Thanks Libertarians

[Edgetho]

I appreciate it. Almost as much as I appreciated the totally insane Ross Pirogi giving the 1992 election to Bill the rapist Clinton.

Really appreciate it guys. Way to go... Got your heads on straight, huh?

As usual


Big Obama Bundler Donated To Sarvis, the Fake Libertarian Candidate in Virginia
—Ace

A bit late for this to have an impact, but...

Campaign finance records show the Libertarian Booster PAC has made the largest independent contribution to Sarvis’ campaign, helping to pay for professional petition circulators who collected signatures necessary to get Sarvis’ name on Tuesday’s statewide ballot.

Austin, Texas, software billionaire Joe Liemandt is the Libertarian Booster PAC’s major benefactor. He’s also a top bundler for President Barack Obama. This revelation comes as Virginia voters head to the polls Tuesday in an election where some observers say the third-party gubernatorial candidate could be a spoiler for Republican Ken Cuccinelli.

Of course, getting Sarvis on to the ballot doesn't get him votes, necessarily. To the extent he's a spoiler, it's due to the fact that a sizable number of Republicans prefer a more libertarian take on many issues.

 

[Pennywise]

Don't blame libertarians on the whole, but heap the blame on any of them stupid enough to vote for this puppet.

I voted for Cuccinelli at 6:30am with the wife. We'll see what plays out by tonight. I'm not hopeful but just maybe the Obamacare fallout has been enough to energize the right base. We'll know soon enough just how fucked Virginia has gotten with the infiltration of progressive scum, many of whom are my neighbors.

 

[Contumacious]

I appreciate it. Almost as much as I appreciated the totally insane Ross Pirogi giving the 1992 election to Bill the rapist Clinton.

Really appreciate it guys. Way to go... Got your heads on straight, huh?

As usual


Big Obama Bundler Donated To Sarvis, the Fake Libertarian Candidate in Virginia
—Ace

A bit late for this to have an impact, but...

Campaign finance records show the Libertarian Booster PAC has made the largest independent contribution to Sarvis’ campaign, helping to pay for professional petition circulators who collected signatures necessary to get Sarvis’ name on Tuesday’s statewide ballot.

Austin, Texas, software billionaire Joe Liemandt is the Libertarian Booster PAC’s major benefactor. He’s also a top bundler for President Barack Obama. This revelation comes as Virginia voters head to the polls Tuesday in an election where some observers say the third-party gubernatorial candidate could be a spoiler for Republican Ken Cuccinelli.

Of course, getting Sarvis on to the ballot doesn't get him votes, necessarily. To the extent he's a spoiler, it's due to the fact that a sizable number of Republicans prefer a more libertarian take on many issues.

No, Sarvis Isn’t Costing Cuccinelli the Virginia Governorship

.

 

[kaz]

Of course, getting Sarvis on to the ballot doesn't get him votes, necessarily. To the extent he's a spoiler, it's due to the fact that a sizable number of Republicans prefer a more libertarian take on many issues.

1) Actually, most of the libertarians who vote for the libertarian candidate would not have voted for the Republican.

2) I object to your proposal that liberty not even be on the ballot.

3) I'd vote for Ross over Read My Lips again.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Why are people so afraid of us? What have we ever done?

 

[aaronleland]

Libertarian voters don't feel your candidates are worth voting for, so they don't vote for them. That's how elections work. But the party of "personal responsibility" finds anybody end everybody responsible for their losses but themselves. Nominate a worthwhile candidate and quit your bitching.

 

[Edgetho]

Of course, getting Sarvis on to the ballot doesn't get him votes, necessarily. To the extent he's a spoiler, it's due to the fact that a sizable number of Republicans prefer a more libertarian take on many issues.

1) Actually, most of the libertarians who vote for the libertarian candidate would not have voted for the Republican.

2) I object to your proposal that liberty not even be on the ballot.

3) I'd vote for Ross over Read My Lips again.

Yeah...... How'd that work out?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Is this the part where republicans blame libertarians for their loss...again?

 

[ScienceRocks]

The tea party is libertarian. We're going to see this shit defeated.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

The tea party is libertarian. We're going to see this shit defeated.

Are you going to defeat it with infrastructure, science or education?

 

[Votto]

Yes, the federal government needs our help to elect even more Republicans in order to increase the debt by another $17 trillion and needs your help to attack a few more rogue nations out there who refuse our democracy.



I have no compassion for the GOP.

 

[Pheonixops]

I appreciate it. Almost as much as I appreciated the totally insane Ross Pirogi giving the 1992 election to Bill the rapist Clinton.

Really appreciate it guys. Way to go... Got your heads on straight, huh?

As usual


Big Obama Bundler Donated To Sarvis, the Fake Libertarian Candidate in Virginia
—Ace

A bit late for this to have an impact, but...

Campaign finance records show the Libertarian Booster PAC has made the largest independent contribution to Sarvis’ campaign, helping to pay for professional petition circulators who collected signatures necessary to get Sarvis’ name on Tuesday’s statewide ballot.

Austin, Texas, software billionaire Joe Liemandt is the Libertarian Booster PAC’s major benefactor. He’s also a top bundler for President Barack Obama. This revelation comes as Virginia voters head to the polls Tuesday in an election where some observers say the third-party gubernatorial candidate could be a spoiler for Republican Ken Cuccinelli.

Of course, getting Sarvis on to the ballot doesn't get him votes, necessarily. To the extent he's a spoiler, it's due to the fact that a sizable number of Republicans prefer a more libertarian take on many issues.

I hope Sarvis gets at least 10% of the vote so our state can have Libertarians on the ballot and hopefully in the debates. How is Savis allegedly a "fake Libertarian"? What are his views and stances that make him the aforementioned in your opinion?

 

[Edgetho]

Is this the part where republicans blame libertarians for their loss...again?

Libertarians are not a new phenomenon...

Ayn Rand Q&A on Libertarianism - The Ayn Rand Institute

Ayn Rand was opposed to the libertarian movement of her time.

In 1971 she wrote:

For the record, I shall repeat what I have said many times before: I do not join or endorse any political group or movement. More specifically, I disapprove of, disagree with and have no connection with, the latest aberration of some conservatives, the so-called “hippies of the right,” who attempt to snare the younger or more careless ones of my readers by claiming simultaneously to be followers of my philosophy and advocates of anarchism. Anyone offering such a combination confesses his inability to understand either. Anarchism is the most irrational, anti-intellectual notion ever spun by the concrete-bound, context-dropping, whim-worshiping fringe of the collectivist movement, where it properly belongs. [“Brief Summary,” The Objectivist, Vol. 10, Sep. 1971]
​

And in 1972 she wrote:

Above all, do not join the wrong ideological groups or movements, in order to “do something.” By “ideological” (in this context), I mean groups or movements proclaiming some vaguely generalized, undefined (and, usually, contradictory) political goals. (E.g., the Conservative Party, that subordinates reason to faith, and substitutes theocracy for capitalism; or the “libertarian” hippies, who subordinate reason to whims, and substitute anarchism for capitalism.) To join such groups means to reverse the philosophical hierarchy and to sell out fundamental principles for the sake of some superficial political action which is bound to fail. It means that you help the defeat of your ideas and the victory of your enemies. (For a discussion of the reasons, see “The Anatomy of Compromise” in my book Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.) [“What Can One Do?” The Ayn Rand Letter, Vol. 1, No. 7]​

Rand was often asked about libertarians and the Libertarian Party in the question-and-answer periods following her lectures. Here, from pp.72-76 of Ayn Rand Answers: The Best of Her Q&A, ed. Robert Mayhew, are some of those questions and her answers. (In the excerpt below, “Q” stands for question, “AR” for Ayn Rand, “FHF” for Ford Hall Forum, a venue where Ayn Rand was often invited to speak, “OC” for Objective Communication, a course given by Leonard Peikoff in which Ayn Rand participated in some of the question-and-answer periods, and “71” for the year 1971.)


Q: What do you think of the libertarian movement?

AR: All kinds of people today call themselves “libertarians,” especially something calling itself the New Right, which consists of hippies who are anarchists instead of leftist collectivists; but anarchists are collectivists. Capitalism is the one system that requires absolute objective law, yet libertarians combine capitalism and anarchism. That’s worse than anything the New Left has proposed. It’s a mockery of philosophy and ideology. They sling slogans and try to ride on two bandwagons. They want to be hippies, but don’t want to preach collectivism because those jobs are already taken. But anarchism is a logical outgrowth of the anti-intellectual side of collectivism. I could deal with a Marxist with a greater chance of reaching some kind of understanding, and with much greater respect. Anarchists are the scum of the intellectual world of the Left, which has given them up. So the Right picks up another leftist discard. That’s the libertarian movement. [FHF 71]


Q: What do you think of the Libertarian Party?

AR: I’d rather vote for Bob Hope, the Marx Brothers, or Jerry Lewis—they’re not as funny as John Hospers and the Libertarian Party. If Hospers takes ten votes away from Nixon (which I doubt he’ll do), it would be a moral crime. I don’t care about Nixon, and I care even less about Hospers; but this is no time to engage in publicity seeking, which all these crank political parties are doing. (George Wallace is no great thinker—he’s a demagogue, though with some courage—but even he had the sense to stay home this time.) If you want to spread your ideas, do it through education. But don’t run for president—or even dogcatcher—if you’re going to help McGovern. [FHF 72]

 

[TakeAStepBack]

I'm aware of Ayn's stance on libertarians. You might want to let the LOLberals who think Rand is the spokeman and CEO of libertarian ideology know that she's too militant of mind (and therefore far more republican than libertarian) to be, or like libertarianism.

That doesn't have a whole lot to do with whether libertarians are going to be blamed for republican failures...again.

 

[Pheonixops]

Don't blame libertarians on the whole, but heap the blame on any of them stupid enough to vote for this puppet.

I voted for Cuccinelli at 6:30am with the wife. We'll see what plays out by tonight. I'm not hopeful but just maybe the Obamacare fallout has been enough to energize the right base. We'll know soon enough just how fucked Virginia has gotten with the infiltration of progressive scum, many of whom are my neighbors.

If McAuliffe wins, I hope that there are enough republicans elected so they make the majority in the State house. Vise versa if Cuccinelli wins...................

My vote went to Savis, Northam, and Obenshain. I hope a lot more people did the same and get Savis to the ten percent mark..

 

[JakeStarkey]

I don't libertarianism, but I dislike TPM candidates even more.

I would have voted for Sarvis today if I were part of the VA electorate. Not that it will matter at all.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The tea party is libertarian. We're going to see this shit defeated.

The Tea Party stopped being libertarian when it signed away its soul to the Christian Right.

 

[Edgetho]

I'm aware of Ayn's stance on libertarians. You might want to let the LOLberals who think Rand is the spokeman and CEO of libertarian ideology know that she's too militant of mind (and therefore far more republican than libertarian) to be, or like libertarianism.

That doesn't have a whole lot to do with whether libertarians are going to be blamed for republican failures...again.

I don't mind libertarian strains in the Republican Party. I think it's healthy. And I think we have a lot more in common with libertarians than does the socialist left.

What is annoying is how the left uses libertarians to hurt the Republican Party and other Patriotic Americans.

THAT was my point.

If libertarians want to make a difference, you need to join our party and pitch in. Help, don't hinder the defeat of scum-sucking, lying dimocrap filth.

Make your voices and your draw strong enough that you have a say in the party.

This shit of running your own candidate and harming Republicans is only going to get you disliked by Republicans and laughed at by the scum-sucking left because you're doing their job for them.

THINK about it.

 

[Pheonixops]

I'm aware of Ayn's stance on libertarians. You might want to let the LOLberals who think Rand is the spokeman and CEO of libertarian ideology know that she's too militant of mind (and therefore far more republican than libertarian) to be, or like libertarianism.

That doesn't have a whole lot to do with whether libertarians are going to be blamed for republican failures...again.

Yeah, I'm much more of a Harry Browne guy myself.

 

[Rebelitarian]

I appreciate it. Almost as much as I appreciated the totally insane Ross Pirogi giving the 1992 election to Bill the rapist Clinton.

Really appreciate it guys. Way to go... Got your heads on straight, huh?

As usual


Look if you voted Republican or Democrat in any election since 2000, you are as much a traitor to America as Jane Fonda.

Ross Perot was never a Globalist traitor trying to destroy America like all the Rs and Ds were.

So if anything thank all the Ameri-tards who never made the Bilderberg/Globalist connection to the 2 main parties.

Despite 6 years of evidence....

Endgame

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho]EndGame HQ full length version - YouTube[/ame]