XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,580
- 10,498
- 435
At the 1:22 mark on the video...Colin Noir is a lawyer...
He doesn't sound very optimistic about it.
I expect him to be in violation of this law.
If you look at the law you will see that it is so vague that any lawyer could drive a truck through it. Kyle has a dream team legal representation. Just ask Nick Sandmann how good they are. I contributed to his defense yesterday. All Americans should.
If he is somehow guilty of possessing a gun that he should have been carrying because of his age that "crime" sure as hell ain't murder. The killing of the Communists was clear cut self defense. He never should have been charge. The Moon Bat DA is an asshole for charging him. Shame on her!
What's vague about it? The law seems perfectly clear on that infraction. "Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor."
"that 'crime' sure as hell ain't murder"
Who said a class A misdemeanor is murder? Of course it's not the same thing. I think he's going to get a relatively light sentence of 9 months.
most likely just a fine and a slap on the wrist,,,
and then he can sue the city for allowing violent riots to happen unopposed,,,
"(a) For a Class A misdemeanor, a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 9 months, or both."
Wisconsin Legislature: 939.51
docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
There's nothing to sue over. He broke the law and that's what the punishment is.
you can sue for anything,,and in his case he has a long list of options including the MSM,,
He could. But it would be a waste of time and resources against the city. He has no case against them.
You'd have to point to something specific from the MSM for me to form an opinion.
theyve lied constantly about the facts of the case,,,,
Which facts did they lie about?
that he was there to shoot protesters is one of them,,,not to mention the whole chain of events,,,
Can you site that?
why waste my time AGAIN all you will do is deny and claim a biased source,,
your minds are made up regardless of the proof proving you wrong,,,
You either have evidence or you don't. Kind of hard to sue someone and win the lawsuit without evidence.
I'm not the one suing,,,
Obviously you're not the one suing. You're the one claiming that he should sue the MSM.
If he doesn't have evidence, then it would be a waste of time and resources for him to do so. But sure, he can go ahead and sue for any ridiculous thing.