CDZ The 2nd Amendment

[danielpalos]

That is all I need to do. Our Second Amendment is clear and Express, not Implied.

Shall not be infringed is not an implication nor does it imply anything. It means what it means

lol. for the People who Are, well regulated militia.

As to be expected in working order.

Only in the ignorance of right wing fantasy.

For the True militia of the United States, wellness of regulation Must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

If that were true the second amendment would have been written this way
A militia well regulated by Congress being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall be prescribed by the Congress

Our Second Article of Amendment is Not, a Constitution unto itself.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Shall not be infringed is not an implication nor does it imply anything. It means what it means

lol. for the People who Are, well regulated militia.

As to be expected in working order.

Only in the ignorance of right wing fantasy.

For the True militia of the United States, wellness of regulation Must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

If that were true the second amendment would have been written this way
A militia well regulated by Congress being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall be prescribed by the Congress

Our Second Article of Amendment is Not, a Constitution unto itself.

No? it actually dictates to Congress what they cannot do.

 

[frigidweirdo]

And get Congress has the ability to change those laws.

It's how the separation of powers work.

The Constitution Is Real Easy To Just Change Through The Legislatures

That's Why Radicals Need The Courts

SCOTUS Has Said There Are Penumbras Within Our Constitution

That's How Roe v Wade
Was Found Within The Constitution

And The Legislature Doesn't Have Time
To Scribble Up New Legislation
To Over-Turn Precedent Rulings
To The Satisfaction Of The Courts That Set Them

Pretty Simplistic Assertion, fridgid....

The Constitution can be changed. If the Constitution is out of date and a majority of people think it should be changed because of bad interpretation.

But the Constitution has to be interpreted by someone. Who is to say what is the "correct" way of viewing it?

It was the Framers' intent that the Supreme Court determines what the Constitution means, including the Second Amendment.

Actually the 'Framers' intended for Congress to overshadow the Supreme Court, ans as we know from the historical record they let the states handle their own gun laws as the individual states saw fit .

The Bill of Rights was a restraint on the federal government until the 14th amendment was ratified, and that amendment extended the individual rights of the Bill of Rights to the states.

Actually, The Supreme Court declared themselves to be the final arbitrator of the Constitution. The states should have opposed that power grab, but did not, and now we are pretty much stuck with it.

Well, the Supreme Court did what was logical. You have the separation of powers, each branch having powers over other branches.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. for the People who Are, well regulated militia.

As to be expected in working order.

Only in the ignorance of right wing fantasy.

For the True militia of the United States, wellness of regulation Must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

If that were true the second amendment would have been written this way
A militia well regulated by Congress being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall be prescribed by the Congress

Our Second Article of Amendment is Not, a Constitution unto itself.

No? it actually dictates to Congress what they cannot do.

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when Being so, for the security of our free States.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

As to be expected in working order.

Only in the ignorance of right wing fantasy.

For the True militia of the United States, wellness of regulation Must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

If that were true the second amendment would have been written this way
A militia well regulated by Congress being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall be prescribed by the Congress

Our Second Article of Amendment is Not, a Constitution unto itself.

No? it actually dictates to Congress what they cannot do.

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when Being so, for the security of our free States.

George Mason the father of the second amendment
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."

 

[danielpalos]

Only in the ignorance of right wing fantasy.

For the True militia of the United States, wellness of regulation Must be prescribed by our federal Congress.

If that were true the second amendment would have been written this way
A militia well regulated by Congress being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall be prescribed by the Congress

Our Second Article of Amendment is Not, a Constitution unto itself.

No? it actually dictates to Congress what they cannot do.

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when Being so, for the security of our free States.

George Mason the father of the second amendment
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."

And, only well regulated militia are Expressly declared Necessary.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

If that were true the second amendment would have been written this way
A militia well regulated by Congress being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall be prescribed by the Congress

Our Second Article of Amendment is Not, a Constitution unto itself.

No? it actually dictates to Congress what they cannot do.

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when Being so, for the security of our free States.

George Mason the father of the second amendment
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."

And, only well regulated militia are Expressly declared Necessary.

as to be expected in working order

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Article of Amendment is Not, a Constitution unto itself.

No? it actually dictates to Congress what they cannot do.

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when Being so, for the security of our free States.

George Mason the father of the second amendment
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."

And, only well regulated militia are Expressly declared Necessary.

as to be expected in working order

Our Constitution says otherwise.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No? it actually dictates to Congress what they cannot do.

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when Being so, for the security of our free States.

George Mason the father of the second amendment
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."

And, only well regulated militia are Expressly declared Necessary.

as to be expected in working order

Our Constitution says otherwise.

ok that is what well regulated meant when the second amendment was written
So no it doesn't say otherwise

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Amendment declares which subset of the People are Necessary and shall not be Infringed, when Being so, for the security of our free States.

George Mason the father of the second amendment
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."

And, only well regulated militia are Expressly declared Necessary.

as to be expected in working order

Our Constitution says otherwise.

ok that is what well regulated meant when the second amendment was written
So no it doesn't say otherwise

yes, it does. First Sergeants don't appeal to ignorance of their Orders.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

George Mason the father of the second amendment
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."

And, only well regulated militia are Expressly declared Necessary.

as to be expected in working order

Our Constitution says otherwise.

ok that is what well regulated meant when the second amendment was written
So no it doesn't say otherwise

yes, it does. First Sergeants don't appeal to ignorance of their Orders.

whatever the fvck that means anyway ignorance does attach itself to you.

 

[danielpalos]

And, only well regulated militia are Expressly declared Necessary.

as to be expected in working order

Our Constitution says otherwise.

ok that is what well regulated meant when the second amendment was written
So no it doesn't say otherwise

yes, it does. First Sergeants don't appeal to ignorance of their Orders.

whatever the fvck that means anyway ignorance does attach itself to you.

ignorant of your Constitutional, standing Orders?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

as to be expected in working order

Our Constitution says otherwise.

ok that is what well regulated meant when the second amendment was written
So no it doesn't say otherwise

yes, it does. First Sergeants don't appeal to ignorance of their Orders.

whatever the fvck that means anyway ignorance does attach itself to you.

ignorant of your Constitutional, standing Orders?

huh? are you drunk?

 

[danielpalos]

Our Constitution says otherwise.

ok that is what well regulated meant when the second amendment was written
So no it doesn't say otherwise

yes, it does. First Sergeants don't appeal to ignorance of their Orders.

whatever the fvck that means anyway ignorance does attach itself to you.

ignorant of your Constitutional, standing Orders?

huh? are you drunk?

I am not the one who Only has appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Can right wing Bakers, be any more moral.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

ok that is what well regulated meant when the second amendment was written
So no it doesn't say otherwise

yes, it does. First Sergeants don't appeal to ignorance of their Orders.

whatever the fvck that means anyway ignorance does attach itself to you.

ignorant of your Constitutional, standing Orders?

huh? are you drunk?

I am not the one who Only has appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Can right wing Bakers, be any more moral.

pisss OVER HERE HERE.... THE SECOND AMENDMENT DISCUSSION IS OVER HERE.
You're drifting.

 

[danielpalos]

yes, it does. First Sergeants don't appeal to ignorance of their Orders.

whatever the fvck that means anyway ignorance does attach itself to you.

ignorant of your Constitutional, standing Orders?

huh? are you drunk?

I am not the one who Only has appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Can right wing Bakers, be any more moral.

pisss OVER HERE HERE.... THE SECOND AMENDMENT DISCUSSION IS OVER HERE.
You're drifting.

Our Second Amendment is not a Constitution unto itself.

You merely appeal to ignorance.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

whatever the fvck that means anyway ignorance does attach itself to you.

ignorant of your Constitutional, standing Orders?

huh? are you drunk?

I am not the one who Only has appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Can right wing Bakers, be any more moral.

pisss OVER HERE HERE.... THE SECOND AMENDMENT DISCUSSION IS OVER HERE.
You're drifting.

Our Second Amendment is not a Constitution unto itself.

You merely appeal to ignorance.

So what is the constitution for?

 

[danielpalos]

ignorant of your Constitutional, standing Orders?

huh? are you drunk?

I am not the one who Only has appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Can right wing Bakers, be any more moral.

pisss OVER HERE HERE.... THE SECOND AMENDMENT DISCUSSION IS OVER HERE.
You're drifting.

Our Second Amendment is not a Constitution unto itself.

You merely appeal to ignorance.

So what is the constitution for?

Is is our supreme law of the land.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

huh? are you drunk?

I am not the one who Only has appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Can right wing Bakers, be any more moral.

pisss OVER HERE HERE.... THE SECOND AMENDMENT DISCUSSION IS OVER HERE.
You're drifting.

Our Second Amendment is not a Constitution unto itself.

You merely appeal to ignorance.

So what is the constitution for?

Is is our supreme law of the land.

and the second amendment says the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

 

[danielpalos]

I am not the one who Only has appeals to ignorance of our supreme law of the land.

Can right wing Bakers, be any more moral.

pisss OVER HERE HERE.... THE SECOND AMENDMENT DISCUSSION IS OVER HERE.
You're drifting.

Our Second Amendment is not a Constitution unto itself.

You merely appeal to ignorance.

So what is the constitution for?

Is is our supreme law of the land.

and the second amendment says the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

It says, well regulated militia are Necessary, not the unorganized militia, expressly.