John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 29,024
- 15,083
Slavery apologetics is beneath the dignity of any elected official.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really. Roberts Has always been someone who puts the law in the constitution before political ideology. And Thomas has always been outspoken against racism, since it effects him. He only disregards people's rights When is the group that he's not part of.This is a shocking ruling given the make up of the court
Not really. Roberts Has always been someone who puts the law in the constitution before political ideology.
And Thomas has always been outspoken against racism, since it effects him. He only disregards people's rights When is the group that he's not part of.
Especially considering it was illegal to educate Blacks on how to read or write.
I’ve got better than that. I’ve got Ron himself defending and doubling down.
So let me know when it was good for Blacks. Especially considering it was illegal to educate Blacks on how to read or write.
![]()
Anti-literacy laws in the United States - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
So you don't got a quote on the actual curriculum. and what you got isn't better, it's a deflection.
Again, where in the lesson or the curriculum does it explicitly say what you are saying it says.
Not what I’m saying. What Ron DeSantis is saying.
Again, where in the curriculum does it state what people are claiming it states?
The people claiming it states that is Ron DeSantis. His state. He is the Governor. Are you saying that Ron DeSantis is lying about what his state is teaching?
He claimed exactly that the curriculum said what people claim it said? Or did he just defend the standards/curriculum?
Again, where in the curriculum does it say what people are saying it says.
Try page six. At the bottom.
So is the Florida Department of Education lying about what the Florida Department of Education has mandated?
This " could have been used for their personal benefit, not that slavery was a personal benefit" is a slimy bit of weaseling. You are right slavery has no merit AT ALL.
It says skills that could have been used for their personal benefit, not that slavery was a personal benefit.
As usual the left has to lie to try to make a point.
And the thing is when certain slaves were apprenticed for certain skills those were the ones that were more likely to be able to buy their freedom, or have their freedom bought.
Every article I linked to quoted that. Don’t blame the left for your side being dumb.
It’s not a lie. It’s just that we see through your desperate attempt to spin it.And they lied about what it said in every article.
It’s not a lie. It’s just that we see through your desperate attempt to spin it.
It doesn’t matter which way you word it. They mean the same thing and they’re both atrocious.It's not spin when you see the actual wording of the document. Nothing about slavery benefiting the slave, but certain trades they could be trained in being beneficial.
It doesn’t matter which way you word it. They mean the same thing and they’re both atrocious.
You don’t see that because you’re programmed not to see that. You’re a good little drone.
No, actually don't mean the same thing.It doesn’t matter which way you word it. They mean the same thing and they’re both atrocious.
You don’t see that because you’re programmed not to see that. You’re a good little drone.