browsing deer
Silver Member
- Jul 11, 2015
- 2,455
- 403
The fire has to go.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Similarly, US govt support propped up the SA apartheid regime long past its use by date as well.It took decades, but a similar BDS movement eventually toppled the apartheid South African government.
So there is no reason the BDS tactic applied against the apartheid Israeli government won't produce the same results. .......
It took decades, but a similar BDS movement eventually toppled the apartheid South African government.
So there is no reason the BDS tactic applied against the apartheid Israeli government won't produce the same results. .......
The Anti-Apartheid sanctions movement is exactly like the BDS movement, it started with a few universities and slowly began to involve companies and then nations.
The Zionists themselves declared their movement a colonial movement. They were Europeans colonizing the native people of Palestine.
Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times
View attachment 58830
View attachment 58831
Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times - World Bulletin
Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
July 25, 1926
(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)
The contemplated trip to the United States of Dr. Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, the continuation of his efforts while in America to extend the Jewish Agency through his negotiations with the Marshall group, the possibilities of extending Jewish colonization work outside of the present Palestine frontiers, including. Transjordania and certain parts of Syria, were the main features around which the deliberations centered.
“Due to the success of our colonization work in Palestine proper, it is possible that eventually our colonization work will be extended beyond the frontiers of Transjordania. It is true that the Palestine government has not taken a clear stand in regard to its economic policy, but well founded demands have every prospect of being agreed to. A great deal has been achieved during the last months,” Dr. Weizmann said.
Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ
Incorrect BozoActually it was not a similar BDS movement. Even the briefest of views of the two situations will reveal the glaring differences. The first and most basic is that Israel is not an apartheid state. Its the palestinians who are requiring Israel to institute restrictions in order to quell the ongoing palestinian violence. Its a state of war. South Africa was not at war.
Another glaring difference is that while South Africa was a colonial state the Israeli's are a first nations people. Its the Arab Muslims who conquered and colonized the middle east, a very small portion of which has now been won by its native inhabitants.
Incorrect BozoActually it was not a similar BDS movement. Even the briefest of views of the two situations will reveal the glaring differences. The first and most basic is that Israel is not an apartheid state. Its the palestinians who are requiring Israel to institute restrictions in order to quell the ongoing palestinian violence. Its a state of war. South Africa was not at war.
Another glaring difference is that while South Africa was a colonial state the Israeli's are a first nations people. Its the Arab Muslims who conquered and colonized the middle east, a very small portion of which has now been won by its native inhabitants.
There is almost no difference between the defunct fascist S African government and the current fascist state of Israel.
Both enforced a segregated apartheid social structure by the use of an paramilitary police. .....
Hoho, so it looks like DeNial is not actually a river in Egypt, rather it's situated a bit northeast.Actually it was not a similar BDS movement. Even the briefest of views of the two situations will reveal the glaring differences. The first and most basic is that Israel is not an apartheid state. Its the palestinians who are requiring Israel to institute restrictions in order to quell the ongoing palestinian violence. Its a state of war. South Africa was not at war.
Incorrect BozoActually it was not a similar BDS movement. Even the briefest of views of the two situations will reveal the glaring differences. The first and most basic is that Israel is not an apartheid state. Its the palestinians who are requiring Israel to institute restrictions in order to quell the ongoing palestinian violence. Its a state of war. South Africa was not at war.
Another glaring difference is that while South Africa was a colonial state the Israeli's are a first nations people. Its the Arab Muslims who conquered and colonized the middle east, a very small portion of which has now been won by its native inhabitants.
There is almost no difference between the defunct fascist S African government and the current fascist state of Israel.
Both enforced a segregated apartheid social structure by the use of an paramilitary police. .....
Israel is the center of the world. East meets West right there, ground zero.Oh yes, if it wasn't for Israel the world would go back to the stone age. What arrogance.
So what's your point?Here the thread goes wandering again....
This is about the BDS and they have to be logically consistent. That means no apple laptops, and no computers using the last 3 operating systems or Pc operating systems using Vista, 8, or 10. And all the other things that come out of there
So what's your point?Here the thread goes wandering again....
This is about the BDS and they have to be logically consistent. That means no apple laptops, and no computers using the last 3 operating systems or Pc operating systems using Vista, 8, or 10. And all the other things that come out of there
During the 1930's Nazi Germany lead the world in technology and inventions.
And we all know how that turned out. ......
What he said!His point is exactly what he wrote. In order for the BDS movement to be consistent and non-hypocritical, no recent computer technologies should be used by its proponents.