Supreme Court upholds Obamacare subsidies

[Luddly Neddite]

Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare




.

Ted sCrewz is gonna' have to find a new dream. And platform for his sCruz America presidential campaign.

This decision is actually a huge gift to Repub candidates. If they had gone the other way, the candidates would have had to answer to their constituents.

Now they can pretend to have something better even though the Repubs have shown they have nothing except their usual "go away and die".

A week or so ago, Paul Ryan said they have a better plan. He ended by saying 'we'll have more on that next week'. Of course, that's also what he said when he was running for veep. He lied then and he's lying now.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Once again the SCOTUS tells us something doesn't say what it says.

Maybe the name should be changed to SCOTUSCARE or Robertscare

When do I get my subsidizes? When do I get anything from the feds? Oh right, I get a bill from them.

Quit your job and go on welfare

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Now it will be a huge campaign issue. obama's threats didn't take away the public dissatisfaction.

Tipsycatlover

Post proof the president threatened the justices and their families.

That's what you said. Now prove it.

Drunk dingbat.

 

[hangover]

Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare

So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?

Four words

A petty attempt by Republicans to hurt Americans just so they can destroy Obamacare

How about the people who write a law pay attention when doing it?

How about cons quit obstructing so that it gets written correctly?

 

[Geaux4it]

Once again the SCOTUS tells us something doesn't say what it says.

Maybe the name should be changed to SCOTUSCARE or Robertscare

When do I get my subsidizes? When do I get anything from the feds? Oh right, I get a bill from them.

Quit your job and go on welfare

Who has jobs anymore?

-Geaux

 

[Edgetho]

You don't see it now, but this is a HUGE victory for Republicans.

People, I'm telling you, dimocfraps WANTED the ACA to go down.

They wanted Single Payer.

And if this had gone down, we would have Single Payer AND Hitlery.

I'm telling you, when the dust clears, you're gonna thank the SCOTUS

 

[Luddly Neddite]

So we have to wait until a conservative is elected president in 2016, big deal.

The bill will get repealed, one way or another, period.

No it will ever be repealed, no way. The Republicans are making deals with Obama they said they would never make and there is a price, That price is SCOTUScare.

For those of you paying attention, this is what tyranny and despotism looks like.

Ahh, another reason to laugh at you. Not that we needed it.

SassyIrishLass is too damn dumb to understand that the bill was passed more than 50 times.

That's the opposite of "tyranny and despotism".

 

[Statistikhengst]

Obama:

Lily Ledbetter act - a DEM win
Auto Bailout - a DEM win
ACA - a DEM win
Got Osama bin Ladin - an AMERICAN win under a DEM president
ending DADT/gays in the military - a DEM win
Indian Trade Pact - a DEM win.
Renegotiated STARK treaty with Russia - a DEM win
Pacific Trade Agreement - a DEM win.

President Obama will indeed be able to claim that the vast majority of what he wanted to push through the US Congress indeed came to pass.

His record of successes will be greater than either Reagan's or Eisenhower's.

Congratulations, Mr. President.

 

[Liminal]

This is what happens when a dictator threatens the lives of the justices.

Two questions: 1. Why do people like you have to lie about everything all the time?
2. Why are you so fucking stupid?

 

[hangover]

Another piss-poor decision from the Roberts court. They find ambiguity where none exists, then correct the ambiguity.

Scalia's dissenting opinion is dead-on.

Na, just dead.

 

[Freewill]

Once again the SCOTUS tells us something doesn't say what it says.

Maybe the name should be changed to SCOTUSCARE or Robertscare

When do I get my subsidizes? When do I get anything from the feds? Oh right, I get a bill from them.

Quit your job and go on welfare

thanks for the advice but I am not sure I want to take your career path.

 

[Statistikhengst]

You don't see it now, but this is a HUGE victory for Republicans.

People, I'm telling you, dimocfraps WANTED the ACA to go down.

They wanted Single Payer.

And if this had gone down, we would have Single Payer AND Hitlery.

I'm telling you, when the dust clears, you're gonna thank the SCOTUS

Keep on dreaming, little man.

 

[Statistikhengst]

I predict that this thread will get many, many postings and will live for quite a while.

 

[candycorn]

So we have to wait until a conservative is elected president in 2016, big deal.

The bill will get repealed, one way or another, period.

No it will ever be repealed, no way. The Republicans are making deals with Obama they said they would never make and there is a price, That price is SCOTUScare.

For those of you paying attention, this is what tyranny and despotism looks like.

Ahh, another reason to laugh at you. Not that we needed it.

SassyIrishLass is too damn dumb to understand that the bill was passed more than 50 times.

That's the opposite of "tyranny and despotism".

 

[SassyIrishLass]

So we have to wait until a conservative is elected president in 2016, big deal.

The bill will get repealed, one way or another, period.

No it will ever be repealed, no way. The Republicans are making deals with Obama they said they would never make and there is a price, That price is SCOTUScare.

For those of you paying attention, this is what tyranny and despotism looks like.

Ahh, another reason to laugh at you. Not that we needed it.

SassyIrishLass is too damn dumb to understand that the bill was passed more than 50 times.

That's the opposite of "tyranny and despotism".

^^^ Old man, pretending to be female. Pathetic

 

[Statistikhengst]

And for RWNJ losers out there, just a small reminder:


332 - 206

 

[hangover]

Maybe this will take the left loon's minds off a flag for awhile....until some dope white woman comes out as black or some mental midget former Olympian decides he's a fake woman.

Well you get away with pretending to be human.

 

[Freewill]

Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare

So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?

Four words

A petty attempt by Republicans to hurt Americans just so they can destroy Obamacare

How about the people who write a law pay attention when doing it?

How about cons quit obstructing so that it gets written correctly?

So are you agreeing that it is not written correctly? That is what you said but I am sure the SCOTUS would agree that I am taking you actual words to literally.

On the off chance you think it wrongly written then you must agree it isn't the SCOTUS' job to fix it.

 

[candycorn]

Rubio disagrees with the decision because "people are getting hit with a $4,000 deductible". I guess he thinks a $30,000 bill is preferable to an insurance deductible.

 

[candycorn]

No it will ever be repealed, no way. The Republicans are making deals with Obama they said they would never make and there is a price, That price is SCOTUScare.

For those of you paying attention, this is what tyranny and despotism looks like.

Ahh, another reason to laugh at you. Not that we needed it.

SassyIrishLass is too damn dumb to understand that the bill was passed more than 50 times.

That's the opposite of "tyranny and despotism".

^^^ Old man, pretending to be female. Pathetic