That Cohen Prague Trip?



And allow me to get my Ben Shapiro, Liberal Tears Tumbler.....as this story turns to tasty left wing tears.....

Michael Cohen Report Is Based On Third-Hand Information, Reporter Reveals

In an interview on MSNBC, Greg Gordon said that he and his McClatchy colleague, Peter Stone, did not physically see cell tower records and intelligence intercepts that they claim placed Cohen in Prague in summer 2016.

Gordon also suggested that the four anonymous sources he and Stone cite in their articlealso did not see the intelligence for themselves, meaning that the report is based on third-hand information.
 

Cohen continues to vehemently deny that he was in Prague. If he is lying - he is desperately trying to hide something really big. I'm sure Mueller is on top of it.

Michael Cohen Report Is Based On Third-Hand Information, Reporter Reveals


In an interview on MSNBC, Greg Gordon said that he and his McClatchy colleague, Peter Stone, did not physically see cell tower records and intelligence intercepts that they claim placed Cohen in Prague in summer 2016.

Gordon also suggested that the four anonymous sources he and Stone cite in their articlealso did not see the intelligence for themselves, meaning that the report is based on third-hand information.
 
Crooked Hillary and her Deep State definitely got their money's worth with the fake piss dossier. Leftards still think it might turn out to be real. :p
 

Cohen continues to vehemently deny that he was in Prague. If he is lying - he is desperately trying to hide something really big. I'm sure Mueller is on top of it.

Michael Cohen Report Is Based On Third-Hand Information, Reporter Reveals


In an interview on MSNBC, Greg Gordon said that he and his McClatchy colleague, Peter Stone, did not physically see cell tower records and intelligence intercepts that they claim placed Cohen in Prague in summer 2016.

Gordon also suggested that the four anonymous sources he and Stone cite in their articlealso did not see the intelligence for themselves, meaning that the report is based on third-hand information.
Or no information. It was completely made up.
 
Wrong
Looks like the only Dossier claim to be challenged has pretty definitively been challenged.

Cohen was in Prague just as the Dossier claimed

Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting
Already been proven it was a DIFFERENT Cohen but hey go ahead and dig yourself a deeper hole.
No shit?

Link required
REPORT: Intelligence Community Believes It Was a Different Michael Cohen Who Visited Prague

Even from a leftist site!
Fail. They are talking about a report of some passport...NOT the cell phone records
Wrong snowflake as usual you missed the ENTIRE point. Its NOT the same Cohen...but please keep grasping at straws trying tie a CONVICTED LIAR to President Trump when its been shown the CONVICTED LIAR will say anything to save his own ass from his own wrongdoings.
 
Wrong
Looks like the only Dossier claim to be challenged has pretty definitively been challenged.

Cohen was in Prague just as the Dossier claimed

Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting
Already been proven it was a DIFFERENT Cohen but hey go ahead and dig yourself a deeper hole.
No shit?

Link required
REPORT: Intelligence Community Believes It Was a Different Michael Cohen Who Visited Prague

Even from a leftist site!
Fail. They are talking about a report of some passport...NOT the cell phone records
Wrong snowflake as usual you missed the ENTIRE point. Its NOT the same Cohen...but please keep grasping at straws trying tie a CONVICTED LIAR to President Trump when its been shown the CONVICTED LIAR will say anything to save his own ass from his own wrongdoings.
As anyone who has read your moronic postings might guess,you are completely misunderstanding and misusing this information.
 
Steele was put under oath in England and said the file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad. He sure did not want to lie to a bit court under oath and go to jail.
Really?

I'm sure you can provide a link to that right?

Oh you won't because what you're talking about bears no real relationship to what you claimed??

Oh...


Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified

.

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.

Except HE DOES NOT, where the fuck do you get proposterous bullshit like that from?
 
Steele was put under oath in England and said the file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad. He sure did not want to lie to a bit court under oath and go to jail.
Really?

I'm sure you can provide a link to that right?

Oh you won't because what you're talking about bears no real relationship to what you claimed??

Oh...


Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified

.

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.

Except HE DOES NOT, where the fuck do you get proposterous bullshit like that from?
He certainly does. What do you imagine the link points at?
 
Really?

I'm sure you can provide a link to that right?

Oh you won't because what you're talking about bears no real relationship to what you claimed??

Oh...


Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified

.

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.

Except HE DOES NOT, where the fuck do you get proposterous bullshit like that from?
He certainly does. What do you imagine the link points at?
Apparently not what you think.
 
Really?

I'm sure you can provide a link to that right?

Oh you won't because what you're talking about bears no real relationship to what you claimed??

Oh...


Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified

.

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.

Except HE DOES NOT, where the fuck do you get proposterous bullshit like that from?
He certainly does. What do you imagine the link points at?

It points at Steely saying that a SPECIFIC piece of intel is not fully verified. It's does not say ANYTHING about the entirety of the dossier.

You seriously need to learn to read.
 

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.

Except HE DOES NOT, where the fuck do you get proposterous bullshit like that from?
He certainly does. What do you imagine the link points at?

It points at Steely saying that a SPECIFIC piece of intel is not fully verified. It's does not say ANYTHING about the entirety of the dossier.
Nor does "not fully verified" mean, "false". Hannity has turned this guy's brain to tapioca.
 
Steele was put under oath in England and said the file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad. He sure did not want to lie to a bit court under oath and go to jail.
Really?

I'm sure you can provide a link to that right?

Oh you won't because what you're talking about bears no real relationship to what you claimed??

Oh...


Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified

.

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.
its opposition research, worth more if its true. But never used by her campaign.
Steele himself says its 70 to 90 percent true. Or you could say 10 to 30 percent bullshit.
 

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.

Except HE DOES NOT, where the fuck do you get proposterous bullshit like that from?
He certainly does. What do you imagine the link points at?

It points at Steely saying that a SPECIFIC piece of intel is not fully verified. It's does not say ANYTHING about the entirety of the dossier.

You seriously need to learn to read.
Nothing in the document has been verified, dumbass.
 
How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.

Except HE DOES NOT, where the fuck do you get proposterous bullshit like that from?
He certainly does. What do you imagine the link points at?

It points at Steely saying that a SPECIFIC piece of intel is not fully verified. It's does not say ANYTHING about the entirety of the dossier.
Nor does "not fully verified" mean, "false". Hannity has turned this guy's brain to tapioca.
Hillary sucked Putin's dick. That claim has not been "full verified" either, dumbass.
 
Steele was put under oath in England and said the file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad. He sure did not want to lie to a bit court under oath and go to jail.
Really?

I'm sure you can provide a link to that right?

Oh you won't because what you're talking about bears no real relationship to what you claimed??

Oh...


Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified

.

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.
its opposition research, worth more if its true. But never used by her campaign.
Steele himself says its 70 to 90 percent true. Or you could say 10 to 30 percent bullshit.
Why should anyone believe Steele?
 
Really?

I'm sure you can provide a link to that right?

Oh you won't because what you're talking about bears no real relationship to what you claimed??

Oh...


Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified

.

How the hell is that even close to "file was a fiction put out to make Trump look bad."????
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.
its opposition research, worth more if its true. But never used by her campaign.
Steele himself says its 70 to 90 percent true. Or you could say 10 to 30 percent bullshit.
Why should anyone believe Steele?
Why should anyone care that you don't?

We remember your hysterics over Flynn ya know
 
Hillary funded it, and the author admits it's bullshit. That's right on the money.

Except HE DOES NOT, where the fuck do you get proposterous bullshit like that from?
He certainly does. What do you imagine the link points at?

It points at Steely saying that a SPECIFIC piece of intel is not fully verified. It's does not say ANYTHING about the entirety of the dossier.
Nor does "not fully verified" mean, "false". Hannity has turned this guy's brain to tapioca.
Hillary sucked Putin's dick.

Oh? Is that why Hillary was supporting anti-Putin demostrations and sactions on Russia??

Is that why Trump oppposed sanctions and wouldn't dare utter a single negative word about Putin regime?

Is that why Putin wanted Trump to win?

Analysis | Trump dismissed the idea that Putin wanted him to win. Putin just admitted that he did.

You are a fucking moron.
 

Forum List

Back
Top