Supreme Court Allows Semi Automatic Gun Ban

[g5000]

Here is the UK homicide rate over a period of decades.

As you can see, it was rising until the gun ban, and has been falling ever since.

The US is not the UK.

I'm not the one who brought up the UK. Nice try!

Speaking of the US, notice the homicide rate has been declining since the passage of the Brady Bill in 1993:

wrong....there were 2 million people carrying concealed weapons in the 1990s....in 2007 there were 4.7 million carrying guns for self defense, and in 2016...there are now 13million Americans carrying guns for self defense...and the gun murder rate, the violent crime rate and the gun crime rate all went down....showing that you are talking out of your ass when it comes to guns.....

And we went from 320,000,000 million guns in 2013 to 357,000,000 guns in private hands in 2016....and our gun murder rate went down..

Nothing you guys say about the gun issue is accurate or factual.

I already posted the proof that less Americans own guns, dummy. You're too late, and looking stupid.


If ten out of twenty people own guns, and those ten people own 40 guns, that is a 50 percent ownership rate, with 2 guns per capita.

If you fast forward 40 years and five out of twenty people own guns, and those five people own 80 guns, that is a 25 percent ownership rate, with 4 guns per capita. You have had a 50 percent decline in gun ownership, but those who own guns just own more of them.

Less people own guns. That's a fact. Just because you own ten guns instead of two doesn't mean gun ownership has risen. It just means the people who do own guns own more of them.

But the number of people in a crowd owning a gun is much lower than before.

Fact.

No moron, more Americans actually own guns than ever before

A smaller percentage of American own guns than before. Fact.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Exactly. We shouldn't really have any laws anyway. Someone's always going to break them, so wtf.

Same demonstrated by Obama - if he's not going to enforce Immigration law then why have any? If he is not going to hold anyone accountable foe the laws they break then why have those laws? If liberals (Timmy Geithner, most of Obama's 1st Cabinet appointees, Charlie Rangel, Al Sharpton, etc...) are not going to be held accountable to the law / punished for tax evasion why make tax evasion a crime anyway?

You can't really separate anything out can you, you just spew. Who's deported more than Obama? You better look into that past what your TV told you. Geitner, Larry Summers, Hank Paulson? They all came along for the ride from the Bush II administration pard.

See how that works? Bush is a"rep" "conservative", Obama is a "dem" "lib". Bush's economic advisors; Tim Geitner, Larry Summers, Hank Paulson; we get Wall Street bailouts - socialism for the aristocracy. Obama comes in. Obama's economic advisors; Tim Geitner, Larry Summers, Hank Paulson; we get Wall Street bailouts - socialism for the aristocracy.

And you idiots screech at each other while the societal wealth extraction continues unabated regardless "which" party or "which" side wins.

 

[2aguy]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit. It's a stupid meme intentionally created to make retards believe more guns means more safety, when the opposite is true.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

You're totally right(Sarcasm), they prefer a higher chance of being shot back at. You're funny. 100% by chance, it's not as though the most recent mass shooting scouted the location multiple times before gunning them all down. I guess he must not have known it was a gun free zone, or he probably would have chosen a place that allows concealed carry, so he could be shot by the patrons(More sarcasm).

Mass shooters are suicidal. They WANT to die. So what makes you think "gun free zone" has fuck-all to do with their choice of target?

It doesn't.

They almost always pick a venue with which they are very familiar. THAT is the primary factor.

Because, asswipe....we have the actual confessions of shooters who were captured, and the notes and videos of shooters who died....they chose gun free zones...

Notes.....from the Sandy Hook shooter, Colorado theater, the guy just captured in Minnesota targeting a mega church, the South Carolina Church shooter and the Santa Barbara shooter....all said they chose gun free zones...to get their body counts up.

 

[Fenton Lum]

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones

Could you link us to those studies please? Not media reports, but the actual primary research.

So Pulse was not a gun free zone? Or was it not the deadliest shooting?

Here's what I responded to, it was above, perhaps you missed it.

"no it's just a coincidence that the most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones"

I'd like to see the primary research. Don't know what that answer is, but a claim on a chat board ain't verification. Nor is a media report interpretation of any data.

I really don't give a shit what you would like to see.

So the claim "most deadly shootings happen in gun free zones" cannot be scientifically substantiated, got it, thanks.

 

[IsaacNewton]

According to gun derps freedom will end tomorrow and the black helicopters will be flying overhead at noon. Expect a column of gun-grabbers to be marching through every town to collect everyone's guns and their satellite dishes. And their peanut butter.

Worst of all what inanimate objects will the derps pleasure themselves to now? Their $99 shopping network sword collection?

 

[Fenton Lum]

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit. It's a stupid meme intentionally created to make retards believe more guns means more safety, when the opposite is true.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

You're totally right(Sarcasm), they prefer a higher chance of being shot back at. You're funny. 100% by chance, it's not as though the most recent mass shooting scouted the location multiple times before gunning them all down. I guess he must not have known it was a gun free zone, or he probably would have chosen a place that allows concealed carry, so he could be shot by the patrons(More sarcasm).

Mass shooters are suicidal. They WANT to die. So what makes you think "gun free zone" has fuck-all to do with their choice of target?

It doesn't.

They almost always pick a venue with which they are very familiar. THAT is the primary factor.

Because, asswipe....we have the actual confessions of shooters who were captured, and the notes and videos of shooters who died....they chose gun free zones...

Notes.....from the Sandy Hook shooter, Colorado theater, the guy just captured in Minnesota targeting a mega church, the South Carolina Church shooter and the Santa Barbara shooter....all said they chose gun free zones...to get their body counts up.

So that would be five if you can back that up, do go on. Thanks, this is helpful.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

So now only the criminals will be able to get automatic weapons.

Automatic weapons have been illegal for 30 years

Wrong!

You can buy Automatic Weapons:

"Most people can buy machine guns in lots of states," Howard said. "But, and this is one of those classic big ‘buts,’ they have to get through a background check by FBI that is as thorough as if you are getting clearance to become a federal agent."


Only certain automatic weapons like Uzi's are banned to my knowledge.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Mass murders will not decrease, much less stop, if you ban "assault weapons".

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit. It's a stupid meme intentionally created to make retards believe more guns means more safety, when the opposite is true.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

You're totally right(Sarcasm), they prefer a higher chance of being shot back at. You're funny. 100% by chance, it's not as though the most recent mass shooting scouted the location multiple times before gunning them all down. I guess he must not have known it was a gun free zone, or he probably would have chosen a place that allows concealed carry, so he could be shot by the patrons(More sarcasm).

Mass shooters are suicidal. They WANT to die. So what makes you think "gun free zone" has fuck-all to do with their choice of target?

It doesn't.

They almost always pick a venue with which they are very familiar. THAT is the primary factor.

Well, for one, more victims if you're not dead, and they want to kill as many as possible. If you're shot in the face after killing one or two guys, you likely aren't making national news.

 

[Fenton Lum]

According to gun derps freedom will end tomorrow and the black helicopters will be flying overhead at noon. Expect a column of gun-grabbers to be marching through every town to collect everyone's guns and their satellite dishes. And their peanut butter.

Worst of all what inanimate objects will the derps pleasure themselves to now? Their $99 shopping network sword collection?

If the rabble can be kept in a state of constant fear, anxiety, confusion, and incoherence they will never mount any significant pushback to the aristocracy.

 

[Contumacious]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Banning weapons works.

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum

Soon , very very soon, the 4th and 5th Circuits will rule that the ban of assault weapons and high capacity clips is UNconstitutional . Hopefully by then there will be a justice who is pro liberty.

Then the 2nd Circuit ruling will be REVERSED.


.By the way the 2nd Cir ruling was not upheld - certiorari was denied.

 

[g5000]

Booze, cars, guns, and swimming pools. God only knows how many millions these weapons of mass destruction have killed.


"All right. If you must have a car, at least put seat belts in it."

"FUCK YOU! FREEEEEEDOOOOOMMMMMMMM!!!!!!"

 

[g5000]

"All right. If you must have booze, at least don't get behind the wheel when you are drunk."

"FUCK YOU! FREEEEEEDOOOOOOMMMMMM!!!!"

 

[nat4900]

What the Left REALLY wants is a total ban on all firearms.

They want to repeal the Second Amendment.

How fucking STUPID is that??? Repeal the 2nd amendment and send Trump's storm troopers into all those households with guns and confiscate them????
Is THAT what you morons really think sane Americans want??

(You are OWNED by the NRA !!!!)

 

[g5000]

Did you get that "data" when you went to your bathroom and squatted for a while???

Of course, "mass murders" will never be completely eliminated....BUT, the carnage in New Town and Orlando have shown us that a military style of weapon manufactured ONLY for the purpose of killing many, many people in the shortest amount of time, should NEVER be so easily purchased.

Actually, it showed us that Gun Free Zones are easy targets, and not having weapons ensures your death if someone targets you. Of course, expecting a Democrat to think logically is like expecting a one-legged man to win a rear-kicking contest.

This whole "gun free zones are easy targets" thing is bullshit. It's a stupid meme intentionally created to make retards believe more guns means more safety, when the opposite is true.

These mass shooters are not choosing their targets because they are gun free zones. They are choosing targets with which they are very familiar. It's almost always their workplace or their school or some other place they know well.

It has nothing to do with being a "gun free zone".

You're totally right(Sarcasm), they prefer a higher chance of being shot back at. You're funny. 100% by chance, it's not as though the most recent mass shooting scouted the location multiple times before gunning them all down. I guess he must not have known it was a gun free zone, or he probably would have chosen a place that allows concealed carry, so he could be shot by the patrons(More sarcasm).

Mass shooters are suicidal. They WANT to die. So what makes you think "gun free zone" has fuck-all to do with their choice of target?

It doesn't.

They almost always pick a venue with which they are very familiar. THAT is the primary factor.

Because, asswipe....we have the actual confessions of shooters who were captured, and the notes and videos of shooters who died....they chose gun free zones...

Notes.....from the Sandy Hook shooter, Colorado theater, the guy just captured in Minnesota targeting a mega church, the South Carolina Church shooter and the Santa Barbara shooter....all said they chose gun free zones...to get their body counts up.

Link?

Dollars to donuts they said they chose CROWDS, not gun free zones.

 

[nat4900]

Yep, just like in France......

Indeed, they were shipped from Belgium and unless you close ALL European borders, you can get an assault weapon (probably left over from the war ON Iraq) from that country all the way to France in a car trunk.

 

[g5000]

Mass shooters are completely unconcerned about whether or not an area is a “Gun-Free Zone.” A study conducted by Mother Jones found that, in 62 mass shootings over 32 years, there were exactly zero instances of a killer targeting a place because of a gun ban.

The Gun-Free Zone Myth: No relationship between Gun-Free Zones and Mass Shootings

New data from Mayors Against Illegal Guns confirm this point, by showing that in all 56 mass shootings between 2009 and 2013, “no more than one quarter of the shootings occurred in public spaces that were so-called ‘gun-free zones.” Neither the motive nor the location of a mass shooting, therefore, have anything to do with ‘gun-free zones.’

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

What the Left REALLY wants is a total ban on all firearms.

They want to repeal the Second Amendment.

How fucking STUPID is that??? Repeal the 2nd amendment and send Trump's storm troopers into all those household with guns and confiscate them????
Is THAT what you morons really think sane Americans want??

(You are OWNED by the NRA !!!!)

Would you prefer it was Clinton instead?

Also I am not a member of the NRA and never belonged to them nor do I own any semi-auto or automatic firearm and just one one pump action shotgun and one single shot shotgun.

 

[OKTexas]

Could someone explain the thread title, I need to know if I need to throw out my deer rifles.

In the simplest terms, it's a lie. Typical regressive BS.

 

[JBond]

For the second year in a row the supreme court refused to reverse a ban on assault weapons and high capacity clips.

Banning weapons works.

When was the last time anyone used a Thompson machine gun or had one? They were banned in the 1930s.

When as the last time anyone used a fully automatic weapon? They were banned in the 80s, ronald reagan signed the ban.

Now if we can get all those weapons banned nation wide we will see the mass murders decrease and eventually stop.

Roberts' S.Ct. upholds 2 states assault rifle ban in News Forum

At least you are honest about your gun grabbing intentions. Of course you have no idea what you are babbling about. I shot a Thompson last week. They are not banned. Where do you get this shit from? I also fired a Barrett 50 and a full auto Israeli uzzi. Fun start for the Batchelor party.

 

[NOLA Gator]

So, will you ban:

• fertilizer?
• box cutters?
• tacks and nails?
• pressure cookers?
• cell phones?
• R/C remotes?
• diesel fuel?
• Shoes?
• Underwear?

You won't let law enforcement profile. You won't let our borders to be closed. So, how will you protect us?