talk about insider information ..

[Lewdog]

And despite what you are saying now, your fallow Trump supporters have already said it is ok for him to do it because Clinton and Obama have done it.

I personally have not seen anyone say that - perhaps I just missed it. THAT, however, as WE both know is NOT RIGHT. That's partisan / 'playground' BS!

We have been in one of the biggest, most lawless eras in this nation's history, where no one is held accountable and everything has been 'justifiable'. That HAS to end...on BOTH sides!

No person or party is to big to jail. Our Constitutional Rights, however, must be protected, and people must be considered 'Innocent until proven Guilty' - EVERYONE.

For MONTHS on this board liberals screamed 'Hillary isn't guilty because there has been no conviction' and suddenly liberals want to declare trump guilty of something before it even happens, let alone any criminal charges are filed and he is convicted?

That's some of the most hypocritical bullshit to ever be spewed by anyone!

Did I miss Trump's conviction for Insider Trading? No? Then according to Liberals, Trump is innocent of all wrong-doing.

It's said by Trump supporters in every single thread on this board.

But but but Clinton!!!!!!!!!!

But but but Obama!!!!!!!!!

Over and over and over. For you to say you haven't seen it, you're being a flat out liar.

 

[Lewdog]

Again, under Republican views, it will NEVER be "proven" because circumstantial evidence that would prove anyone else guilty, would not be enough to prove Trump guilty. Trump will never tell on himself, and his kids won't tell on him either.

1. That is your opinion.

2. If a criminal is never prosecuted it is not the criminal's fault that the prosecutor failed to do his job. Don't try to punish the criminal for the prosecutor's failure / lack of evidence.

3. 'Innocent until proven guilty' is a Constitutional Right that is not negotiable, even if Liberals SWEAR Trump has already violated Insider Trading rules just for meeting with the heads of tech industry.

No, it isn't my opinion. It's fact, and has been repeated an indescribable amount of times on this forum.

Trump is more than likely already guilty of insider trading just from his comments on Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

 

[easyt65]

Trump is more than likely already guilty of insider trading just from his comments on Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

Please provide the evidence of such crimes.

Oh wait, you have none, which explains your comment, 'more than likely'.

Thanks for answering my question - you do NOT believe citizens are innocent until proven guilty, at least not Conservatives.

 

[easyt65]

Over and over and over. For you to say you haven't seen it, you're being a flat out liar.

I have seen people say "but Clinton...but Obama' but I have not seen anyone say 'It is ok for trump to break the law because others have done so'. AS I HAVE SAID ALREADY, I DISAGREE WITH THAT STATEMENT.

 

[Lewdog]

Trump is more than likely already guilty of insider trading just from his comments on Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

Please provide the evidence of such crimes.

Oh wait, you have none, which explains your comment, 'more than likely'.

Thanks for answering my question - you do NOT believe citizens are innocent until proven guilty, at least not Conservatives.

No, because circumstantial evidence isn't good enough... though some of you guys say it is until it is provided for you.

We can't make comments about Trump's holdings because well... he won't divulge them. Kind of convenient right?

 

[Siete]

RW's should charge admission for the stupidity show.

 

[Lewdog]

Over and over and over. For you to say you haven't seen it, you're being a flat out liar.

I have seen people say "but Clinton...but Obama' but I have not seen anyone say 'It is ok for trump to break the law because others have done so'. AS I HAVE SAID ALREADY, I DISAGREE WITH THAT STATEMENT.

Do you understand what the word "but" means? How can they say "but" if they aren't accepting the fact of Trump's actions? Derp derp derp.

 

[easyt65]

Lew, again, do you believe that Americans are 'Innocent until proven guilty' and that our constitutional Right to a fair trial must be protected?

 

[Siete]

Lew, again, do you believe that Americans are 'Innocent until proven guilty' and that our constitutional Right to a fair trial must be protected?

deflection ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


ssdd

 

[Lewdog]

Lew, again, do you believe that Americans are 'Innocent until proven guilty' and that our constitutional Right to a fair trial must be protected?

Does Trump lie?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

'Trump WILL engage in Inside Trading because he is meeting with Tech Industry Leaders"...

Yeah, uh-huh...

Brain tests at the age of THREE can predict a child's future | Daily Mail Online

Wasn't this the rough basis for some FICTIONAL Tom Cruise Sci-Fi movie?

Van Damn, Time Cop

No dumbass, it was Minority Report with Tom Cruise.

Despite the attitude, Lew is right. It was Minority Report.

My point was the moronic left are acting like the time cops claiming what Trump will do in the future and are desperately trying to stop it before it happens.

 

[Lewdog]

'Trump WILL engage in Inside Trading because he is meeting with Tech Industry Leaders"...

Yeah, uh-huh...

Brain tests at the age of THREE can predict a child's future | Daily Mail Online

Wasn't this the rough basis for some FICTIONAL Tom Cruise Sci-Fi movie?

Van Damn, Time Cop

No dumbass, it was Minority Report with Tom Cruise.

Despite the attitude, Lew is right. It was Minority Report.

My point was the moronic left are acting like the time cops claiming what Trump will do in the future and are desperately trying to stop it before it happens.

Look, you were wrong. Just admit it and shut up. Damn... you can't even admit it when you get a movie wrong.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

'Trump WILL engage in Inside Trading because he is meeting with Tech Industry Leaders"...

Yeah, uh-huh...

Brain tests at the age of THREE can predict a child's future | Daily Mail Online

Wasn't this the rough basis for some FICTIONAL Tom Cruise Sci-Fi movie?

Van Damn, Time Cop

No dumbass, it was Minority Report with Tom Cruise.

Despite the attitude, Lew is right. It was Minority Report.

My point was the moronic left are acting like the time cops claiming what Trump will do in the future and are desperately trying to stop it before it happens.

Look, you were wrong. Just admit it and shut up. Damn... you can't even admit it when you get a movie wrong.

I admit when I'm wrong all the time fuck face. And I am the one who brought up time travel movies in this thread to begin with so how the fuck am I wrong about what I originally referred to?

 

[Lewdog]

Van Damn, Time Cop

No dumbass, it was Minority Report with Tom Cruise.

Despite the attitude, Lew is right. It was Minority Report.

My point was the moronic left are acting like the time cops claiming what Trump will do in the future and are desperately trying to stop it before it happens.

Look, you were wrong. Just admit it and shut up. Damn... you can't even admit it when you get a movie wrong.

I admit when I'm wrong all the time fuck face. And I am the one who brought up time travel movies in this thread to begin with so how the fuck am I wrong about what I originally referred to?

Because it wasn't about what you originally said... so now admit you were wrong. Do it! Do it!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

No dumbass, it was Minority Report with Tom Cruise.

Despite the attitude, Lew is right. It was Minority Report.

My point was the moronic left are acting like the time cops claiming what Trump will do in the future and are desperately trying to stop it before it happens.

Look, you were wrong. Just admit it and shut up. Damn... you can't even admit it when you get a movie wrong.

I admit when I'm wrong all the time fuck face. And I am the one who brought up time travel movies in this thread to begin with so how the fuck am I wrong about what I originally referred to?

Because it wasn't about what you originally said... so now admit you were wrong. Do it! Do it!

How bout you blow me? Seems more appropriate for the situation

 

[Lewdog]

Despite the attitude, Lew is right. It was Minority Report.

My point was the moronic left are acting like the time cops claiming what Trump will do in the future and are desperately trying to stop it before it happens.

Look, you were wrong. Just admit it and shut up. Damn... you can't even admit it when you get a movie wrong.

I admit when I'm wrong all the time fuck face. And I am the one who brought up time travel movies in this thread to begin with so how the fuck am I wrong about what I originally referred to?

Because it wasn't about what you originally said... so now admit you were wrong. Do it! Do it!

How bout you blow me? Seems more appropriate for the situation

Oh, did you learn those homosexual tendencies in prison?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

My point was the moronic left are acting like the time cops claiming what Trump will do in the future and are desperately trying to stop it before it happens.

Look, you were wrong. Just admit it and shut up. Damn... you can't even admit it when you get a movie wrong.

I admit when I'm wrong all the time fuck face. And I am the one who brought up time travel movies in this thread to begin with so how the fuck am I wrong about what I originally referred to?

Because it wasn't about what you originally said... so now admit you were wrong. Do it! Do it!

How bout you blow me? Seems more appropriate for the situation

Oh, did you learn those homosexual tendencies in prison?

Are you suggesting that the left isn't tolerant of faggots? Are you using what you perceive someone's sexuality to be as a weapon? Are you not practicing what you preach?

 

[Lewdog]

Look, you were wrong. Just admit it and shut up. Damn... you can't even admit it when you get a movie wrong.

I admit when I'm wrong all the time fuck face. And I am the one who brought up time travel movies in this thread to begin with so how the fuck am I wrong about what I originally referred to?

Because it wasn't about what you originally said... so now admit you were wrong. Do it! Do it!

How bout you blow me? Seems more appropriate for the situation

Oh, did you learn those homosexual tendencies in prison?

Are you suggesting that the left isn't tolerant of faggots? Are you using what you perceive someone's sexuality to be as a weapon? Are you not practicing what you preach?

No, I'm saying you got turned out while locked up.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I admit when I'm wrong all the time fuck face. And I am the one who brought up time travel movies in this thread to begin with so how the fuck am I wrong about what I originally referred to?

Because it wasn't about what you originally said... so now admit you were wrong. Do it! Do it!

How bout you blow me? Seems more appropriate for the situation

Oh, did you learn those homosexual tendencies in prison?

Are you suggesting that the left isn't tolerant of faggots? Are you using what you perceive someone's sexuality to be as a weapon? Are you not practicing what you preach?

No, I'm saying you got turned out while locked up.

Bend over, let's find out if your right

 

[buckeye45_73]

So what is the point of this thread?
Hes not going to give up his family business, and others havent as well....


GTF over it!!!!!!!

There is no point to this thread. I busted it with my first post then humiliated the op with follow up posts. He has NO clue what he's talking about.

one more time just for you and the rest of the idiots .....


today at the table Intel says the have a state of the art processor coming out in 2018 that will revolutionize laptops ... (information)

mid 2017 Trump tells one of his kids Intel might be worth buying (information)


get it dumbasses?

No shit and you think that doesnt happen already?

You never cared about it before. Its still better than the Clinton Foundation, you defended

Again.. do you guys have any type of defense for wrong doing other than, "WELL THEY DID IT!"

Trump ran as a candidate that was supposed to be anti-establishment, and "drain the swamp."

Now when he does stuff that is exactly like others have in the past... your fucking defense is..."WELL THEY DID IT!"

Do you not see how fucking stupid that is?

the miserable asshats yammer about how bad Clinton is, and its ok to be just like her ..




amazing huh?

Nope all politicians do that, you people.are.jusr making yourselves look dumber and dumber.

You cant refute my point



John kerry
Herb kohl
Penny pritzker
Hillary Clinton

Ooh i forgot about Jay Rockerfeller

Here are a.few.others
More Democrats than Republicans Sit on 10 Richest Members of Congress List

Stop fighting this battle, ill just kick your ass everytime