Teenager Who Has Been Dating Her Father For Two Years Reveals The Pair Are Planning To Get Married..

If you believe that the government should step in and prevent this union

and

if you believe that government in too big and has no business intervening into the private lives of private people

How do you fit those two - apparently contradictory positions - together?

I'm just curious.


Government sure as hell shouldn't sanction it by giving them a marriage license.
 
When changing marriage from a state-granted privelege into a right, presuming that happens this year, the US Supreme Court may not play favorites. All consenting adults will thereafter have access to "anything goes" marriage if that is based on abandoning tradition (man/woman & "two only"). Opponents to this union between father and daughter will only have the argument "it's creepy" to fall back on. But a man using another man's anus as an artificial vagina is also very creepy, so, there you go.

Game over. Remove powers from the states to regulate and this is what Lady Justice with the blindfold on and the scales will dispense as "justice in the name of equality"...if marriage becomes a right to lifestyles in addition to race.


this is the logical next step after state sanctioned gay marriage. once that precedent is set, there can be no laws preventing any form or marriage, from father/daughter to polysexuals of all combinations.

the gay agenda is directly responsible for the destruction of western civilization. "if we don't learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it" Rome, Greece, Mayans, Egyptians, etc. when a society loses its moral compass, that society is over.
 
There's no more sick and mentally ill, disgusting, perverted, unclean and immoral sexual trash than two men fucking each up the shit hole.

You need a fucking reality check there you sick degenerate.

:lmao:

And you need an education. Just because you don't like it does not mean it's a mental illness. In fact, the question has been thoroughly studied and the results are very conclusive. Homosexual behavior is a very normal and common set of sexual behaviors in many mammalian species, including human beings. It has been known to human societies since the dawn of time, and it's condemnation is actually the exception to the rule in the big picture of human culture. The only consistent influence that can be seen to support the condemnation of homosexual behavior is the religious scruples of the Abrahamic faiths.


Homosexuality is "normal" only in the sense that Down's Syndrome is normal. Yes, it happens in nature all the time, but that doesn't make it healthy or good for the organism afflicted with it.

All else being equal what are the health risks of gay sex compared to heterosexual sex?

HIV, which is fatal.
 
..this is the logical next step after state sanctioned gay marriage. once that precedent is set, there can be no laws preventing any form or marriage, from father/daughter to polysexuals of all combinations.

the gay agenda is directly responsible for the destruction of western civilization. "if we don't learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it" Rome, Greece, Mayans, Egyptians, etc. when a society loses its moral compass, that society is over.

Well it's more that justice is blind. "Marriage equality" cannot play favorites..
 
When changing marriage from a state-granted privelege into a right, presuming that happens this year, the US Supreme Court may not play favorites. All consenting adults will thereafter have access to "anything goes" marriage if that is based on abandoning tradition (man/woman & "two only"). Opponents to this union between father and daughter will only have the argument "it's creepy" to fall back on. But a man using another man's anus as an artificial vagina is also very creepy, so, there you go.

Game over. Remove powers from the states to regulate and this is what Lady Justice with the blindfold on and the scales will dispense as "justice in the name of equality"...if marriage becomes a right to lifestyles in addition to race.

Well, I agree... if such a decision comes along, we will then be informed that the powers that be have determined that the US Ship is to be scuttled.

There will be no alternative conclusion possible, in that such will tell us that what amounts to the cultural conscience has completely lost any means to make sense of the rapidly devolving circumstances and that they feel that it is better to burn this bitch down, than to watch it rot.
 
The defenders of homo marriage said it couldn't happen, yet here it is:

Teenager who has been dating her father for two years reveals the pair are planning to get married - and have children Daily Mail Online

Teenager Who Has Been Dating Her Father For Two Years Reveals The Pair Are Planning To Get Married - And Have Children An 18-year-old girl is revealing in a new interview that she has been dating her father for two years The pair were estranged for 12 years, but met up again when she was 16, having sex the week they were reunited They were soon dating and are now planning their wedding

After their wedding they plan on moving to New Jersey and having children, were adult incest is legal By CHRIS SPARGO 16 January 2015 A young girl who is planning her upcoming wedding may have some trouble getting her mother to attend the ceremony - as she is marrying her father.

It is seriously legal in NJ? Gonna be some birth defects.
 
There's no more sick and mentally ill, disgusting, perverted, unclean and immoral sexual trash than two men fucking each up the shit hole.

You need a fucking reality check there you sick degenerate.

:lmao:

And you need an education. Just because you don't like it does not mean it's a mental illness. In fact, the question has been thoroughly studied and the results are very conclusive. Homosexual behavior is a very normal and common set of sexual behaviors in many mammalian species, including human beings. It has been known to human societies since the dawn of time, and it's condemnation is actually the exception to the rule in the big picture of human culture. The only consistent influence that can be seen to support the condemnation of homosexual behavior is the religious scruples of the Abrahamic faiths.


Homosexuality is "normal" only in the sense that Down's Syndrome is normal. Yes, it happens in nature all the time, but that doesn't make it healthy or good for the organism afflicted with it.

All else being equal what are the health risks of gay sex compared to heterosexual sex?

HIV, which is fatal.

How many lesbians have died of HIV?
 
There's no more sick and mentally ill, disgusting, perverted, unclean and immoral sexual trash than two men fucking each up the shit hole.

You need a fucking reality check there you sick degenerate.

:lmao:

And you need an education. Just because you don't like it does not mean it's a mental illness. In fact, the question has been thoroughly studied and the results are very conclusive. Homosexual behavior is a very normal and common set of sexual behaviors in many mammalian species, including human beings. It has been known to human societies since the dawn of time, and it's condemnation is actually the exception to the rule in the big picture of human culture. The only consistent influence that can be seen to support the condemnation of homosexual behavior is the religious scruples of the Abrahamic faiths.


Homosexuality is "normal" only in the sense that Down's Syndrome is normal. Yes, it happens in nature all the time, but that doesn't make it healthy or good for the organism afflicted with it.

All else being equal what are the health risks of gay sex compared to heterosexual sex?

HIV, which is fatal.

How many lesbians have died of HIV?

Are you admitting the HIV can't be transmitted by females?
 
It's definitely strange, but I personally don't care if people want to do it. Nothing about two consenting adults is the slippery slope towards bestiality Republicans like to pretend it is. "Consenting" and "adults" being the key words that erases this imaginary slippery slope.
 
When changing marriage from a state-granted privelege into a right, presuming that happens this year, the US Supreme Court may not play favorites. All consenting adults will thereafter have access to "anything goes" marriage if that is based on abandoning tradition (man/woman & "two only"). Opponents to this union between father and daughter will only have the argument "it's creepy" to fall back on. But a man using another man's anus as an artificial vagina is also very creepy, so, there you go.

Game over. Remove powers from the states to regulate and this is what Lady Justice with the blindfold on and the scales will dispense as "justice in the name of equality"...if marriage becomes a right to lifestyles in addition to race.


this is the logical next step after state sanctioned gay marriage. once that precedent is set, there can be no laws preventing any form or marriage, from father/daughter to polysexuals of all combinations.

the gay agenda is directly responsible for the destruction of western civilization. "if we don't learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it" Rome, Greece, Mayans, Egyptians, etc. when a society loses its moral compass, that society is over.

Oh? I assume you can site any single historical source that explains how gays destroyed any civilization. And if two men fucking each other in private destroyed your great civilization then it was meant to be, because your civilization sucks. :thup:

EDIT: And how has it destroyed Western civilization? By every Western nation still being the most powerful countries in the world? Maybe we have different definitions of "destroyed".
 
Why would any liberal not like a father/daughter marriage? Provided, of course, each is a registered Democrat. No chance of genetic defects since you'll be paying for the abortion.
 
It's definitely strange, but I personally don't care if people want to do it. Nothing about two consenting adults is the slippery slope towards bestiality Republicans like to pretend it is. "Consenting" and "adults" being the key words that erases this imaginary slippery slope.

Duh . . . even if those consenting adults are father and daughter?
 
Oh where's your sense of acceptance? The Constitution is for one and all and nowhere does it say that Dada can't marry sissy? As long as they're both consenting adults I think you should be forced to accept the upcoming nuptials as perfectly normal. In fact ... you should embrace the idea. I also think that a Christian pastor should be forced to perform the ceremony. It's the American way.

1. Christian pastors aren't forced to marry anyone.
2. Incest isn't the same as homosexuality when it comes to marriage - there's a valid argument that it is damaging.
 
Oh where's your sense of acceptance? The Constitution is for one and all and nowhere does it say that Dada can't marry sissy? As long as they're both consenting adults I think you should be forced to accept the upcoming nuptials as perfectly normal. In fact ... you should embrace the idea. I also think that a Christian pastor should be forced to perform the ceremony. It's the American way.

1. Christian pastors aren't forced to marry anyone.
2. Incest isn't the same as homosexuality when it comes to marriage - there's a valid argument that it is damaging.

Christian businesses are being forced to ignore their religious values in some cases and Pastors are finding themselves being accused of "hate crimes" if they don't recognize gays as just your average, day-to-day, normal, run-of-the-mill folks.

I agree that incest is damaging for the same reason that homosexuality is damaging. Both are forms of sexual deviancy & perversion. Both send a wrong message to society. And both defy common sense and good judgment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top