Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll take this with a grain (or a few billion) of salt. I think KJU is leading South Korea into a trap.
I'll take this with a grain (or a few billion) of salt. I think KJU is leading South Korea into a trap.Go trump!!
He did what Obama, bush, Ronnie, bill, nixion, Ford Carter, LBJ, Kennedy could not do......
North and South Korea reportedly set to announce official end to war
Sam Meredith | @smeredith19
Published 5 Hours Ago Updated 1 Min AgoCNBC.com
- Ahead of a summit next week between North Korean premier Kim Jong Un and South Korean President Moon Jae-In, lawmakers from the neighboring states were thought to be negotiating the details of a joint statement that could outline an end to the military conflict between the two countries.
- Pyongyang and Seoul have technically been at war since the 1950-1953 Korean conflict ended with a truce — and not a peace treaty.
North and South Korea are in talks to announce a permanent end to the officially declared military conflict between the two countries, daily newspaper Munhwa Ilbo reported Tuesday, citing an unnamed South Korean official.
Ahead of a summit next week between North Korean premier Kim Jong Un and South Korean President Moon Jae-in, lawmakers from the neighboring states were thought to be negotiating the details of a joint statement that could outline an end to the confrontation.
Kim and Moon could also discuss returning the heavily fortified demilitarized zone separating them to its original state, the newspaper said
North and South Korea reportedly set to announce an official end to war
Before you celebrate, this really screws Trump. Because with a peace treaty, Trump can't threaten to bomb North Korea. Because that would be an act of war.
Before you celebrate, a peace treaty is between TWO COUNTRIES. Bombing NK would NOT be an "act of war" against SK.
What did he do?
I'll take this with a grain (or a few billion) of salt. I think KJU is leading South Korea into a trap.
Like I said. With a peace treaty any attack by the US would be an act of war. While it was just an armistice, if Trump gave Kim Jong Un a bloody nose, it was just a continuation of the existing state of war.
Once you end the old war, an attack on North Korea starts a new war, which has to be authorized by congress.
Before you celebrate, this really screws Trump. Because with a peace treaty, Trump can't threaten to bomb North Korea. Because that would be an act of war.
Before you celebrate, a peace treaty is between TWO COUNTRIES. Bombing NK would NOT be an "act of war" against SK.
Bombing any country is an act of war against that country. Right now a state of war exists between North Korea and South Korea and it's allies. So under international law, bombing North Korea is just a resumption of the existing war.
If they sign a peace treaty, bombing North Korea would be against international law, and would be an act of war.
What did he do?
Getting a little desperate, eh? TRUMP KEEPS WINNING and YOU CAN'T HANDLE IT.
You would know, Stormyhe is orange
Only where you've seen. The carpet does not match the drapes.
and what about Kim following thru on his threats of attacking us....and we're forced to retaliate??
So is bombing Syria, right? WRONG
So is bombing Syria, right? WRONG
They're in the middle of a civil war.
Maybe you didn't notice the word WAR in that sentence.
The leader of a third country calling you "fat little rocket man" over Twitter isn't what most would consider furthering peace negotiations.
The leader of a third country calling you "fat little rocket man" over Twitter isn't what most would consider furthering peace negotiations.
Apparently it did.
I think it may be a deeper change. For nearly my entire lifetime we've been waiting for NK to collapse and democracy to break out. When, in fact, the democracy in SK was too democratic and was lot closer to totalitarian for a long time. The US writes the history books but we dropped more bombs on NK than in the entire WWII Pacific campaign, and we used napalm on civilians.Removing the DMZ and moving back artillery will certainly help deescalate tensions, but it's a largely a symbolic gesture otherwise. They were as much "at war" as the US and Soviets were during the Cold War. Could you imagine soldiers 100 years ago looking into the future, and seeing soldiers making silly faces at each other over the DMZ, and calling it war?
Yes, but without Trump, the Koreas might not have done it on their own. They needed a village idiot to throw us out of the village.If you go to the Fox, Daily Caller, or Breitbart articles on this none of them are crediting Trump with these peace talks. It's all wishful thinking on the part of nobody but Trump hacks on message boards.
Unless the North gives up their nuclear program this is a win for Korea, not Trump.
and what about Kim following thru on his threats of attacking us....and we're forced to retaliate??
I wouldn't call that a war. It would be more like a total annihilation. They would have to change the maps, because North Korea would no longer exist on it.
