Susan Collins sounds like a "No"

[OldLady]

I think the OP mis-spelled "Ho" in the header....

Watch your mouth, talkin' about my senator.

 

[Rustic]

Looks like Ted Cruz is saying no

Is he a progressive?

Well, that's the first thing the guy has done that I could agree with. Good for him.

He's a career politician… Of course he's a progressive

 

[Rustic]

Just now, on Jake Tapper, she can't think of a reason to support the Graham-Cassidy Bill.

Susan Collins is a Democrat.

Susan Collins has a brain.

Susan Collins has a conscience.

She's a control freak, a shortcoming of all career politicians.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The country is far from "broke". we have just let the wealth of this country be hoarded by a very few. And these people have spent a great deal of time and money getting good little footsoldiers like you to do their heavy lifting for them, somewhat at your own expense.

I don't care what other people make or own, it's none of my business. Envy plays no role in my life…

Nothing of what I said has anything to do with envy, and it would all be true, regardless of how much money I have or don't have. What you are doing is a charlatan's tactic called, "bait and switch", no doubt gleaned right from AM radio. Rush has made a living using this charlatan's tactic.

I don't care if people to participate in the collective or not, I certainly don't want to force people into it.
You say you're not envious? It must be a control then and then, huh?

No, i just think that basic healthcare should be a right for all people. and we have the means to do it, and it would greatly benefit the human condition. Of course, you'll just ignore everything I just said and attribute a different reason more suited to your arguments.

Na, I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my health care.
I certainly do not want the collective in my personal life...

You still have not answered my question, what makes you think everyone should be forced into the collective. Why don't you keep it to yourselves? The collective does not require participation for those of us that want nothing to do with it.

I directly answered your question, for this case: Because I think basic healthcare should be a basic human right. You disagreed directly. Asking me the same question over and over is not going to change my answer

 

[Rustic]

I don't care what other people make or own, it's none of my business. Envy plays no role in my life…

Nothing of what I said has anything to do with envy, and it would all be true, regardless of how much money I have or don't have. What you are doing is a charlatan's tactic called, "bait and switch", no doubt gleaned right from AM radio. Rush has made a living using this charlatan's tactic.

I don't care if people to participate in the collective or not, I certainly don't want to force people into it.
You say you're not envious? It must be a control then and then, huh?

No, i just think that basic healthcare should be a right for all people. and we have the means to do it, and it would greatly benefit the human condition. Of course, you'll just ignore everything I just said and attribute a different reason more suited to your arguments.

Na, I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my health care.
I certainly do not want the collective in my personal life...

You still have not answered my question, what makes you think everyone should be forced into the collective. Why don't you keep it to yourselves? The collective does not require participation for those of us that want nothing to do with it.

I directly answered your question, for this case: Because I think basic healthcare should be a basic human right. You disagreed directly. Asking me the same question over and over is not going to change my answer

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nothing of what I said has anything to do with envy, and it would all be true, regardless of how much money I have or don't have. What you are doing is a charlatan's tactic called, "bait and switch", no doubt gleaned right from AM radio. Rush has made a living using this charlatan's tactic.

I don't care if people to participate in the collective or not, I certainly don't want to force people into it.
You say you're not envious? It must be a control then and then, huh?

No, i just think that basic healthcare should be a right for all people. and we have the means to do it, and it would greatly benefit the human condition. Of course, you'll just ignore everything I just said and attribute a different reason more suited to your arguments.

Na, I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my health care.
I certainly do not want the collective in my personal life...

You still have not answered my question, what makes you think everyone should be forced into the collective. Why don't you keep it to yourselves? The collective does not require participation for those of us that want nothing to do with it.

I directly answered your question, for this case: Because I think basic healthcare should be a basic human right. You disagreed directly. Asking me the same question over and over is not going to change my answer

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

 

[Rustic]

I don't care if people to participate in the collective or not, I certainly don't want to force people into it.
You say you're not envious? It must be a control then and then, huh?

No, i just think that basic healthcare should be a right for all people. and we have the means to do it, and it would greatly benefit the human condition. Of course, you'll just ignore everything I just said and attribute a different reason more suited to your arguments.

Na, I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my health care.
I certainly do not want the collective in my personal life...

You still have not answered my question, what makes you think everyone should be forced into the collective. Why don't you keep it to yourselves? The collective does not require participation for those of us that want nothing to do with it.

I directly answered your question, for this case: Because I think basic healthcare should be a basic human right. You disagreed directly. Asking me the same question over and over is not going to change my answer

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

 

[rightwinger]

Collins is one of the few Republicans in Congress who understands sound, responsible governance, and the importance of pragmatism in politics.

Most Congressional Republicans have become blind, partisan ideologues, pursuing a reckless, irresponsible, and wrongheaded conservative agenda.

Seeking to repeal the ACA absent replacement for no other reason than associating the Act with Obama is an example of that reckless, irresponsible, and wrongheaded conservative agenda.

And make no mistake: Graham-Cassidy is not ‘replacement,’ it’s bad-faith ‘legislation’ intended to provide Republicans with political cover as they take from millions of Americans access to affordable healthcare.

First of all, career politicians are not there for the good of the people of the country, obama only represented people that voted for him, definitely nobody else. ''Hope and change" was for gullible motherfuckers.

Second, The people that are paying for those that did not have health care in the past cannot afford that shit. Nobody should be forced to pay for other people shit and shit they will never use.

"Nobody should be forced to pay for other people shit and shit they will never use."

we all have portions of our tax dollar go to things with which we don't agree. What makes you so special, princess?

There's a reason why no real conservatives voted for Obamacare, it has destroyed millions of peoples lives...
Paying for shit they'll never use and do not want that is the very definition of Obamacare. Cupcake

Drama Queen
Whose lives were destroyed ?

 

[OldLady]

Just now, on Jake Tapper, she can't think of a reason to support the Graham-Cassidy Bill.

Susan Collins is a Democrat.

Susan Collins has a brain.

Susan Collins has a conscience.

She's a control freak, a shortcoming of all career politicians.

She's also a Republican. I respect her but I don't forget she's an R. She makes a habit of seeming very moderate but she usually falls in line with the Republicans despite her rhetoric. I'm glad in this case she isn't, but it might be because she has such an extensive amount of experience and knowledge about healthcare issues and programs--it's been her "niche" her whole career. She knows what will work for Mainers.

 

[Rustic]

Collins is one of the few Republicans in Congress who understands sound, responsible governance, and the importance of pragmatism in politics.

Most Congressional Republicans have become blind, partisan ideologues, pursuing a reckless, irresponsible, and wrongheaded conservative agenda.

Seeking to repeal the ACA absent replacement for no other reason than associating the Act with Obama is an example of that reckless, irresponsible, and wrongheaded conservative agenda.

And make no mistake: Graham-Cassidy is not ‘replacement,’ it’s bad-faith ‘legislation’ intended to provide Republicans with political cover as they take from millions of Americans access to affordable healthcare.

First of all, career politicians are not there for the good of the people of the country, obama only represented people that voted for him, definitely nobody else. ''Hope and change" was for gullible motherfuckers.

Second, The people that are paying for those that did not have health care in the past cannot afford that shit. Nobody should be forced to pay for other people shit and shit they will never use.

"Nobody should be forced to pay for other people shit and shit they will never use."

we all have portions of our tax dollar go to things with which we don't agree. What makes you so special, princess?

There's a reason why no real conservatives voted for Obamacare, it has destroyed millions of peoples lives...
Paying for shit they'll never use and do not want that is the very definition of Obamacare. Cupcake

Drama Queen
Whose lives were destroyed ?

Anyone that cannot afford socialist entitlement programs that are forced into them…

 

[Rustic]

Just now, on Jake Tapper, she can't think of a reason to support the Graham-Cassidy Bill.

Susan Collins is a Democrat.

Susan Collins has a brain.

Susan Collins has a conscience.

She's a control freak, a shortcoming of all career politicians.

She's also a Republican. I respect her but I don't forget she's an R. She makes a habit of seeming very moderate but she usually falls in line with the Republicans despite her rhetoric. I'm glad in this case she isn't, but it might be because she has such an extensive amount of experience and knowledge about healthcare issues and programs--it's been her "niche" her whole career. She knows what will work for Mainers.

Na, she's a career politician and a control freak. All she cares about is herself

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, i just think that basic healthcare should be a right for all people. and we have the means to do it, and it would greatly benefit the human condition. Of course, you'll just ignore everything I just said and attribute a different reason more suited to your arguments.

Na, I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my health care.
I certainly do not want the collective in my personal life...

You still have not answered my question, what makes you think everyone should be forced into the collective. Why don't you keep it to yourselves? The collective does not require participation for those of us that want nothing to do with it.

I directly answered your question, for this case: Because I think basic healthcare should be a basic human right. You disagreed directly. Asking me the same question over and over is not going to change my answer

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

No, it's a mathematical thing.

 

[Rustic]

Na, I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my health care.
I certainly do not want the collective in my personal life...

You still have not answered my question, what makes you think everyone should be forced into the collective. Why don't you keep it to yourselves? The collective does not require participation for those of us that want nothing to do with it.

I directly answered your question, for this case: Because I think basic healthcare should be a basic human right. You disagreed directly. Asking me the same question over and over is not going to change my answer

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

No, it's a mathematical thing.

The country cannot afford another socialist entitlement program because they cannot afford the ones that we have so it can't be a mathematical thing.
You progressives need to form your own shit And keep the rest of us out of it...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I directly answered your question, for this case: Because I think basic healthcare should be a basic human right. You disagreed directly. Asking me the same question over and over is not going to change my answer

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

No, it's a mathematical thing.

The country cannot afford another socialist entitlement program because they cannot afford the ones that we have so it can't be a mathematical thing.
You progressives need to form your own shit And keep the rest of us out of it...

We, of course, can afford it, and a public option would actually reduce per capita healthcare spending. Why do you think it terrifies the private carriers?

 

[Rustic]

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

No, it's a mathematical thing.

The country cannot afford another socialist entitlement program because they cannot afford the ones that we have so it can't be a mathematical thing.
You progressives need to form your own shit And keep the rest of us out of it...

We, of course, can offord it, and a single-payer option would actually reduce per capita healthcare spending.

Na, it's so great why don't you just keep it to yourselves? It does not require participation from the rest of us.
The country is broke... that well is dry

 

[OldLady]

Susan Collins is a Democrat.

Susan Collins has a brain.

Susan Collins has a conscience.

She's a control freak, a shortcoming of all career politicians.

She's also a Republican. I respect her but I don't forget she's an R. She makes a habit of seeming very moderate but she usually falls in line with the Republicans despite her rhetoric. I'm glad in this case she isn't, but it might be because she has such an extensive amount of experience and knowledge about healthcare issues and programs--it's been her "niche" her whole career. She knows what will work for Mainers.

Na, she's a career politician and a control freak. All she cares about is herself

Sounds like you dated and it didn't go well.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I directly answered your question, for this case: Because I think basic healthcare should be a basic human right. You disagreed directly. Asking me the same question over and over is not going to change my answer

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

No, it's a mathematical thing.

The country cannot afford another socialist entitlement program because they cannot afford the ones that we have so it can't be a mathematical thing.
You progressives need to form your own shit And keep the rest of us out of it...

Ffurthermore, calling a person "progressive" because he supports the public option is like calling someone in 1865 "progressive" because he opposed slavery, despite being in one of the last developed countries to do so. Supporting a public option is not "progressive", unless you live in the year 1920.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

No, it's a mathematical thing.

The country cannot afford another socialist entitlement program because they cannot afford the ones that we have so it can't be a mathematical thing.
You progressives need to form your own shit And keep the rest of us out of it...

We, of course, can offord it, and a single-payer option would actually reduce per capita healthcare spending.

Na, it's so great why don't you just keep it to yourselves? It does not require participation from the rest of us.
The country is broke... that well is dry

Who said the public option required everyone's participation? You are saying odd things, now.

 

[Rustic]

Why do you think everyone should be forced into the collective?
Like I said I have no right to healthcare, but I do have a right to earn my healthcare. Fact

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

No, it's a mathematical thing.

The country cannot afford another socialist entitlement program because they cannot afford the ones that we have so it can't be a mathematical thing.
You progressives need to form your own shit And keep the rest of us out of it...

Ffurthermore, calling a person "progressive" because he supports the public option is like calling someone in 1865 "progressive" because he opposed slavery, despite being in one of the last developed countries to do so. Supporting a public option is not "progressive", unless you live in the year 1920.

Political correctness does not suit millions of people, why force the issue? I ask again, is it a control thing with you?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not "fact", your opinion. I am able to accept the actual fact that your opinion differs. I suggest you learn to do the same.

By the way, your arguments are pretty weak. If the opposition to single payer comes armed with those weak arguments over the next few decades, it's going to be a slam dunk.

Why would you want to force people into single payer? It does not require everybody's participation.

Is it a control thing?

No, it's a mathematical thing.

The country cannot afford another socialist entitlement program because they cannot afford the ones that we have so it can't be a mathematical thing.
You progressives need to form your own shit And keep the rest of us out of it...

Ffurthermore, calling a person "progressive" because he supports the public option is like calling someone in 1865 "progressive" because he opposed slavery, despite being in one of the last developed countries to do so. Supporting a public option is not "progressive", unless you live in the year 1920.

Political correctness does not suit millions of people, why force the issue? I ask again, is it a control thing with you?

Can you go one single post without inventing things I did not say to argue against? Doesn't seem like it. That should tell you that you just don't have very good arguments.