Texas Gov. Greg Abbott: ‘Federal Judge Just Granted My Request to Halt Obama’s Executive Amnesty

[JoeMoma]

We teabaggers enjoy your derangement syndromes....all of them... entertainment we can't buy!

That's it.....Embrace that name. Crazy teabaggers claimed it, and it encompasses all that you are. Proud crazy teabaggers.

Worn as a badge of Patriotism, fucking subversive! Yes, I'm PROUD that we have been given a name reminiscent of the Boston Tea Party....the FIRST STRIKE against dictatorship!

Well good for you. Even though you would like people to think of the patriots of the Boston tea party, we both know that is not what comes to mind. The first thought is derision that people would actually chose such a double entendre for their trademark, and then thoughts of funny hats and misspelled signs. After that, if they haven't already broken out laughing, they think of silly people proudly proclaiming to be patriots while they advocate secession. The name teabagger brings a lot of things to mind, but association with the Boston tea party is rarely included. How very unfortunate and funny for you to have dumbly embraced such a name.

The old geezers that are in the tea party didn't have a clue about the slang meaning of tea bagging. Guess they don't spend enough time watching porn to know.

Not my problem.

It is your justification for being an ass.

 

[BULLDOG]

FYI: Boston Tea Party was about being unfairly taxed. Tea Party means Taxed Enough Already. Nothing subersive, nothing evil. Just simple facts. Something liberal pukes can't fathom.

Something the pukes don't want to admit. They took a perfectly sensible idea by the fed-up conservatives and the liberal assholes were successful in crucifying the organization among themselves.

You want to blame liberals for laughing at your dumb assed choice of name? That's the kind of thing that just reinforces the crazy and childish reputation of teabaggers.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

We teabaggers enjoy your derangement syndromes....all of them... entertainment we can't buy!

That's it.....Embrace that name. Crazy teabaggers claimed it, and it encompasses all that you are. Proud crazy teabaggers.

Worn as a badge of Patriotism, fucking subversive! Yes, I'm PROUD that we have been given a name reminiscent of the Boston Tea Party....the FIRST STRIKE against dictatorship!

Well good for you. Even though you would like people to think of the patriots of the Boston tea party, we both know that is not what comes to mind. The first thought is derision that people would actually chose such a double entendre for their trademark, and then thoughts of funny hats and misspelled signs. After that, if they haven't already broken out laughing, they think of silly people proudly proclaiming to be patriots while they advocate secession. The name teabagger brings a lot of things to mind, but association with the Boston tea party is rarely included. How very unfortunate and funny for you to have dumbly embraced such a name.

FYI: Boston Tea Party was about being unfairly taxed. Tea Party means Taxed Enough Already. Nothing subersive, nothing evil. Just simple facts. Something liberal pukes can't fathom.

Ok. If you want to think of it in those terms, I don't care. The rest of the country thinks of it as I described.

Not sure where you got that idea.You're surrounded by Texans who dont think that way.

 

[JoeMoma]

But it does give "temporary legal status". This goes beyond prosecutory discretion. It's my understanding that these formerly illegal immigrants will be granted valid social security numbers and the right to employment.

They already have jobs. They wouldn't be here otherwise. Why don't you want them to pay the same taxes as everyone else?

They illegally already have jobs.

The point is that the president does not have the constitutional authority to grant them this status in effect overruling current law regardless of whether or not we want them to be paying taxes.

Just to be clear, exactly what status do you think is being granted? Surely you aren't one of those idiots claiming this is amnesty, are you?

From the post you quoted "temporary legal status". That being said, I don't know if there is an official name for this status, but seeing as the formerly illegal immigrants are will be granted documents such as social security cards, it does seem like an appropriate discription. Also, it's temporary because Obama has just 2 more years a president.

The post I quoted that included "temporary legal status" was your post. I never used that term. You did, and your use is inaccurate. There are too many here to deport all of them at once, so some sort of priority must be determined for deportations. Any sane person would agree that violent criminals should be the first group to concentrate on, and families who are working and raising their kids, and are virtually undistinguishable from any other normal family should be left for later. This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. They aren't at least as advantageous to the country as citizens, they don't qualify for the deferral. If the crazy house would have allowed a vote on immigration reform, this wouldn't be necessary anyway. I know you have already heard all of this many times before, but you would rather make dumb statements than look at the reality of what this is.

If illegal immigrants are being issued valid social security numbers in response to the EO then what you say is not true.

 

[BULLDOG]

I'll be happy to have a reasonable discussion with you, but that question is just too stupid to answer.

No it's not too stupid a question. Do you believe illegal aliens/ non sovereign citizens who ignored our legal immigration laws breaking into our country should be able to vote in our elections? It's a simple yes or no question. Please answer.

Of course it is a stupid question. Illegal immigrants can't vote in elections and the only people talking about it are crazy right wing radio listeners and fox drones. Just another manufactured outrage based on nothing but teabaggers imagination. Certainly not something for reasonable discussion.

I know I've already asked this but you failed to respond.
Are you of hispanic descent?
I think it's a fair question when someone condones the onslaught of illegals in this country.
You know,just to give us some insight on your motives.

Nothing to do with onslaught. This deals with people who are already here.

Here illegally. And you dodged the question for the second time.

I've mentioned my heritage many times before, but you'll just have to guess puta.

 

[BULLDOG]

That's it.....Embrace that name. Crazy teabaggers claimed it, and it encompasses all that you are. Proud crazy teabaggers.

Worn as a badge of Patriotism, fucking subversive! Yes, I'm PROUD that we have been given a name reminiscent of the Boston Tea Party....the FIRST STRIKE against dictatorship!

Well good for you. Even though you would like people to think of the patriots of the Boston tea party, we both know that is not what comes to mind. The first thought is derision that people would actually chose such a double entendre for their trademark, and then thoughts of funny hats and misspelled signs. After that, if they haven't already broken out laughing, they think of silly people proudly proclaiming to be patriots while they advocate secession. The name teabagger brings a lot of things to mind, but association with the Boston tea party is rarely included. How very unfortunate and funny for you to have dumbly embraced such a name.

The old geezers that are in the tea party didn't have a clue about the slang meaning of tea bagging. Guess they don't spend enough time watching porn to know.

Not my problem.

It is your justification for being an ass.

It's my justification for laughing at you. You chose the name, and I will honor that choice whenever I can.

 

[BULLDOG]

That's it.....Embrace that name. Crazy teabaggers claimed it, and it encompasses all that you are. Proud crazy teabaggers.

Worn as a badge of Patriotism, fucking subversive! Yes, I'm PROUD that we have been given a name reminiscent of the Boston Tea Party....the FIRST STRIKE against dictatorship!

Well good for you. Even though you would like people to think of the patriots of the Boston tea party, we both know that is not what comes to mind. The first thought is derision that people would actually chose such a double entendre for their trademark, and then thoughts of funny hats and misspelled signs. After that, if they haven't already broken out laughing, they think of silly people proudly proclaiming to be patriots while they advocate secession. The name teabagger brings a lot of things to mind, but association with the Boston tea party is rarely included. How very unfortunate and funny for you to have dumbly embraced such a name.

FYI: Boston Tea Party was about being unfairly taxed. Tea Party means Taxed Enough Already. Nothing subersive, nothing evil. Just simple facts. Something liberal pukes can't fathom.

Ok. If you want to think of it in those terms, I don't care. The rest of the country thinks of it as I described.

Not sure where you got that idea.You're surrounded by Texans who dont think that way.

Obviously you judge all Texans by the silly statements of our gerrymandered politicians. Plenty of crazy teabaggers here, but far from all.

 

[BULLDOG]

They already have jobs. They wouldn't be here otherwise. Why don't you want them to pay the same taxes as everyone else?

They illegally already have jobs.

The point is that the president does not have the constitutional authority to grant them this status in effect overruling current law regardless of whether or not we want them to be paying taxes.

Just to be clear, exactly what status do you think is being granted? Surely you aren't one of those idiots claiming this is amnesty, are you?

From the post you quoted "temporary legal status". That being said, I don't know if there is an official name for this status, but seeing as the formerly illegal immigrants are will be granted documents such as social security cards, it does seem like an appropriate discription. Also, it's temporary because Obama has just 2 more years a president.

The post I quoted that included "temporary legal status" was your post. I never used that term. You did, and your use is inaccurate. There are too many here to deport all of them at once, so some sort of priority must be determined for deportations. Any sane person would agree that violent criminals should be the first group to concentrate on, and families who are working and raising their kids, and are virtually undistinguishable from any other normal family should be left for later. This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. They aren't at least as advantageous to the country as citizens, they don't qualify for the deferral. If the crazy house would have allowed a vote on immigration reform, this wouldn't be necessary anyway. I know you have already heard all of this many times before, but you would rather make dumb statements than look at the reality of what this is.

If illegal immigrants are being issued valid social security numbers in response to the EO then what you say is not true.

Which part?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

No it's not too stupid a question. Do you believe illegal aliens/ non sovereign citizens who ignored our legal immigration laws breaking into our country should be able to vote in our elections? It's a simple yes or no question. Please answer.

Of course it is a stupid question. Illegal immigrants can't vote in elections and the only people talking about it are crazy right wing radio listeners and fox drones. Just another manufactured outrage based on nothing but teabaggers imagination. Certainly not something for reasonable discussion.

I know I've already asked this but you failed to respond.
Are you of hispanic descent?
I think it's a fair question when someone condones the onslaught of illegals in this country.
You know,just to give us some insight on your motives.

Nothing to do with onslaught. This deals with people who are already here.

Here illegally. And you dodged the question for the second time.

I've mentioned my heritage many times before, but you'll just have to guess puta.

Then you shouldnt mind answering the question now.

 

[Care4all]

So, this was temporarily stopped because the federal government has not offered to pay for the driver's licenses is what the USA TODAY article says.

Texas charges $24 for driver's licenses but they cost $200 to do all the back ground checks required by the federal gvt.

The judge made clear that his ruling does not apply to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, which has granted legal status to the almost 700,000 teenagers and young adults born outside the United States.

Texas has standing to bring the lawsuit, the judge ruled, because the federal action would make thousands of newly legalized immigrants eligible for Texas driver's licenses. The state charges $24 per license, but they cost nearly $200 for the state to process — in part because of federal mandates under the REAL ID Act of 2005

 

[BULLDOG]

Of course it is a stupid question. Illegal immigrants can't vote in elections and the only people talking about it are crazy right wing radio listeners and fox drones. Just another manufactured outrage based on nothing but teabaggers imagination. Certainly not something for reasonable discussion.

I know I've already asked this but you failed to respond.
Are you of hispanic descent?
I think it's a fair question when someone condones the onslaught of illegals in this country.
You know,just to give us some insight on your motives.

Nothing to do with onslaught. This deals with people who are already here.

Here illegally. And you dodged the question for the second time.

I've mentioned my heritage many times before, but you'll just have to guess puta.

Then you shouldnt mind answering the question now.

I am a citizen of the United States, and have been all my life. What difference does it make if my ancestors came from Mexico, Ireland, France, Africa, Australia, or England? They did come from at least one of those countries. Where did your ancestors come from, and does it make a difference?

 

[JoeMoma]

They illegally already have jobs.

The point is that the president does not have the constitutional authority to grant them this status in effect overruling current law regardless of whether or not we want them to be paying taxes.

Just to be clear, exactly what status do you think is being granted? Surely you aren't one of those idiots claiming this is amnesty, are you?

From the post you quoted "temporary legal status". That being said, I don't know if there is an official name for this status, but seeing as the formerly illegal immigrants are will be granted documents such as social security cards, it does seem like an appropriate discription. Also, it's temporary because Obama has just 2 more years a president.

The post I quoted that included "temporary legal status" was your post. I never used that term. You did, and your use is inaccurate. There are too many here to deport all of them at once, so some sort of priority must be determined for deportations. Any sane person would agree that violent criminals should be the first group to concentrate on, and families who are working and raising their kids, and are virtually undistinguishable from any other normal family should be left for later. This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. They aren't at least as advantageous to the country as citizens, they don't qualify for the deferral. If the crazy house would have allowed a vote on immigration reform, this wouldn't be necessary anyway. I know you have already heard all of this many times before, but you would rather make dumb statements than look at the reality of what this is.

If illegal immigrants are being issued valid social security numbers in response to the EO then what you say is not true.

Which part?

"This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens."

In fact, the second part of that sentence contradicts the first part. If the EO is simply a deferral of deportation, then it cannot also be a route for them to become citizens. Let's overlook that contradiction for the moment. If executive order were simply a deferral of deportion then it would not include legal access to things like social security numbers to be able to legally work in the USA ( even if they are already working here illegally).

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I know I've already asked this but you failed to respond.
Are you of hispanic descent?
I think it's a fair question when someone condones the onslaught of illegals in this country.
You know,just to give us some insight on your motives.

Nothing to do with onslaught. This deals with people who are already here.

Here illegally. And you dodged the question for the second time.

I've mentioned my heritage many times before, but you'll just have to guess puta.

Then you shouldnt mind answering the question now.

I am a citizen of the United States, and have been all my life. What difference does it make if my ancestors came from Mexico, Ireland, France, Africa, Australia, or England? They did come from at least one of those countries. Where did your ancestors come from, and does it make a difference?

I'm Dutch. But you wont hear me condoning massive Dutch immigration.
Because I'm American first and foremost.

 

[JoeMoma]

Just to be clear, exactly what status do you think is being granted? Surely you aren't one of those idiots claiming this is amnesty, are you?

From the post you quoted "temporary legal status". That being said, I don't know if there is an official name for this status, but seeing as the formerly illegal immigrants are will be granted documents such as social security cards, it does seem like an appropriate discription. Also, it's temporary because Obama has just 2 more years a president.

The post I quoted that included "temporary legal status" was your post. I never used that term. You did, and your use is inaccurate. There are too many here to deport all of them at once, so some sort of priority must be determined for deportations. Any sane person would agree that violent criminals should be the first group to concentrate on, and families who are working and raising their kids, and are virtually undistinguishable from any other normal family should be left for later. This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. They aren't at least as advantageous to the country as citizens, they don't qualify for the deferral. If the crazy house would have allowed a vote on immigration reform, this wouldn't be necessary anyway. I know you have already heard all of this many times before, but you would rather make dumb statements than look at the reality of what this is.

If illegal immigrants are being issued valid social security numbers in response to the EO then what you say is not true.

Which part?

"This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens."

In fact, the second part of that sentence contradicts the first part. If the EO is simply a deferral of deportation, then it cannot also be a route for them to become citizens. Let's overlook that contradiction for the moment. If executive order were simply a deferral of deportion then it would not include legal access to things like social security numbers to be able to legally worn in the USA ( even if they are already working here illegally).

Also, if the EO simply deferred deportation, it would not make illegal immergrants eligible for Texas drivers licenses (assuming that they are in Texas).

 

[BULLDOG]

Just to be clear, exactly what status do you think is being granted? Surely you aren't one of those idiots claiming this is amnesty, are you?

From the post you quoted "temporary legal status". That being said, I don't know if there is an official name for this status, but seeing as the formerly illegal immigrants are will be granted documents such as social security cards, it does seem like an appropriate discription. Also, it's temporary because Obama has just 2 more years a president.

The post I quoted that included "temporary legal status" was your post. I never used that term. You did, and your use is inaccurate. There are too many here to deport all of them at once, so some sort of priority must be determined for deportations. Any sane person would agree that violent criminals should be the first group to concentrate on, and families who are working and raising their kids, and are virtually undistinguishable from any other normal family should be left for later. This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. They aren't at least as advantageous to the country as citizens, they don't qualify for the deferral. If the crazy house would have allowed a vote on immigration reform, this wouldn't be necessary anyway. I know you have already heard all of this many times before, but you would rather make dumb statements than look at the reality of what this is.

If illegal immigrants are being issued valid social security numbers in response to the EO then what you say is not true.

Which part?

"This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens."

In fact, the second part of that sentence contradicts the first part. If the EO is simply a deferral of deportation, then it cannot also be a route for them to become citizens. Let's overlook that contradiction for the moment. If executive order were simply a deferral of deportion then it would not include legal access to things like social security numbers to be able to legally worn in the USA ( even if they are already working here illegally).

No contradiction at all. How does one preclude the other? Why do you think an executive order can only deal with one aspect of a problem? That's just silly.

 

[BULLDOG]

Nothing to do with onslaught. This deals with people who are already here.

Here illegally. And you dodged the question for the second time.

I've mentioned my heritage many times before, but you'll just have to guess puta.

Then you shouldnt mind answering the question now.

I am a citizen of the United States, and have been all my life. What difference does it make if my ancestors came from Mexico, Ireland, France, Africa, Australia, or England? They did come from at least one of those countries. Where did your ancestors come from, and does it make a difference?

I'm Dutch. But you wont hear me condoning massive Dutch immigration.
Because I'm American first and foremost.

As am I.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Here illegally. And you dodged the question for the second time.

I've mentioned my heritage many times before, but you'll just have to guess puta.

Then you shouldnt mind answering the question now.

I am a citizen of the United States, and have been all my life. What difference does it make if my ancestors came from Mexico, Ireland, France, Africa, Australia, or England? They did come from at least one of those countries. Where did your ancestors come from, and does it make a difference?

I'm Dutch. But you wont hear me condoning massive Dutch immigration.
Because I'm American first and foremost.

As am I.

Then why would you condone illegal immigration?

 

[BULLDOG]

From the post you quoted "temporary legal status". That being said, I don't know if there is an official name for this status, but seeing as the formerly illegal immigrants are will be granted documents such as social security cards, it does seem like an appropriate discription. Also, it's temporary because Obama has just 2 more years a president.

The post I quoted that included "temporary legal status" was your post. I never used that term. You did, and your use is inaccurate. There are too many here to deport all of them at once, so some sort of priority must be determined for deportations. Any sane person would agree that violent criminals should be the first group to concentrate on, and families who are working and raising their kids, and are virtually undistinguishable from any other normal family should be left for later. This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. They aren't at least as advantageous to the country as citizens, they don't qualify for the deferral. If the crazy house would have allowed a vote on immigration reform, this wouldn't be necessary anyway. I know you have already heard all of this many times before, but you would rather make dumb statements than look at the reality of what this is.

If illegal immigrants are being issued valid social security numbers in response to the EO then what you say is not true.

Which part?

"This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens."

In fact, the second part of that sentence contradicts the first part. If the EO is simply a deferral of deportation, then it cannot also be a route for them to become citizens. Let's overlook that contradiction for the moment. If executive order were simply a deferral of deportion then it would not include legal access to things like social security numbers to be able to legally worn in the USA ( even if they are already working here illegally).

Also, if the EO simply deferred deportation, it would not make illegal immergrants eligible for Texas drivers licenses (assuming that they are in Texas).

Because it doesn't simply defer deportation. It defers deportation and offers a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. Didn't you read my earlier post?

 

[JoeMoma]

From the post you quoted "temporary legal status". That being said, I don't know if there is an official name for this status, but seeing as the formerly illegal immigrants are will be granted documents such as social security cards, it does seem like an appropriate discription. Also, it's temporary because Obama has just 2 more years a president.

The post I quoted that included "temporary legal status" was your post. I never used that term. You did, and your use is inaccurate. There are too many here to deport all of them at once, so some sort of priority must be determined for deportations. Any sane person would agree that violent criminals should be the first group to concentrate on, and families who are working and raising their kids, and are virtually undistinguishable from any other normal family should be left for later. This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. They aren't at least as advantageous to the country as citizens, they don't qualify for the deferral. If the crazy house would have allowed a vote on immigration reform, this wouldn't be necessary anyway. I know you have already heard all of this many times before, but you would rather make dumb statements than look at the reality of what this is.

If illegal immigrants are being issued valid social security numbers in response to the EO then what you say is not true.

Which part?

"This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens."

In fact, the second part of that sentence contradicts the first part. If the EO is simply a deferral of deportation, then it cannot also be a route for them to become citizens. Let's overlook that contradiction for the moment. If executive order were simply a deferral of deportion then it would not include legal access to things like social security numbers to be able to legally worn in the USA ( even if they are already working here illegally).

No contradiction at all. How does one preclude the other? Why do you think an executive order can only deal with one aspect of a problem? That's just silly.

So you are saying that the EO is a route for the illegal immigrants to become citizens? And you really think that is not a contradiction to it just being a deferral of deportation!!!! Oh my goodness!

 

[RKMBrown]

The post I quoted that included "temporary legal status" was your post. I never used that term. You did, and your use is inaccurate. There are too many here to deport all of them at once, so some sort of priority must be determined for deportations. Any sane person would agree that violent criminals should be the first group to concentrate on, and families who are working and raising their kids, and are virtually undistinguishable from any other normal family should be left for later. This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. They aren't at least as advantageous to the country as citizens, they don't qualify for the deferral. If the crazy house would have allowed a vote on immigration reform, this wouldn't be necessary anyway. I know you have already heard all of this many times before, but you would rather make dumb statements than look at the reality of what this is.

If illegal immigrants are being issued valid social security numbers in response to the EO then what you say is not true.

Which part?

"This is nothing more than a deferral of deportation for those families until the bad guys are dealt with, and a reasonable rout for them to become citizens."

In fact, the second part of that sentence contradicts the first part. If the EO is simply a deferral of deportation, then it cannot also be a route for them to become citizens. Let's overlook that contradiction for the moment. If executive order were simply a deferral of deportion then it would not include legal access to things like social security numbers to be able to legally worn in the USA ( even if they are already working here illegally).

Also, if the EO simply deferred deportation, it would not make illegal immergrants eligible for Texas drivers licenses (assuming that they are in Texas).

Because it doesn't simply defer deportation. It defers deportation and offers a reasonable rout for them to become citizens. Didn't you read my earlier post?

So you are implying that our immigration system is an unreasonable route to citizenship. Interesting view you democrats have. Maybe we should just open the door to all immigration and let your democrat constituents beg for jobs at minimum wage if they are willing to work harder than everyone we let in.