Liability
Locked Account.
* * * *
With each post you expose yourself as a mindless Ditto-Doper. Thank you.* * * *
No ma'am. Repeating your intentional lie still does nothing to support it.
You remain a lying moron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
* * * *
With each post you expose yourself as a mindless Ditto-Doper. Thank you.* * * *
seems to fit most of the n00bs from PMSNBCThis thread reminds me of the saying.
Beware of stupid people in large groups.
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: You remember how much crap, you remember how much abuse I, El Rushbo, took ... blah, blah blah
RUSH: The real unemployment rate is not 9.4%. If laid-off workers who have given up looking for new jobs or have settled for part-time work are included in the unemployment rate -- this is what's called U6 -- the total unemployment rate nationwide is 16.3%. If you add the people still looking for work and those who have given up, it's 16.3% unemployed. State-Run Media is trying to make this out to be some big successful day today.
In light of the tenor and tone of discourse favored by liberals all the time that President Bush was in Office, any complaint about Rush "lowering of the tone of the discussion" is just gonna have to get mocked as the rather hypocritical commentary it is. If some folks on the left would simply wake up a little bit, they'd probably have a CHANCE (at least) to see that while Rush does say some stuff for its shock value, he IS still being sarcastic and not literal.
As for Mark Levin, you are half right. He IS a brilliant man. But he is not even a tiny bit "wrong." He is absolutely right on the target. He is simply and flatly correct.
He does not ignore his legal training when he RIGHTLY objects to liberal judicial activists. And he doesn't contend that it would be "ok" if they were conservative activists, either.
What he says (at least in a boiled down version) is that Marbury overreached. There may be some implication in the Constitution that a Court has a duty to declare legislation void if it violates the Constitution. But Marbury went further than even that. Marbury says that it is the Court (in effect, ONLY the Court) which can make such determinations. That's not supported by anything said in (or validly inferrable from) the Constitution. In fact, it is NOT the Courts who say "what the law is."
We are taught about these things in our school days in a very different way than we ought to be taught. Maybe if we got a bit more honest historical context in our early schooling, some of us wouldn't find it so difficult in later life to challenge the errorneous myth that the SCOTUS is the only Constitutional Branch which may declare an Act to be in violation of the Constitution.
Just answerin'.
You're being a bit selective in your memory of incivility. Rush far pre-dated bush's presidency. In fact, he's been ranting for a very long time. The National Review called him the "leader of the opposition" to Bill Clinton in 1993. The incivility started then. His rants and rage helped drive an investigation that cost this country about ten times what we spent to investigate 9/11. I have called his type of vitriole the "rush limbaugh school of debate" since then. That is a far cry from honest consternation about the overstepping of our USSC in Bush v Gore. (the ultimate example of judicial activism). In that case, the court for the first time, interjected itself into a determination of election law which was and is the province of the highest court of the state.
I'm afraid that given our checks and balances, it IS only the Court that can determine if the legislature or executive has acted beyond the constitution. We have a common law system. That means we examine legislation, including the constitution, in light of many factors... Does the court always get it right? No. We have decisions like Plessy and Dred Scott, Korematsu.... overall, those things mostly get corrected over time. but we're a system of precedent...and the desire of certain true activists to change and ignore that system has to be called what it is.
ultimately, the court has to ask itself what the overall intent of the document is... and that's to assure the greatest level of individual liberty possible.... hence the court looking at concepts like the penumbra emanating from the bill of rights.
... but i digress... as i said, levin is certainly bright. but he's not intellectually honest, imo.
Yeah pull all the shit out of context you can dipstick and then make spurious claims.
None of which by the way have a damn thing to do with the argument being advanced in the piece at the beginning. And if you look at the monthly numbers from 2000 rather than just the yearly's you'll note that unemployment was beginning to rise again before Bush ever took office. Further Bush's first budget does not go on line until October of 2001. Which means essentially there is nothing he can do about the economy especially given a Democratically controlled senate that was stonewalling him at every turn.
No wonder your ed the cynic. Your head is so far up your freaking ass that all you can see every whcih way you look is shit.
Yeah pull all the shit out of context you can dipstick and then make spurious claims.
None of which by the way have a damn thing to do with the argument being advanced in the piece at the beginning. And if you look at the monthly numbers from 2000 rather than just the yearly's you'll note that unemployment was beginning to rise again before Bush ever took office. Further Bush's first budget does not go on line until October of 2001. Which means essentially there is nothing he can do about the economy especially given a Democratically controlled senate that was stonewalling him at every turn.
No wonder your ed the cynic. Your head is so far up your freaking ass that all you can see every whcih way you look is shit.
All Ditto-Nazis are pathological liars like their MessiahRushie!
The unemployment rate was 3.9 from Sept through Dec 2000 and ranged from 3.8% to 4.1% the whole year for a yearly average of 3.97%.
But like LieAbility, you will never admit the truth!
Jan 2000 4.0
Feb 2000 4.1
Mar 2000 4.0
Apr 2000 3.8
May 2000 4.0
Jun 2000 4.0
Jul 2000 4.0
Aug 2000 4.1
Sep 2000 3.9
Oct 2000 3.9
Nov 2000 3.9
Dec 2000 3.9
Yeah pull all the shit out of context you can dipstick and then make spurious claims.
None of which by the way have a damn thing to do with the argument being advanced in the piece at the beginning. And if you look at the monthly numbers from 2000 rather than just the yearly's you'll note that unemployment was beginning to rise again before Bush ever took office. Further Bush's first budget does not go on line until October of 2001. Which means essentially there is nothing he can do about the economy especially given a Democratically controlled senate that was stonewalling him at every turn.
No wonder your ed the cynic. Your head is so far up your freaking ass that all you can see every whcih way you look is shit.
All Ditto-Nazis are pathological liars like their MessiahRushie!
The unemployment rate was 3.9 from Sept through Dec 2000 and ranged from 3.8% to 4.1% the whole year for a yearly average of 3.97%.
But like LieAbility, you will never admit the truth!
Jan 2000 4.0
Feb 2000 4.1
Mar 2000 4.0
Apr 2000 3.8
May 2000 4.0
Jun 2000 4.0
Jul 2000 4.0
Aug 2000 4.1
Sep 2000 3.9
Oct 2000 3.9
Nov 2000 3.9
Dec 2000 3.9
EdTheCompulsiveHabitualLyingMoron claiming that anybody else in the universe is "a liar" is the height of irony!
All Ditto-Nazis are pathological liars like their MessiahRushie!
The unemployment rate was 3.9 from Sept through Dec 2000 and ranged from 3.8% to 4.1% the whole year for a yearly average of 3.97%.
But like LieAbility, you will never admit the truth!
Jan 2000 4.0
Feb 2000 4.1
Mar 2000 4.0
Apr 2000 3.8
May 2000 4.0
Jun 2000 4.0
Jul 2000 4.0
Aug 2000 4.1
Sep 2000 3.9
Oct 2000 3.9
Nov 2000 3.9
Dec 2000 3.9
EdTheCompulsiveHabitualLyingMoron claiming that anybody else in the universe is "a liar" is the height of irony!
Well, just explain exactly how those monthly numbers DON'T make a liar out of your Fellow Traveler!!!!
it might have helped had he provided a source linkEdTheCompulsiveHabitualLyingMoron claiming that anybody else in the universe is "a liar" is the height of irony!
Well, just explain exactly how those monthly numbers DON'T make a liar out of your Fellow Traveler!!!!
You once again ASSume (and lie) by claiming (dishonestly as always) that I am a dittohead.
Secondly, why on Earth would you accept government figures?
There are liars, Damn Lairs, GOD-Damn Liars, Statisticians and
You -- in that order.
EdtheLyingMassiveMoron is orders of magnitude a more complusive liar than anybody he would EVER call a liar.
Baghdad Bob laughs you you, Ed.
it might have helped had he provided a source linkWell, just explain exactly how those monthly numbers DON'T make a liar out of your Fellow Traveler!!!!
You once again ASSume (and lie) by claiming (dishonestly as always) that I am a dittohead.
Secondly, why on Earth would you accept government figures?
There are liars, Damn Lairs, GOD-Damn Liars, Statisticians and
You -- in that order.
EdtheLyingMassiveMoron is orders of magnitude a more complusive liar than anybody he would EVER call a liar.
Baghdad Bob laughs you you, Ed.
EdTheCompulsiveHabitualLyingMoron claiming that anybody else in the universe is "a liar" is the height of irony!
Well, just explain exactly how those monthly numbers DON'T make a liar out of your Fellow Traveler!!!!
You once again ASSume (and lie) by claiming (dishonestly as always) that I am a dittohead.
Secondly, why on Earth would you accept government figures?
There are liars, Damn Lairs, GOD-Damn Liars, Statisticians and
You -- in that order.
EdtheLyingMassiveMoron is orders of magnitude a more complusive liar than anybody he would EVER call a liar.
Baghdad Bob laughs you you, Ed.
EdTheCompulsiveHabitualLyingMoron claiming that anybody else in the universe is "a liar" is the height of irony!
Well, just explain exactly how those monthly numbers DON'T make a liar out of your Fellow Traveler!!!!
You once again ASSume (and lie) by claiming (dishonestly as always) that I am a dittohead.
Secondly, why on Earth would you accept government figures?
There are liars, Damn Lairs, GOD-Damn Liars, Statisticians and
You -- in that order.
EdtheLyingMassiveMoron is orders of magnitude a more complusive liar than anybody he would EVER call a liar.
Baghdad Bob laughs you you, Ed.
it might have helped had he provided a source linkYou once again ASSume (and lie) by claiming (dishonestly as always) that I am a dittohead.
Secondly, why on Earth would you accept government figures?
There are liars, Damn Lairs, GOD-Damn Liars, Statisticians and
You -- in that order.
EdtheLyingMassiveMoron is orders of magnitude a more complusive liar than anybody he would EVER call a liar.
Baghdad Bob laughs you you, Ed.
First of all, you should know by now I ALWAYS have links.
Second, it never makes a difference to CON$ anyway, they reject all links that provide data they don't like.
Prove me wrong and admit my numbers are accurate.
Monthly U.S. Unemployment Rate, % source data - Swivel