Text began coming in to Meadows on January 6th, begging trump to stop the Capitol attack

[Nostra]

Her testimony is regarding her direct conversations with the two who were there. They related the story to her. Not hearsay but straight from the horses mouth.

No Stupid, that is the very definition of hearsay. The agents dispute her version of events.

 

[hadit]

It can be taken seriously if Ornato or Engel confirm what she said.

She said they were in the Beast. If they confirm they were in the Beast, it makes TRUMP! trying to grab the wheel that much less likely.

 

[hadit]

Her testimony is regarding her direct conversations with the two who were there. They related the story to her. Not hearsay but straight from the horses mouth.

And, of course, not embellished in any way to make it sound more dramatic in a casual conversation. For sure they knew they were going to be quoted in a hearing under oath, so they recounted to her the exact details of everything that happened. Of course, you can hear the sarcasm. Until they get the people who were actually in the car to testify, there's no good reason to believe it happened.

 

[Faun]

Quote Trump saying that.

I never said he did.

 

[Lastamender]

Her testimony is regarding her direct conversations with the two who were there. They related the story to her. Not hearsay but straight from the horses mouth.

Mark Meadows: My Aide Is Lying About Me Wanting a Pardon After the January 6 Riot

townhall.com

 

[Sunsettommy]

Her testimony is regarding her direct conversations with the two who were there. They related the story to her. Not hearsay but straight from the horses mouth.

You gloss over the part that it was in error.

Better to have actual physical witnesses of people who were at the SUV with Trump to testify but there is a reason why the Joke 6 committee isn't going to allow it.

Can you figure it out buttercup?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Her testimony is regarding her direct conversations with the two who were there. They related the story to her. Not hearsay but straight from the horses mouth.

You embarrass yourself here because what YOU described is HEARSAY in this case probably DOUBLE hearsay since NONE of them are physical witnesses of the alleged events in a SUV not in the Beast as they erroneously claimed.



Hearsay evidence, in a legal forum, is testimony from an under-oath witness who is reciting an out-of-court statement, the content of which is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. In most courts, hearsay evidence is inadmissible (the "hearsay evidence rule") unless an exception to the hearsay rule applies.

LINK

bolding mine

===

Using your very lose interpretation, I can say you beat your wife every day in a drunken rage, I heard it during my prayers.

You have very low standards for determining what is real and valid.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Mark Meadows: My Aide Is Lying About Me Wanting a Pardon After the January 6 Riot

townhall.com

There was only a 13 day pardon window available for something they didn't do anyway since it was a riot not an insurrection which is why Meadows saying no that is false is very credible.

 

[Billy_Bob]

There was only a 13 day pardon window available for something they didn't do anyway since it was a riot not an insurrection which is why Meadows saying no that is false is very credible.

Most people have no clue about the time limit restrictions of a president being in office. LOL they totally miss that...

 

[Billiejeens]

because they are guilty AF - why would THEY (most of 'em so far anyways) ask for a pardon?

No one asked for a pardon on this -

You fucking idiots can't get any fucking thing right -
You are a small minority that keep repeating the same talking point over and over.

Midterms are going to slam your ass so hard that you will never walk right again.

 

[Billiejeens]

There was only a 13 day pardon window available for something they didn't do anyway since it was a riot not an insurrection which is why Meadows saying no that is false is very credible.

The request was never about that -
Don't fall for that shit.

 

[Sunsettommy]

The request was never about that -
Don't fall for that shit.

Did you read the article?

Mark Meadows: My Aide Is Lying About Me Wanting a Pardon After the January 6 Riot​

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No Stupid, that is the very definition of hearsay. The agents dispute her version of events.

So anything said directly to her or she heard in conversation is just hearsay then? What isn’t hearsay then?

Hearsay is gossip. Word around the office or on the street. This is a story related directly to her by the two who were there.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

She said they were in the Beast. If they confirm they were in the Beast, it makes TRUMP! trying to grab the wheel that much less likely.

She said she was told they were in the Beast. She is relating information from others. Not making claims of her own.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No Stupid, that is the very definition of hearsay. The agents dispute her version of events.

Quote “ the agents”.

 

[bripat9643]

You'll have to ask Trump's allies who've either not complied with being called in to testify ... or did show up but pled the 5th to virtually every question.

Wrong. Pelosi and Schif for brains are the ones who need to answer that questions.

 

[bripat9643]

She said she was told they were in the Beast. She is relating information from others. Not making claims of her own.

That's true. It's all hearsay, or made up, which is pretty much the same thing.

 

[Nostra]

I never said he did.

So you agree Trump never incited any insurrection.

Got it.

 

[hadit]

She said she was told they were in the Beast. She is relating information from others. Not making claims of her own.

Then why is everyone making such a big deal about him being in an SUV? If he wasn't in the Beast, then the story she was told is that much more unlikely. This is the problem with hearsay, the details and the truth get lost very quickly.

 

[bripat9643]

Quote “ the agents”.

If the Dims don't need to quote the agents, then why should anyone else?