Here's the quote:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said Monday that the FBI had disclosed possible political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.

Look it up in this thread or online.

Flynn lied about having talked to the ambassador, not about "contacts between the Trump team and Russia." You're spinning what is going on in your typical sleazy dishonest fashion.

"Disclosed it" to who?

this skylar punk never adds a link. is useless to a discussion. he's a troll looking to run circular posts. I now have him on ignore. He doesn't have any link to show what he claims on Nunes.

 

[Faun]

Hey Skyler, tell me how an indictment for tax evasion dating back to 2006, before Obama was even elected, proves 'Collusion'...

You're such a liberal crotch sniffing, traitor supporting joke...

Bwuhahahaha

Says the poor fool that quoted as 'fact' in the Nunes memo that the FBI didn't disclose that possible political motivations of the Dossier......

.....with Nunes just admitting that yes, the FBI did include that information.

You've been duped.

And of course, you're ignoring both Flynn and Papodopoulos who have plead guilty to lying to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russia. There is no debate that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. There is no debate that these crimes relate directly with Russia.

Which is why Mueller will continue to methodically dig into the crimes of the Trump team.

Where did Nunez "admit" that? Please post a link. They plead guilty to lying, and nothing else. As usual, you only prove that you're a lying douchebag.

They admitted they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russia.

As for the link on what Nunes admitted.....I already did. Here's the quote:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said Monday that the FBI had disclosed possible political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.

Look it up in this thread or online.

Flynn lied about having talked to the ambassador, not about "contacts between the Trump team and Russia." You're spinning what is going on in your typical sleazy dishonest fashion.

"Disclosed it" to who?

this skylar punk never adds a link. is useless to a discussion. he's a troll looking to run circular posts. I now have him on ignore. He doesn't have any link to show what he claims on Nunes.

Sure Skylar uses links. Just not for trolls or idiots with an IQ under 20.

In which of those categories do you think you fall?

 

[jc456]

Smiling.....I'm just amused at how desperately you're scrambling from the simple facts. The dossier included info on Carter Page and it was that information that was cited in the FISA warrant request.

Yet......you run from this simple fact. You can't even acknoweldge it.

And when pressed to tell us how a warrant in October is an attempt to spy on the Trump team.....when Page left the Trump team in September, you've got nothing. You just run.

Keep running, boy. It won't matter.

You want me to defend a position I never took and then cry out to the forum you won because I won't play your game? You're a legend in your own mind honey. I'll make you deal sweetie, show where I took the position you say I took and we'll go from there, umk?

The facts have definitely taken a side, boy. And the dossier includes info on Carter Page. And it was that info that was cited in the FISA warrant. You can continue to run if you'd like. But it won't matter.

As for Nunes Memo and the 'spy on Trump' narrative, even you have abandoned that steaming rhetorical pile.

When you muster the courage to stop running....I'll be here, kiddo.

Translation:" I can't show where Doc ever took the position I said he took'.

Translation: you've fled from the entire 'spy on Trump' idiocy and abandoned the entire Nunes memo. And are still running from the fact that the Dossier had information on Carter Page. And that it was the information on Carter Page that was cited in the FISA warrant.

There isn't much to you but running, is there boy?

Look sky-sky, show where I said what you are accusing me of saying. Why are you afraid of that?
Oh yes, because you can't.

that's what that punk does. he's a troll. I finally put him on ignore since he is useless to a discussion. ask him for a link about Nunes and he tells you to go search online. so he has none. I'm always happy to get a link to prove my point. It helps make it. the troll has no point but to run circular discussions. will you go round in circle,

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Nope, Hillary retained an American law firm.

It's called a "cut out" and it's used to try and hide guilt. Sorry.

Call it what you want, she retained an American law firm. No laws against that. And that American law firm hired an American research firm. No laws against that either.

That law firm paid a British spy for the dossier. That is against the law. That spy in turn paid Russian spies for malicious gossip to put in the dossier. That's also against the law.

Stop lying. That law firm paid an American corporation. There is no law against that.

ROFL! You actually believe that because they used surrogates to make the purchase that they are off the hook?

You actually believe there is a hook at all?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You don’t anything either dude.

Denial from fake messiah is not an evidence. Denial from fake messiah is not a verdict ( copied this from someone here ) ...... It takes time but Mueller will get there.

If Trump did not commit crime:
1. Why he is so scared?
2. Why is he acting like he committed crimes?
3. Why not stop lying and stop interfering then let the justice do the job? If he didn’t then he is cleared if he did then like everyone else he is not above the law. He should pay for his crimes.

FAIR ENOUGH?

In other words, you can't name a crime Trump or his administration committed. Who cares about your rationalizations for lying?

Well dude. Why don’t you answer my 3 questions?

Then explain why he is going all over the place scared like a puppy screaming no collusions no collusions no collusions. Normally people shut the fuck up.

1. He isn't scared
2. He isn't acting like he committed any crimes.
3. Why would anyone cooperate with a witch hunt?

cuz the TRUTH will set you free... and this investigation can come to an end....

unless of course, Trump does have something to hide.....?

If the purpose of the witch hunt was to find the truth, you might have a point, but the purpose is to impeach Trump, and it won't stop until it achieves its goal or someone puts a stop to it.

No one has stated that is the purpose except RW media.

 

[jc456]

McCabe said without they would never have gotten the
And going on 2 years now no evidence of a crime warranting an investigation exists.

And the Democrats turned to treason, collaborating with a foreign spy they assessed to be a lying extremist...

In barely 6 months of investigations we have 4 indictments of Trump team members and 2 guilty pleas. With both Papodopoulos and Flynn admitting that they lied to the FBI about ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

We know there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. We know that these crimes relate directly with Russia. The only question is.....how many such crimes exist, by whom and for how long.

Which is why the Mueller investigation will continue.

You dont' know any such thing, moron. Flynn lied about talking to the Russian ambassador. I don't recall what Papawhatshisname lied about, but it wasn't about "ties between the Trump campaign and Russia."

There is no evidence that the Trump campaign has committed any crimes whatsoever. There is none. nada, zilch.

You don’t anything either dude.

Denial from fake messiah is not an evidence. Denial from fake messiah is not a verdict ( copied this from someone here ) ...... It takes time but Mueller will get there.

If Trump did not commit crime:
1. Why he is so scared?
2. Why is he acting like he committed crimes?
3. Why not stop lying and stop interfering then let the justice do the job? If he didn’t then he is cleared if he did then like everyone else he is not above the law. He should pay for his crimes.

FAIR ENOUGH?

In other words, you can't name a crime Trump or his administration committed. Who cares about your rationalizations for lying?

Well dude. Why don’t you answer my 3 questions?

Then explain why he is going all over the place scared like a puppy screaming no collusions no collusions no collusions. Normally people shut the fuck up.

LOL, those three questions are stupid, and not worth any time to comment on. try some actual questions. Like if there was a crime against trump, why did comey testify under oath there was no investigation into trump? You answer that little bear.

 

[irosie91]

I am still confused