Supreme Court Allows Semi Automatic Gun Ban

[g5000]

What the Left REALLY wants is a total ban on all firearms.

They want to repeal the Second Amendment.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

If you get rid of the assault weapons, people won't have them to commit mass murder.

Yep, just like in France......

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

What the Left REALLY wants is a total ban on all firearms.

They want to repeal the Second Amendment.

Don't you agree?

Repeal the Second Amendment and the Terrorist and Criminal will obey the law... If not then pass a law telling them and then they will... Now if that does not work then pass another law that tell the Criminal and Terrorist that the other law must be read and followed...

I mean if you pass enough laws the Criminal and Terrorist will stop being evil and remember ask nicely too while they laugh...

 

[Skull Pilot]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Banning weapons works.

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum

You don't seem to understand the difference between a semiautomatic rifle and an automatic rifle

 

[Conservative65]

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

If you get rid of the assault weapons, people won't have them to commit mass murder. Logically, if you don't have the weapons you won't be able to do what happened in Orlando, Sandy Hook, Aurora and so many other places in our nation where large number of innocent people are murdered in a matter of minutes.

You had the Assault Weapon Ban of 1994 to 2004 and still had mass shootings here in the states, so explain how that assault weapon ban stopped mass shootings?

The now second deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history, first until a few weeks ago, was done with handguns.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Tell me why the murder rate in the UK today is the same as it was in 1950 despite the strict gun laws passed in 1968.

Tell me why the murder rate in the US today is the same as it was in 1950 even though we have passed thousands of gun laws since then

 

[g5000]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit. It's a stupid meme intentionally created to make retards believe more guns means more safety, when the opposite is true.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

 

[SmokeALib]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Banning weapons works.

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum

So now only the criminals will be able to get automatic weapons. And trust me - they will. That's what criminals do. This is what braindead libs don't understand. More laws and regulations only suppresses people that follow said laws and regulations; and thus empowers the lawbreakers.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

So now only the criminals will be able to get automatic weapons.

Automatic weapons have been illegal for 30 years

 

[Fenton Lum]

Now if we

Are Liberals really THAT stupid?

The problem with mass murders is that a law banning semi-automatic weapons hasn't been passed? That is one is actually passed the criminals and terrorists using them will say, "Holy crap - these are illegal. We can't use them now"?!

If semi-automatic weapons are banned criminals, terrorists, and law-abiding citizens will all get rid of their weapons, will join hands in a circle, will sing Kum-bay-ah, and all the mass shootings and murders will simply end...

MURDER is already banned - illegal - yet that isn't stopping Chicago from being 50% ahead of last year's record-setting gun murder rate from last year. Haven't they heard your philosophy? If a law is passed, crime / murder will end?!

Exactly. We shouldn't really have any laws anyway. Someone's always going to break them, so wtf.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So now only the criminals will be able to get automatic weapons.

Automatic weapons have been illegal for 30 years

Technically they are not illegal since one can obtain the proper federal permits to own them

 

[Fenton Lum]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones

Could you link us to those studies please? Not media reports, but the actual primary research.

 

[g5000]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Tell me why the murder rate in the UK today is the same as it was in 1950 despite the strict gun laws passed in 1968.

The murder rate in the UK in 1998 was much higher than it was in 1950. The homicide rate had been climbing linearly for decades before the gun ban. After the gun ban, there was a brief spike, but it has been steadily declining every since, and has returned to 1950 levels.

Tell me why the murder rate in the US today is the same as it was in 1950 even though we have passed thousands of gun laws since then

Same thing. The homicide rate was climbing until the Brady Law was passed. Ever since then, it has been steadily declining.

 

[easyt65]

If you ASSAULT someone with any weapon does it make that weapon an 'assault weapon'? If some guy uses a machete or a hammer to kill 10 people, are they 'assault' machetes and 'assault' hammers? The word 'assault' is a liberal label placed on these guns. A gun, like any tool in your toolbox, can be used for a variety of different jobs and should not be defined as being for 1 reason only - the worst possible one, at that.

 

[Fenton Lum]

So now only the criminals will be able to get automatic weapons.

Automatic weapons have been illegal for 30 years

Technically they are not illegal since one can obtain the proper federal permits to own them

I think we all understand the concept. Illegall w/out the permit, legal with.

 

[2aguy]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Banning weapons works.

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum

Banning Weapons works....? Wow...you better tell all those dead people in Paris....France has an absolute ban on fully automatic weapons...absolute...you can't buy them, you can't own them, there are no gun stores and no gun shows...and criminals in France and terrorists on government watch lists get them easily....

By the way......we don't have easy access to fully automatic rifles anyway....fully automatic rifles are still available twit...you just need a special license.....

Do you realize that 'assault' weapons as you define them killed 149 people in 34 years......1982-2016? According to he list kept by Mother Jones....

Knives killed 1,567 in 2014 and well over a thousand every single year....

You know nothing about the issue, you are as clueless about it as all gun grabbers are.....

Do you even realize that the worst mass murder before Orlando was virginia tech...and he used a pistol....32 people were murdered...

you guys know 0 when it comes to the gun issues....

 

[chikenwing]

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Wow. You really drank the anti-gun piss. Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

If you get rid of the assault weapons, people won't have them to commit mass murder. Logically, if you don't have the weapons you won't be able to do what happened in Orlando, Sandy Hook, Aurora and so many other places in our nation where large number of innocent people are murdered in a matter of minutes.

You really believe,that only an AR15 could kill that many people? A pump shot gun can be just as deadly,in the same time frame.
.223 cal are small varmint rounds,they are the JV of center fire bullets.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones

Could you link us to those studies please? Not media reports, but the actual primary research.

So Pulse was not a gun free zone? Or was it not the deadliest shooting?