Ted Cruz Introduces Bills to Stop Gay Marriage

[Politico]

There is no comparison to slavery. Slaves didn't choose to be slaves. Peter puffers choose to puff Peter

-Geaux

This is true.

It is? Man....you are so smart!

Yes I am thank you.

 

[LoneLaugher]

There is no comparison to slavery. Slaves didn't choose to be slaves. Peter puffers choose to puff Peter

-Geaux

This is true.

It is? Man....you are so smart!

Yes I am thank you.

Nobody doubts it bro. Anyone who thinks that people choose to be gay is working at a very high level of intellect. The evidence is squarely against you.....but your brilliance makes evidence meaningless. We bow to you.

 

[G.T.]

Another wedge issue loss for the Conservatives.

 

[G.T.]

There is no comparison to slavery. Slaves didn't choose to be slaves. Peter puffers choose to puff Peter

-Geaux

This is true.

It is? Man....you are so smart!

Yes I am thank you.

Nobody doubts it bro. Anyone who thinks that people choose to be gay is working at a very high level of intellect. The evidence is squarely against you.....but your brilliance makes evidence meaningless. We bow to you.

The "its a choice" people are easily debunked.

The only way they can even imagine its a choice is if they can voluntarily get a boner for the same sex.

I cannot do that. Ipso facto its clear to me that sexual attraction is not a choice.

If it is, for them, sadly they need to be told: theyre bisexual.

 

[Politico]

There is no comparison to slavery. Slaves didn't choose to be slaves. Peter puffers choose to puff Peter

-Geaux

This is true.

It is? Man....you are so smart!

Yes I am thank you.

Nobody doubts it bro. Anyone who thinks that people choose to be gay is working at a very high level of intellect. The evidence is squarely against you.....but your brilliance makes evidence meaningless. We bow to you.

As you should.

 

[Mac1958]

The GOP should run Cruz and whomever he feels would be the most conservative and appropriate running mate for him. Palin, maybe?

That way there can be no doubt about whether their theory - that strict, pure conservatism would win - can finally be tested once and for all.

Let's get this over with.

.

 

[Stephanie]

Well as we see folks what their sleazy dirty politics is going to be for this election

Homosexual homosexual homosexual. because you know that's all that is on the majority of the peoples mind in this country...the hell with the economy, jobs, immigration, etc

People should be pissed at Bloomberg for this misleading and dishonest TITLE with that article. But that's how the left propaganda media flies in this country...

 

[G.T.]

Well as we see folks what their sleazy dirty politics is going to be for this election

Homosexual homosexual homosexual. because you know that's all that is on the majority of the peoples mind in this country...the hell with the economy, jobs, immigration, etc

People should be pissed at Bloomberg for this misleading and dishonest TITLE with that article. But that's how the left propaganda media flies in this country...

So youre mad at Cruz for wasting time on this bill, is what youre saying?

Youre too dumb to realize what youre saying.

 

[LoneLaugher]

The GOP should run Cruz and whomever he feels would be the most conservative and appropriate running mate for him. Palin, maybe?

That way there can be no doubt about whether their theory - that strict, pure conservatism would win - can finally be tested once and for all.

Let's get this over with.

.

Spoken like a true circus fan.

 

[Stephanie]

You want THESE people running your country? AND they have the nerve to put down others

SNIP:
Tolerant Liberals Calling For Boycott Of Gay Businessman Who Hosted Reception For Ted Cruz…




So loving and open-minded…

Via Hot Air:

all of it here;
Tolerant Liberals Calling For Boycott Of Gay Businessman Who Hosted Reception For Ted Cruz Weasel Zippers

 

[G.T.]

You want THESE people running your country? AND they have the nerve to put down others

SNIP:
Tolerant Liberals Calling For Boycott Of Gay Businessman Who Hosted Reception For Ted Cruz…




So loving and open-minded…

Via Hot Air:

all of it here;
Tolerant Liberals Calling For Boycott Of Gay Businessman Who Hosted Reception For Ted Cruz Weasel Zippers

This is yet another example of your level.of retardation, as if you didnt already provide enough.

Last post: gay issue doesnt matter, theres way more important issues.
This post: people who support gay like this should NOT be running our Country.


Your ability to out do yourself with your levels upon levels of stupidity is amazing.

 

[Geaux4it]

There is no comparison to slavery. Slaves didn't choose to be slaves. Peter puffers choose to puff Peter

-Geaux

This is true.

It is? Man....you are so smart!

Yes I am thank you.

Nobody doubts it bro. Anyone who thinks that people choose to be gay is working at a very high level of intellect. The evidence is squarely against you.....but your brilliance makes evidence meaningless. We bow to you.

Of course you bow. Leftist like yourself, and Obama for that matter, don't mind bowing. Wow, that's neat

-Geaux

 

[LoneLaugher]

There is no comparison to slavery. Slaves didn't choose to be slaves. Peter puffers choose to puff Peter

-Geaux

This is true.

It is? Man....you are so smart!

Yes I am thank you.

Nobody doubts it bro. Anyone who thinks that people choose to be gay is working at a very high level of intellect. The evidence is squarely against you.....but your brilliance makes evidence meaningless. We bow to you.

Of course you bow. Leftist like yourself, and Obama for that matter, don't mind bowing. Wow, that's neat

-Geaux

Yes.....low hanging fruit never goes unpicked when idiots like you are around. Remember, nutter, there is little satisfaction in always going for the easy joke. Try harder.

By the way....there is an "S" at the end of "leftist" when speaking about more than one person. You fucking imbecile.

 

[zeke]

Is there any dog whistle that Ted will not blow when he is courting those crazy ass right wingers who love him so?
What will the next dog whistle be? He has already trotted out his gay hate. What could ole Canadian Ted do next?
Maybe he could do a reading of Green Eggs and Ham again. That was so cute.

 

[Geaux4it]

Well, where were we now?

-Geaux
-------------------------------

10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed

1. It Is Not Marriage

Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.

2. It Violates Natural Law

Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.

Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.

Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother

It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle

In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants.

Civil laws are structuring principles of man's life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.

Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right

Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.

Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.

10 Reasons Why Homosexual Marriage is Harmful and Must be Opposed

 

[Redfish]

Ted Cruz Introduces Bills to Stop Gay Marriage
Bloomberg | 4/23/2015 | Heidi Prszbyla


Bloomberg Title and Link Only
Ted Cruz Introduces Bills to Stop Gay Marriage - Bloomberg Politics
Sub-Heading-- "The Texas senator wants to establish a constitutional amendment that protects states that define marriage as being between a man and a woman from legal action. "

---
Cruz Is going to fight the gays!

its called having principles and being willing to stand up for them. Something not a single dem can or will do.

Bigotry is a "principle" ....smooth!

Sorry, dude. But the bigotry here is yours. You are bigoted against anyone who does not share your far left ideas of how our society should operate. YOU ARE THE BIGOT.

 

[Stephanie]

Ted Cruz Introduces Bills to Stop Gay Marriage
Bloomberg | 4/23/2015 | Heidi Prszbyla


Bloomberg Title and Link Only
Ted Cruz Introduces Bills to Stop Gay Marriage - Bloomberg Politics
Sub-Heading-- "The Texas senator wants to establish a constitutional amendment that protects states that define marriage as being between a man and a woman from legal action. "

---
Cruz Is going to fight the gays!

its called having principles and being willing to stand up for them. Something not a single dem can or will do.

Bigotry is a "principle" ....smooth!

Sorry, dude. But the bigotry here is yours. You are bigoted against anyone who does not share your far left ideas of how our society should operate. YOU ARE THE BIGOT.

That sums up all the people from the left/libs/dem party. Also if you don't bow down to them they'll call you all kinds of names. because they are so high and mighty they feel it's THEIR RIGHT. all I see them as is intolerant bullies, which you see in this thread

 

[Geaux4it]

Ted Cruz Introduces Bills to Stop Gay Marriage
Bloomberg | 4/23/2015 | Heidi Prszbyla


Bloomberg Title and Link Only
Ted Cruz Introduces Bills to Stop Gay Marriage - Bloomberg Politics
Sub-Heading-- "The Texas senator wants to establish a constitutional amendment that protects states that define marriage as being between a man and a woman from legal action. "

---
Cruz Is going to fight the gays!

its called having principles and being willing to stand up for them. Something not a single dem can or will do.

Bigotry is a "principle" ....smooth!

Sorry, dude. But the bigotry here is yours. You are bigoted against anyone who does not share your far left ideas of how our society should operate. YOU ARE THE BIGOT.

That sums up all the people from the left/libs/dem party. Also if you don't bow down to them they'll call you all kinds of names. because they are so high and mighty they feel it's THEIR RIGHT. all I see them as is intolerant bullies, which you see in this thread

They're mostly all liars as they play the bleeding heart role. They could give a chit about the common man.

-Geaux

 

[mdk]

Well, where were we now?

-Geaux
-------------------------------

10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed

1. It Is Not Marriage

Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.

2. It Violates Natural Law

Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.

Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.

Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother

It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle

In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants.

Civil laws are structuring principles of man's life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.

Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right

Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.

Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.

10 Reasons Why Homosexual Marriage is Harmful and Must be Opposed

"It offends God" isn't exactly a very compelling legal argument.

 

[Mr Natural]

Don't these people have anything better to do with their time?