Juan de Fuca
Gold Member
- May 24, 2016
- 3,254
- 452
I made my point and I do not care about more gun law. I care that we eliminate the cause of gun violence, period. We need to address the violence and all of the other problems disappear. If you are a gun owner of 30 years and have abided by the laws you get a pass. If you test for a violent disposition with less experience you lose your guns and no one should have an issue with that. If you are a gun owner who knows that they will test positive then you have an opportunity before that time come to get help. It doesn't have to be abusive but it does have to address the problem.
So....you ignore the fact that your "test" for violent tendencies has already failed.
If you actually cared about getting rid of gun violence you would focus on single, teenage mothers raising generations of young males without fathers...that is the primary source of gun violence....
I prefer to concentrate on the problem of violence and if that means middle age gun owners or single teenage moms so be it. I do know the problem of men+violence is the problem and that's what needs to be addressed.
again....I have shown how your point and solution are dumb.....and yet you cling to them........
Please...think before you post...
You haven't shown anything and we don't even have a law yet. Violence is the problem and when it is addressed all the other problems go away.
And none of your laws addresses the violence.....you punish people who don't commit crimes or violence with guns...but the actual criminals....you ignore them...
Duh, my proposal addresses men+violence. No one needs to be punished for crimes of violence if you take away the biggest reason they are violent.