Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".
Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???
Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.
This is all about conjecture because we haven't tried banning guns and enforcing decent laws yet.
Try looking up gun statutes by state and reading them. The first section of the statute is all about exclusions and exceptions to previous laws which neutralize and neuter the statute. That is why our current gun laws don't work
Yeah.....but France did.......and they lost 140 to fully automatic weapons that are completely illegal there...and they can't keep them out of the hands of criminals or terrorists........
So you can name one mass shooting in France Now start with April 1999, Littleton, Colorado and post the list
Hey twit......they don't shoot people as often.....that is their culture, not access to guns....I just gave you a list of links with fucking quotes that show how easy it is to get fully automatic weapons in France.......so access to guns isn't the reason they aren't shooting people.....
And that is changing......they are just now starting to have their culture change.......
Our non-gun murder rate is higher than their total murder rate too........moron.
Don't give me that "culture" shit. Dead is dead regardless of your culture. Our culture is such that American men are tools of the NRA. They have been sold a bill of goods that if they don't own a gun they are pussies. So welcome to The Club, pussy
Wrong asswipe....Britain banned and confiscated their guns.....and their gun crime and gun murder rate did not change....this was after the Dunblane shootings....
So no......confiscating guns had nothing to do with their level of gun murder or gun crime.....their thugs do not use guns to murder people as often as ours do.......
And Mexican thugs in Mexico murder even more people with guns even though they have extreme gun control there....
...What scares you about it?
the noise?
it's black and ugly?
They kill?
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.
.
Was that supposed to make sense?
Was that supposed to make sense?
it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.
.
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.
Look at Germany
Mexico,
Rwanda,
The Armenian genocide...
Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...
all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.
it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.
.
...What scares you about it?
the noise?
it's black and ugly?
They kill?
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.
.
Was that supposed to make sense?
Was that supposed to make sense?
it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.
.
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.
Look at Germany
Mexico,
Rwanda,
The Armenian genocide...
Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...
all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.
it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.
.
...
the reason to have the law is for the blatant greed and stupidity displayed by those who need an automatic weapon and their unstable addiction they are unable control.
.
Was that supposed to make sense?
Was that supposed to make sense?
it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.
.
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.
Look at Germany
Mexico,
Rwanda,
The Armenian genocide...
Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...
all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.
it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.
.
that looked like an assault weapon to me
that looked like an assault weapon to me
..Was that supposed to make sense?
Was that supposed to make sense?
it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.
.
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.
Look at Germany
Mexico,
Rwanda,
The Armenian genocide...
Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...
all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.
it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.
.
that looked like an assault weapon to me
.
that looked like an assault weapon to me
and you did noticed he began reloading one round at a time ... so whats your problem ?
.
Fuck that. The public has the right to buy semi-automatic weapons. These are the best kind for self defence, especially for novices..The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.
The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.
The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.
The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.
The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.
.
What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?..Was that supposed to make sense?
Was that supposed to make sense?
it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.
.
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.
Look at Germany
Mexico,
Rwanda,
The Armenian genocide...
Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...
all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.
it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.
.
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.
What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
confiscate and destroy them.
5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
The Fifth AMendment says:What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?..Was that supposed to make sense?
Was that supposed to make sense?
it makes no sense to cater to people who feel they need an assault rifle when there is no logical reason for them to be made available, the same as with hand grenades.
.
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.
Look at Germany
Mexico,
Rwanda,
The Armenian genocide...
Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...
all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.
it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.
.
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.
What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
confiscate and destroy them.
5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
That would do nothing to remove guns from criminals although it would disarm many law abiding citizens. Which is really what this is about.Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brainsWhat do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?.The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...do you ever look at human history....when only the government has rifles, the people eventually suffer.
Look at Germany
Mexico,
Rwanda,
The Armenian genocide...
Mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide can only happen to unarmed people.........that Europe failed to learn that lesson after the Holocaust shows how stupid they are....
The reason we need to have rifles....because the police and military have them...
all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.
it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.
.
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.
What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
confiscate and destroy them.
5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains
accommodations would be made for the gun owners for a period of time -
eventually the law would be enforced: 5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.
Banning weapons works.
When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.
When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.
Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.
Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum
.That would do nothing to remove guns from criminals although it would disarm many law abiding citizens. Which is really what this is about.Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brainsWhat do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?.
all public (police) and private firearms to be bolt or lever action, 6 round max. capacity non detachable magazine - the military would be prohibited from using any weapons against the civilian population.
it is time for sane 2nd amendment legislation.
.
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.
What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
confiscate and destroy them.
5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains
accommodations would be made for the gun owners for a period of time -
eventually the law would be enforced: 5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
That would do nothing to remove guns from criminals although it would disarm many law abiding citizens. Which is really what this is about.
For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.
Banning weapons works.
When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.
When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.
Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.
Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum
WIll never happen.That would do nothing to remove guns from criminals although it would disarm many law abiding citizens. Which is really what this is about.Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brainsWhat do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.
What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
confiscate and destroy them.
5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains
accommodations would be made for the gun owners for a period of time -
eventually the law would be enforced: 5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
That would do nothing to remove guns from criminals although it would disarm many law abiding citizens. Which is really what this is about.
lever or bolt action, 6 round max capacity non detachable magazine both public (police) and private firearms - is not disarming anyone.
is what this is all about.
.
Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.
Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.
Culture. Problem is a heart problem, not a gun problem.Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.
There's a country down under... you might have heard of it... Australia...
They proved it does work.
So, fail you.
.That would do nothing to remove guns from criminals although it would disarm many law abiding citizens. Which is really what this is about.Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brainsWhat do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
And pump shotguns cause a hell of a lot of damage, as do bolt rifles, as the guy in the Texas Tower demonstrated.
Another idiotic solution by a self proclaimed expert.
What do you plan to do about the 200M guns already in circulation that don't fall into those categories?
confiscate and destroy them.
5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
Millions would die if confiscation was tried. Shit for brains
accommodations would be made for the gun owners for a period of time -
eventually the law would be enforced: 5 years - $10,000 fine first offense ... no parole.
.
That would do nothing to remove guns from criminals although it would disarm many law abiding citizens. Which is really what this is about.
lever or bolt action, 6 round max capacity non detachable magazine both public (police) and private firearms - is not disarming anyone.
is what this is all about.
.
The AR-15 was developed for and marketed to military services starting in about 1959. A few years later they began selling a semi-automatic model to the public. The AR-15 was certainly not designed to sell to hunters, however arms manufactures will sell any military weapon for civilian use wherever there is a market and it is legal to do so.Wrong. Here is the ad for the original AR15, the Colt SP1 from 1963.It would take a lot more than banning assault weapons to stop mass killing in the US. It's a step in right direction but a very small step. These weapons are becoming the weapon of choice for mass killing because that is exactly what they were designed to do. They were not made for hunting, the shooting range, or home protection. They were made to kill people and lots of them.Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.
Libs get pwned so easily.
