2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,239
- 52,463
Wrong.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania concerned the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause, not the Second Amendment.
And the Supreme Court has never ruled on the constitutionality of licenses, permits, and fees.
![]()
Sorry, Mandatory Gun Registration Is Constitutional
Second Amendment Advocates Don't Like It, But It May Be Permissible; A Lawsuit Against Washington, D.C. Could Decide The Questionwww.cbsnews.com
Requiring a license to carry a concealed firearm is perfectly Constitutional, in no manner violating the Second Amendment.
Dipshit......Murdock states this...you asshole...
They don't say....this only applies to First Amendment protections...you dope...
4. A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P. 319 U. S. 113.
![supreme.justia.com](https://justatic.com/v/20240521113135/shared/images/social-media/law.jpg)
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
Murdock v. Pennsylvania: It is unconstitutional for a state to tax people selling religious merchandise.
![supreme.justia.com](https://justatic.com/v/20240521113135/shared/images/justia/jbutton_flat_144.png)