Teen arrested for defending him self against the mob!

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

Yup. That is so very true.
Really? We had guns as kids. Even took them to school LEGALLY

I remember growing up in Montana, and during hunting season there were lots of kids who had rifles in the gun racks in their trucks. But, the school only allowed it during hunting season, and the guns had to stay inside the vehicle while on school grounds. And yeah, I've seen a couple of them bag a deer on their way into school (lots of open prairie and grassland around where I grew up). But then again, that was back in the mid 70's to early 80's.

I would have to read up on their laws, but I think carrying a loaded firearm in public is different than carrying an empty gun on a gun rack. In our state, if you do not have a CCW, the ammo has to be separate (out of arms reach) from your weapon. The gun goes in your glove compartment and ammo in the trunk of your car.

Just doing a web search looks like you might be right. It’s illegal to open carry a firearm under age 18. If that’s the case, he may lose his ability to claim self defense as he was committing a crime.
What crime would that be? The crime of self defense?

Did you read my post? It looks like it might be illegal to open carry a firearm under 18. Not to mention he was breaking curfew.
So? Are laws applying to the rioters who also had guns and were out past curfew? Or just this guy?

Obviously the issue here is that this kid killed 2 people and almost killed a third. If any of the other rioters killed people, I expect the same laws to apply.
except for this kid did it to protect himself and the rioters are trying to hurt others,,,
Then why was he charged with homicide?
 
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:
He looks like one of those INCEL characters.

You know, I kinda thought the same thing. Especially when I saw that he was wearing Crocs. What kind of a gun owner would have a picture of them with their gun, wearing the most pussified type of footwear?

Quick question for you gun owners out there, would you be willing to have your picture taken of you holding your gun and wearing Crocs? Better question still, would any of you guys even own Crocs?

Obviously by my avatar, I have no problem being photoed with my gun. :auiqs.jpg:

Whether or not you would have a picture taken with your gun wasn't quite the question. The question is, would you have that picture taken while wearing Crocs? The follow up question to that was how many of you gun owners actually own Crocs?

That I couldn't tell you. To be totally honest, I didn't know what crocs were until this topic. This is a kid after all. When I was a kid, I wore an army jacket, tie died tee shirts, bell bottom jeans, and had hair down to my shoulders. my mother made me an elastic band for my bike to tie up my bell bottoms because they kept getting caught between the bike chain and sprockets. When the family breaks out the photo album and I see pictures of myself back then, all I can think is OMG, WTF was I thinking? LOL.

That was an issue long after bell bottom jeans. Unless you were a skate rat with skin tight jeans*

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,

Gun rights have nothing to do with economic policy....


There are two axis. Social and economic

Actual economic marxists don't exist in america. And social marxists don't either in any numbers

To be a social marxist you'd need to support chinese style authoritarianism. Wanting state enforced equal outcomes for all demographics isn't enough.
dont believe everything you read on the internet,,that compass is wrong in this country,,,

What?

It's a political scale, it's a bit arbitrary. Social and economic policy overlap.

Oobviously if you have no currency and the state controls everything in an economic sense. Your personal liberty is going to be severely limited depending on how they do that.

But to call it wrong is absurd. It's a universal scale specifically trying to remove a variable like American culture so you don't have some twisted view where you think NYT or MSNBC employees are commies working for massive corporations.

Basically all Americans fall at the socially libertarian bottom half of the scale.


it has no meaning in this country under our constitution,,,

our scale is a straight line with total government on the left and anarchy on the right with the constitution in the middle,,,


under our constitution the economy is no business of the federal government,,,

It's a political science tool. No shit....?

It's for objectively mapping where you are on the scale.

To be a marxist you need to be very far to the left on the scale. Which basically no one is


how can you be far left on a circular scale???

Why the fuck would you use a circular scale? lol

Do you not understand how graphing works?

Just because you don't visualize it, doesn't mean it's not still a square graph with 2 axis.....You are not prepared to have this conversation. Hahaha


youre the one that used it not me,,what shape do you think a compass is??

read your links next time,,,

Do you imagine compasses have to be a circle?

A compass just shows true north bud. Or in this case true political alignment

Whooosh


like I said,,,read your link next time,,,

uhhhh huh

tell me more about the imaginary marxists you giant pussy


why are you changing the subject???

The subject is exactly the same

The reason i posted the compass in the first place was to clarify to you what a marxist is

And how absurd your use of the word is

Act like you're some peasant who has never heard of the discipline of political science.

Why are you so fucking stupid? Did your mother drink? My god


HUH???
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

Yup. That is so very true.
Really? We had guns as kids. Even took them to school LEGALLY

I remember growing up in Montana, and during hunting season there were lots of kids who had rifles in the gun racks in their trucks. But, the school only allowed it during hunting season, and the guns had to stay inside the vehicle while on school grounds. And yeah, I've seen a couple of them bag a deer on their way into school (lots of open prairie and grassland around where I grew up). But then again, that was back in the mid 70's to early 80's.

I would have to read up on their laws, but I think carrying a loaded firearm in public is different than carrying an empty gun on a gun rack. In our state, if you do not have a CCW, the ammo has to be separate (out of arms reach) from your weapon. The gun goes in your glove compartment and ammo in the trunk of your car.

Just doing a web search looks like you might be right. It’s illegal to open carry a firearm under age 18. If that’s the case, he may lose his ability to claim self defense as he was committing a crime.
What crime would that be? The crime of self defense?

Did you read my post? It looks like it might be illegal to open carry a firearm under 18. Not to mention he was breaking curfew.
So? Are laws applying to the rioters who also had guns and were out past curfew? Or just this guy?

Obviously the issue here is that this kid killed 2 people and almost killed a third. If any of the other rioters killed people, I expect the same laws to apply.
I guarantee you I'd never convict him in a jury.................

You don't care that these people are terrorizing the neighborhood and looting and burning..............

The kid was trying to stop them from doing it.............they chased him.......and the guy who got shot in the arm had a gun and was about to shoot him.

Oh well...................I no longer care about these looters............I think a MEU should be sent there and clean fucking house.

But that is me because I support the right of people to protect themselves and their property..........you obviously don't.
 
Turns out our fresh faced murderer is a huge fan of Trump. That should make him real popular in prison.

 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

Yup. That is so very true.
Really? We had guns as kids. Even took them to school LEGALLY

I remember growing up in Montana, and during hunting season there were lots of kids who had rifles in the gun racks in their trucks. But, the school only allowed it during hunting season, and the guns had to stay inside the vehicle while on school grounds. And yeah, I've seen a couple of them bag a deer on their way into school (lots of open prairie and grassland around where I grew up). But then again, that was back in the mid 70's to early 80's.

I would have to read up on their laws, but I think carrying a loaded firearm in public is different than carrying an empty gun on a gun rack. In our state, if you do not have a CCW, the ammo has to be separate (out of arms reach) from your weapon. The gun goes in your glove compartment and ammo in the trunk of your car.

Just doing a web search looks like you might be right. It’s illegal to open carry a firearm under age 18. If that’s the case, he may lose his ability to claim self defense as he was committing a crime.
What crime would that be? The crime of self defense?

Did you read my post? It looks like it might be illegal to open carry a firearm under 18. Not to mention he was breaking curfew.
So? Are laws applying to the rioters who also had guns and were out past curfew? Or just this guy?

Obviously the issue here is that this kid killed 2 people and almost killed a third. If any of the other rioters killed people, I expect the same laws to apply.
except for this kid did it to protect himself and the rioters are trying to hurt others,,,
Then why was he charged with homicide?
Dem DA Dem town probably..........

A jury of normal people will never convict him..............
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

Yup. That is so very true.
Really? We had guns as kids. Even took them to school LEGALLY

I remember growing up in Montana, and during hunting season there were lots of kids who had rifles in the gun racks in their trucks. But, the school only allowed it during hunting season, and the guns had to stay inside the vehicle while on school grounds. And yeah, I've seen a couple of them bag a deer on their way into school (lots of open prairie and grassland around where I grew up). But then again, that was back in the mid 70's to early 80's.

I would have to read up on their laws, but I think carrying a loaded firearm in public is different than carrying an empty gun on a gun rack. In our state, if you do not have a CCW, the ammo has to be separate (out of arms reach) from your weapon. The gun goes in your glove compartment and ammo in the trunk of your car.

Just doing a web search looks like you might be right. It’s illegal to open carry a firearm under age 18. If that’s the case, he may lose his ability to claim self defense as he was committing a crime.
What crime would that be? The crime of self defense?

Did you read my post? It looks like it might be illegal to open carry a firearm under 18. Not to mention he was breaking curfew.
So? Are laws applying to the rioters who also had guns and were out past curfew? Or just this guy?

Obviously the issue here is that this kid killed 2 people and almost killed a third. If any of the other rioters killed people, I expect the same laws to apply.
except for this kid did it to protect himself and the rioters are trying to hurt others,,,
Then why was he charged with homicide?
so youve never heard of charges being dropped when its revealed it happened different,,,

why arent you talking about how he was on his back being attacked by [people with weapons,,
I saw some pictures the guy that got shot in the arm had a gun,,waiting for more information on that one
 
Turns out our fresh faced murderer is a huge fan of Trump. That should make him real popular in prison.

and the guy that tried to kill the GOP baseball players was a bernie fan,,,

whats your point??
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

lol if only you applied this logic to BLM and antifa

Hahahaha

Wow surprise it's almost like there is no national organizatino for any of this shit

Could poll the "members" and less than 5% could even name a single leader in the movement
The people marching for blm don't know shit about that which they support. 90% of the protesters, rioters, looters, arsonists don't give two shits about blacks. If they did they would have been in the inner cities decades ago trying to stop the genocide.

It's as vague as hope and change old man

Just like militia is a vague term

Why you so easily see the nuance with teh white kid but don't with the others I have no idea.

90% lol whole country would be burning not enough TV's to go around
Because ONE WHITE KID =/= thousands of people looting, burning & murdering.

No that makes it easier to see the nuance.

There are thousands lol of course they don't all think the same thing

God damn old man

The reason you see nuance with the dumbass white trash is because you understand them. While the white liberal white kids and certanily blacks you don't get. You stupid old sack of shit.
 
Turns out our fresh faced murderer is a huge fan of Trump. That should make him real popular in prison.

So what? Does your political affiliation negate self protection? Can only democrats be safe from prosecution?
 
The local police are in Kenosha, the sheriff's depts from other various cities and towns are in Kenosha,

Along with the federal govts FBI are in Kenosha, the ATF are in Kenosha, the US Marshalls are in Kenosha

The vigilantes are not needed, and have made it worse.


where were the cops when that kid was attacked?
 
The local police are in Kenosha, the sheriff's depts from other various cities and towns are in Kenosha,

Along with the federal govts FBI are in Kenosha, the ATF are in Kenosha, the US Marshalls are in Kenosha

The vigilantes are not needed, and have made it worse.
How have vigilantes made it worse? Also, are there more than just this kid? If so, give me a link to those vids. I hope they are as entertaining as this one.
Heard on the news, social media had a call out for all "patriots" to go to Kenosha.....
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

Yup. That is so very true.
Really? We had guns as kids. Even took them to school LEGALLY

I remember growing up in Montana, and during hunting season there were lots of kids who had rifles in the gun racks in their trucks. But, the school only allowed it during hunting season, and the guns had to stay inside the vehicle while on school grounds. And yeah, I've seen a couple of them bag a deer on their way into school (lots of open prairie and grassland around where I grew up). But then again, that was back in the mid 70's to early 80's.

I would have to read up on their laws, but I think carrying a loaded firearm in public is different than carrying an empty gun on a gun rack. In our state, if you do not have a CCW, the ammo has to be separate (out of arms reach) from your weapon. The gun goes in your glove compartment and ammo in the trunk of your car.

Just doing a web search looks like you might be right. It’s illegal to open carry a firearm under age 18. If that’s the case, he may lose his ability to claim self defense as he was committing a crime.
What crime would that be? The crime of self defense?

Did you read my post? It looks like it might be illegal to open carry a firearm under 18. Not to mention he was breaking curfew.
So? Are laws applying to the rioters who also had guns and were out past curfew? Or just this guy?

Obviously the issue here is that this kid killed 2 people and almost killed a third. If any of the other rioters killed people, I expect the same laws to apply.
They've killed 30 so far.

You're welcome
Find em and prosecute them. How many of them shot people and walked away gun in his hands right in front of police?
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

lol if only you applied this logic to BLM and antifa

Hahahaha

Wow surprise it's almost like there is no national organizatino for any of this shit

Could poll the "members" and less than 5% could even name a single leader in the movement
The people marching for blm don't know shit about that which they support. 90% of the protesters, rioters, looters, arsonists don't give two shits about blacks. If they did they would have been in the inner cities decades ago trying to stop the genocide.

It's as vague as hope and change old man

Just like militia is a vague term

Why you so easily see the nuance with teh white kid but don't with the others I have no idea.

90% lol whole country would be burning not enough TV's to go around
Because ONE WHITE KID =/= thousands of people looting, burning & murdering.

No that makes it easier to see the nuance.

There are thousands lol of course they don't all think the same thing

God damn old man

The reason you see nuance with the dumbass white trash is because you understand them. While the white liberal white kids and certanily blacks you don't get. You stupid old sack of shit.
What is there to get? Like arson and looting and harassment of people in restaurants and blocking traffic are all fine because “you just don’t get it”. I get it, and fuck you. A lot of you worthless fucks need to die.
 
Turns out our fresh faced murderer is a huge fan of Trump. That should make him real popular in prison.

and the guy that tried to kill the GOP baseball players was a bernie fan,,,

whats your point??

WTF are you babbling about? You have the attention span of a gnat.
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

Yup. That is so very true.
Really? We had guns as kids. Even took them to school LEGALLY

I remember growing up in Montana, and during hunting season there were lots of kids who had rifles in the gun racks in their trucks. But, the school only allowed it during hunting season, and the guns had to stay inside the vehicle while on school grounds. And yeah, I've seen a couple of them bag a deer on their way into school (lots of open prairie and grassland around where I grew up). But then again, that was back in the mid 70's to early 80's.

I would have to read up on their laws, but I think carrying a loaded firearm in public is different than carrying an empty gun on a gun rack. In our state, if you do not have a CCW, the ammo has to be separate (out of arms reach) from your weapon. The gun goes in your glove compartment and ammo in the trunk of your car.

Just doing a web search looks like you might be right. It’s illegal to open carry a firearm under age 18. If that’s the case, he may lose his ability to claim self defense as he was committing a crime.
What crime would that be? The crime of self defense?

Did you read my post? It looks like it might be illegal to open carry a firearm under 18. Not to mention he was breaking curfew.
So? Are laws applying to the rioters who also had guns and were out past curfew? Or just this guy?

Obviously the issue here is that this kid killed 2 people and almost killed a third. If any of the other rioters killed people, I expect the same laws to apply.
except for this kid did it to protect himself and the rioters are trying to hurt others,,,
Dunno what he was trying to do. He might have gone there looking for any reason to cause harm. We certainly see the right celebrating violence when it suits them.

My point is that this kid may have committed crimes which might prevent him from claiming self defense. Not a lawyer though
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

Yup. That is so very true.
Really? We had guns as kids. Even took them to school LEGALLY

I remember growing up in Montana, and during hunting season there were lots of kids who had rifles in the gun racks in their trucks. But, the school only allowed it during hunting season, and the guns had to stay inside the vehicle while on school grounds. And yeah, I've seen a couple of them bag a deer on their way into school (lots of open prairie and grassland around where I grew up). But then again, that was back in the mid 70's to early 80's.

I would have to read up on their laws, but I think carrying a loaded firearm in public is different than carrying an empty gun on a gun rack. In our state, if you do not have a CCW, the ammo has to be separate (out of arms reach) from your weapon. The gun goes in your glove compartment and ammo in the trunk of your car.

Just doing a web search looks like you might be right. It’s illegal to open carry a firearm under age 18. If that’s the case, he may lose his ability to claim self defense as he was committing a crime.
What crime would that be? The crime of self defense?

Did you read my post? It looks like it might be illegal to open carry a firearm under 18. Not to mention he was breaking curfew.
So? Are laws applying to the rioters who also had guns and were out past curfew? Or just this guy?

Obviously the issue here is that this kid killed 2 people and almost killed a third. If any of the other rioters killed people, I expect the same laws to apply.
I guarantee you I'd never convict him in a jury.................

You don't care that these people are terrorizing the neighborhood and looting and burning..............

The kid was trying to stop them from doing it.............they chased him.......and the guy who got shot in the arm had a gun and was about to shoot him.

Oh well...................I no longer care about these looters............I think a MEU should be sent there and clean fucking house.

But that is me because I support the right of people to protect themselves and their property..........you obviously don't.
I support people following the laws. I don’t think this kid can claim to have been doing so.

And I think it’s a tragedy whatever happens here. If this kid goes to jail, it’s on the right wing for glorifying vigilante violence.
 
The local police are in Kenosha, the sheriff's depts from other various cities and towns are in Kenosha,

Along with the federal govts FBI are in Kenosha, the ATF are in Kenosha, the US Marshalls are in Kenosha

The vigilantes are not needed, and have made it worse.


where were the cops when that kid was attacked?
They were where the left wanted them. Out of the area so they could kill this kid and call it social justice.
 
The local police are in Kenosha, the sheriff's depts from other various cities and towns are in Kenosha,

Along with the federal govts FBI are in Kenosha, the ATF are in Kenosha, the US Marshalls are in Kenosha

The vigilantes are not needed, and have made it worse.


where were the cops when that kid was attacked?
Why was he running? What did he do or someone else do, to make him run? There are a lot of unknowns for us peons, the police charged him....you can not do that, without probable cause.... so they have more evidence, than we do....i suppose?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top