Over you?^ he mad
![rofl :rofl: :rofl:](/styles/smilies/rofl.gif)
Oh and I want you to show me where I was saying one was better than the other. I mean that's what you all are claiming I did............. I won't hold my breath...........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Over you?^ he mad
^ dunning effectYou're an idiot.
But I think you might just cry.I won't hold my breath...........
Strike three.^ dunning effectYou're an idiot.
Dunning - Krueger effect is that the less intelligent one is the more likely he is to under estimate the intelligence of others and over estimate his own intelligence.
They amend their Constitution by popular vote?
How lame
You give yourself waaaaaay too much credit.But I think you might just cry.I won't hold my breath...........
No shit, Sherlock.BTW all those jokes, weren't.
I don’t believe I am. I have match grade hair triggers which were harder to pull than you.You give yourself waaaaaay too much credit.But I think you might just cry.I won't hold my breath...........![]()
Repealing an amendment goes thru the same process since it is actually amending the Constitution, so it would have to go to the citizens for a vote. Libnuts can't just come in and change the Constitution.Pre-emptive action aimed at the leftists flooding the state from shithole libnut states like Kalifornia.
Because they won't just turn around and repeal the amendment once they have the majority?
Delusional to boot.I don’t believe I am. I have match grade hair triggers which were harder to pull than you.You give yourself waaaaaay too much credit.But I think you might just cry.I won't hold my breath...........![]()
Why not? Why do you oppose the people of a state having a direct say in how the state is run?More reason why you don’t put a change to the Constitution up to a popular voteGood thing we live in a Representative Republic then, right?I know letting the people have a say in policy upsets Dimwingers. You would rather be told by your handlers what they can and can't do to you.They amend their Constitution by popular vote?
How lame
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for supper
I assume it is because you are unable to think for yourself, and instead rely on political hacks to do our thinking. Typical Dimwinger.
Because they won't just turn around and repeal the amendment once they have the majority?
I'll ask you the same question I asked the Ding bat. It would appear you're claiming I'm making a comparison that one is better than the other, right? If that's the case I want you to show me exactly where I did that........ The clock's ticking......Funny thing about messageboards..............once you post something and it gets quoted by another poster, it doesn't go away.Wow, and I bet you think you're educated....... Wow....... Try again Sparky.More crawfishing.I did not make any of those claims, you are making incorrect assumptions. Try reading without reading into.You specifically brought up Kalifornia and trade offs, and claimed those evened things out. I compared those "trade offs" and showed those "trade offs" amount to TX having a tax rate about half of Kalifornia.No I didn't, you're just another highly educated idiot who can't see past his own nose. You read what I said wrong and now you want to blame me fore your fuck up. That's pathetic.
That's when you started crawfishing from your "trade off" comment.![]()
How many times will your handlers tell you to post that?Why not? Why do you oppose the people of a state having a direct say in how the state is run?More reason why you don’t put a change to the Constitution up to a popular voteGood thing we live in a Representative Republic then, right?I know letting the people have a say in policy upsets Dimwingers. You would rather be told by your handlers what they can and can't do to you.
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for supper
I assume it is because you are unable to think for yourself, and instead rely on political hacks to do our thinking. Typical Dimwinger.
Because Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for supper
The clock's ticking?I'll ask you the same question I asked the Ding bat. It would appear you're claiming I'm making a comparison that one is better than the other, right? If that's the case I want you to show me exactly where I did that........ The clock's ticking......Funny thing about messageboards..............once you post something and it gets quoted by another poster, it doesn't go away.Wow, and I bet you think you're educated....... Wow....... Try again Sparky.More crawfishing.I did not make any of those claims, you are making incorrect assumptions. Try reading without reading into.You specifically brought up Kalifornia and trade offs, and claimed those evened things out. I compared those "trade offs" and showed those "trade offs" amount to TX having a tax rate about half of Kalifornia.
That's when you started crawfishing from your "trade off" comment.![]()
Indeed. Yet another reason to go.Time for me to remind the wife that we need to move to Texas...
Like the Ding bat you're avoiding the question.........The clock's ticking?I'll ask you the same question I asked the Ding bat. It would appear you're claiming I'm making a comparison that one is better than the other, right? If that's the case I want you to show me exactly where I did that........ The clock's ticking......Funny thing about messageboards..............once you post something and it gets quoted by another poster, it doesn't go away.Wow, and I bet you think you're educated....... Wow....... Try again Sparky.More crawfishing.I did not make any of those claims, you are making incorrect assumptions. Try reading without reading into.![]()
![]()
Your post is here already. I'm not in the habit of jumping thru hoops because some poster wants to deny what he posted.Like the Ding bat you're avoiding the question.........The clock's ticking?I'll ask you the same question I asked the Ding bat. It would appear you're claiming I'm making a comparison that one is better than the other, right? If that's the case I want you to show me exactly where I did that........ The clock's ticking......Funny thing about messageboards..............once you post something and it gets quoted by another poster, it doesn't go away.Wow, and I bet you think you're educated....... Wow....... Try again Sparky.More crawfishing.![]()
![]()
I just thought you might want to back up your asinine claim with fact, that's all. Nice backpeddle though.......Your post is here already. I'm not in the habit of jumping thru hoops because some poster wants to deny what he posted.Like the Ding bat you're avoiding the question.........The clock's ticking?I'll ask you the same question I asked the Ding bat. It would appear you're claiming I'm making a comparison that one is better than the other, right? If that's the case I want you to show me exactly where I did that........ The clock's ticking......Funny thing about messageboards..............once you post something and it gets quoted by another poster, it doesn't go away.Wow, and I bet you think you're educated....... Wow....... Try again Sparky.![]()
![]()
Deal with it.
He’s super triggered about this.The clock's ticking?I'll ask you the same question I asked the Ding bat. It would appear you're claiming I'm making a comparison that one is better than the other, right? If that's the case I want you to show me exactly where I did that........ The clock's ticking......Funny thing about messageboards..............once you post something and it gets quoted by another poster, it doesn't go away.Wow, and I bet you think you're educated....... Wow....... Try again Sparky.More crawfishing.I did not make any of those claims, you are making incorrect assumptions. Try reading without reading into.![]()
![]()