danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1,061
all we need is a bailout on at-will demand.Too lazy and/or too dumb to succeed is exponentially more accurate.too rich to fail, regardless. is more like it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
all we need is a bailout on at-will demand.Too lazy and/or too dumb to succeed is exponentially more accurate.too rich to fail, regardless. is more like it.
What really need is to “bailout” of unconstitutional programs like welfare, Social Security, Obamacare, etc.all we need is a bailout on at-will demand.Too lazy and/or too dumb to succeed is exponentially more accurate.too rich to fail, regardless. is more like it.
why bailout the already rich, at all?What really need is to “bailout” of unconstitutional programs like welfare, Social Security, Obamacare, etc.all we need is a bailout on at-will demand.Too lazy and/or too dumb to succeed is exponentially more accurate.too rich to fail, regardless. is more like it.
History has proven time and time again that conservative policies create prosperity and progressive policies create poverty.Over 700 companies have boosted wages and given bonuses and other benefits to their employees because of tax reform.
higher paid labor creates more in demand; and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, stabilizes markets.It’s already been proven that minimum wage hikes reduces salaries (resulting in reduced tax revenues) and eliminates jobs (resulting in no tax revenues). Next?Minimum wage raise economics to generate more tax revenue
It’s already been proven that minimum wage hikes reduces salaries (resulting in reduced tax revenues) and eliminates jobs (resulting in no tax revenues). Next?higher paid labor creates more in demand; and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, stabilizes markets.It’s already been proven that minimum wage hikes reduces salaries (resulting in reduced tax revenues) and eliminates jobs (resulting in no tax revenues). Next?Minimum wage raise economics to generate more tax revenue
we need to get rid of low wage jobs that don't cover the cost of social services. a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage will function as a cost of living adjustment, and higher paid labor creates more in demand and pay more in taxes. the laws of demand and supply work.It’s already been proven that minimum wage hikes reduces salaries (resulting in reduced tax revenues) and eliminates jobs (resulting in no tax revenues). Next?higher paid labor creates more in demand; and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, stabilizes markets.It’s already been proven that minimum wage hikes reduces salaries (resulting in reduced tax revenues) and eliminates jobs (resulting in no tax revenues). Next?Minimum wage raise economics to generate more tax revenue
And that’s exactly what failed left-wing policy does. It gets rid of low-wage jobs and turns them into no-wage jobs as those positions are either automated or outsourced. People simply will not pay $15 per hour for unskilled labor. It’s truly a shame that you can’t grasp basic economics.we need to get rid of low wage jobs that don't cover the cost of social services.
...will result in higher unemployment and lower wages for those that were lucky enough to hold onto their job. It’s been proven already. In Seattle. In Oakland.a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage willfunction as a cost of living adjustment.
Except that the law of supply and demand doesn’t apply here. At all. You think by creating supply (more money for unskilled labor), you can create demand. It doesn’t work that way, chief. Demand drives supply. Lack of supply for that demand drives prices higher. You haven’t grasped basic economics yet.and higher paid labor creates more in demand and pay more in taxes. the laws of demand and supply work.
That’s because it takes most of their incomes for the basics, you dimwit.Higher paid labor creates more in demand simply because the poor tend to spend most of their incomes.
it is about the economic concept of monopsony. it is relevant due to the sovereignty of legal jurisdiction.By that “logic” sparky, we should lower the minimum wage. I mean, after all, “the minimum wage is still the minimum wage”.The minimum wage is still the minimum wage.
I’ve already proven that you are the one who doesn’t understand basic economics. And I’ll prove it yet again. This is from the left-wing University of Washington in the very left-wing Seattle Times.You don't know what you are talking about.
Oops. Indisputable proof. This argument is officially over. You lose (again).Seattle’s minimum-wage law is boosting wages for a range of low-paid workers, but the law is causing those workers as a group to lose hours, and it’s also costing jobs
The “statutory” unemployment compensation would be $0.00 per hour and we will eliminate “social services”. We’re not paying people not to work - no matter how lazy and greedy you are.The Statutory minimum wage would be fifteen dollars an hour. Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed would be fourteen dollars an hour, to compete with the equivalent cost of social services.
That would cause the “statutory unemployment” to skyrocket (as it has done in Oakland, Seattle, etc.). There is a reason that left-wing cities are shitholes of filth and unemployment. This is from the left-wing University of Washington in the very left-wing Seattle Times.The Statutory minimum wage would be fifteen dollars an hour.
Oops. Indisputable proof. This argument is officially over. You lose (again).Seattle’s minimum-wage law is boosting wages for a range of low-paid workers, but the law is causing those workers as a group to lose hours, and it’s also costing jobs