Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Families' Case Against Remington Arms To Proceed

[Baz Ares]

 

[Brain357]

I've read the second amendment. It's short and to the point.

It's for a well regulated militia.

There is absolutely nothing in the second amendment that says a person can have a military weapon to murder large numbers of humans in a short period of time.

” A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”.

There is nothing in there about protection for a private citizen.

There is wording of a militia keeping the security of the free state.

It's totally legal to sue a company for false advertising and advertising that will cause harm or death to humans.

I've found that the people who are so fixated on weapons, especially semi automatic ones, are those who have a very small penis or feel they have no control of their lives. Most of them have never been in the military and would never be able to get past even basic training.

As a person who was in the military and was trained by our government on how to use a military style weapon, I know what they are and that they have no place in our society outside the military.

the well regulated Militia also consists of the unorganized Militia which is every able body man and woman who are not connected with the regular military or national guard.

It doesn’t mention unorganized militia, sorry.

WOW, you don't know the different types of Militias?

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

but it does say the people not militia members,,,

and also how can you call up a militia if the people dont have guns ???

The people have a right to be in the well regulated militia.

if they so choose,,,but they would be worthless if they didnt have guns

Those in the well regulated militia have the right to arms.

according to the 2nd its the people that have that right,,,
one reason it says it that way is because an unarmed militia is useless

Throughout most of American history there was no federal objection to laws regulating the civilian use of firearms. When I joined the Supreme Court in 1975, both state and federal judges accepted the Court’s unanimous decision in United States v.Miller as having established that the Second Amendment’s protection of the right to bear arms was possessed only by members of the militia and applied only to weapons used by the militia. In that case, the Court upheld the indictment of a man who possessed a short-barreled shotgun, writing, “In the absence of any evidence that the possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.”

The Supreme Court’s Worst Decision of My Tenure

Militia
In U.S. Code it defines what is a militia

10 USC § 311 - Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

 

[progressive hunter]

but it does say the people not militia members,,,

and also how can you call up a militia if the people dont have guns ???

The people have a right to be in the well regulated militia.

if they so choose,,,but they would be worthless if they didnt have guns

Those in the well regulated militia have the right to arms.

according to the 2nd its the people that have that right,,,
one reason it says it that way is because an unarmed militia is useless

Throughout most of American history there was no federal objection to laws regulating the civilian use of firearms. When I joined the Supreme Court in 1975, both state and federal judges accepted the Court’s unanimous decision in United States v.Miller as having established that the Second Amendment’s protection of the right to bear arms was possessed only by members of the militia and applied only to weapons used by the militia. In that case, the Court upheld the indictment of a man who possessed a short-barreled shotgun, writing, “In the absence of any evidence that the possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.”

The Supreme Court’s Worst Decision of My Tenure

AND WHAT GOOD WOULD A MILITIA BE IF THE PEOPLE DIDNT HAVE GUNS???

THATS WHY THE 2ND WAS WRITTEN THE WAY IT WAS,,,

you may not like it but your feelings are irrelevant,,,

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I've read the second amendment. It's short and to the point.

It's for a well regulated militia.

There is absolutely nothing in the second amendment that says a person can have a military weapon to murder large numbers of humans in a short period of time.

” A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”.

There is nothing in there about protection for a private citizen.

There is wording of a militia keeping the security of the free state.

It's totally legal to sue a company for false advertising and advertising that will cause harm or death to humans.

I've found that the people who are so fixated on weapons, especially semi automatic ones, are those who have a very small penis or feel they have no control of their lives. Most of them have never been in the military and would never be able to get past even basic training.

As a person who was in the military and was trained by our government on how to use a military style weapon, I know what they are and that they have no place in our society outside the military.

the well regulated Militia also consists of the unorganized Militia which is every able body man and woman who are not connected with the regular military or national guard.

It doesn’t mention unorganized militia, sorry.

WOW, you don't know the different types of Militias?

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

ALL ABLE BODY MEN AND WOMEN ARE PART OF THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
FYI the National guard doesn't need a second amendment right to keep a firearm and its members cannot keep their firearms supplied by the government.

 

[Brain357]

I've read the second amendment. It's short and to the point.

It's for a well regulated militia.

There is absolutely nothing in the second amendment that says a person can have a military weapon to murder large numbers of humans in a short period of time.

” A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”.

There is nothing in there about protection for a private citizen.

There is wording of a militia keeping the security of the free state.

It's totally legal to sue a company for false advertising and advertising that will cause harm or death to humans.

I've found that the people who are so fixated on weapons, especially semi automatic ones, are those who have a very small penis or feel they have no control of their lives. Most of them have never been in the military and would never be able to get past even basic training.

As a person who was in the military and was trained by our government on how to use a military style weapon, I know what they are and that they have no place in our society outside the military.

the well regulated Militia also consists of the unorganized Militia which is every able body man and woman who are not connected with the regular military or national guard.

It doesn’t mention unorganized militia, sorry.

WOW, you don't know the different types of Militias?

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

ALL ABLE BODY MEN AND WOMEN ARE PART OF THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
FYI the National guard doesn't need a second amendment right to keep a firearm and its members cannot keep their firearms supplied by the government.

That’s not well regulated. Sorry.

 

[Brain357]

The people have a right to be in the well regulated militia.

if they so choose,,,but they would be worthless if they didnt have guns

Those in the well regulated militia have the right to arms.

according to the 2nd its the people that have that right,,,
one reason it says it that way is because an unarmed militia is useless

Throughout most of American history there was no federal objection to laws regulating the civilian use of firearms. When I joined the Supreme Court in 1975, both state and federal judges accepted the Court’s unanimous decision in United States v.Miller as having established that the Second Amendment’s protection of the right to bear arms was possessed only by members of the militia and applied only to weapons used by the militia. In that case, the Court upheld the indictment of a man who possessed a short-barreled shotgun, writing, “In the absence of any evidence that the possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.”

The Supreme Court’s Worst Decision of My Tenure

AND WHAT GOOD WOULD A MILITIA BE IF THE PEOPLE DIDNT HAVE GUNS???

THATS WHY THE 2ND WAS WRITTEN THE WAY IT WAS,,,

you may not like it but your feelings are irrelevant,,,

It’s the feeling of the Supreme Court for most of our history. It’s very recent the gun lobby trashed the constitution.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

the well regulated Militia also consists of the unorganized Militia which is every able body man and woman who are not connected with the regular military or national guard.

It doesn’t mention unorganized militia, sorry.

WOW, you don't know the different types of Militias?

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

ALL ABLE BODY MEN AND WOMEN ARE PART OF THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
FYI the National guard doesn't need a second amendment right to keep a firearm and its members cannot keep their firearms supplied by the government.

That’s not well regulated. Sorry.

Well regulated meaning is as follows
IN WORKING ORDER AS TO BE EXPECTED.

 

[progressive hunter]

if they so choose,,,but they would be worthless if they didnt have guns

Those in the well regulated militia have the right to arms.

according to the 2nd its the people that have that right,,,
one reason it says it that way is because an unarmed militia is useless

Throughout most of American history there was no federal objection to laws regulating the civilian use of firearms. When I joined the Supreme Court in 1975, both state and federal judges accepted the Court’s unanimous decision in United States v.Miller as having established that the Second Amendment’s protection of the right to bear arms was possessed only by members of the militia and applied only to weapons used by the militia. In that case, the Court upheld the indictment of a man who possessed a short-barreled shotgun, writing, “In the absence of any evidence that the possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.”

The Supreme Court’s Worst Decision of My Tenure

AND WHAT GOOD WOULD A MILITIA BE IF THE PEOPLE DIDNT HAVE GUNS???

THATS WHY THE 2ND WAS WRITTEN THE WAY IT WAS,,,

you may not like it but your feelings are irrelevant,,,

It’s the feeling of the Supreme Court for most of our history. It’s very recent the gun lobby trashed the constitution.

sorry but its only recently we started getting gun laws,,,for 150 yrs there were no gun laws,,,

so its lying commie fucks like you that have trashed the constitution,,,

 

[bigrebnc1775]

View attachment 289495

And when the supreme court rules in favor of Remington you'll be calling them evil
lol

 

[progressive hunter]

the well regulated Militia also consists of the unorganized Militia which is every able body man and woman who are not connected with the regular military or national guard.

It doesn’t mention unorganized militia, sorry.

WOW, you don't know the different types of Militias?

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

ALL ABLE BODY MEN AND WOMEN ARE PART OF THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
FYI the National guard doesn't need a second amendment right to keep a firearm and its members cannot keep their firearms supplied by the government.

That’s not well regulated. Sorry.

it says "the people" not "the militia",,,sorry

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It doesn’t mention unorganized militia, sorry.

WOW, you don't know the different types of Militias?

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

ALL ABLE BODY MEN AND WOMEN ARE PART OF THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
FYI the National guard doesn't need a second amendment right to keep a firearm and its members cannot keep their firearms supplied by the government.

That’s not well regulated. Sorry.

it says "the people" not "the militia",,,sorry

both are correct because all able body men and women are in the militia. James Mason said who is the militia the people are.

 

[Wyatt earp]

the well regulated Militia also consists of the unorganized Militia which is every able body man and woman who are not connected with the regular military or national guard.

It doesn’t mention unorganized militia, sorry.

WOW, you don't know the different types of Militias?

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

ALL ABLE BODY MEN AND WOMEN ARE PART OF THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
FYI the National guard doesn't need a second amendment right to keep a firearm and its members cannot keep their firearms supplied by the government.

That’s not well regulated. Sorry.

It means to give them guns.


You do know back then blacksmiths made them right?

.

 

[progressive hunter]

WOW, you don't know the different types of Militias?

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

ALL ABLE BODY MEN AND WOMEN ARE PART OF THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
FYI the National guard doesn't need a second amendment right to keep a firearm and its members cannot keep their firearms supplied by the government.

That’s not well regulated. Sorry.

it says "the people" not "the militia",,,sorry

both are correct because all able body men and women are in the militia. James Mason said who is the militia the people are.

its more like you need one to have the other,,,to call up a militia that doesnt have proper weapons is nothing more than a neighborhood BBQ

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Constitution only protects the well regulated kind.

ALL ABLE BODY MEN AND WOMEN ARE PART OF THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA.
FYI the National guard doesn't need a second amendment right to keep a firearm and its members cannot keep their firearms supplied by the government.

That’s not well regulated. Sorry.

it says "the people" not "the militia",,,sorry

both are correct because all able body men and women are in the militia. James Mason said who is the militia the people are.

its more like you need one to have the other,,,to call up a militia that doesnt have proper weapons is nothing more than a neighborhood BBQ

Exactly

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Ar-15s are for mass killing.

If that's true, then they must be a really, really creepy products, since the overwhelming vast majority of them are never involved in any human deaths or injuries at all, much less mass killings.

They are. When used many die.

Wrong. When used for mass murders, many die. But most aren't used for that purpose.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Wonderful marketing by Remington that they make the POS so you can kill peoples as like you were a wonderful military guy fighting off kids in school.
So the cowardly NRA Member can masturbate their sperm on their weapons as to lube them in safety.

So, Weak ass Hunters, you see deer as needing a “assaultive qualities, military uses, and lethality AR-15.” to take them down?

Another anti-gunner getting sexually stimulated by the thought of guns....


You guys really, really need to get help with your psycho-sexual issues...your wiring is all wrong.

I do not know the true source of a quote popularly, but incorrectly attributed to Freud, which states that a fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual development; but it certainly is the case that every once in a while, a hoplophobe demonstrates this statement to be quite true.

 

[progressive hunter]

Wonderful marketing by Remington that they make the POS so you can kill peoples as like you were a wonderful military guy fighting off kids in school.
So the cowardly NRA Member can masturbate their sperm on their weapons as to lube them in safety.

So, Weak ass Hunters, you see deer as needing a “assaultive qualities, military uses, and lethality AR-15.” to take them down?

Another anti-gunner getting sexually stimulated by the thought of guns....


You guys really, really need to get help with your psycho-sexual issues...your wiring is all wrong.

I do not know the true source of a quote popularly, but incorrectly attributed to Freud, which states that a fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual development; but it certainly is the case that every once in a while, a hoplophobe demonstrates this statement to be quite true.

freud quotes: Where did Freud say, "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

So, Weak ass Hunters, you see deer as needing a “assaultive qualities, military uses, and lethality AR-15.” to take them down?

An AR-15 is not widely-regarded as a suitable gun with which to hunt deer. In some jurisdictions, it is not legal to use it for this purpose.

You know why?

It's not deadly enough to guarantee a quick, clean kill. Against an animal the size of a deer, there's too much risk of only wounding the animal, causing the animal to suffer needlessly.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Yes it does. The 2nd half says those in a well regulated militia can have arms. Bearing arms is a military term.

It says, “…the right of •THE PEOPLE•…shall not be infringed.”

“The People” means all free American citizens.