Sweden is at War.

[Tommy Tainant]

And yet Sweden is many times safer than the US.Even with made up shootings.

 

[Mindful]

And yet Sweden is many times safer than the US.Even with made up shootings.

It's not about "safe".

It's about not supposed to be like that in Sweden.

 

[Mindful]

Try another tactic.

What tactic? Is it 30, or is it 300?

There's a pretty big difference there.

I know what you're getting at.

No, ya don't.

Yes I do.

Because it's you.

You're still dodging the question. Is it 30 or 300?

Why ask me, if you assume you know?

Whatever that is.

 

[Crepitus]

What tactic? Is it 30, or is it 300?

There's a pretty big difference there.

I know what you're getting at.

No, ya don't.

Yes I do.

Because it's you.

You're still dodging the question. Is it 30 or 300?

Why ask me, if you assume you know?

Whatever that is.

How would I know? You posted it.

 

[Mindful]

I know what you're getting at.

No, ya don't.

Yes I do.

Because it's you.

You're still dodging the question. Is it 30 or 300?

Why ask me, if you assume you know?

Whatever that is.

How would I know? You posted it.

You made an issue of it.

 

[Crepitus]

No, ya don't.

Yes I do.

Because it's you.

You're still dodging the question. Is it 30 or 300?

Why ask me, if you assume you know?

Whatever that is.

How would I know? You posted it.

You made an issue of it.

I pointed out a glaring inconsistency.

You have been dodging the issue. My guess is because it kinda blows you're silly premise right outta the water.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

From the link in the OP:

In January, a so-called unaccompanied minor from Afghanistan, Sadeq Nadir, sought to murder several people in the city by ramming into them with a stolen car. Although he claimed to have converted to Christianity, material found in his apartment showed that he wanted to wage jihad and become a martyr. He told the police that his intention had been to kill. The event was initially classified as an attempt at a terrorist crime but then changed to a charge of ten attempted murders. Although Sadeq had admitted that his intention was to kill, the Swedish district court did not find that Sadeq could be convicted for either terrorism or attempted murder. The court argued that he had not been driving "fast enough" to cause a concrete risk of death. In the same vein, although Sadeq was found to have written texts about jihad and martyrdom and claimed to be acting for Allah, the court did not find that he had acted from any religious terrorist motives. He was convicted of merely causing danger to others and threatening them.

I don't know when this guy will be back on the street, but people are going to die when he does. So, why does the progressive Left bend so far over backwards to protect these people at the expense of their own citizens? Is it just politics? They want a one-world gov't? I know why we do it here in the US - more eventual votes for the Dems. If anyone has a better idea, I'd love to see it.

Cause the issue is never the issue

And yet Sweden is many times safer than the US.Even with made up shootings.

If you ever visited the USA which parts would you avoid ?

Would you avoid all the black hoods ...Just like in the UK ?

 

[Mindful]

Yes I do.

Because it's you.

You're still dodging the question. Is it 30 or 300?

Why ask me, if you assume you know?

Whatever that is.

How would I know? You posted it.

You made an issue of it.

I pointed out a glaring inconsistency.

You have been dodging the issue. My guess is because it kinda blows you're silly premise right outta the water.

And you had an ulterior motive.

Something like gotcha games.

 

[Mindful]

From the link in the OP:

In January, a so-called unaccompanied minor from Afghanistan, Sadeq Nadir, sought to murder several people in the city by ramming into them with a stolen car. Although he claimed to have converted to Christianity, material found in his apartment showed that he wanted to wage jihad and become a martyr. He told the police that his intention had been to kill. The event was initially classified as an attempt at a terrorist crime but then changed to a charge of ten attempted murders. Although Sadeq had admitted that his intention was to kill, the Swedish district court did not find that Sadeq could be convicted for either terrorism or attempted murder. The court argued that he had not been driving "fast enough" to cause a concrete risk of death. In the same vein, although Sadeq was found to have written texts about jihad and martyrdom and claimed to be acting for Allah, the court did not find that he had acted from any religious terrorist motives. He was convicted of merely causing danger to others and threatening them.

I don't know when this guy will be back on the street, but people are going to die when he does. So, why does the progressive Left bend so far over backwards to protect these people at the expense of their own citizens? Is it just politics? They want a one-world gov't? I know why we do it here in the US - more eventual votes for the Dems. If anyone has a better idea, I'd love to see it.

Cause the issue is never the ISsue

And yet Sweden is many times safer than the US.Even with made up shootings.

If you ever visited the USA which parts would you avoid ?

Would you avoid all the black hoods ...Just like in the UK ?

Even in Berlin, there are areas not even the police will go.

 

[Mindful]

It all comes down to the America hating.

Not even the truck rammings and shootings and knife stabbings in Europe will be as bad as the United States.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

From the link in the OP:

In January, a so-called unaccompanied minor from Afghanistan, Sadeq Nadir, sought to murder several people in the city by ramming into them with a stolen car. Although he claimed to have converted to Christianity, material found in his apartment showed that he wanted to wage jihad and become a martyr. He told the police that his intention had been to kill. The event was initially classified as an attempt at a terrorist crime but then changed to a charge of ten attempted murders. Although Sadeq had admitted that his intention was to kill, the Swedish district court did not find that Sadeq could be convicted for either terrorism or attempted murder. The court argued that he had not been driving "fast enough" to cause a concrete risk of death. In the same vein, although Sadeq was found to have written texts about jihad and martyrdom and claimed to be acting for Allah, the court did not find that he had acted from any religious terrorist motives. He was convicted of merely causing danger to others and threatening them.

I don't know when this guy will be back on the street, but people are going to die when he does. So, why does the progressive Left bend so far over backwards to protect these people at the expense of their own citizens? Is it just politics? They want a one-world gov't? I know why we do it here in the US - more eventual votes for the Dems. If anyone has a better idea, I'd love to see it.

Cause the issue is never the ISsue

And yet Sweden is many times safer than the US.Even with made up shootings.

If you ever visited the USA which parts would you avoid ?

Would you avoid all the black hoods ...Just like in the UK ?

Even in Berlin, there are areas not even the police will go.

Berlin, Paris, London , All have No go zones

Paris has been the worst the longest

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Im gonna send an email to Volvo

Home | TN Chamber

 

[Kilroy2]

^In 2018, Sweden experienced a record number of lethal shootings, 306 in all. Forty-five people were killed and 135 injured nationwide, most deaths occurring in Region South, where Malmö is located. In March, the Swedish National Forensic Centre estimated that since 2012, the number of shootings classified as murder or attempted murder has increased by almost 100 percent.

The Centre also found that the most popular weapon used in the shootings is the Kalashnikov assault rifle. "It is one of the world's most manufactured weapons and used in many wars," said the Centre's team manager, Mikael Högfors. "When they are no longer needed... they are smuggled into Sweden".

Their math sucks.

One sentence is "306 lethal shootings", next one is "45 people killed nation wide".

What stands out for me is the last sentence

the number of shootings classified as murder or attempted murder has increased by almost 100 percent. Does this mean that there never has been a murder or attempted murder?

So does that mean there was never a murder by shooting

Still the notable thing about Sweden, since 2005, when doing crime statistics they do not use the nationality or immigration background in reporting crime statistics.

Still there murder rate was 1.06 in 2016 and there neighbor Denmark .50
Canada 1.68 and they have a very liberal immigration policy

quoting articles that declare Sweden a war zone goes to show that there is a good, bad and ugly side to everything but may not be as bad as some think? It may be only a way to support your position.

 

[Crepitus]

You're still dodging the question. Is it 30 or 300?

Why ask me, if you assume you know?

Whatever that is.

How would I know? You posted it.

You made an issue of it.

I pointed out a glaring inconsistency.

You have been dodging the issue. My guess is because it kinda blows you're silly premise right outta the water.

And you had an ulterior motive.

Something like gotcha games.

I pointed out that your source is worthless and weak, much like your idiology.


And you know it. That's why you will not address it.

Case closed.

 

[Mindful]

Why ask me, if you assume you know?

Whatever that is.

How would I know? You posted it.

You made an issue of it.

I pointed out a glaring inconsistency.

You have been dodging the issue. My guess is because it kinda blows you're silly premise right outta the water.

And you had an ulterior motive.

Something like gotcha games.

I pointed out that your source is worthless and weak, much like your idiology.


And you know it. That's why you will not address it.

Case closed.

What ideology?

There was no case, to open or close.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

How would I know? You posted it.

You made an issue of it.

I pointed out a glaring inconsistency.

You have been dodging the issue. My guess is because it kinda blows you're silly premise right outta the water.

And you had an ulterior motive.

Something like gotcha games.

I pointed out that your source is worthless and weak, much like your idiology.


And you know it. That's why you will not address it.

Case closed.

What ideology?

There was no case, to open or close.

Your figures are not consistent. Cant be trusted.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Why ask me, if you assume you know?

Whatever that is.

How would I know? You posted it.

You made an issue of it.

I pointed out a glaring inconsistency.

You have been dodging the issue. My guess is because it kinda blows you're silly premise right outta the water.

And you had an ulterior motive.

Something like gotcha games.

I pointed out that your source is worthless and weak, much like your idiology.


And you know it. That's why you will not address it.

Case closed.

The gatestone institute is not ministry of truth approved!
They are indeed thought criminals

Gatestone is great

They only go to respectful credible sources like CNN and think progress.

And one day his ideology will actually be a success because everything tried before wasn't real socialism

 

[Mindful]

You made an issue of it.

I pointed out a glaring inconsistency.

You have been dodging the issue. My guess is because it kinda blows you're silly premise right outta the water.

And you had an ulterior motive.

Something like gotcha games.

I pointed out that your source is worthless and weak, much like your idiology.


And you know it. That's why you will not address it.

Case closed.

What ideology?

There was no case, to open or close.

Your figures are not consistent. Cant be trusted.

You'll try everything, won't you? lol.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I pointed out a glaring inconsistency.

You have been dodging the issue. My guess is because it kinda blows you're silly premise right outta the water.

And you had an ulterior motive.

Something like gotcha games.

I pointed out that your source is worthless and weak, much like your idiology.


And you know it. That's why you will not address it.

Case closed.

What ideology?

There was no case, to open or close.

Your figures are not consistent. Cant be trusted.

You'll try everything, won't you? lol.

Why dont you answer his question ?

 

[longknife]

The UK now has a special court to try individuals for "hate speech" if they say anything bad about Islam.