leftwinger
Diamond Member
Because you are anti-science? Anti-reality?I have serious doubts about the article's veracity.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because you are anti-science? Anti-reality?I have serious doubts about the article's veracity.
This is fact. I predicted in 1957 as a college student that future cars would use electric current. So I have been at this topic for a hell of a lot of years. In 1957 few thought cars would be powered by current.Whoa, holy split personalities Batman!!
I'm not talking about how much they weight, Son. I want you to tell us about how we have to go to the store to get them.You either do not accept EVs have as much as 2900 # weight or think you are funny. I urge you to look up EV batteries. Now that you mock me. Where will you get them if not from the store?
anti bullshit.Because you are anti-science? Anti-reality?
Yeah I know That is the major problem of course. Last I heard it was 130% inefficient to hydrolyze the gas and then use it for what it can offer back later.Now he just needs to invent a process that creates the hydrogen, without the significant energy loss in conversion.
We'll be waiting.
I'm trying to make it obvious that there can be no replacement for gas and diesel vehicles. But you don't seem to understand that.Do you have great feelings about the future of batteries? Suppose China shuts off our supply?
The thread, the video, the link. It's ALL FAKE.
I am well acquainted with oil production and automobiles since I was once in the business of building race cars and of course worked on automobiles.I'm trying to make it obvious that there can be no replacement for gas and diesel vehicles. But you don't seem to understand that.
They can't be replaced by any alternative. That much we should be able to agree!
They (gas and diesel) will have to be eliminated.
Can you think of a few alternatives for when they are being eliminated and 'are' eliminated?
Ask me if you give a fk?
I'm trying to make it obvious that there can be no replacement for gas and diesel vehicles. But you don't seem to understand that.
They can't be replaced by any alternative. That much we should be able to agree!
They (gas and diesel) will have to be eliminated.
Can you think of a few alternatives for when they are being eliminated and 'are' eliminated?
Ask me if you give a fk?
There are as it turns out many videos produced by various people claiming Elon Musk changed his mind and in 2026 will introduce a hydrogen automobile. Not clear to me how, but this remarkable guy will get us to the Moon and to Mars. What he works on happens.Now he just needs to invent a process that creates the hydrogen, without the significant energy loss in conversion.
We'll be waiting.
Better investments and efforts would be spent uncovering zero-point, then coming out and sharing it with the world immediately.Yeah I know That is the major problem of course. Last I heard it was 130% inefficient to hydrolyze the gas and then use it for what it can offer back later.
Expanding gasses and moving parts are soooo 20th century.There are as it turns out many videos produced by various people claiming Elon Musk changed his mind and in 2026 will introduce a hydrogen automobile. Not clear to me how, but this remarkable guy will get us to the Moon and to Mars. What he works on happens.
Well that doesn't seem very efficient.On Youtube there are some video's by the owners of factory Toyota hydrogen cars filling them up at the fueling station.
It costs almost $200 for a tank full of hydrogen.
The milage is about the same as a Toyota with a tank full of gasoline.
By discharging 2 tons and hundreds if not thousands of batteries, you fucking moron.Going to a store to buy 2 tons of batteries?
Just how do you think EVs work?
Yes, all of them take more energy than you get back.Hydrogen can be created many ways. Electrolysis is just one
Rather than our opinions, let's examine what Shell says about production and costs.Hydrogen power has some problems.
The first problem is laws of thermodynamics.
Hydrogen production consumes more energy than it provides.
i.e. it is like a diesel generator charging an EV.
It is inefficient.
It would be more efficient to just burn the diesel fuel directly in the car.
The second problem is the transportation and storage of hydrogen.
Hydrogen is the smallest element and takes about a 10,000-psi storage tank to contain it.
An average person can't safely handle a 10,000-psi fuel system.
It's very dangerous.
So you gonna run over to walmart and buy them outta AAs?Well that doesn't seem very efficient.
By discharging 2 tons and hundreds if not thousands of batteries, you fucking moron.
How do YOU think EVs work? Because I fucking know.![]()