Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,443
- 81,566
I wasn’t asking you but why would they?
To get their account of what happened on the record.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn’t asking you but why would they?
They can simply tell the press if they want their account on the record. They don't need to filter it through a gang of sleazy lying clowns who will do everything in their power to mischaracterize it.To get their account of what happened on the record.
Gossip Girl has been caught in multiple lies by multiple people. She claimed to write a letter that her boss actually wrote on top of all her other bullshit lies.She was repeating something Ornato told her. What's to stop him from lying about what he told her?
He said she said
So hearsay vs hearsay. And one set of hearsay evidence is more believable because why?That's not been reported. What was actually reported was someone else, who was not in the vehicle that day, is claiming those 2 agents dispute Hutchinson's claim. But those 2 agents have not yet made a public statement yet either way. Rightards, who regrettably suffer from a lack of comprehension, read that wrong and ran with it out of desperation. And while it's entirely possible those 2 agents can publicly state they never told her that, that hasn't actually happened yet. Read for clarity next time.
You really don't know what HEARSAY is because she wasn't a WITNESS of the claimed events.
Meadows and Cipollone were not in the car thus also hearsay which makes it a DOUBLE hearsay.
Thus, it is at best second hand which very often make it admissible in court thus worthless.
Why not have the two REAL witnesses testify under oath instead?
So hearsay vs hearsay. And one set of hearsay evidence is more believable because why?
CNN, the NY Times, CNBC,The Huffington Post for starters
Why not get everyone’s account? Why just one side?To get their account of what happened on the record.
Yes, let's get Pelosi's account. Put her on the witness stand.Why not get everyone’s account? Why just one side?
She witnessed discussions with Trump and key Trump staff
She testified under oath
Why won’t they?
What specific part of his testimony did you find most compelling?
Didn't she swear under oath that she heard it happened in the Beast? If she did and TRUMP! wasn't in the Beast, then what she recounted is false and cannot be taken seriously.
The part where he denied being involved with the FBI.
Nobody knew if the protesters were armed. Furthermore, they weren't armed.
But he is on video inciting an insurrection. Why dont you want him in jail?
You wont call him out. Why is that?
So where are the guns?Fucking moron, the police were reporting seeing guns.
Why not get everyone’s account? Why just one side?
Her testimony is regarding her direct conversations with the two who were there. They related the story to her. Not hearsay but straight from the horses mouth.It is hearsay since she wasn't at the SUV you understand now?
So where are the guns?
Quote Trump saying that.Quote him saying they should go inside the Capitol forcefully and to overturn the election...