Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
States right DO NOT include the right to defraud the other states, not by election rigging or any other method.This can't be serious. Texas has no standing to sue another state on that state's conduct under state law. Texas has no interest in another state's decision to send out ballot applications, nor any interest in whether those who received ballots in response to submitting the application returned those ballots, or how these ballots were handled once received. The pols who run the Texas government become more and more bizarre each day.
The Supreme Court over rules state laws all the time, moron.The supreme court gives great deference to the courts of the states. After all, who knows more about the legislative intent, than those that wrote it.
The supreme court invalidates state laws that are unconstitutional or extra-legal.
But the court doesn't mandate a states laws be followed. Ex: the court can't point to the states prisoners on death row, and insist they be executed.
Only if a law affecting that state has been violated.States right DO NOT include the right to defraud the other states, not by election rigging or any other method.This can't be serious. Texas has no standing to sue another state on that state's conduct under state law. Texas has no interest in another state's decision to send out ballot applications, nor any interest in whether those who received ballots in response to submitting the application returned those ballots, or how these ballots were handled once received. The pols who run the Texas government become more and more bizarre each day.
No state "defrauded" another state. The electoral votes of Texas went into trump's column. If one state can attack another state's execution of its own laws, what happens to the concept of state sovereignty? Can New York now sit in judgment of the laws of Texas, how they are passed, and how they are applied?
I don't think so. Do you have any examples from the lawsuit that you think are relevant?Great.
Did the states bypass their own constitution and laws to change voting laws?
the argument seems to be that the state constitution has rules for "absentee ballots", and they sought to create a new class of balloting not defined in the constitution
So the state legislature created a new type of ballot, called a "mail-in" ballot, under rules the state legislature enacted.
Imbecile, there was nothing wrong with Dominion.Yes. The Supreme Court has done it's job when the lower state and federal courts refused to do theirsEvery voter in every election whose candidate does not win is "disenfranchised" if that's how you wish toThat is a bad argument to attempt. A monority of voters elected this president in 2016. Were voters in the more populous states disenfranchised?
look at things. The question is was an election fairly contested? Or not?
We know for absolutely certain the 2020 presidential election was as dirty and corrupt as can be.
And the aftermath has been corrupt too. Appeals to lower and state courts have been summarily rejected
out of hand.
The solution when lower courts refuse to honestly deal with things (ignoring Dominion and ballot fraud) is to take it to the Supreme Court.
Tbhe federal courts have rejected them as well. That includes judges appointed by Trump.
because they know no one is going to hold them accountable.
Disgusting but it's just what we saw in Gore v Bush in 2000. In the second Trump term I would like to see
some accountability from these petty autocrats in robes.
Anyone who can say he sees no evidence of fraud after being informed about Dominion needs to be
removed from office and lose any pensions or remunerations due.
The supreme court gives great deference to the courts of the states. After all, who knows more about the legislative intent, than those that wrote it.
Courts don't write legislation.
Case law defines legislation.
In essence they write the regulations.
Don't tell me. Prove it. We believe that's a lie and are not overly interested in sitting back and watching our beloved Nation turned into just another third world shithole. Plain enough.Nobody is trying to "overturn" an election. A great many people believe that corrupt officials manipulated the count to put who they wanted in office rather than the candidate that actually got the most votes. Why would anyone who wants a fair and honest election mind people checking to make sure that it was? All this resistance only convinces people you have something to hide. It would be a very bad idea to go on with as many Americans as is current thinking that what is being attempted is a coup rather than an election.Wow. So because you feel wronged over something completely different that affects this election how?Oh please we have just had several years of Dems accusing every one who doesn't share their agenda with every crime misdemeanor and/or perversion they can think of without the first shred of evidence. Best expect the shoe to be on the other foot if Biden should actually manage to sleeze his way into office and for impeachment proceedings to commence immediately. Besides who are you to claim the evidence is invalid before it is even all presented? If those States have accepted illegal votes or deliberately encouraged illegal voting in a Federal election they have committed a crime against the Nation.
That fails basic logic. Sorry your feewings were hewt snowflake but like...tough shit. You don't get to overturn an election based on your feelings.
As far as evidence...it's been over a month and about 60 court cases...when were you planning on presenting this "evidence"?
How many times do you need to check?
How many recounts are needed?
The answer is as many as you need until Trump is selected no matter if the evidence does not support the claim Trump lost because of fraud!
Hell courts have rejected every case except one and that one was overturned...
So how many times must you be told Trump lost?
And when this one fails them, it will be the next one that will do it for them.Social media is full of Trombies claiming that THIS IS IT! This is the lawsuit that overturns the election.
It is also full of Trombies congratulating themselves for not rioting and burning down cities in response to the election...”like the libs did”.
I feel a collision coming.
Georgia has been counted 3 times. Joe won every count. Thats proof enough for you to admit Joe won Georgia...right?Don't tell me. Prove it. We believe that's a lie and are not overly interested in sitting back and watching our beloved Nation turned into just another third world shithole. Plain enough.Nobody is trying to "overturn" an election. A great many people believe that corrupt officials manipulated the count to put who they wanted in office rather than the candidate that actually got the most votes. Why would anyone who wants a fair and honest election mind people checking to make sure that it was? All this resistance only convinces people you have something to hide. It would be a very bad idea to go on with as many Americans as is current thinking that what is being attempted is a coup rather than an election.Wow. So because you feel wronged over something completely different that affects this election how?Oh please we have just had several years of Dems accusing every one who doesn't share their agenda with every crime misdemeanor and/or perversion they can think of without the first shred of evidence. Best expect the shoe to be on the other foot if Biden should actually manage to sleeze his way into office and for impeachment proceedings to commence immediately. Besides who are you to claim the evidence is invalid before it is even all presented? If those States have accepted illegal votes or deliberately encouraged illegal voting in a Federal election they have committed a crime against the Nation.
That fails basic logic. Sorry your feewings were hewt snowflake but like...tough shit. You don't get to overturn an election based on your feelings.
As far as evidence...it's been over a month and about 60 court cases...when were you planning on presenting this "evidence"?
How many times do you need to check?
How many recounts are needed?
The answer is as many as you need until Trump is selected no matter if the evidence does not support the claim Trump lost because of fraud!
Hell courts have rejected every case except one and that one was overturned...
So how many times must you be told Trump lost?
Well hi, Poser! I see your dumb ass is still Trolling me again over your stupid ploy I didn't fall for. You're the fucking dumbass who posted your DD 214 as a challenge to prove you heap big brave warrior & so you could display like a fucking peacock, an award you received. That is the epitome of a poser and just one of many reasons why I use that moniker to peg your dumb ass for so long. All along I refused to display my DD 214, and instead posted my VA Benefits letter as proof of MY SEA/Nam deployments as agreed. And your dumb ass dismissed that as non-proof because it wasn't a DD 214...fucking bullshitter!The case in the OP has nothing to do with other cases, of course you know that, but deflection seems to be all you have. STFU.
As far as the single item on topic, ALL of the cases have a common thread, notwithstanding your bullshit of trying to decouple them, one from another; Trump & Co. trying to put their collective thumbs on the scale. Tough shit Tex...you don't want to see it because you're just a fucking puppet. So piss off now Lil' Tex. You're the one making a fool of himself with your childish behavior in your 70's. TaTa Poser!
Well punk, first of all I'm not in my 70s and there in nothing in the TX suit that alleges any fraud. It simply points out States not following their own State laws, violations of due process and violations of the Constitution.
If you didn't spend so much time lying and deflecting you might be able to keep up. LMAO
.
Do you know the case they are presenting?Well hi, Poser! I see your dumb ass is still Trolling me again over your stupid ploy I didn't fall for. You're the fucking dumbass who posted your DD 214 as a challenge to prove you heap big brave warrior & so you could display like a fucking peacock, an award you received. That is the epitome of a poser and just one of many reasons why I use that moniker to peg your dumb ass for so long. All along I refused to display my DD 214, and instead posted my VA Benefits letter as proof of MY SEA/Nam deployments as agreed. And your dumb ass dismissed that as non-proof because it wasn't a DD 214...fucking bullshitter!The case in the OP has nothing to do with other cases, of course you know that, but deflection seems to be all you have. STFU.
As far as the single item on topic, ALL of the cases have a common thread, notwithstanding your bullshit of trying to decouple them, one from another; Trump & Co. trying to put their collective thumbs on the scale. Tough shit Tex...you don't want to see it because you're just a fucking puppet. So piss off now Lil' Tex. You're the one making a fool of himself with your childish behavior in your 70's. TaTa Poser!
Well punk, first of all I'm not in my 70s and there in nothing in the TX suit that alleges any fraud. It simply points out States not following their own State laws, violations of due process and violations of the Constitution.
If you didn't spend so much time lying and deflecting you might be able to keep up. LMAO
.
They are providing no evidence. This is a rehash of the same arguments that have been thrown out in state and federal courts.
You can apply equal protection when your state has been given affirmative action.Yes, they are. I sure as hell was hurt by fraud being used to get Biden elected.The states are not hurt by how the other states run their elections. They have no standing.
You have a state which gets 1.2 EC votes for every million citizens, arguing equal protection with a state which gets 1.8 EC votes for every million citizens.
Oh, spare us with the false equivalency bullshit. "We don't have to follow the law, because we don't have the pure mob rule democracy that we want!!!"
The operative part of the phrase "equal protection under the law" is actually "UNDER THE LAW". The law - in this case, the US Constitution - says that election laws are set by state legislatures. Not by the governor, not by the state Supreme Court, not by the Secretary of State. If a state's election was being governed by arbitrary decisions made by those other people, rather than by the laws passed by the state legislature, then that is a violation of the US Constitution.
And there's no amount of whining that "Well, the whole election is not fair, because it isn't done the way I think it should be!!!" that's going to change that fact, or be worth a taco fart in a wind tunnel to anyone here.
Do you know the case they are presenting?Well hi, Poser! I see your dumb ass is still Trolling me again over your stupid ploy I didn't fall for. You're the fucking dumbass who posted your DD 214 as a challenge to prove you heap big brave warrior & so you could display like a fucking peacock, an award you received. That is the epitome of a poser and just one of many reasons why I use that moniker to peg your dumb ass for so long. All along I refused to display my DD 214, and instead posted my VA Benefits letter as proof of MY SEA/Nam deployments as agreed. And your dumb ass dismissed that as non-proof because it wasn't a DD 214...fucking bullshitter!The case in the OP has nothing to do with other cases, of course you know that, but deflection seems to be all you have. STFU.
As far as the single item on topic, ALL of the cases have a common thread, notwithstanding your bullshit of trying to decouple them, one from another; Trump & Co. trying to put their collective thumbs on the scale. Tough shit Tex...you don't want to see it because you're just a fucking puppet. So piss off now Lil' Tex. You're the one making a fool of himself with your childish behavior in your 70's. TaTa Poser!
Well punk, first of all I'm not in my 70s and there in nothing in the TX suit that alleges any fraud. It simply points out States not following their own State laws, violations of due process and violations of the Constitution.
If you didn't spend so much time lying and deflecting you might be able to keep up. LMAO
.
They are providing no evidence. This is a rehash of the same arguments that have been thrown out in state and federal courts.
I asked...Do you know the case they are presenting?Do you know the case they are presenting?Well hi, Poser! I see your dumb ass is still Trolling me again over your stupid ploy I didn't fall for. You're the fucking dumbass who posted your DD 214 as a challenge to prove you heap big brave warrior & so you could display like a fucking peacock, an award you received. That is the epitome of a poser and just one of many reasons why I use that moniker to peg your dumb ass for so long. All along I refused to display my DD 214, and instead posted my VA Benefits letter as proof of MY SEA/Nam deployments as agreed. And your dumb ass dismissed that as non-proof because it wasn't a DD 214...fucking bullshitter!The case in the OP has nothing to do with other cases, of course you know that, but deflection seems to be all you have. STFU.
As far as the single item on topic, ALL of the cases have a common thread, notwithstanding your bullshit of trying to decouple them, one from another; Trump & Co. trying to put their collective thumbs on the scale. Tough shit Tex...you don't want to see it because you're just a fucking puppet. So piss off now Lil' Tex. You're the one making a fool of himself with your childish behavior in your 70's. TaTa Poser!
Well punk, first of all I'm not in my 70s and there in nothing in the TX suit that alleges any fraud. It simply points out States not following their own State laws, violations of due process and violations of the Constitution.
If you didn't spend so much time lying and deflecting you might be able to keep up. LMAO
.
They are providing no evidence. This is a rehash of the same arguments that have been thrown out in state and federal courts.
It is just rehashed cow manure that has been rejected by state and federal courts. In these states, there is plenty of cow manure they can use.
the legislative branch includes the executive?You can apply equal protection when your state has been given affirmative action.Yes, they are. I sure as hell was hurt by fraud being used to get Biden elected.The states are not hurt by how the other states run their elections. They have no standing.
You have a state which gets 1.2 EC votes for every million citizens, arguing equal protection with a state which gets 1.8 EC votes for every million citizens.
Oh, spare us with the false equivalency bullshit. "We don't have to follow the law, because we don't have the pure mob rule democracy that we want!!!"
The operative part of the phrase "equal protection under the law" is actually "UNDER THE LAW". The law - in this case, the US Constitution - says that election laws are set by state legislatures. Not by the governor, not by the state Supreme Court, not by the Secretary of State. If a state's election was being governed by arbitrary decisions made by those other people, rather than by the laws passed by the state legislature, then that is a violation of the US Constitution.
And there's no amount of whining that "Well, the whole election is not fair, because it isn't done the way I think it should be!!!" that's going to change that fact, or be worth a taco fart in a wind tunnel to anyone here.
State legislatures include the Governor. The state Supreme Court has every right to interpret state constitutions. State officials also have the right to interpret laws. If that interpretation conflicts with the legislature then the legislature can pass a propos3ed law subject to approval of the Governor.
Dont mess with Texas, ya freaking commies!
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court before midnight on Monday challenging election results in four other states.www.breitbart.com
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.…This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.
