Thanks to Reaganomics 80 Percent...

[francoHFW]

Oh fer chrissake, we still have Voodoo tax rates- REPEAT STILL have voodoo tax rates, and Dems only had 6 months of control (200 Pub filibusters 2009-11). Not to mention their disfunction/obstruction Debt ceiling "crisis" etc killing all growth. ALL news to the hater dupes, obsessed with phony scandals and hater BS...

Voodoo was always BS- cut fed income taxes on all, but state, local, PAYROLL taxes and fees were all raised, and that has killed the nonrich and the country, while the rich have 4x the wealth growth.

 

[boedicca]

VooDOOOO!!!!!!!!111!!!!1

Oh Noeesssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!111!!!!!!

Ooo Eeee Ooo Ah Ah
Bing Bang
Walla Walla Bing Bang

 

[birddog]

Obama, on the other hand, has been in office since January 2008.

No wonder y'all blame him for the crash of fall 2008

Of course Obama became President in Jan. 2009, but in the Fall of 2008 it was apparent to investors that he was going to be elected, hence the SM collapse.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

* * * we still have Voodoo tax rates- REPEAT STILL have voodoo tax rates* * * *

FrancoTug:

That is a meaningless term. "VoodDoo economics" had SOME meaning. "VooDoo tax rates" is utterly meaningless, you retarded troll shit.

If something wasn't worth saying in the first place, then there is NO good reason to REPEAT it, you mindless dick-sucker.

 

[francoHFW]

#24- You are a brainwashed MORON
#23- " "

Voodoo economics tax rates are Voodoo tax rates duh. Reagan cut the top rate 20+%

 

[IlarMeilyr]

#24- You are a brainwashed MORON

Wrong again, you useless brainless pile of shit.

Disagreeing with YOUR always vapid crap is a sign of intelligence.

You agree with you.

Therefore you would have to upgrade to BE a retard.

 

[georgiapeach]

I would take Reagan anyday over Obama:

President Reagan reduced the maximum tax rate on job creators by 60 percent; Mr. Obama increased the maximum tax rate on job creators by 17 percent. Reagan cut non-defense, discretionary, federal government spending by a third as a percentage of gross domestic product; Mr. Obama has increased it. Reagan cut government regulations while Mr. Obama has greatly increased them.

The results are:

Under Reagan, adult black unemployment fell by 20 percent, but under Mr. Obama, it has increased by 42 percent.

Black teenage unemployment fell by 16 percent under Reagan, but has risen by 56 percent under Mr. Obama.

The increase in unemployment rates has been far worse for blacks under Mr. Obama than for whites and Hispanics.

Inflation-adjusted real incomes are slightly higher for Hispanics and whites than they were in 2008, but are lower for blacks.

The labor force participation rate has fallen for all groups, but remains far lower for blacks than for whites and Hispanics.

Read more: RAHN: Obama's bad news for blacks - Washington Times

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Reagan hasn't been president since January 1989, so your blame is misplaced.

Obama, on the other hand, has been in office since January 2008.

Which is still not enough time to undo the mistakes of the oafish, simple-minded George W. Bush, and his ill-cultured, bible schooled defenders.

Smartest President ever still hasn't fixed things?

 

[Freewill]

Obama, on the other hand, has been in office since January 2008.

No wonder y'all blame him for the crash of fall 2008

No, that would be the democrat take over in 2006. We blame Obama for doing exactly what we said, extended the recovery and made it the weakest in history when in fact it should have been one of the strongest.

 

[freedombecki]

Oh fer chrissake, we still have Voodoo tax rates- REPEAT STILL have voodoo tax rates, and Dems only had 6 months of control (200 Pub filibusters 2009-11). Not to mention their disfunction/obstruction Debt ceiling "crisis" etc killing all growth. ALL news to the hater dupes, obsessed with phony scandals and hater BS...

Voodoo was always BS- cut fed income taxes on all, but state, local, PAYROLL taxes and fees were all raised, and that has killed the nonrich and the country, while the rich have 4x the wealth growth.

Please explain how making the rich poor is going to employ people who haven't had a job since 2009, and few college grads are able to get jobs in their major? The world waits.

 

[freedombecki]

.
Thanks to Reaganomics 80 Percent...

...Of U.S. Adults Face Near-Poverty, Unemployment


Excerpted from Hope Yen's AP article;
80 Percent Of U.S. Adults Face Near-Poverty, Unemployment



*The risks of poverty also have been increasing in recent decades, particularly among people ages 35-55, coinciding with widening income inequality. For instance, people ages 35-45 had a 17 percent risk of encountering poverty during the 1969-1989 time period; that risk increased to 23 percent during the 1989-2009 period. For those ages 45-55, the risk of poverty jumped from 11.8 percent to 17.7 percent.



*"They [uneducated whites] don't trust big government, but it doesn't mean they want no government," says Republican pollster Ed Goeas, who agrees that working-class whites will remain an important electoral group. His research found that many of them would support anti-poverty programs if focused broadly on job training and infrastructure investment.
.

That is grossly untrue and you know it, don't you. So do your handlers who told you to create a hoax while they steal more money from the US Treasury

 

[CrusaderFrank]

.
Thanks to Reaganomics 80 Percent...

...Of U.S. Adults Face Near-Poverty, Unemployment


Excerpted from Hope Yen's AP article;
80 Percent Of U.S. Adults Face Near-Poverty, Unemployment



*The risks of poverty also have been increasing in recent decades, particularly among people ages 35-55, coinciding with widening income inequality. For instance, people ages 35-45 had a 17 percent risk of encountering poverty during the 1969-1989 time period; that risk increased to 23 percent during the 1989-2009 period. For those ages 45-55, the risk of poverty jumped from 11.8 percent to 17.7 percent.



*"They [uneducated whites] don't trust big government, but it doesn't mean they want no government," says Republican pollster Ed Goeas, who agrees that working-class whites will remain an important electoral group. His research found that many of them would support anti-poverty programs if focused broadly on job training and infrastructure investment.
.

^ Reactionary Hater still thinks Reagan is President

 

[francoHFW]

#30-Make the bloated rich a little less rich, maybe- try not to get hysterical. LOL

Voodoo wrecked and IS WRECKING the nonrich to the point where demand for products and services has dried up, along with their savings...before the corruption and cronyism housing and credit meltdown of 2008...

Memorize the facts, hater dupes:
1. WORKERS past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50% TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)


A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez | The White House
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb...able=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--June 6, 2013
5/6 = Wealth And Inequality In America - Business Insider

 

[Two Thumbs]

.
Thanks to Reaganomics 80 Percent...

...Of U.S. Adults Face Near-Poverty, Unemployment


Excerpted from Hope Yen's AP article;
80 Percent Of U.S. Adults Face Near-Poverty, Unemployment



*The risks of poverty also have been increasing in recent decades, particularly among people ages 35-55, coinciding with widening income inequality. For instance, people ages 35-45 had a 17 percent risk of encountering poverty during the 1969-1989 time period; that risk increased to 23 percent during the 1989-2009 period. For those ages 45-55, the risk of poverty jumped from 11.8 percent to 17.7 percent.



*"They [uneducated whites] don't trust big government, but it doesn't mean they want no government," says Republican pollster Ed Goeas, who agrees that working-class whites will remain an important electoral group. His research found that many of them would support anti-poverty programs if focused broadly on job training and infrastructure investment.
.

so to translate from dullardberal into human I must first strike myself with a hammer in the head, then do it again.

or

just guess

That blaming Bush has become so 5 seconds ago, that they need to go back to RR to not seem like the bunch of looser pussies that they are?

krist, we've had 10 years of dems in the WH. how the fuck do you blame RR?

 

[Two Thumbs]

It's all FDR's fault.

If he wasn't such an evil vile pile of oozing puss, we never would have become so involved in other countries affairs.

 

[Missourian]

When Kerry was running against Bush in 2004 the Democrat message was "where are the jobs"...

Bush had been president for three years.

Obama's been president almost five years, and still his idiot supporters refuse to place the blame where it most deservedly belongs...on the shoulders of the campaigner in chief Barrack Obama.

More bullshit...they've been ridiculed into abandoning ' blame Bush ' but lack the education or imagination to invent a new talking point...

Today it's Reagan...tomorrow look for a thread detailing why it's Eisenhower's fault Obama's such a fuck up.

 

[boedicca]

I blame Ogg the Cave Man when he hit Ugg over the head and stole his haunch of mastadon.

It's been all down hill for humanity ever since.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

.
Thanks to Reaganomics 80 Percent...

...Of U.S. Adults Face Near-Poverty, Unemployment


Excerpted from Hope Yen's AP article;
80 Percent Of U.S. Adults Face Near-Poverty, Unemployment



*The risks of poverty also have been increasing in recent decades, particularly among people ages 35-55, coinciding with widening income inequality. For instance, people ages 35-45 had a 17 percent risk of encountering poverty during the 1969-1989 time period; that risk increased to 23 percent during the 1989-2009 period. For those ages 45-55, the risk of poverty jumped from 11.8 percent to 17.7 percent.



*"They [uneducated whites] don't trust big government, but it doesn't mean they want no government," says Republican pollster Ed Goeas, who agrees that working-class whites will remain an important electoral group. His research found that many of them would support anti-poverty programs if focused broadly on job training and infrastructure investment.
.

Excuse me? We haven't used Reaganomics since Bush was elected, why blame him?

 

[francoHFW]

For the billionth time, we still have Reagan's TAX RATES- the top rate was 70% or so until RR...the lower fed rates are made up with higher state, local, payroll taxes and FEES that KILL the nonrich, and HAVE. Der.

 

[boedicca]

For the billionth time, we still have Reagan's TAX RATES- the top rate was 70% or so until RR...the lower fed rates are made up with higher state, local, payroll taxes and FEES that KILL the nonrich, and HAVE. Der.

You're funny.