Texas Gets One Step Closer to Secession

[Crepitus]

Mexico isn’t invading Texas, and the US wouldn’t allow them to do so even if they wanted to.

Do you know what the word "succession" means?

Texass wouldn't be in the US anymore after it.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Then what’s stopping them from leaving?

Sanity. Notice no actual Texans are supporting this. If tried we'd hang their skulls from The Twin Sisters by nightfall.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Leftists supported the secession of Kosovo but not TX. Why is that?

lol

Wrong question. Correct question: why are conservatives in fact this stupid.

This fails as a false comparison fallacy – and it has nothing to do with ‘leftists,’ it has to do with the Constitution and its prohibition of ‘secession.’

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Are they?

What a stupid question.

 

[Couchpotato]

And if they let the state succeed they lose all the subsidies for them.

Ain't gonna happen.

Yeah because gas and oil production is a losing proposition. LOl.

 

[Couchpotato]

Do you know what the word "succession" means?

Texass wouldn't be in the US anymore after it.

Succession?

Texas being annexed by Mexico even as an independent country doesn’t benefit the US. Not that Mexico would be able to do so even if it wanted to or the US was interested in letting them do it.

 

[bodecea]

Yes, they really did.

Funny how you had to cut out the facts I laid out in my post.

 

[bodecea]

What a stupid question.

Asking again....are they? Missing any evidence to back up your claim. What a surprise.

 

[Unkotare]

Funny how you had to cut out the facts I laid out in my post.

Funny how they were not facts, they were just bullshit.

 

[bodecea]

Funny how they were not facts, they were just bullshit.

No, it is factual...When Texas was a Republic for 10 years, the understood Southern border was the Nueces....NOT the Rio Grande....so, for the US Army to cross the Nueces and camp on the Rio Grande was an act of war against Mexico. Mexico actually showed great restraint......for a while.

 

[Couchpotato]

No, it is factual...When Texas was a Republic for 10 years, the understood Southern border was the Nueces....NOT the Rio Grande....so, for the US Army to cross the Nueces and camp on the Rio Grande was an act of war against Mexico. Mexico actually showed great restraint......for a while.

Then got their ass handed to them.

 

[Crepitus]

Yeah because gas and oil production is a losing proposition. LOl.

Zero to do with my post.

Nice try though

 

[Crepitus]

Succession?

Texas being annexed by Mexico even as an independent country doesn’t benefit the US. Not that Mexico would be able to do so even if it wanted to or the US was interested in letting them do it.

LMAO!!!

If Texass succeeded who would stop them?

 

[Couchpotato]

Zero to do with my post.

Nice try though

Sure it does dum dum. Why would they need subsidies from the US? Those subsides come in the form of tax breaks, the same ones the Country of Texas would likely offer because Texas would be a wildly wealthy country due to its oil and gas production which would likely go up as a result of less regulation were they not a part of the US.

 

[Couchpotato]

LMAO!!!

If Texass succeeded who would stop them?

If they succeeded? Who would stop Mexico? Texas #1.

 

[Crepitus]

Sure it does dum dum. Why would they need subsidies from the US? Those subsides come in the form of tax breaks, the same ones the Country of Texas would likely offer because Texas would be a wildly wealthy country due to its oil and gas production which would likely go up as a result of less regulation were they not a part of the US.

They are much more than "tax breaks".

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I wish they would secede, it's called addition by subtraction.

Just like you IQ or lack thereof!

 

[Couchpotato]

They are much more than "tax breaks".

It’s comical that you think the oil and gas production in Texas wouldn’t be profitable minus the “subsides”

 

[drudge X]

lol

Wrong question. Correct question: why are conservatives in fact this stupid.

This fails as a false comparison fallacy – and it has nothing to do with ‘leftists,’ it has to do with the Constitution and its prohibition of ‘secession.’

I am sure the former Yugoslavia's constitution was against secession. Kosovo wanted to leave. Yugoslavia said no and sent troops in. Clinton violated Yugoslavia's sovereignty.

If TX is ready to secede tomorrow, you think Biden won't send the military into TX to prevent secession?

 

[Couchpotato]

I am sure the former Yugoslavia's constitution was against secession. Kosovo wanted to leave. Yugoslavia said no and sent troops in. Clinton violated Yugoslavia's sovereignty.

If TX is ready to secede tomorrow, you think Biden won't send the military into TX to prevent secession?

But were they against Succession? You should ask Crepitus