Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 73,103
- 65,219
It's Who'sWhose they?
Guiliani
Meadows
Jordan
Cippione
Biggs
Ginni Thomas
Need more?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's Who'sWhose they?
I wasn’t asking you but why would they?It's Who's
Guiliani
Meadows
Jordan
Cippione
Biggs
Ginni Thomas
Need more?
Because their Congress asked them to do so of course.I wasn’t asking you but why would they?
That’s not a compelling reason, frankly.Because their Congress asked them to do so of course.
If they don't testify...then what is said about them standsThat’s not a compelling reason, frankly.
She witnessed discussions with Trump and key Trump staff
She testified under oath
Why won’t they?
Let me know when something worth hearing about is said in these hearings. If yesterday was any indication I won’t hold my breathIf they don't testify...then what is said about them stands
So the fact that Trump not only knew the protesters were armed but approved of it means nothing?Let me know when something worth hearing about is said in these hearings. If yesterday was any indication I won’t hold my breath
Ok...and? You think Ornato lied to her?It is hearsay since she wasn't at the SUV you understand now?
He wanted more people in the crowd. He didn’t care if they were armed. So no I dont think it means anything other than he’s a narcissist. But we didn’t need a committee to investigate to know thatSo the fact that Trump not only knew the protesters were armed but approved of it means nothing?
Actually, it means he is derelict. Those guns are illegal in DC.He wanted more people in the crowd. He didn’t care if they were armed. So no I dont think it means anything other than he’s a narcissist.
Ok and? The POTUS isn’t in charge of enforcing the gun laws in DC. You guys are grasping at straws.Actually, it means he is derelict. Those guns are illegal in DC.
Right, he is just disregarding them. Disregard for the law. Gun laws. gins carried by angry people in the DC.Ok and? The POTUS isn’t in charge of enforcing the gun laws in DC. You guys are grasping at straws.
That's right, and they're both willing to testify under oath. Or were you not paying any attention?The only testimony which can confirm or deny Hutchinson's statements about what took place in the Beast is from Engel and/or Ornato.
POTUS has no authority to enforce those laws or not enforce them. Whether Trump cared or not is irrelevant. Did the DC police hear that Trump didn’t care about those people being armed and not arrest then as a result?Right, he is just disregarding them. Disregard for the law. Gun laws. gins carried by angry people in the DC.
How low will you go? Keep going?
Your word salads are not worth a cogent response. So get bent.Given your 'response', I was a bit wrong, you are both a damn liar and a childish grownup, incapable of posting an honest rebuttal.
I have not seen them quoted in any reportage.That's right, and they're both willing to testify under oath. Or were you not paying any attention?
I have not seen them quoted in any reportage.
Do you have a link?
Therefore, okay to facilitate people breaking them.POTUS has no authority to enforce those laws or not enforce them.