Texas GOP releases statement on SCOTUS decision

[Gdjjr]

Link? Look it up it was in the news already...

You made the allegation, not me. Prove what you're saying-

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Chairman Allen West's Response to SCOTUS Decision - Republican Party of Texas

RPT Chairman Allen West's statement regarding the SCOTUS decision to dismiss Texas's constitutionally legitimate and critical lawsuit.

www.texasgop.org

YES YES YES! I am ready to pack and move because I know damn well my spineless coward of a governor would sit on his ass and do nothing!

It appears that the Texas GOP main site is down.

502 Bad Gateway

Guess the ruling knocked the crap right out of the whole organization.

 

[Ben Thomson]

This means only one thing..the SCOTUS is part of the Deep State. - Trump voter

 

[Moonglow]

Link? Look it up it was in the news already...

You made the allegation, not me. Prove what you're saying-

I can't help it if you don't take the time to peruse.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

as with a great deal of stuff..you were told wrong.

Who told you what you believe?

I've shaped my own beliefs for quite some time now.....But I'm smart enough to know that the foremost jurists in the land were never going to hear this suit. It had no legal basis in fact.

 

[Moonglow]

This means only one thing..the SCOTUS is part of the Deep State. - Trump voter

Including the three justices he appointed.....I'll tell you a secret, Jesus Christ is in on it also, Buddha stayed at home.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is NOT over by a long shot.

It's not over til' is over!

Bless Trump! Bless all Patriots!

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This means only one thing..the SCOTUS is part of the Deep State. - Trump voter

Damn, this is entertaining. Almost as entertaining as the real Looney Tunes.

 

[Preacher]

Texas GOP: Perhaps Law-Abiding States Should ‘Form A Union’ That Will ‘Abide By Constitution’ | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

 

[Gdjjr]

the SCOTUS is part of the Deep State.

Yes- that's been obvious for a long time- they granted Police Immunity with impunity choosing to come down on the side of a Police State- although, countering that, they have ruled against Asset Forfeiture- by and large, they rule, not in favor of liberty, or the constitution, as written, but in favor of interpretation- which aggravates the hell out of me, a literalist, who loves to point out that without definition, interpretation doesn't exist-

 

[Gdjjr]

Damn, this is entertaining. Almost as entertaining as the real Looney Tunes.

And you're as sad as what you represent- anti-liberty.

 

[Moonglow]

Texas GOP: Perhaps Law-Abiding States Should ‘Form A Union’ That Will ‘Abide By Constitution’ | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

FBI is investigating Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, AP report says

The bureau is probing allegations that Paxton broke the law by using the attorney general's office to serve the interests of a political donor, two unnamed sources told the Associated Press.

www.texastribune.org

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Texas GOP: Perhaps Law-Abiding States Should ‘Form A Union’ That Will ‘Abide By Constitution’ | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

17 States sued for this but 23 sued against it. Hate to break it to you but you ain't going to get a Constitutional Congress 2/3rds with those odds. Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough for one day,or week, or month or year or.......

 

[Gdjjr]

Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.

That's pretty ambiguous- what it means is; the SC didn't like the wording-

 

[Synthaholic]

We were told this SCOTUS would always rule in Trump’s favor. How is this possible?

It's call Law and Order....

It's also called States Rights....

 

[Synthaholic]

We were told this SCOTUS would always rule in Trump’s favor. How is this possible?

You've been told a lot of things.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.

That's pretty ambiguous- what it means is; the SC didn't like the wording-

no. that is not what it means.

 

[Gdjjr]

that is not what it means.

cognizable interest is precisely what that means-

 

[Gdjjr]

You've been told a lot of things.

You haven't?

 

[L.K.Eder]

that is not what it means.

cognizable interest is precisely what that means-

Nope. stop it. it's clearly beyond your grasp.