Supreme Court: Coach Can Pray on the Sidelines. Ruling 6-3

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The coach did not require them to do it.

How do you know?

How do you know the players didn't feel pressured?

And how do you know the coaches won't require it and the players wont feel pressured in any instance of this at every school in America until the end of time?

You don't know any of these things. Nobody can.

 

[flan327]

That's on the players, not the coach. Key phrase "not required". The coach did not require them to do it.

THEY PRAY
THEY PLAY

 

[Ralph Norton]

THEY PRAY
THEY PLAY

And your evidence for that statement is?

 

[Meister]

How do you know?

How do you know the players didn't feel pressured?

And how do you know the coaches won't require it and the players wont feel pressured in any instance of this at every school in America until the end of time?

You don't know any of these things. Nobody can.

That was probably hashed out in the lower courts and found no merit.
That is unless the school district had the stupidest lawyers to be found

 

[Weatherman2020]

As the TRUMPCourt continues to erode Constitutional protections long understood.

The coach has a right to personally pray but not to coerce players to participate in public prayer

The coach was fired for ignoring instructions not to hold public prayers not for the act of praying

Did seeing a man pray make you piddle your diaper?

 

[JoeMoma]

How do you know?

How do you know the players didn't feel pressured?

And how do you know the coaches won't require it and the players wont feel pressured in any instance of this at every school in America until the end of time?

You don't know any of these things. Nobody can.

The burden of proof would be to prove that it Did Happen, not for the other side to prove that it didn't happen.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That was probably hashed out in the lower courts and found no merit.

Actually, it has been hashed out in the Supreme Court many times and has been found to have merit each time. This most recent ruling, like several rulings by this court, trashes Decades of precedence.

And this exact case was hashed out in the lower courts, and these ideas were shown to have merit. This scotus decision overturned a lower Court's decision. Did you not know that?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The burden of proof would be to prove that it Did Happen, not for the other side to prove that it didn't happen.

False. That is a ridiculous idea. This ruling wasn't about one case. This ruling guaranteed a constitutional right until the end of time. So it applies to every instance in every school in America until the end of time.

So the question still stands. Try again?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Also, I am not perfect like Jesus Christ. Are you? That's something if you are. huh.

I am not. But I do not go around proclaiming my love for Jesus while acting no different at all than the atheist on the forum.

Jesus tells us we will know His followers by their fruit.

Do you think if you or anyone else on here did not tell people they were Christians anyone would be able to tell you were?

 

[Meister]

Actually, it has been hashed out in the Supreme Court many times and has been found to have merit each time. This most recent ruling, like several rulings by this court, trashes Decades of precedence.

And this exact case was hashed out in the lower courts, and these ideas were shown to have merit. This scotus decision overturned a lower Court's decision. Did you not know that?

not with this case, dude.

 

[JoeMoma]

False. That is a ridiculous idea. This ruling wasn't about one case. This ruling guaranteed a constitutional right until the end of time. So it applies to every instance in every school in America until the end of time.

So the question still stands. Try again?

No! True, not false. You have the burden of proof backwards. And the correct direct for the burden of proof should apply to all cases across america.

 

[Meister]

False. That is a ridiculous idea. This ruling wasn't about one case. This ruling guaranteed a constitutional right until the end of time. So it applies to every instance in every school in America until the end of time.

So the question still stands. Try again?

The Constitution was set up to protect the People from it's government, not to protect the government from its People.
Power goes back to the People for now. Doesn't it?

 

[Weatherman2020]

False. That is a ridiculous idea. This ruling wasn't about one case. This ruling guaranteed a constitutional right until the end of time. So it applies to every instance in every school in America until the end of time.

So the question still stands. Try again?

Maybe if you lay down on the freeway to protest the decision the Justices will scurry back to court and reverse their ruling.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

not with this case, dude.

Uh, I just showed you how it was.

Yes, they overturned a lower courts decision.

Stop saying things to the contrary. We call those "lies".

 

[Meister]

Uh, I just showed you how it was.

Yes, they overturned a lower courts decision.

Stop saying things to the contrary. We call those "lies".

Let me reiterate for you....

"The Constitution was set up to protect the People from it's government, not to protect the government from its People.
Power goes back to the People for now. Doesn't it?"

 

[Delldude]

What are you talking about?

We will become ballistic when a measure Is introduced to make all in the stadium face Mecca also.

Wouldn’t happen.

Maybe Dearborn

 

[Delldude]

You'd think someone would come up with a disclaimer and end all this needless exercise in making lawyers rich.

Schools could put a placard on display saying something to the effect of:

This school supports free exercise of or no exercise of any and all religions under the First Amendment.

Kinda ends the separation of church and state argument....which also needs to be addressed.

 

[Cougarbear]

Haha.... then try it.

Do it during a work meeting.

Or on stage, at the next concert you go to.

Nice try to move the goal posts. Thank God for Donald Trump

 

[flan327]

And your evidence for that statement is?

Common sense

 

[XponentialChaos]

Maybe Dearborn

Dearborn?