Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
? He claimed he was God. By definition that would mean he claimed perfection. Whether you believe he was God or not, if someone claims to be Him he's claiming to be perfect since God doesnt make mistakes.I read the book---Jesus never claimed to be perfect
A person CLAIMING to be him is----by definition---psychotic? He claimed he was God. By definition that would mean he claimed perfection. Whether you believe he was God or not, if someone claims to be Him he's claiming to be perfect since God doesnt make mistakes.
Perfectly legal if he prayed in the middle of the field with a stadium full of fans and players surrounding him as well apparently.
Again whether you believe him or not is irrelevant.A person CLAIMING to be him is----by definition---psychotic
And you didn't file a lawsuit to get him to stop?apparently the guy actually KNELT . well---to me it is a minor faux pas.
sportsmen do things that bother ME----all the time-----Long ago---when
my brothers watched TV baseball----it BOTHERED me that the pitcher
SPIT his tobacco juice incessantly
Nopesomething about feeling bad when comnittng sin---a kind of
"THE DEVIL MADE ME DO IT"
You don’t know any Leftists IRLAnd you didn't file a lawsuit to get him to stop?
Wrote letters to the commissioner?
Picketed outside the ballfield?
What kind of a lefty are you anyway??
Coerced MINORS to praymeh... there is a lot more things to worry about.
Like I say, if a person is actually so outraged by seeing a man standing on the sidelines with his head bowed that they pay lawyers to get it stopped??.... you got issues.
Infringe upon it and see how quickly it applies.Why could the states not prohibit other religions or interfere with the practices of said religions, since the 1st does not apply to the states at all?
Actually, the burden of proof would be on the school to prove that the coach did give favorable treatment to the kids that prayed with him, not to prove that it didn't happen. I expect that if it had been proven that he was giving favorable treatment to the kids that prayed with him, the the court case would have gone the other way, as it should have, but it didn't because proving that he showed favoritism was not part of the case..prove it.
Now see... you can't just go on and say things that make a lot of sense like that.Actually, the burden of proof would be on the school to prove that the coach did give favorable treatment to the kids that prayed with him, not to prove that it didn't happen. I expect that if it had been proven that he was giving favorable treatment to the kids that prayed with him, the the court case would have gone the other way, as it should have, but it didn't because proving that he showed favoritism was not part of the case..
To make an analogy, it's Okay for the coach to wear/display a cross necklace while coaching the kids. It's not okay for him to show favoritism in his coaching to kids who also wear cross necklaces. If some kids decide that want to wear cross necklaces because the coach does, then so be it.
What are you talking about?Dearborn
Coerced minors?Coerced MINORS to pray
NOT MY CHILDREN
IMHO----coaches and teachers in public schools should not wear symbolsActually, the burden of proof would be on the school to prove that the coach did give favorable treatment to the kids that prayed with him, not to prove that it didn't happen. I expect that if it had been proven that he was giving favorable treatment to the kids that prayed with him, the the court case would have gone the other way, as it should have, but it didn't because proving that he showed favoritism was not part of the case..
To make an analogy, it's Okay for the coach to wear/display a cross necklace while coaching the kids. It's not okay for him to show favoritism in his coaching to kids who also wear cross necklaces. If some kids decide that want to wear cross necklaces because the coach does, then so be it.
THEY PRAYCoerced minors?
No he didn't
sheesh, they just keep making shit up to fit their narrative
That's on the players, not the coach. Key phrase "not required". The coach did not require them to do it.And let me guess, you never did anything that was not required to gain the coach's favor
But that's simply your opinion, not the constitution of The US.IMHO----coaches and teachers in public schools should not wear symbols
of religion-----just an opinion
That is different than being coerced to pray.THEY PRAY
THEY PLAY
I never did bring the coach an apple. true storyAnd let me guess, you never did anything that was not required to gain the coach's favor
