Supreme Court Allows Semi Automatic Gun Ban

[g5000]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

 

[easyt65]

Exactly. We shouldn't really have any laws anyway. Someone's always going to break them, so wtf.

Same demonstrated by Obama - if he's not going to enforce Immigration law then why have any? If he is not going to hold anyone accountable foe the laws they break then why have those laws? If liberals (Timmy Geithner, most of Obama's 1st Cabinet appointees, Charlie Rangel, Al Sharpton, etc...) are not going to be held accountable to the law / punished for tax evasion why make tax evasion a crime anyway?

 

[2aguy]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Wrong, twit. Sandy Hook and Orlando would have been done with pistols and shotguns.....just like Virginia tech....32 people murdered with a pistol....so you are wrong, again.

there are 8,000,000 of those rifles in this country...how many are used to murder people.....? 1 or 2 a year.....if that......

your argument is not rational....it makes no sense, and as a typical gun grabber you can't use the truth, facts or reality in your points....

 

[easyt65]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

The US is not the UK.

 

[Fenton Lum]

If you ASSAULT someone with any weapon does it make that weapon an 'assault weapon'? If some guy uses a machete or a hammer to kill 10 people, are they 'assault' machetes and 'assault' hammers? The word 'assault' is a liberal label placed on these guns. A gun, like any tool in your toolbox, can be used for a variety of different jobs and should not be defined as being for 1 reason only - the worst possible one, at that.

Have you ever stopped to wonder if someone else benefits from you're being all wound up about your guns and an alleged threat of "liberals" coming for them?

 

[Skull Pilot]

So now only the criminals will be able to get automatic weapons.

Automatic weapons have been illegal for 30 years

Technically they are not illegal since one can obtain the proper federal permits to own them

I think we all understand the concept. Illegall w/out the permit, legal with.

That's funny because it seems a lot of people here don't even know the difference between a semiauto and a full auto

 

[g5000]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

The US is not the UK.

I'm not the one who brought up the UK. Nice try!

Speaking of the US, notice the homicide rate has been declining since the passage of the Brady Bill in 1993:

 

[2aguy]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

Twit....they banned guns in the U.K. in 96.....did you even fucking look at your own chart.....as I constantly point out, twit......gun crime in Britain spiked in the years after they confiscated guns...then it returned to it's normal level...

There was no benefit in gun crime when they confiscated their guns...not one benefit, and a lot of downside.....normal Brits are the victims of violent criminal attack at at least 2x the rate as we are in the United STates...and that is saying something....

 

[Fenton Lum]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Wrong, twit. Sandy Hook and Orlando would have been done with pistols and shotguns.....just like Virginia tech....32 people murdered with a pistol....so you are wrong, again.

there are 8,000,000 of those rifles in this country...how many are used to murder people.....? 1 or 2 a year.....if that......

your argument is not rational....it makes no sense, and as a typical gun grabber you can't use the truth, facts or reality in your points....

You really need to source all the "facts" and "reality" in your points. Not media reports, but the primary research, especially when you scatter numbers around like you do.

 

[g5000]

Notice, also, the homicide rate has been dropping as the percentage of US households that own guns has been dropping:

 

[Skull Pilot]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

They passed their really strict gun laws in 1968 so it seems the rates were still going up after that

 

[easyt65]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

The US is not the UK.

Why don't you liberals use Chicago, which is almost a total lost now anyway, as a 'gun law test case city'. You go ahead and ban anything you want in Chicago and see if any of the thugs, mugs, gang members, and murderers who are busy setting a new record for gun murders will put down their weapons, join hands, and sing, 'We are the world'. Good luck with that. Nothing short of the National Guard now will probably save that city.

 

[g5000]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

Twit....they banned guns in the U.K. in 96.....did you even fucking look at your own chart.....as I constantly point out, twit......gun crime in Britain spiked in the years after they confiscated guns...then it returned to it's normal level...

There was no benefit in gun crime when they confiscated their guns...not one benefit, and a lot of downside.....normal Brits are the victims of violent criminal attack at at least 2x the rate as we are in the United STates...and that is saying something....

As I pointed out, the spike occurred for a brief time after the enactment of the ban, and has been steadily declining since.

It's clearly lower now than before the ban. Twit. It has been declining, whereas it was steadily climbing for decades.

 

[koshergrl]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Banning weapons works.

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum

Fuck the supreme court.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Wish we could vote all of those people off the court.

Banning weapons works.

It has literally never worked, the results of gun laws have shown us they don't work, we have statistics showing they don't work, you'd have to be high as a kite to think they've worked. Speaking of which, you wouldn't happen to be high, would you?

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

You mean those obsolete weapons? I'm so surprised nobody uses them, how strange.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Wednesday, March 9th, 2016.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

No, we'll see more mass murders, because criminals would obtain them illegally, and now nobody could defend themselves.

 

[easyt65]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

The US is not the UK.

I'm not the one who brought up the UK. Nice try!

Speaking of the US, notice the homicide rate has been declining since the passage of the Brady Bill in 1993:

You pointed it out:

"]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades. As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

Or is there a DIFFERENT 'g5000'?

 

[2aguy]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

The US is not the UK.

I'm not the one who brought up the UK. Nice try!

Speaking of the US, notice the homicide rate has been declining since the passage of the Brady Bill in 1993:

wrong....there were 2 million people carrying concealed weapons in the 1990s....in 2007 there were 4.7 million carrying guns for self defense, and in 2016...there are now 13million Americans carrying guns for self defense...and the gun murder rate, the violent crime rate and the gun crime rate all went down....showing that you are talking out of your ass when it comes to guns.....

And we went from 320,000,000 million guns in 2013 to 357,000,000 guns in private hands in 2016....and our gun murder rate went down..

Nothing you guys say about the gun issue is accurate or factual.

 

[g5000]

It is stoopid to deny less guns means less homicides. It is just plain common sense that less guns means less homicides.

Just like less swimming pools would mean less drownings.

Or less cars would mean less accidental deaths.

To deny reality is to undermine your integrity and look like an idiot.

 

[Auld Phart]

The Minneapolis mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh temple mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Oikos University mass killer used a handgun. No assault weapon.

The Seal Beach mass killer used three handguns. No assault weapon.

The Tucson, Arizona mass killer who shot Gabby Giffords used a handgun. No assault weapon.

.
then make all firearms bolt or lever action, 6 round capacity non detachable magazine for both public (police) and private use - the right to bear arms.

.

How do you enforce that on criminals?

 

[easyt65]

It is stoopid to deny less guns means less homicides. To deny reality is to undermine your integrity and look like an idiot.

It is stupid to declare less legal / legally acquired guns in LAW-ABIDING citizens' hands means less homicides.

But it's rather funny watching sheep argue the wolves' case that sheep don't need protection.