Actually, that is a rather thoughtful observation. Bi sexual people might actually have a case if they were to pursue it. But that is not a state interest. It is a bi sexual interest that has yet to be raised. The courts were not compelled to ensure that everyoneis accomodated when the question of bisexual accomodation and plural marriage was not before the court. So there is still no compelling state interest that should delay same sex marriage untill the issue of bisexuality is raised and resolved. But, nice try
Hey, I didn’t want the change in the first place as I saw what opening the door would create.
The state now has an interest to provide accommodation to all sexualities.
It’s kind of bigoted to argue the interest does not exist.