but nobody was armed!!it doesn't undermine her testimony, because it still means Trump wanted to lead an armed crowd to the capitol, just that they didn't "lock and load" until they left the rally.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but nobody was armed!!it doesn't undermine her testimony, because it still means Trump wanted to lead an armed crowd to the capitol, just that they didn't "lock and load" until they left the rally.
who what police have treaties to that?By police.
His desire to march on the Capitol. His request to remove the magnetometers and allow armed supporters to attend the "Stop the Steal" rally.that nobody can back up her claim about guns at the rally
Keep up.did you not watch her testimony?
Remember, many crimes are one of intent, as well as success. Attempted murder is as serious a crime, and has the same punishment as an actual murder.say what? if it didn’t actually happen then what i’m the world can you get to trump intentions
yes that’s what this discredited woman said…but there is nothing to support itHis desire to march on the Capitol. His request to remove the magnetometers and allow armed supporters to attend the "Stop the Steal" rally.
Backstage at the rally, Trump was irate that people with weapons were not being let through the magnetometers by Secret Service officers
Minutes before Donald Trump took the stage at an Ellipse rally on Jan. 6, 2021, he urged the Secret Service to remove security magnetometers ...
Trump wanted to take magnetometers away from the entrance to his rally space near the White House in order to let armed supporters in on Jan. 6, .
When they got to the capitol they were armed.but nobody was armed!!
well actually it doesn’t…but yes it requires the actual internet commit murderRemember, many crimes are one of intent, as well as success. Attempted murder is as serious a crime, and has the same punishment as an actual murder.
You repeating what you heard a cop say but did not see yourself is classic hearsayA cop saying he sees an individual with a gun is hearsay??
You're fucking nuts.![]()
that nobody can back up her claim about guns at the rally
The classic “ you should be ashamed of yourself” as brought by abused libsWrong as always. The police testified to that fact and arrested people for it. You have zero shame. Else you would be embarrassed of yourself for being such a sissy.
You repeating what you heard a cop say but did not see yourself is classic hearsay
To that I say you are wrong. The proof is in the federal record.but nobody was armed!!
And when you “testify” as to testimony provided by others then it’s hearsay. That testimony is not proven fact and when you pass on what you heard, and in your case try to present as fact, then you are wrong in two ways including hearsayWrong as always. The police testified to that fact and arrested people for it. You have zero shame. Else you would be embarrassed of yourself for being such a sissy.
but nobody was armed!!
who what police have treaties to that?
You do not have to be a witness in court to have committed hearsay. In everyday parlance it’s called gossip.LOLOL
You retard, I'm not a witness. That's not hearsay. And the video containing police reporting seeing guns was posted here a couple of times.
yes that’s what this discredited woman said…but there is nothing to support it
No it never doesRemember, many crimes are one of intent, as well as success. Attempted murder is as serious a crime, and has the same punishment as an actual murder.
How about one of his supporters who was at the ellipse, and later at the capitol pleading guilty to possessing a loaded taurus revolver at the capitol.yes that’s what this discredited woman said…but there is nothing to support it