Thank you GOP for making Hillary look so very presidential!

Laughing at dead soldiers and a dead ambassador is presidential?
No one, especially Hillary, has laughed at either. You tried to nail jell-o to a wall. Don't be surprised that it didn't stay where put...

Lies were certainly told and the American people know it.
Actually the American people think the GOP of full of crap on this, just slinging poo like monkeys. Hillary didn't make the call, and you blame her. Stevens did make the call, and you treat him like a sock puppet. And the guys who actually killed, well you don't even seem to remember their part in this little fiasco. If you want to point out an example of total partisan crap, that would be a good one.

You are aware that help was only two hours away by C130 aircraft and Hillary, who held the responsibility, never made the call. The fighting went on for some nine hours and help was two hours away. She should never hold any position of authority in the government again. She got those guys killed by inaction and incompetence.
What you believe is entirely wrong. There was no one who knew what was up until it was too late, and no one who could have saved him. It's in the reports, read them.

I did. In fact it was reported yesterday in the aftermath of the hearings. Help was two hours away.
 
Yep. Nothing says presidential like getting away with not doing your job, getting people killed, then smirking about it. Let's elect hillary president and see how many more Americans she can get killed! What a victory!
She didn't get anyone killed. You can blame the killers for that, and Stevens for making himself an easy target. Remember, no one died at the embassy, which he was 400 miles away from at the time.
Stevens was doing his job under his boss hillary clinton. Blaming him for his own death makes as much sense as hillary laughing at his emails requesting security in hopes of not getting killed. No one died at the embassy? That makes the four dead Americans no big deal?

I don't know how else to say this. There is something wrong with you.
To be rational means you need to assign blame as is appropriate. Stevens has his share as well, along with the killers, both which you are ignoring in your partisan zeal to nail Hillary... Who’s to blame for Benghazi? A layman’s guide
 
No one, especially Hillary, has laughed at either. You tried to nail jell-o to a wall. Don't be surprised that it didn't stay where put...

Lies were certainly told and the American people know it.
Actually the American people think the GOP of full of crap on this, just slinging poo like monkeys. Hillary didn't make the call, and you blame her. Stevens did make the call, and you treat him like a sock puppet. And the guys who actually killed, well you don't even seem to remember their part in this little fiasco. If you want to point out an example of total partisan crap, that would be a good one.

You are aware that help was only two hours away by C130 aircraft and Hillary, who held the responsibility, never made the call. The fighting went on for some nine hours and help was two hours away. She should never hold any position of authority in the government again. She got those guys killed by inaction and incompetence.
What you believe is entirely wrong. There was no one who knew what was up until it was too late, and no one who could have saved him. It's in the reports, read them.

I did. In fact it was reported yesterday in the aftermath of the hearings. Help was two hours away.
That's not what is in the reports, nor would it have saved the day. Sorry,
 
Lies were certainly told and the American people know it.
Actually the American people think the GOP of full of crap on this, just slinging poo like monkeys. Hillary didn't make the call, and you blame her. Stevens did make the call, and you treat him like a sock puppet. And the guys who actually killed, well you don't even seem to remember their part in this little fiasco. If you want to point out an example of total partisan crap, that would be a good one.

You are aware that help was only two hours away by C130 aircraft and Hillary, who held the responsibility, never made the call. The fighting went on for some nine hours and help was two hours away. She should never hold any position of authority in the government again. She got those guys killed by inaction and incompetence.
What you believe is entirely wrong. There was no one who knew what was up until it was too late, and no one who could have saved him. It's in the reports, read them.

I did. In fact it was reported yesterday in the aftermath of the hearings. Help was two hours away.
That's not what is in the reports, nor would it have saved the day. Sorry,

Here's a few for the uninformed : Military intelligence official: 'We should have tried' to help Americans during Benghazi attack
EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say
Benghazi attack: Urgent call for military help ‘was denied by chain of command’
Benghazi Bungle
 
Actually the American people think the GOP of full of crap on this, just slinging poo like monkeys. Hillary didn't make the call, and you blame her. Stevens did make the call, and you treat him like a sock puppet. And the guys who actually killed, well you don't even seem to remember their part in this little fiasco. If you want to point out an example of total partisan crap, that would be a good one.

You are aware that help was only two hours away by C130 aircraft and Hillary, who held the responsibility, never made the call. The fighting went on for some nine hours and help was two hours away. She should never hold any position of authority in the government again. She got those guys killed by inaction and incompetence.
What you believe is entirely wrong. There was no one who knew what was up until it was too late, and no one who could have saved him. It's in the reports, read them.

I did. In fact it was reported yesterday in the aftermath of the hearings. Help was two hours away.
That's not what is in the reports, nor would it have saved the day. Sorry,

Here's a few for the uninformed : Military intelligence official: 'We should have tried' to help Americans during Benghazi attack
EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say
Benghazi attack: Urgent call for military help ‘was denied by chain of command’
Benghazi Bungle
Per 13 hours of Benghazi. They were told there was a stand down.
 
You are aware that help was only two hours away by C130 aircraft and Hillary, who held the responsibility, never made the call. The fighting went on for some nine hours and help was two hours away. She should never hold any position of authority in the government again. She got those guys killed by inaction and incompetence.
What you believe is entirely wrong. There was no one who knew what was up until it was too late, and no one who could have saved him. It's in the reports, read them.

I did. In fact it was reported yesterday in the aftermath of the hearings. Help was two hours away.
That's not what is in the reports, nor would it have saved the day. Sorry,

Here's a few for the uninformed : Military intelligence official: 'We should have tried' to help Americans during Benghazi attack
EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say
Benghazi attack: Urgent call for military help ‘was denied by chain of command’
Benghazi Bungle
Per 13 hours of Benghazi. They were told there was a stand down.
Things like this, from your link no less, prove you wrong.

"General Ham himself testified before the House Committee on Armed Services in June 2013 that the decision not to deploy close air support during the attack was made by him based on his assessment of the situation at the time, not because he was ordered to "stand down":"

And:

"The head of U.S. Africa Command, Gen. Carter Ham, debunked a widespread rumor that he was removed from overseeing the military operation because he wanted to do more militarily that night than he was allowed to by his superiors or the White House. "
 
What you believe is entirely wrong. There was no one who knew what was up until it was too late, and no one who could have saved him. It's in the reports, read them.

I did. In fact it was reported yesterday in the aftermath of the hearings. Help was two hours away.
That's not what is in the reports, nor would it have saved the day. Sorry,

Here's a few for the uninformed : Military intelligence official: 'We should have tried' to help Americans during Benghazi attack
EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say
Benghazi attack: Urgent call for military help ‘was denied by chain of command’
Benghazi Bungle
Per 13 hours of Benghazi. They were told there was a stand down.
Things like this, from your link no less, prove you wrong.

"General Ham himself testified before the House Committee on Armed Services in June 2013 that the decision not to deploy close air support during the attack was made by him based on his assessment of the situation at the time, not because he was ordered to "stand down":"

And:

"The head of U.S. Africa Command, Gen. Carter Ham, debunked a widespread rumor that he was removed from overseeing the military operation because he wanted to do more militarily that night than he was allowed to by his superiors or the White House. "

No. It proves you wrong. Help was available just like I stated which you denied. President Obama is Commander-in-Chief but apparently was off on a golf course or somewhere that night. He should have order a rescue attempt. That is his job. Hillary might at least have requested a rescue attempt but she never did. Nice try but both Hillary and Obama proved themselves totally incompetent that night. Neither are fit for any office in the government. Incompetence should never be tolerated. The same has been found at the IRS. Total and complete incompetence.
 
Per 13 hours of Benghazi. They were told there was a stand down.
Things like this, from your link no less, prove you wrong.

"General Ham himself testified before the House Committee on Armed Services in June 2013 that the decision not to deploy close air support during the attack was made by him based on his assessment of the situation at the time, not because he was ordered to "stand down":"

And:

"The head of U.S. Africa Command, Gen. Carter Ham, debunked a widespread rumor that he was removed from overseeing the military operation because he wanted to do more militarily that night than he was allowed to by his superiors or the White House. "

No. It proves you wrong. Help was available just like I stated which you denied. President Obama is Commander-in-Chief but apparently was off on a golf course or somewhere that night. He should have order a rescue attempt. That is his job. Hillary might at least have requested a rescue attempt but she never did. Nice try but both Hillary and Obama proved themselves totally incompetent that night. Neither are fit for any office in the government. Incompetence should never be tolerated. The same has been found at the IRS. Total and complete incompetence.
Okay, facts (even from your own link) will not be getting in your way I see so, we're done.

You want to blame Hillary and Obama, it happened on their watch, but they had nothing to do with what happened and couldn't have saved Stevens and his three-man team. So be it.
 
Things like this, from your link no less, prove you wrong.

"General Ham himself testified before the House Committee on Armed Services in June 2013 that the decision not to deploy close air support during the attack was made by him based on his assessment of the situation at the time, not because he was ordered to "stand down":"

And:

"The head of U.S. Africa Command, Gen. Carter Ham, debunked a widespread rumor that he was removed from overseeing the military operation because he wanted to do more militarily that night than he was allowed to by his superiors or the White House. "

No. It proves you wrong. Help was available just like I stated which you denied. President Obama is Commander-in-Chief but apparently was off on a golf course or somewhere that night. He should have order a rescue attempt. That is his job. Hillary might at least have requested a rescue attempt but she never did. Nice try but both Hillary and Obama proved themselves totally incompetent that night. Neither are fit for any office in the government. Incompetence should never be tolerated. The same has been found at the IRS. Total and complete incompetence.
Okay, facts (even from your own link) will not be getting in your way I see so, we're done...

Yes, you got your butt handed to you and exposed yourself for a low-life so off with you. Peddle your lies somewhere else.
 
Things like this, from your link no less, prove you wrong.

"General Ham himself testified before the House Committee on Armed Services in June 2013 that the decision not to deploy close air support during the attack was made by him based on his assessment of the situation at the time, not because he was ordered to "stand down":"

And:

"The head of U.S. Africa Command, Gen. Carter Ham, debunked a widespread rumor that he was removed from overseeing the military operation because he wanted to do more militarily that night than he was allowed to by his superiors or the White House. "

No. It proves you wrong. Help was available just like I stated which you denied. President Obama is Commander-in-Chief but apparently was off on a golf course or somewhere that night. He should have order a rescue attempt. That is his job. Hillary might at least have requested a rescue attempt but she never did. Nice try but both Hillary and Obama proved themselves totally incompetent that night. Neither are fit for any office in the government. Incompetence should never be tolerated. The same has been found at the IRS. Total and complete incompetence.
Okay, facts (even from your own link) will not be getting in your way I see so, we're done...

Yes, you got your butt handed to you and exposed yourself for a low-life so off with you. Peddle your lies somewhere else.
The teller of untruths is you. Even the official reports say so. No one can help someone like you, who lies to themselves.
 
Hillary Clinton weathers House Benghazi committee hearing - CNNPolitics.com

image13.png
Draco-3-draco-malfoy-8560274-280-315.jpg

Get this, when Trey (Malfoy) Gowdy was asked, after 11 hours of testimony, if he got anything new, he answered uh, no.

Millions in taxpayer money and nothing new.

When she was asked why she testified again, Mrs. Clinton said it was because if the Republicans found something new, let them present it. The American public has a right to know.

She also talked about the hundred attacks and the dozens who had died since 2001.

As wild and crazy as the Republicans appeared, Mrs. Clinton looked thoughtful, informed and presidential.
Sorry liberals. Read it and weep

"By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, Americans say they're unsatisfied with Hillary Clinton's response to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, according to results froma new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll."

Poll: Americans Unsatisfied With Clinton's Benghazi Response
 
Hillary Clinton weathers House Benghazi committee hearing - CNNPolitics.com

image13.png
Draco-3-draco-malfoy-8560274-280-315.jpg

Get this, when Trey (Malfoy) Gowdy was asked, after 11 hours of testimony, if he got anything new, he answered uh, no.

Millions in taxpayer money and nothing new.

When she was asked why she testified again, Mrs. Clinton said it was because if the Republicans found something new, let them present it. The American public has a right to know.

She also talked about the hundred attacks and the dozens who had died since 2001.

As wild and crazy as the Republicans appeared, Mrs. Clinton looked thoughtful, informed and presidential.
Sorry liberals. Read it and weep

"By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, Americans say they're unsatisfied with Hillary Clinton's response to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, according to results froma new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll."

Poll: Americans Unsatisfied With Clinton's Benghazi Response
Yeah, not concerned:

"Forty-four percent of Americans say that they're not satisfied with Clinton's response to the Benghazi attack in 2012, when Clinton served as secretary of state. That includes 77 percent of Republican respondents, 40 percent of independents but just 14 percent of Democrats."

Most of them would never vote for her anyway...
 
Per 13 hours of Benghazi. They were told there was a stand down.
Things like this, from your link no less, prove you wrong.

"General Ham himself testified before the House Committee on Armed Services in June 2013 that the decision not to deploy close air support during the attack was made by him based on his assessment of the situation at the time, not because he was ordered to "stand down":"

And:

"The head of U.S. Africa Command, Gen. Carter Ham, debunked a widespread rumor that he was removed from overseeing the military operation because he wanted to do more militarily that night than he was allowed to by his superiors or the White House. "

No. It proves you wrong. Help was available just like I stated which you denied. President Obama is Commander-in-Chief but apparently was off on a golf course or somewhere that night. He should have order a rescue attempt. That is his job. Hillary might at least have requested a rescue attempt but she never did. Nice try but both Hillary and Obama proved themselves totally incompetent that night. Neither are fit for any office in the government. Incompetence should never be tolerated. The same has been found at the IRS. Total and complete incompetence.
Okay, facts (even from your own link) will not be getting in your way I see so, we're done...

Yes, you got your butt handed to you and exposed yourself for a low-life so off with you. Peddle your lies somewhere else.
The teller of untruths is you. Even the official reports say so. No one can help someone like you, who lies to themselves.

No one has put me on ignore. You seem to be the loon with all the problems.
 
Hillary Clinton weathers House Benghazi committee hearing - CNNPolitics.com

image13.png
Draco-3-draco-malfoy-8560274-280-315.jpg

Get this, when Trey (Malfoy) Gowdy was asked, after 11 hours of testimony, if he got anything new, he answered uh, no.

Millions in taxpayer money and nothing new.

When she was asked why she testified again, Mrs. Clinton said it was because if the Republicans found something new, let them present it. The American public has a right to know.

She also talked about the hundred attacks and the dozens who had died since 2001.

As wild and crazy as the Republicans appeared, Mrs. Clinton looked thoughtful, informed and presidential.
Sorry liberals. Read it and weep

"By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, Americans say they're unsatisfied with Hillary Clinton's response to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, according to results froma new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll."

Poll: Americans Unsatisfied With Clinton's Benghazi Response
Yeah, not concerned:

"Forty-four percent of Americans say that they're not satisfied with Clinton's response to the Benghazi attack in 2012, when Clinton served as secretary of state. That includes 77 percent of Republican respondents, 40 percent of independents but just 14 percent of Democrats."

Most of them would never vote for her anyway...

No real American would. She's proven to be totally incompetent and untrustworthy.
 
Hillary Clinton weathers House Benghazi committee hearing - CNNPolitics.com

image13.png
Draco-3-draco-malfoy-8560274-280-315.jpg

Get this, when Trey (Malfoy) Gowdy was asked, after 11 hours of testimony, if he got anything new, he answered uh, no.

Millions in taxpayer money and nothing new.

When she was asked why she testified again, Mrs. Clinton said it was because if the Republicans found something new, let them present it. The American public has a right to know.

She also talked about the hundred attacks and the dozens who had died since 2001.

As wild and crazy as the Republicans appeared, Mrs. Clinton looked thoughtful, informed and presidential.
Sorry liberals. Read it and weep

"By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, Americans say they're unsatisfied with Hillary Clinton's response to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, according to results froma new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll."

Poll: Americans Unsatisfied With Clinton's Benghazi Response
Yeah, not concerned:

"Forty-four percent of Americans say that they're not satisfied with Clinton's response to the Benghazi attack in 2012, when Clinton served as secretary of state. That includes 77 percent of Republican respondents, 40 percent of independents but just 14 percent of Democrats."

Most of them would never vote for her anyway...
40% independents. You can pretend not to be worried but that's not good.
 
Conservatives may continue to contrive and attempt to propagate their ridiculous lies, conservatives may continue to believe whatever nonsense they want – the fact is the American people know the truth: that the 'hearings' were solely partisan, that there were no 'crimes' or 'cover ups' on the part of Clinton and the Administration, and that as a consequence of their blind partisanism, republicans have unwittingly benefited Clinton's campaign to become president.
Maybe partisan but people aren't as impressed with Hillary as the libs on here are saying.

The media is trying desperately to spin this but the majority of people are sick of the Clinton lie factory.
 
Hillary Clinton weathers House Benghazi committee hearing - CNNPolitics.com

image13.png
Draco-3-draco-malfoy-8560274-280-315.jpg

Get this, when Trey (Malfoy) Gowdy was asked, after 11 hours of testimony, if he got anything new, he answered uh, no.

Millions in taxpayer money and nothing new.

When she was asked why she testified again, Mrs. Clinton said it was because if the Republicans found something new, let them present it. The American public has a right to know.

She also talked about the hundred attacks and the dozens who had died since 2001.

As wild and crazy as the Republicans appeared, Mrs. Clinton looked thoughtful, informed and presidential.
Sorry liberals. Read it and weep

"By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, Americans say they're unsatisfied with Hillary Clinton's response to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, according to results froma new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll."

Poll: Americans Unsatisfied With Clinton's Benghazi Response
Yeah, not concerned:

"Forty-four percent of Americans say that they're not satisfied with Clinton's response to the Benghazi attack in 2012, when Clinton served as secretary of state. That includes 77 percent of Republican respondents, 40 percent of independents but just 14 percent of Democrats."

Most of them would never vote for her anyway...
40% independents. You can pretend not to be worried but that's not good.
If she wins that would be roughly the number that wouldn't vote for her anyway, and Benghazi isn't going to stop anyone who wasn't already opposed to her. It's honestly not that big a deal and if it was old news, which it should be, only a few hyper-partisans would give a damn.
 
Conservatives may continue to contrive and attempt to propagate their ridiculous lies, conservatives may continue to believe whatever nonsense they want – the fact is the American people know the truth: that the 'hearings' were solely partisan, that there were no 'crimes' or 'cover ups' on the part of Clinton and the Administration, and that as a consequence of their blind partisanism, republicans have unwittingly benefited Clinton's campaign to become president.
Maybe partisan but people aren't as impressed with Hillary as the libs on here are saying.

The media is trying desperately to spin this but the majority of people are sick of the Clinton lie factory.
Based on this poll the majority aren't concerned.
 

Forum List

Back
Top