The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[Faun]

Oh don't say the GDP is fake because it's bad. Then when it's good take credit for it. Can't have it both ways ya conspiracy theorist.

When it was very good from Trump (4.2%), BEA deceivers lowered it to 3.5. Simultaneously, they raised Obama's pitiful 1.8 GDP to 2.5. All their changes improved Obama's numbers and diminished Trump's.

PS- "conspiracy theorist" catchphrase died out a year ago. Try something new.

You’re lying. Remember the unemployment numbers weren’t real until trump was potus and the number went down suddenly it was real

The proof that what I said was true is right here in the threads. I posted the BEA GDP charts both before and after, showing completely different figures for the same quarters. Look them up, and then you can apologize.

Also note all their changes make Trump look worse, and Obama better . They weren't even trying to hide their manipulations. Guess they thought nobody was looking. They were wrong.

2019 is in the books and Impeached Trump is keeping his streak alive of not having a single year reach 3% annualized real growth or better. Even worse, Impeached Trump is the only U.S. president in recorded history to not have a quarter exceed 3.5% real growth.

You speak as if it has been the Democrats plan the whole time, otherwise to set Trump up or make him fail in regards to your long term strategy and agenda that was figured to be solid as a rock going foward.

To hell with the American people eh ? Just keep hammering for the agenda no matter what the cost to the economy, security, and freedoms of the people on whole in America were eh ?

This has absolutely nothing to do with one man named Trump, but everything to do with the attempt to set the Republican party back years, and all in hopes to clear the path for what you all put in motion years and years ago. The Democrats just figured that they had an easy blundering target to take down after 2016, and they hoped that in taking him down, that it would attempt to drag the Republicans down with him.

To bad it didn't work, and to bad the Republicans finally came to their senses about what was going down. They are unified now, and Trump will be re-elected for his second term. MAGA.

In summary - This is more about the Democrat agenda, than it ever was with the get Trump bullcrap.

Imbecile, Democrats can not hold GDP down.

 

[Faun]

You’re lying. Remember the unemployment numbers weren’t real until trump was potus and the number went down suddenly it was real

The proof that what I said was true is right here in the threads. I posted the BEA GDP charts both before and after, showing completely different figures for the same quarters. Look them up, and then you can apologize.

Also note all their changes make Trump look worse, and Obama better . They weren't even trying to hide their manipulations. Guess they thought nobody was looking. They were wrong.

2019 is in the books and Impeached Trump is keeping his streak alive of not having a single year reach 3% annualized real growth or better. Even worse, Impeached Trump is the only U.S. president in recorded history to not have a quarter exceed 3.5% real growth.

You got the title wrong. It's Acquitted Trump. It's understandable that the TDS afflicted get that wrong. But hey, at least you're saying that the good economy is Trump's.

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

They will be reporting that one of the greatest Presidents in history was actually impeached.

LOLOL

A president with a 45% approval rating, who lowered the unemployment rate by one percentage point and has not [yet] had a single quarter of GDP exceed 3.5%, is one of the greatest presidents ever???

 

[Faun]

2019 is in the books and Impeached Trump is keeping his streak alive of not having a single year reach 3% annualized real growth or better. Even worse, Impeached Trump is the only U.S. president in recorded history to not have a quarter exceed 3.5% real growth.

You got the title wrong. It's Acquitted Trump. It's understandable that the TDS afflicted get that wrong. But hey, at least you're saying that the good economy is Trump's.

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

Would it be illegal to investigate if Biden had robbed a bank in the Ukraine or raped someone?
Of course not.
It is NEVER illegal to investigate anyone, anywhere.
The only way it could have been illegal is if there were some indication that there was a conspiracy to commit purjury with false evidence.
That never happened, so there was absolutely no crime by Trump.
But we do not yet know if Biden committed a crime, because there still has been no investigation into that.
And by law, there should be.

It would have been illegal no matter what Biden had done had Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to investigate him. There are legal avenues Impeached Trump could have taken to have Biden investigated. Doing it by soliciting a foreign national, however, is illegal; and he can't violate one law to enforce another.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

And all appropriate for a skit on SNL.

Even funnier than the farce itself, is laughable liberals still trying to pass it off as authentic.

The photographer who took it, who's an official White House photographer and fan of Impeached Trump, says it's real.

As always, gramps, you prove to be senile.

So assuming it is real, how is it newsworthy to show a politician does makeup?
Again, I do not like or support Trump, but this is ridiculous to focus on.

It's funny because Impeached Trump denies it. And don't worry, there's 24 hours in a day. Plenty of time to focus on important things too. Like Barack Obama' birth certificate.

 

[sealybobo]

You got the title wrong. It's Acquitted Trump. It's understandable that the TDS afflicted get that wrong. But hey, at least you're saying that the good economy is Trump's.

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

Would it be illegal to investigate if Biden had robbed a bank in the Ukraine or raped someone?
Of course not.
It is NEVER illegal to investigate anyone, anywhere.
The only way it could have been illegal is if there were some indication that there was a conspiracy to commit purjury with false evidence.
That never happened, so there was absolutely no crime by Trump.
But we do not yet know if Biden committed a crime, because there still has been no investigation into that.
And by law, there should be.

It would have been illegal no matter what Biden had done had Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to investigate him. There are legal avenues Impeached Trump could have taken to have Biden investigated. Doing it by soliciting a foreign national, however, is illegal; and he can't violate one law to enforce another.

And having his personal lawyer Rudy doing his dirty work? Shady republicans should be ashamed

 

[Rigby5]

You got the title wrong. It's Acquitted Trump. It's understandable that the TDS afflicted get that wrong. But hey, at least you're saying that the good economy is Trump's.

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

Would it be illegal to investigate if Biden had robbed a bank in the Ukraine or raped someone?
Of course not.
It is NEVER illegal to investigate anyone, anywhere.
The only way it could have been illegal is if there were some indication that there was a conspiracy to commit purjury with false evidence.
That never happened, so there was absolutely no crime by Trump.
But we do not yet know if Biden committed a crime, because there still has been no investigation into that.
And by law, there should be.

Yes it’s illegal to pressure a foreign government to dig dirt against his political rival trying to cheat the next election.

Sad part of that is you don’t have a real evidence that the Biden committed any wrongdoing except conspiracy crap created by Solomon.

No its not.
Where did you get that crazy idea?
If a US citizen commits crimes in another country, then the US is required by law to get that country to investigate, so that the crimes can be prosecuted.
It would only be improper if the political rival had committed no crimes and there was a hint of a frame up.
But that is not the case at all, and it is clear Burisma Holdings is incredibly suspicious.

You claim the there is nothing suspicious about Hunter Biden getting $50k/month for doing nothing and not even being able to read Ukrainian law or travel to the Ukraine?

 

[Rigby5]

The proof that what I said was true is right here in the threads. I posted the BEA GDP charts both before and after, showing completely different figures for the same quarters. Look them up, and then you can apologize.

Also note all their changes make Trump look worse, and Obama better . They weren't even trying to hide their manipulations. Guess they thought nobody was looking. They were wrong.

2019 is in the books and Impeached Trump is keeping his streak alive of not having a single year reach 3% annualized real growth or better. Even worse, Impeached Trump is the only U.S. president in recorded history to not have a quarter exceed 3.5% real growth.

You got the title wrong. It's Acquitted Trump. It's understandable that the TDS afflicted get that wrong. But hey, at least you're saying that the good economy is Trump's.

OJ was acquitted too.

And it was clear the prosecution of OJ was also full of irregularities and deception.
Whether or not OJ was actually guilty has no bearing on whether or not Trump violated any law, and it seems unlikely since no actual criminal statutes were ever brought up.

Or witnesses. I guess corruption is ok now

The way impeachment is supposed to work is the House calls all the witnesses and get all the testimony on transcripts. Then the senate is supposed to have the actual hearing from those transcripts.
There are not supposed to be any NEW witnesses that have not already testified before the House.
It is like the supreme court, who also never get any new witness testimony.

But the only corruption we have evidence of is Hunter Biden getting paid kickbacks from US foreign aid.
And why was that never investigated?

 

[Rigby5]

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

And all appropriate for a skit on SNL.

Even funnier than the farce itself, is laughable liberals still trying to pass it off as authentic.

The photographer who took it, who's an official White House photographer and fan of Impeached Trump, says it's real.

As always, gramps, you prove to be senile.

So assuming it is real, how is it newsworthy to show a politician does makeup?
Again, I do not like or support Trump, but this is ridiculous to focus on.

It's funny because Impeached Trump denies it. And don't worry, there's 24 hours in a day. Plenty of time to focus on important things too. Like Barack Obama' birth certificate.

Ok, I can agree Trump does bizarre things, like his tweets.
And the birth certificate thing as well.

 

[Rigby5]

You got the title wrong. It's Acquitted Trump. It's understandable that the TDS afflicted get that wrong. But hey, at least you're saying that the good economy is Trump's.

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

Would it be illegal to investigate if Biden had robbed a bank in the Ukraine or raped someone?
Of course not.
It is NEVER illegal to investigate anyone, anywhere.
The only way it could have been illegal is if there were some indication that there was a conspiracy to commit purjury with false evidence.
That never happened, so there was absolutely no crime by Trump.
But we do not yet know if Biden committed a crime, because there still has been no investigation into that.
And by law, there should be.

It would have been illegal no matter what Biden had done had Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to investigate him. There are legal avenues Impeached Trump could have taken to have Biden investigated. Doing it by soliciting a foreign national, however, is illegal; and he can't violate one law to enforce another.

That is totally untrue.
There is no other possible avenue to investigate a crime by a US citizen in a foreign country except by asking that country to investigate.
Not only would the FBI or CIA have no authority or ability to investigate, but it would be illegal.
No US personnel can legally conduct official business in a foreign country without registering with that country and getting their permission, which typically is not given.
The last thing any country wants or allows is a bunch of US spies potentially stealing, extorting, bribing, murdering, or anything else.

 

[Rigby5]

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

Would it be illegal to investigate if Biden had robbed a bank in the Ukraine or raped someone?
Of course not.
It is NEVER illegal to investigate anyone, anywhere.
The only way it could have been illegal is if there were some indication that there was a conspiracy to commit purjury with false evidence.
That never happened, so there was absolutely no crime by Trump.
But we do not yet know if Biden committed a crime, because there still has been no investigation into that.
And by law, there should be.

It would have been illegal no matter what Biden had done had Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to investigate him. There are legal avenues Impeached Trump could have taken to have Biden investigated. Doing it by soliciting a foreign national, however, is illegal; and he can't violate one law to enforce another.

And having his personal lawyer Rudy doing his dirty work? Shady republicans should be ashamed

Weird and shady is not illegal necessarily.
I would not have done it, but you can NOT legally sent the FBI or CIA into another country without their permission, and they are never going to allow that.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

Would it be illegal to investigate if Biden had robbed a bank in the Ukraine or raped someone?
Of course not.
It is NEVER illegal to investigate anyone, anywhere.
The only way it could have been illegal is if there were some indication that there was a conspiracy to commit purjury with false evidence.
That never happened, so there was absolutely no crime by Trump.
But we do not yet know if Biden committed a crime, because there still has been no investigation into that.
And by law, there should be.

Yes it’s illegal to pressure a foreign government to dig dirt against his political rival trying to cheat the next election.

Sad part of that is you don’t have a real evidence that the Biden committed any wrongdoing except conspiracy crap created by Solomon.

No its not.
Where did you get that crazy idea?
If a US citizen commits crimes in another country, then the US is required by law to get that country to investigate, so that the crimes can be prosecuted.
It would only be improper if the political rival had committed no crimes and there was a hint of a frame up.
But that is not the case at all, and it is clear Burisma Holdings is incredibly suspicious.

You claim the there is nothing suspicious about Hunter Biden getting $50k/month for doing nothing and not even being able to read Ukrainian law or travel to the Ukraine?

Of course it's illegal to solicit a foreign national to help with a campaign.

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

​

 

[Faun]

2019 is in the books and Impeached Trump is keeping his streak alive of not having a single year reach 3% annualized real growth or better. Even worse, Impeached Trump is the only U.S. president in recorded history to not have a quarter exceed 3.5% real growth.

You got the title wrong. It's Acquitted Trump. It's understandable that the TDS afflicted get that wrong. But hey, at least you're saying that the good economy is Trump's.

OJ was acquitted too.

And it was clear the prosecution of OJ was also full of irregularities and deception.
Whether or not OJ was actually guilty has no bearing on whether or not Trump violated any law, and it seems unlikely since no actual criminal statutes were ever brought up.

Or witnesses. I guess corruption is ok now

The way impeachment is supposed to work is the House calls all the witnesses and get all the testimony on transcripts. Then the senate is supposed to have the actual hearing from those transcripts.
There are not supposed to be any NEW witnesses that have not already testified before the House.
It is like the supreme court, who also never get any new witness testimony.

But the only corruption we have evidence of is Hunter Biden getting paid kickbacks from US foreign aid.
And why was that never investigated?

There's never been an impeachment trial before that didn't call witnesses. This was a first.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

The taint of Impeachment never goes away.

I dislike Trump and totally disagree with his political views, but the impeachment was totally wrong.
You can not over ride an election without serious and specific actual criminal acts.

Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to aid his own campaign. That's illegal and the Congress would have been malfeasant to ignore it.

Would it be illegal to investigate if Biden had robbed a bank in the Ukraine or raped someone?
Of course not.
It is NEVER illegal to investigate anyone, anywhere.
The only way it could have been illegal is if there were some indication that there was a conspiracy to commit purjury with false evidence.
That never happened, so there was absolutely no crime by Trump.
But we do not yet know if Biden committed a crime, because there still has been no investigation into that.
And by law, there should be.

It would have been illegal no matter what Biden had done had Impeached Trump solicited a foreign national to investigate him. There are legal avenues Impeached Trump could have taken to have Biden investigated. Doing it by soliciting a foreign national, however, is illegal; and he can't violate one law to enforce another.

That is totally untrue.
There is no other possible avenue to investigate a crime by a US citizen in a foreign country except by asking that country to investigate.
Not only would the FBI or CIA have no authority or ability to investigate, but it would be illegal.
No US personnel can legally conduct official business in a foreign country without registering with that country and getting their permission, which typically is not given.
The last thing any country wants or allows is a bunch of US spies potentially stealing, extorting, bribing, murdering, or anything else.

Actually, what you're saying is untrue. There is another way Impeached Trump could have handled this. We have a treaty with Ukraine to request such investigations. Impeached Trump could have followed the provisions of that treaty and legally had Biden investigated. Impeached Trump chose to do it illegally. And like all others, the president is not above the law. He cannot break a law to enforce another.

 

[hadit]

You got the title wrong. It's Acquitted Trump. It's understandable that the TDS afflicted get that wrong. But hey, at least you're saying that the good economy is Trump's.

OJ was acquitted too.

And it was clear the prosecution of OJ was also full of irregularities and deception.
Whether or not OJ was actually guilty has no bearing on whether or not Trump violated any law, and it seems unlikely since no actual criminal statutes were ever brought up.

Or witnesses. I guess corruption is ok now

The way impeachment is supposed to work is the House calls all the witnesses and get all the testimony on transcripts. Then the senate is supposed to have the actual hearing from those transcripts.
There are not supposed to be any NEW witnesses that have not already testified before the House.
It is like the supreme court, who also never get any new witness testimony.

But the only corruption we have evidence of is Hunter Biden getting paid kickbacks from US foreign aid.
And why was that never investigated?

There's never been an impeachment trial before that didn't call witnesses. This was a first.

Sure, but had they followed Bubba's impeachment trial example and had closed door testimony and only presented excerpts as testimony, would you have been appeased and not carried on about "No witnesses, no witnesses!"? Not likely.

 

[LaDairis]

Of course it's illegal to solicit a foreign national to help with a campaign.

Then why wasn't that one of the arcticles??

LOL!!!

It is because you SPIN and LIE.

The request by Trump was to investigate WHERE our foreign aid to Ukraine actually went.

Some of it went into HUNTER BIDEN's pocket.

You loved it. You cheered it. And you HATE IT when someone wants to INVESTIGATE IT....

 

[Faun]

OJ was acquitted too.

And it was clear the prosecution of OJ was also full of irregularities and deception.
Whether or not OJ was actually guilty has no bearing on whether or not Trump violated any law, and it seems unlikely since no actual criminal statutes were ever brought up.

Or witnesses. I guess corruption is ok now

The way impeachment is supposed to work is the House calls all the witnesses and get all the testimony on transcripts. Then the senate is supposed to have the actual hearing from those transcripts.
There are not supposed to be any NEW witnesses that have not already testified before the House.
It is like the supreme court, who also never get any new witness testimony.

But the only corruption we have evidence of is Hunter Biden getting paid kickbacks from US foreign aid.
And why was that never investigated?

There's never been an impeachment trial before that didn't call witnesses. This was a first.

Sure, but had they followed Bubba's impeachment trial example and had closed door testimony and only presented excerpts as testimony, would you have been appeased and not carried on about "No witnesses, no witnesses!"? Not likely.

There was a fundamental difference between the two Impeachments. With Clinton, the investigation was done in private by an Independent Counsel for a year. All depositions and evidence gathering were done in secret before the Congress ever got involved. Whereas with Impeached Trump, that was done by the House inquiry where the right screeched how unfair it was and even stormed their hearing with proverbial torches and pitchforks.

 

[Faun]

Of course it's illegal to solicit a foreign national to help with a campaign.

Then why wasn't that one of the arcticles??

LOL!!!

It is because you SPIN and LIE.

The request by Trump was to investigate WHERE our foreign aid to Ukraine actually went.

Some of it went into HUNTER BIDEN's pocket.

You loved it. You cheered it. And you HATE IT when someone wants to INVESTIGATE IT....

It was in the articles, ya blistering hemorrhoid on the ass of society...

Article I

President Trump solicited the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, in the 2020 United States Presidential election. He did so through a scheme or course of conduct that included soliciting the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations that would benefit his reelection, harm the election prospects of a political opponent, and influence the 2020 United States Presidential election to his advantage.​

 

[22lcidw]

And it was clear the prosecution of OJ was also full of irregularities and deception.
Whether or not OJ was actually guilty has no bearing on whether or not Trump violated any law, and it seems unlikely since no actual criminal statutes were ever brought up.

Or witnesses. I guess corruption is ok now

The way impeachment is supposed to work is the House calls all the witnesses and get all the testimony on transcripts. Then the senate is supposed to have the actual hearing from those transcripts.
There are not supposed to be any NEW witnesses that have not already testified before the House.
It is like the supreme court, who also never get any new witness testimony.

But the only corruption we have evidence of is Hunter Biden getting paid kickbacks from US foreign aid.
And why was that never investigated?

There's never been an impeachment trial before that didn't call witnesses. This was a first.

Sure, but had they followed Bubba's impeachment trial example and had closed door testimony and only presented excerpts as testimony, would you have been appeased and not carried on about "No witnesses, no witnesses!"? Not likely.

There was a fundamental difference between the two Impeachments. With Clinton, the investigation was done in private by an Independent Counsel for a year. All depositions and evidence gathering were done in secret before the Congress ever got involved. Whereas with Impeached Trump, that was done by the House inquiry where the right screeched how unfair it was and even stormed their hearing with proverbial torches and pitchforks.

Its just that we don't care. A political body that has lied to us for years and decades. Calls to impeach a man long before the election. Sounds more like a Communist ploy against an arch rival running against a corrupted and sour smelling system.

 

[LaDairis]

that would benefit his reelection

a big lie that will be put to bed TONIGHT in NH, when Low IQ Joe fails to finish in the top 3 yet again....

 

[Faun]

Or witnesses. I guess corruption is ok now

The way impeachment is supposed to work is the House calls all the witnesses and get all the testimony on transcripts. Then the senate is supposed to have the actual hearing from those transcripts.
There are not supposed to be any NEW witnesses that have not already testified before the House.
It is like the supreme court, who also never get any new witness testimony.

But the only corruption we have evidence of is Hunter Biden getting paid kickbacks from US foreign aid.
And why was that never investigated?

There's never been an impeachment trial before that didn't call witnesses. This was a first.

Sure, but had they followed Bubba's impeachment trial example and had closed door testimony and only presented excerpts as testimony, would you have been appeased and not carried on about "No witnesses, no witnesses!"? Not likely.

There was a fundamental difference between the two Impeachments. With Clinton, the investigation was done in private by an Independent Counsel for a year. All depositions and evidence gathering were done in secret before the Congress ever got involved. Whereas with Impeached Trump, that was done by the House inquiry where the right screeched how unfair it was and even stormed their hearing with proverbial torches and pitchforks.

Its just that we don't care. A political body that has lied to us for years and decades. Calls to impeach a man long before the election. Sounds more like a Communist ploy against an arch rival running against a corrupted and sour smelling system.

Grow a pair. The right was trying to disqualify Obama from before he was president, up until he left office.