Supreme Court Allows Semi Automatic Gun Ban

[OKTexas]

But since the failure of socialist programs is more socialist programs that is the end game. Restrictions lead to registration leads to bans leads to confiscation. Happens every time.

....and here's a "history/sociology" lesson offered by a fifth grader.

Why are you ignoring post #332? Are you too good to apologize when you're proven wrong?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

And you think that the criminals and terrorist will not get their guns from Mexico where the Cartels control the flow or from Canada where the Chinese in Vancouver control the flow?

Go ahead and ban all the weapons you want and when the next attack happen you are at fault for it!

Well, you're "right".......Rather than having the criminals smuggle those guns from Mexico or Canada, we MUST make it easier and have them get them at their local, downtown gun shop.

Do you even own a damn gun?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

And you think that the criminals and terrorist will not get their guns from Mexico where the Cartels control the flow or from Canada where the Chinese in Vancouver control the flow?

Go ahead and ban all the weapons you want and when the next attack happen you are at fault for it!

Well, you're "right".......Rather than having the criminals smuggle those guns from Mexico or Canada, we MUST make it easier and have them get them at their local, downtown gun shop.

Or we keep just let law abiding citizens have weapons to protect themselves and each other, instead of expecting criminals to follow the law. Our government is far too incompetent, especially right now, to protect any of us.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

I have more faith and trust in the one-legged man in a rear kick contest

Have you ever heard about the one legged man in the ass kicking contest?

Damn that was funny as hell when Deadpool said it!

 

[BreezeWood]

.
yes, and everyone else that feels they need one.

.

What scares you about it?

the noise?

it's black and ugly?

They kill?

.
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.

Look at Germany

Mexico,

Rwanda,

The Armenian genocide...

Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...

all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.

it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.

.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
yes, and everyone else that feels they need one.

.

What scares you about it?

the noise?

it's black and ugly?

They kill?

.
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

There is no reason to own a car that can do 100 mph
(far above the speed limit)

I have owned a variety of firearms over the years, and not one has injured, much less killed, anyone.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

Because someone else might misuse it?

.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

no one is taking away firearms - they are being regulated by making all firearms bolt or leaver action, 6 round max capacity non removable magazines for all public (police) and private use.

the intent of the 2nd amendment.

.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

It would take a lot more than banning assault weapons to stop mass killing in the US. It's a step in right direction but a very small step. These weapons are becoming the weapon of choice for mass killing because that is exactly what they were designed to do. They were not made for hunting, the shooting range, or home protection. They were made to kill people and lots of them.

No...they are becoming popular because of twits like you saying they are so deadly, and because they are in every video game shooter that comes out now......that is why they are so popular......

If you guys want them to stop using them....have your minions in the media make them look bad......make them the Miley Cyrus of guns and they will move on to other guns.....

I think the Orlando shooting is a testament to the killing power of these weapons.

You are correct. These weapons were manufactured for that purpose.

Said weapon is only as dangerous as the individual behind it.

 

[Rustic]

What scares you about it?

the noise?

it's black and ugly?

They kill?

.
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.

Look at Germany

Mexico,

Rwanda,

The Armenian genocide...

Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...

all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.

it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.

.

You can't help having shit for brains, can ya??

 

[Rustic]

What scares you about it?

the noise?

it's black and ugly?

They kill?

.
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

There is no reason to own a car that can do 100 mph
(far above the speed limit)

I have owned a variety of firearms over the years, and not one has injured, much less killed, anyone.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

Because someone else might misuse it?

.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

no one is taking away firearms - they are being regulated by making all firearms bolt or leaver action, 6 round max capacity non removable magazines for all public (police) and private use.

the intent of the 2nd amendment.

.

 

[The Rabbi]

What scares you about it?

the noise?

it's black and ugly?

They kill?

.
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.

Look at Germany

Mexico,

Rwanda,

The Armenian genocide...

Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...

all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.

it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.

.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.

 

[BreezeWood]

The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.

The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.

.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.

.

The Texas Tower killer used a Remington 700 bolt action rifle.
/fail.

.

The Texas Tower killer used a Remington 700 bolt action rifle.

Charles Whitman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

where, over an approximate 90- to 95-minute period, he killed 14 people and wounded 32 others in a mass shooting in and around the Tower.

there will always be exceptions why a certain weapon might be more advantageous over another as a sniper in a tower but that is not the situation of the present day mass killings where the only purpose for an assault rifle is mass carnage in the least amount of time.

.

.

 

[The Rabbi]

The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.

The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.

.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.

.

The Texas Tower killer used a Remington 700 bolt action rifle.
/fail.

.

The Texas Tower killer used a Remington 700 bolt action rifle.

Charles Whitman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

where, over an approximate 90- to 95-minute period, he killed 14 people and wounded 32 others in a mass shooting in and around the Tower.

there will always be exceptions why a certain weapon might be more advantageous over another as a sniper in a tower but that is not the situation of the present day mass killings where the only purpose for an assault rifle is mass carnage in the least amount of time.

.

.

Gee I've owned "assault rifles" for years and never used them for that purpose.
WHat the heck is wrong with me?

 

[BreezeWood]

.
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.

Look at Germany

Mexico,

Rwanda,

The Armenian genocide...

Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...

all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.

it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.

.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?

confiscate and destroy them.

5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.

.

 

[Rustic]

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.

Look at Germany

Mexico,

Rwanda,

The Armenian genocide...

Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...

all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.

it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.

.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?

confiscate and destroy them.

5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.

.

Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains

 

[Rexx Taylor]

.
it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.

Look at Germany

Mexico,

Rwanda,

The Armenian genocide...

Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...

all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.

it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.

.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?

confiscate and destroy them.

5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.

.

Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains

at this point in time, the word ban is meaningless. right?

 

[Auld Phart]

What scares you about it?

the noise?

it's black and ugly?

They kill?

.
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

There is no reason to own a car that can do 100 mph
(far above the speed limit)

I have owned a variety of firearms over the years, and not one has injured, much less killed, anyone.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

Because someone else might misuse it?

.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

no one is taking away firearms - they are being regulated by making all firearms bolt or leaver action, 6 round max capacity non removable magazines for all public (police) and private use.

the intent of the 2nd amendment.

.

the intent of the 2nd amendment.

the intent of the 2nd?

Where did you get that idea?

Because of muzzleloaders?

You DO realize that muzzleloaders were the standard military firearm of that era, don't you?

 

[BreezeWood]

.
it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.

Look at Germany

Mexico,

Rwanda,

The Armenian genocide...

Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...

all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.

it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.

.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?

confiscate and destroy them.

5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.

.

Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains

Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains

accommodations would be made for the gun owners for a period of time -

eventually the law would be enforced: 5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.



.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

There is no reason to own a car that can do 100 mph
(far above the speed limit)

I have owned a variety of firearms over the years, and not one has injured, much less killed, anyone.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

Because someone else might misuse it?

.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

no one is taking away firearms - they are being regulated by making all firearms bolt or leaver action, 6 round max capacity non removable magazines for all public (police) and private use.

the intent of the 2nd amendment.

.

the intent of the 2nd amendment.

the intent of the 2nd?

Where did you get that idea?

Because of muzzleloaders?

You DO realize that muzzleloaders were the standard military firearm of that era, don't you?

.

You DO realize that muzzleloaders were the standard military firearm of that era, don't you?

a well regulated militia ....

.

 

[Auld Phart]

Was that supposed to make sense?

.

Was that supposed to make sense?

it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.

.

There is no reason to own a car that can do 100 mph
(far above the speed limit)

I have owned a variety of firearms over the years, and not one has injured, much less killed, anyone.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

Because someone else might misuse it?

.

Why do you want to take away my firearms?

no one is taking away firearms - they are being regulated by making all firearms bolt or leaver action, 6 round max capacity non removable magazines for all public (police) and private use.

the intent of the 2nd amendment.

.

the intent of the 2nd amendment.

the intent of the 2nd?

Where did you get that idea?

Because of muzzleloaders?

You DO realize that muzzleloaders were the standard military firearm of that era, don't you?

.

You DO realize that muzzleloaders were the standard military firearm of that era, don't you?

a well regulated militia ....

.

, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,

NOT , the right of the militia to keep and bear Arms,

 

[Rustic]

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.

Look at Germany

Mexico,

Rwanda,

The Armenian genocide...

Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....

.

The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...

all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.

it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.

.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.

What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?

confiscate and destroy them.

5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.

.

Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains

Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains

accommodations would be made for the gun owners for a period of time -

eventually the law would be enforced: 5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.



.

If That was ever to be enforced this country would deserve to perish forever...