Texans can now openly carry guns in public without a permit or training...CNN: "Police say the new law makes it harder to do their jobs"

Most attempts without guns fail.

People in Japan do not understand the consequences of suicide.
They fully understand the consequences. Often in their society the consequences of NOT committing suicide are worse. On the other hand if you are talking about the Christian belief that suicide condemns you to an eternity in hell, Christianity is the only religion that I am aware of that has that belief. Don’t inflict your religion on others.
 
They fully understand the consequences. Often in their society the consequences of NOT committing suicide are worse. On the other hand if you are talking about the Christian belief that suicide condemns you to an eternity in hell, Christianity is the only religion that I am aware of that has that belief. Don’t inflict your religion on others.
As a Jew I believe they will not suffer more then a few millennia.
 
face it skank,, your just mad you keep looking like a fucking idiot,,
If you troll people don't whine when they turn around and give it back. Put on your big boy pants and suck it up.
Suicide is a mental health issue, not gun control!
Mental health issues don't don't exist in a vacuum. Men in this country are more likely to use a gun for suicide and more likely to be impulse driven and successful. Something as moderate as a 3 day waiting period for gun can possibly give the person a chance to come down from rhe impulse or get help.
 
I can honestly and factually say..........
the "cops" around here don't even bother with their jobs.

You'd be hard pressed to find a police vehicle ANYWHERE in this city, much less any little corrupt piggy doing the jobs they are supposed to be doing!!!
 
If you troll people don't whine when they turn around and give it back. Put on your big boy pants and suck it up.
Mental health issues don't don't exist in a vacuum. Men in this country are more likely to use a gun for suicide and more likely to be impulse driven and successful. Something as moderate as a 3 day waiting period for gun can possibly give the person a chance to come down from rhe impulse or get help.
what happened to my body my choice???

guess that only matters when a women wants to kill her child,,
 
Dipshit......Murdock states this...you asshole...

They don't say....this only applies to First Amendment protections...you dope...

4. A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P. 319 U. S. 113.

You’re the typical dishonest, willfully ignorant conservative.

From your link:

“The flat license tax here involved restrains in advance the Constitutional liberties of press and religion, and inevitably tends to suppress their exercise.”

The ruling concerned only the First Amendment, not the Second.

The fact that jurisdictions currently assess a fee for a concealed carry license or permit is further proof that you are wrong, the Supreme Court having ruled as to their constitutionality.
 
If you troll people don't whine when they turn around and give it back. Put on your big boy pants and suck it up.
Mental health issues don't don't exist in a vacuum. Men in this country are more likely to use a gun for suicide and more likely to be impulse driven and successful. Something as moderate as a 3 day waiting period for gun can possibly give the person a chance to come down from rhe impulse or get help.
Florida had a 3-day waiting period. It performed no function except waste gasoline.
 
You’re the typical dishonest, willfully ignorant conservative.

From your link:

“The flat license tax here involved restrains in advance the Constitutional liberties of press and religion, and inevitably tends to suppress their exercise.”

The ruling concerned only the First Amendment, not the Second.

The fact that jurisdictions currently assess a fee for a concealed carry license or permit is further proof that you are wrong, the Supreme Court having ruled as to their constitutionality.


You are the liar....I posted exactly what they ruled on all Rights......it wasn't limited to religion and the press, you idiot.....you are the liar....

No one has brought case before the previously split Court on fees...because they didn't know how Roberts was going to rule and before him the court was still split 4-4 with that idiot Kennedy as the never reliable swing vote...you doofus.

Murdock v. Pennsylvania: 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
Murdock v. Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 105 (1943)

Held:
- A municipal ordinance which, as construed and applied, requires religious colporteurs to pay a license tax as a condition to the pursuit of their activities, is invalid under the Federal Constitution as a denial of freedom of speech, press and religion.




- A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.


[Notice......it does not limit this to just speech, religion or press....it states "Enjoyment of a Right granted by the Federal Constitution.....you know nothing dumb ass.....]



- The flat license tax here involved restrains in advance the Constitutional liberties of press and religion, and inevitably tends to suppress their exercise

Opinion:
...It is contended, however, that the fact that the license tax can suppress or control this activity is unimportant if it does not do so. But that is to disregard the nature of this tax.


It is a license tax -- a flat tax imposed on the exercise of a privilege granted by the Bill of Rights. A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution....

[Notice......it does not limit this to just speech, religion or press....it states "Enjoyment of a Right granted by the Federal Constitution.....you know nothing dumb ass.....]


... The power to impose a license tax on the exercise of these freedoms is indeed as potent as the power of censorship which this Court has repeatedly struck down...

... It is a flat license tax levied and collected as a condition to the pursuit of activities whose enjoyment is guaranteed by the First Amendment. Accordingly, it restrains in advance those constitutional liberties of press and religion, and inevitably tends to suppress their exercise...
Murdock v. Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
 

Forum List

Back
Top