Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,443
- 81,683
- 2,635
There are all kinds of reasons, turd. For one thing, she's selling a book.
What book?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are all kinds of reasons, turd. For one thing, she's selling a book.
The SUV was shown to be the vehicle used. The RW world immediately started trying to “debunk” this by claiming it is impossible in the limo.
I have no idea why it was characterized as “the beast”. It may just be used as a generic term among staff.
And there is no representation for the accused present in a grand jury!A Gran Jury is a hearing numbnuts
It was the beast. Bobby engel, top dog SS security testified to such. Testified he had an all out disagreement on going to the Capitol with Trump, Engel won....they went to the whitehouse.It could also have been in the Beast. Everyone is assuming it's not because of the video which showed an SUV, but there were several vehicles in that motorcade. It's possible the video they showed just didn't capture the Beast.
Using your criteria of Epps, Trump didn't incite a riot.Never said that either. A pity you lack the ability to understand that.
Exactly my point. She could be recounting word for word what she heard but has no way of knowing if it is the truth, so there's no reason to believe it actually happened the way she told it. IOW, it's a story, and just like Ford's testimony against Kavanaugh, has holes in it.Don’t know but she was recounting what she was told by Ornato. If Ornato mentioned the Beast then meh… or if she just assumed he was talking about the Beast and he never specified… again… meh
Using your criteria of Epps, Trump didn't incite a riot.
You lose again.
And no one is disputing that Trump was irate and demanding to go to the Capitol which is far more serious than any outburst.They’re all reporting the same thing from the same anonymous “source”
If you base that on only his remarks at the Elipse and ignore everything elseUsing your criteria of Epps, Trump didn't incite a riot.
You lose again.
Ornato said Beast. He was Meadows deputy.I heard a former SS Agent on the radio yesterday saying they never use the term "Beast", so she is lying when she claim's the agent said "Beast".
This is Congress. Not a courtroom.it's not even a hearing, turd. At a hearing, the accused is entitled to have his attorney representing him. Rules of evidence still apply. This is a farce.
he said in the speech he was going … so not sure what the issue isIf they do testify, all that is needed for corroboration is that Trump wanted to go to the Capital building. Thats the issue, not if he threw a fit or whatever.
this isn’t Congress…it’s an embarrassmentThis is Congress. Not a courtroom.
I’m going to have so much fun with this thread until my dying day.You guys are fucking nuts. Absolutely insane. Absolutely fucking insane.
Woman has first hand account of Mark Meadows learning the crowd is armed. First hand account that Mark knew that Trump wanted to go to Hill and knew the crowd was armed. First hand account that Trump was mad he couldn’t go to the capitol. First hand account the Mark Meadows said Trump didn’t care Pence was at risk.
The one thing you fucking traitor pieces of shit want to debate was the details of a story related about exactly how mad Trump was they didn’t go to the capital ok? You are all fucking nuts. You deserve a king.
Bobby Engel, the Secret Service top dog in the car, testified before the committee earlier about the all out disagreement with Trump, and him having to hold his ground against Trump's will for them to take him there.Exactly my point. She could be recounting word for word what she heard but has no way of knowing if it is the truth, so there's no reason to believe it actually happened the way she told it. IOW, it's a story, and just like Ford's testimony against Kavanaugh, has holes in it.
yeah i guess if you take bits and pieces of all the words he said in his 70 plus years of life, you could fit them together to make your pointIf you base that on only his remarks at the Elipse and ignore everything else