Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you are a very confused individual.they were traitors to the crown - fighting a just fight against tyranny.those people should be ashamed of the traitors in their family treePeoples families fought in that war.
Do you include those who had family members that fought in the Revolutionary War? They were traitors.
the confederacy was fighting against a representative republic to keep the right to own people as property. there is no comparison
The confederacy was fighting against what they considered tyranny of an overbearing federal government just like the colonists. That you can't see it proves you know nothing of history.
In other words, you justify what you consider traitorous activity. That makes you a traitor.
racist? fascist?Only to racist fascists like you who apply only one selective, close minded view of history in order to push a racist agenda.wrong.except of course that the flag is a symbol of racism and racists.
Except that it's not.
wrongIt's been accepted as a harmless symbol of regional pride for generations.
wrongUntil recently when you libs started getting really desperate for new examples of "racism" and had to invent some more.
the banner has always been a symbol of racists from the first time it was hoisted.
if you want to pretend that it's also a sign of heritage (a heritage of slavery, treason, racism, and jim crow) that's fine, but it still represents racism and hate.
now you're just throwing words around with no regard for their meaning.
and I'm sorry that you view reality as some sort of agenda I'm pushing, but reality is the confederate flag is a symbol of racists and hate. always has been, always will be.
if you feel it represents other things I'm sorry, but the racists have ruined it for everyone. better to find another symbol to represent your supposed "southern pride"
maybe try one that didn't start out as a banner for treasonous men fighting to maintain slavery
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
you are a very confused individual.they were traitors to the crown - fighting a just fight against tyranny.those people should be ashamed of the traitors in their family treePeoples families fought in that war.
Do you include those who had family members that fought in the Revolutionary War? They were traitors.
the confederacy was fighting against a representative republic to keep the right to own people as property. there is no comparison
The confederacy was fighting against what they considered tyranny of an overbearing federal government just like the colonists. That you can't see it proves you know nothing of history.
In other words, you justify what you consider traitorous activity. That makes you a traitor.
what they thiught their reasons were is irrelevant to their status as traitors.
and they had representation in government.
just because they could read the writing on the wall and saw that slavery would come to an wnd over their objections does not make them noble or in any way justified
racist? fascist?Only to racist fascists like you who apply only one selective, close minded view of history in order to push a racist agenda.wrong.Except that it's not.
wrongIt's been accepted as a harmless symbol of regional pride for generations.
wrongUntil recently when you libs started getting really desperate for new examples of "racism" and had to invent some more.
the banner has always been a symbol of racists from the first time it was hoisted.
if you want to pretend that it's also a sign of heritage (a heritage of slavery, treason, racism, and jim crow) that's fine, but it still represents racism and hate.
now you're just throwing words around with no regard for their meaning.
and I'm sorry that you view reality as some sort of agenda I'm pushing, but reality is the confederate flag is a symbol of racists and hate. always has been, always will be.
if you feel it represents other things I'm sorry, but the racists have ruined it for everyone. better to find another symbol to represent your supposed "southern pride"
maybe try one that didn't start out as a banner for treasonous men fighting to maintain slavery
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
Still waiting.
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
Allegiance to one's state is anything but treason. You are so brainwashed by federal government overreach that you are unaware that we are still a collection of states, each with alleged sovereignty and regional pride.you are a very confused individual.they were traitors to the crown - fighting a just fight against tyranny.those people should be ashamed of the traitors in their family treePeoples families fought in that war.
Do you include those who had family members that fought in the Revolutionary War? They were traitors.
the confederacy was fighting against a representative republic to keep the right to own people as property. there is no comparison
The confederacy was fighting against what they considered tyranny of an overbearing federal government just like the colonists. That you can't see it proves you know nothing of history.
In other words, you justify what you consider traitorous activity. That makes you a traitor.
what they thiught their reasons were is irrelevant to their status as traitors.
and they had representation in government.
just because they could read the writing on the wall and saw that slavery would come to an wnd over their objections does not make them noble or in any way justified
racist? fascist?Only to racist fascists like you who apply only one selective, close minded view of history in order to push a racist agenda.wrong.
wrong
wrong
the banner has always been a symbol of racists from the first time it was hoisted.
if you want to pretend that it's also a sign of heritage (a heritage of slavery, treason, racism, and jim crow) that's fine, but it still represents racism and hate.
now you're just throwing words around with no regard for their meaning.
and I'm sorry that you view reality as some sort of agenda I'm pushing, but reality is the confederate flag is a symbol of racists and hate. always has been, always will be.
if you feel it represents other things I'm sorry, but the racists have ruined it for everyone. better to find another symbol to represent your supposed "southern pride"
maybe try one that didn't start out as a banner for treasonous men fighting to maintain slavery
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
Still waiting.
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
LOL Its so funny you think this is an argument or what you say is even true. People did protest this back then.
Regardless, the swastika wasn't seen as negative for hundreds of years until douchebag von suckface stole it.
Things change dumbledore.
The swastika earned its negative reputation through attempted genocide. This negative view of the confederate flag is a contrivance by close minded, racist fascists attempting to impose their fascist will and using anomalous negative representations as an excuse.racist? fascist?Only to racist fascists like you who apply only one selective, close minded view of history in order to push a racist agenda.wrong.
wrong
wrong
the banner has always been a symbol of racists from the first time it was hoisted.
if you want to pretend that it's also a sign of heritage (a heritage of slavery, treason, racism, and jim crow) that's fine, but it still represents racism and hate.
now you're just throwing words around with no regard for their meaning.
and I'm sorry that you view reality as some sort of agenda I'm pushing, but reality is the confederate flag is a symbol of racists and hate. always has been, always will be.
if you feel it represents other things I'm sorry, but the racists have ruined it for everyone. better to find another symbol to represent your supposed "southern pride"
maybe try one that didn't start out as a banner for treasonous men fighting to maintain slavery
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
Still waiting.
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
LOL Its so funny you think this is an argument or what you say is even true. People did protest this back then.
Regardless, the swastika wasn't seen as negative for hundreds of years until douchebag von suckface stole it.
Things change dumbledore.
The swastika earned its negative reputation through attempted genocide. This negative view of the confederate flag is a contrivance by close minded, racist fascists attempting to impose their fascist will and using anomalous negative representations as an excuse.racist? fascist?Only to racist fascists like you who apply only one selective, close minded view of history in order to push a racist agenda.
now you're just throwing words around with no regard for their meaning.
and I'm sorry that you view reality as some sort of agenda I'm pushing, but reality is the confederate flag is a symbol of racists and hate. always has been, always will be.
if you feel it represents other things I'm sorry, but the racists have ruined it for everyone. better to find another symbol to represent your supposed "southern pride"
maybe try one that didn't start out as a banner for treasonous men fighting to maintain slavery
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
Still waiting.
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
LOL Its so funny you think this is an argument or what you say is even true. People did protest this back then.
Regardless, the swastika wasn't seen as negative for hundreds of years until douchebag von suckface stole it.
Things change dumbledore.
the confederate flag earned its reputation by being the flag of traitors and racists.The swastika earned its negative reputation through attempted genocide.racist? fascist?Only to racist fascists like you who apply only one selective, close minded view of history in order to push a racist agenda.
now you're just throwing words around with no regard for their meaning.
and I'm sorry that you view reality as some sort of agenda I'm pushing, but reality is the confederate flag is a symbol of racists and hate. always has been, always will be.
if you feel it represents other things I'm sorry, but the racists have ruined it for everyone. better to find another symbol to represent your supposed "southern pride"
maybe try one that didn't start out as a banner for treasonous men fighting to maintain slavery
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
Still waiting.
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
LOL Its so funny you think this is an argument or what you say is even true. People did protest this back then.
Regardless, the swastika wasn't seen as negative for hundreds of years until douchebag von suckface stole it.
Things change dumbledore.
both were traitors. one was a group of traitors fighting for a just cause and the other was a group throwing a fit because they wanted to keep owning slaves.you are a very confused individual.they were traitors to the crown - fighting a just fight against tyranny.those people should be ashamed of the traitors in their family tree
Do you include those who had family members that fought in the Revolutionary War? They were traitors.
the confederacy was fighting against a representative republic to keep the right to own people as property. there is no comparison
The confederacy was fighting against what they considered tyranny of an overbearing federal government just like the colonists. That you can't see it proves you know nothing of history.
In other words, you justify what you consider traitorous activity. That makes you a traitor.
what they thiught their reasons were is irrelevant to their status as traitors.
and they had representation in government.
just because they could read the writing on the wall and saw that slavery would come to an wnd over their objections does not make them noble or in any way justified
You said both were traitors then tried to justify how one you agreed with was OK.
both were traitors. one was a group of traitors fighting for a just cause and the other was a group throwing a fit because they wanted to keep owning slaves.you are a very confused individual.they were traitors to the crown - fighting a just fight against tyranny.Do you include those who had family members that fought in the Revolutionary War? They were traitors.
the confederacy was fighting against a representative republic to keep the right to own people as property. there is no comparison
The confederacy was fighting against what they considered tyranny of an overbearing federal government just like the colonists. That you can't see it proves you know nothing of history.
In other words, you justify what you consider traitorous activity. That makes you a traitor.
what they thiught their reasons were is irrelevant to their status as traitors.
and they had representation in government.
just because they could read the writing on the wall and saw that slavery would come to an wnd over their objections does not make them noble or in any way justified
You said both were traitors then tried to justify how one you agreed with was OK.
can you really compare the two?
people then were widely opposed to interracial relationships.The swastika earned its negative reputation through attempted genocide. This negative view of the confederate flag is a contrivance by close minded, racist fascists attempting to impose their fascist will and using anomalous negative representations as an excuse.racist? fascist?
now you're just throwing words around with no regard for their meaning.
and I'm sorry that you view reality as some sort of agenda I'm pushing, but reality is the confederate flag is a symbol of racists and hate. always has been, always will be.
if you feel it represents other things I'm sorry, but the racists have ruined it for everyone. better to find another symbol to represent your supposed "southern pride"
maybe try one that didn't start out as a banner for treasonous men fighting to maintain slavery
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
Still waiting.
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
LOL Its so funny you think this is an argument or what you say is even true. People did protest this back then.
Regardless, the swastika wasn't seen as negative for hundreds of years until douchebag von suckface stole it.
Things change dumbledore.
A RECENT contrivance as demonstrated by the Dukes of Hazzard.
that you think it wasn't shows you lack an educationboth were traitors. one was a group of traitors fighting for a just cause and the other was a group throwing a fit because they wanted to keep owning slaves.you are a very confused individual.they were traitors to the crown - fighting a just fight against tyranny.
the confederacy was fighting against a representative republic to keep the right to own people as property. there is no comparison
The confederacy was fighting against what they considered tyranny of an overbearing federal government just like the colonists. That you can't see it proves you know nothing of history.
In other words, you justify what you consider traitorous activity. That makes you a traitor.
what they thiught their reasons were is irrelevant to their status as traitors.
and they had representation in government.
just because they could read the writing on the wall and saw that slavery would come to an wnd over their objections does not make them noble or in any way justified
You said both were traitors then tried to justify how one you agreed with was OK.
can you really compare the two?
Since you say both were traitors, you compared the two.
Like I said, you justify someone being a traitor when you agree with them. Your words, not mine.
That you think it about slavery proves you know nothing and are a traitor.
that you think it wasn't shows you lack an educationboth were traitors. one was a group of traitors fighting for a just cause and the other was a group throwing a fit because they wanted to keep owning slaves.you are a very confused individual.The confederacy was fighting against what they considered tyranny of an overbearing federal government just like the colonists. That you can't see it proves you know nothing of history.
In other words, you justify what you consider traitorous activity. That makes you a traitor.
what they thiught their reasons were is irrelevant to their status as traitors.
and they had representation in government.
just because they could read the writing on the wall and saw that slavery would come to an wnd over their objections does not make them noble or in any way justified
You said both were traitors then tried to justify how one you agreed with was OK.
can you really compare the two?
Since you say both were traitors, you compared the two.
Like I said, you justify someone being a traitor when you agree with them. Your words, not mine.
That you think it about slavery proves you know nothing and are a traitor.
treason for a just cause is justified.that you think it wasn't shows you lack an educationboth were traitors. one was a group of traitors fighting for a just cause and the other was a group throwing a fit because they wanted to keep owning slaves.you are a very confused individual.
what they thiught their reasons were is irrelevant to their status as traitors.
and they had representation in government.
just because they could read the writing on the wall and saw that slavery would come to an wnd over their objections does not make them noble or in any way justified
You said both were traitors then tried to justify how one you agreed with was OK.
can you really compare the two?
Since you say both were traitors, you compared the two.
Like I said, you justify someone being a traitor when you agree with them. Your words, not mine.
That you think it about slavery proves you know nothing and are a traitor.
It shows I wasn't indoctrinated like you.
That you justify treason proves you are one.
I've given you reasons for my thinking, all you guys ever come back with is "heritage"
Once again, a troll non-response from a fascist troll. I'm through with you.
people then were widely opposed to interracial relationships.The swastika earned its negative reputation through attempted genocide. This negative view of the confederate flag is a contrivance by close minded, racist fascists attempting to impose their fascist will and using anomalous negative representations as an excuse.You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
Still waiting.
You haven't explained how this supposedly racist symbol was accepted by HOLLYWOOD and the America TV audience from 1979 to 1985 as a harmless symbol of SOuthern Pride.
LOL Its so funny you think this is an argument or what you say is even true. People did protest this back then.
Regardless, the swastika wasn't seen as negative for hundreds of years until douchebag von suckface stole it.
Things change dumbledore.
A RECENT contrivance as demonstrated by the Dukes of Hazzard.
just because something is acceptable at the time doesn't mean it isn't racist
Traitors should never be part of the armed forces.The Union had 4 slave states of it's own during the Civil War so i guess the american flag is racist too.
Teen was turned away from Marines because of Confederate flag tattoo
jan 22 2016 Anthony Bauswell, 18, has the rebel flag inked on his rib
He said he got 'Southern Pride' added so it wouldn't be seen as racist
But the recruiter told him it was an 'automatic DQ'
The military prohibits all racist, extremist or gang-related tattoos
Well they said it was about slavery. What confused you about that?both were traitors. one was a group of traitors fighting for a just cause and the other was a group throwing a fit because they wanted to keep owning slaves.you are a very confused individual.they were traitors to the crown - fighting a just fight against tyranny.
the confederacy was fighting against a representative republic to keep the right to own people as property. there is no comparison
The confederacy was fighting against what they considered tyranny of an overbearing federal government just like the colonists. That you can't see it proves you know nothing of history.
In other words, you justify what you consider traitorous activity. That makes you a traitor.
what they thiught their reasons were is irrelevant to their status as traitors.
and they had representation in government.
just because they could read the writing on the wall and saw that slavery would come to an wnd over their objections does not make them noble or in any way justified
You said both were traitors then tried to justify how one you agreed with was OK.
can you really compare the two?
Since you say both were traitors, you compared the two.
Like I said, you justify someone being a traitor when you agree with them. Your words, not mine.
That you think it about slavery proves you know nothing and are a traitor.
