Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

[Lesh]

He wanted more people in the crowd. He didn’t care if they were armed. So no I dont think it means anything other than he’s a narcissist. But we didn’t need a committee to investigate to know that

Not only is that illegal in DC...but he SENT those armed people to the Capitol

 

[Lesh]

Secret Service says January 6 Committee didn't reach out before Hutchinson testimony on Trump lunging at agent

The U.S. Secret Service said the January 6 Committee did not check an allegation against former President Trump with witnessing agents before a hearing.

www.foxnews.com

Also posts 948 and 989

That is NOT a link to either of them being quoted

 

[TemplarKormac]

That is NOT a link to either of them being quoted

Every reporter from ABC to FOX are reporting the same thing. It's like having multiple witnesses to a murder. More witnesses, more credibility.

So please, don't bother.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Her "testimony" is HEARSAY you idiot!

It was NOT even a testimony at all,

Merriam-Webster:

"a solemn declaration usually made orally by a witness under oath in response to interrogation by a lawyer or authorized public official"

bolding mine

===

She wasn't a witness.

Wrong.

Hutchinson was present during the exchange between Meadows and Cipollone, where Trump refused to do anything to stop his bloodthirsty supporters, that Trump knew his terrorists were armed, and that Trump didn’t care that Pence was in danger.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Your word salads are not worth a cogent response. So get bent.

LOL temper temper little boy. You have no clue as to what word salad is, and likely never heard of it before I used it weeks ago.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Wrong.

Hutchinson was present during the exchange between Meadows and Cipollone, where Trump refused to do anything to stop his bloodthirsty supporters, that Trump knew his terrorists were armed, and that Trump didn’t care that Pence was in danger.

You really don't know what HEARSAY is because she wasn't a WITNESS of the claimed events.

Meadows and Cipollone were not in the car thus also hearsay which makes it a DOUBLE hearsay.

Thus, it is at best second hand which very often make it admissible in court thus worthless.

Why not have the two REAL witnesses testify under oath instead?

 

[tahuyaman]

Ah ah, another ditto head. No wonder you remain out of touch with reality. Try to ignore the BIG LIE promulgated by Limbaugh decades ago that the major networks and Newspapers were all fake and you may open your eyes to probative evidence.

Ah. Another troll who can’t engage in a discussion

 

[Rye Catcher]

Wrong.

Hutchinson was present during the exchange between Meadows and Cipollone, where Trump refused to do anything to stop his bloodthirsty supporters, that Trump knew his terrorists were armed, and that Trump didn’t care that Pence was in danger.

Yep, and all the clowns who continue to make shit out of one or two phrases is all over the MB. How many lies and misinformation has dumb donald uttered in the past six years?

Tens of thousands, and the young woman didn't even lie.

 

[g5000]

Secret Service says January 6 Committee didn't reach out before Hutchinson testimony on Trump lunging at agent

The U.S. Secret Service said the January 6 Committee did not check an allegation against former President Trump with witnessing agents before a hearing.

www.foxnews.com

Also posts 948 and 989

There is no quote from either man.

All you have is an anonymous source.

 

[TemplarKormac]

There is no quote from either man.

All you have is an anonymous source.

That's a cop-out mate.

How many news outlets are reporting this? How many have confirmed that these men are willing to testify under oath against the testimony? ALL OF THEM. This also shows me you are scared that all of that sophistry and colorful language you threw at me yesterday is going to boomerang on you.

 

[Esdraelon]

There is no quote from either man.

All you have is an anonymous source.

Seems if they are impugning the validity of the committee over the testimony, the committee would subpoena them ASAP and make them testify under oath. The committee is refusing to do this. They've not hesitated to subpoena any other member of the Trump admin or team. That doesn't seem a bit odd to you?

 

[TemplarKormac]

LOL temper temper little boy. You have no clue as to what word salad is, and likely never heard of it before I used it weeks ago.

I actually do. Unintelligible, nonsensical strings of words and phrases, or namely, your posts. You are not smart, it's time you came to terms with that.

 

[rightwinger]

It is hearsay since she wasn't at the SUV you understand now?

The SUV wasn’t in the White House while Trump was throwing his tantrums

 

[rightwinger]

-------------------------------------------------------

In my view, this brouhaha over the wrestling match in the car will fade soon. It is a tempest in a teapot that the RightTighties are fervently wishing to be a nuclear reactor. Gone soon. Betcha.

However.......

What may linger longer is ---- the testimony of Pat Cipollone.
He's been subpoenaed now (wouldn't surprise me that it was after he subtly hinted to 'em to do so. CYA, you know.)

The testimony so far has surely indicated Cipolllone is a key guy in a number of meetings. I hope he comes to the witness table cooperatively.....and brings his files, memory sticks, contemporaneous notes.....and his knowledge of who said what to whom.

These hearings are getting curioser and curioser. No?

We are starting to learn what was going on behind closed doors.
It shows a President detached from reality, throwing tantrums and scheming to overturn the election

 

[Chillicothe]

As you no doubt know by now, the Select Committee issued a subpoena late yesterday to the chief White House lawyer, Pat Cipollone.
And, as you no doubt heard in some of the hearings to date.....Cipollone was a prominent voice in meetings. Often a prudent voice urging moderation while warning of legal jeopardy attached to some of the proposed 'Election Reversal' schemes.

He's been reluctant to sit before the Committee while under oath or being filmed.

But, with the effective testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson Cipollone's name became even more prominent than it was when Cheney called him out as she ended the 4th (or was it the 3rd?) hearing.

Cipollone is now the guy with the spotlight on him.....and it's gonna follow him. THAT much attention doesn't just fade away. Something hasta happen. He'll cooperate. Or he'll file a suit to attempt to stop it. But the press will be on him like a perfume. After all, there's no 'client confidentiality' aspect here. He is the 'People's lawyer'....... NOT Don Trump's lawyer.



This morning's Washington Post offered us this:

"But the subpoena may provide cover for Cipollone to cooperate with the committee, as Trump and his allies have sought to keep those in the former president’s orbit from providing the committee with potentially damaging information.

Hutchinson in her testimony portrayed Cipollone as one of the last firewalls blocking Trump’s efforts to overturn the elections. She testified that, on the morning of Jan. 6, Cipollone came forward with an urgent request, saying “something to the effect of: ‘Please make sure we don’t go up to the Capitol, Cassidy. Keep in touch with me. We’re going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen.’”

Tuesday’s surprise hearing was designed in part to ramp up pressure on reluctant witnesses such as Cipollone, according to those involved with the investigation....."

---------------------------------------------------------

These hearings have been a fascinating exercise in watching drama, conflict, and the 'sausage-making' ickyness of our elected leaders.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

As you no doubt know by now, the Select Committee issued a subpoena late yesterday to the chief White House lawyer, Pat Cipollone.
And, as you no doubt heard in some of the hearings to date.....Cipollone was a prominent voice in meetings. Often a prudent voice urging moderation while warning of legal jeopardy attached to some of the proposed 'Election Reversal' schemes.

He's been reluctant to sit before the Committee while under oath or being filmed.

But, with the effective testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson Cipollone's name became even more prominent than it was when Cheney called him out as she ended the 4th (or was it the 3rd?) hearing.

Cipollone is now the guy with the spotlight on him.....and it's gonna follow him. THAT much attention doesn't just fade away. Something hasta happen. He'll cooperate. Or he'll file a suit to attempt to stop it. But the press will be on him like a perfume. After all, there's no 'client confidentiality' aspect here. He is the 'People's lawyer'....... NOT Don Trump's lawyer.



This morning's Washington Post offered us this:

"But the subpoena may provide cover for Cipollone to cooperate with the committee, as Trump and his allies have sought to keep those in the former president’s orbit from providing the committee with potentially damaging information.

Hutchinson in her testimony portrayed Cipollone as one of the last firewalls blocking Trump’s efforts to overturn the elections. She testified that, on the morning of Jan. 6, Cipollone came forward with an urgent request, saying “something to the effect of: ‘Please make sure we don’t go up to the Capitol, Cassidy. Keep in touch with me. We’re going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen.’”

Tuesday’s surprise hearing was designed in part to ramp up pressure on reluctant witnesses such as Cipollone, according to those involved with the investigation....."

---------------------------------------------------------

These hearings have been a fascinating exercise in watching drama, conflict, and the 'sausage-making' ickyness of our elected leaders.

You ass holes look like GD fools now you imbecile

Give it up. You investigated one man and his family for 6 years and got your teeth knocked in every time. And look at that crooked inside trader, Pelosi

 

[struth]

As you no doubt know by now, the Select Committee issued a subpoena late yesterday to the chief White House lawyer, Pat Cipollone.
And, as you no doubt heard in some of the hearings to date.....Cipollone was a prominent voice in meetings. Often a prudent voice urging moderation while warning of legal jeopardy attached to some of the proposed 'Election Reversal' schemes.

He's been reluctant to sit before the Committee while under oath or being filmed.

But, with the effective testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson Cipollone's name became even more prominent than it was when Cheney called him out as she ended the 4th (or was it the 3rd?) hearing.

Cipollone is now the guy with the spotlight on him.....and it's gonna follow him. THAT much attention doesn't just fade away. Something hasta happen. He'll cooperate. Or he'll file a suit to attempt to stop it. But the press will be on him like a perfume. After all, there's no 'client confidentiality' aspect here. He is the 'People's lawyer'....... NOT Don Trump's lawyer.



This morning's Washington Post offered us this:

"But the subpoena may provide cover for Cipollone to cooperate with the committee, as Trump and his allies have sought to keep those in the former president’s orbit from providing the committee with potentially damaging information.

Hutchinson in her testimony portrayed Cipollone as one of the last firewalls blocking Trump’s efforts to overturn the elections. She testified that, on the morning of Jan. 6, Cipollone came forward with an urgent request, saying “something to the effect of: ‘Please make sure we don’t go up to the Capitol, Cassidy. Keep in touch with me. We’re going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen.’”

Tuesday’s surprise hearing was designed in part to ramp up pressure on reluctant witnesses such as Cipollone, according to those involved with the investigation....."

---------------------------------------------------------

These hearings have been a fascinating exercise in watching drama, conflict, and the 'sausage-making' ickyness of our elected leaders.

why wouldn’t the committee call the secret service agents that were at the heart of the “bombshell” witness testimony?

 

[Couchpotato]

Therefore, okay to facilitate people breaking them.

How low will you go?

How is that facilitation? Did he give them the guns? Straws, keep grasping.

 

[berg80]

The challenge for the committee will be to find useful questions to ask that do not fall under the protections from answering afforded to him. Like executive privilege, attorney-client privilege, and the 5th amendment. However, it has been noted some information he has withheld does not fall under any of those three categories. The extent of his willingness to answer questions fully and honestly will help or hinder the committee and the DoJ in the former's attempt to tell the public what happened and the latter's decision to indict a former prez or not.

 

[Billiejeens]

He is already unelectable. Republicans are not that stupid

He is the single most popular person in the USA.
That Infomercial that yawl are doing is keeping the fraudulent election fresh in everyone mind.