Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a longgggg list of murders and facts . Just because you are ignorant of them, doesn't mean they're not there.Nonsense. They are conspiracy theories because the person forwarding the theory does not have facts to support it.Don't call things conspiracy theories, when you don't know the facts.
That's what You're doing . Bad acting. They couldn't come up with something more believable than this ridiculous farce ?Nobody said he had to. But an innocent person would readily do this, at trialAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
But Trump is guilty as shit, and everyone knows this. Even you cultists, who are just bad actors.
There is a longgggg list of murders and facts . Just because you are ignorant of them, doesn't mean they're not there.Nonsense. They are conspiracy theories because the person forwarding the theory does not have facts to support it.Don't call things conspiracy theories, when you don't know the facts.
I don't care if he did. That's his business, his wife's business, and none of yours.Well if you say Trump is innocent because he's a Republican then I say Faun is innocent because he/she's a liberal. And if Trump will never admit being wrong even when he's cold busted then why should we ever? Seems you live in a world where facts don't matter.What makes you think so ? And how about you ?Faun is innocent.I accuse you of violation of US Code 8 Section 1324. I also accuse you of 10 other things. You are accused.Impeached Trump was accused of pedophilia by Katie Johnson.Its a lib lie accusing trump of being a pedophile
Libs are getting desperate
For example, do you believe he never had sex with Stormy Daniels?
I hear you talking about this long list of facts. I don't see you presenting them.There is a longgggg list of murders and facts . Just because you are ignorant of them, doesn't mean they're not there.Nonsense. They are conspiracy theories because the person forwarding the theory does not have facts to support it.Don't call things conspiracy theories, when you don't know the facts.
Same way Trump really isn't a billionaire. There's a long list of facts that corroborate this but you are ignorant of them. Now if Trump would just release his taxes we could show you but he won't so you remain ignorant.
You idiot. I'm not saying there was no phone call. Trump himself released the transcript immediately, when Democrats started this laughingstock scam. We all saw it.That's what You're doing . Bad acting. They couldn't come up with something more believable than this ridiculous farce ?Nobody said he had to. But an innocent person would readily do this, at trialAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
But Trump is guilty as shit, and everyone knows this. Even you cultists, who are just bad actors.
Come up with? We didn't make this shit up you baffoon. Some whistleblower who worked inside the whitehouse told on him after he heard the inappropriate call. Then a dozen people showed up to testify that it's true. Trump did what we say he did.
But now you want to say it's not illegal? Well it's impeachable dipshit.
The only reason Trump is safe is because the Republicans senators are afraid if they do the right thing they'll lose their next elections. We're hoping that happens because they are defending this criminal.
No witnesses? They don't want to call any witnesses? What a sham.
Its not "the republicans" dummy its Trump's legal team and they want four witnesses so far...Hunter....Joe....Schiff...and the so called treasonous whistle blower....If that were true, Republicans would have a yuge line of witnesses to call. Are you ever not stupid?Witnesses will extend the trial and ultimately increase the dems pain....True, witnesses can say anything -- which is exactly the reason the House conducted those interviews behind closed doors.Look up the facts....every president at one time or another including Obama pleaded executive order with witnesses...you can't be this uninformed....it has to do with national security...no one knows what a witness may say...it could be an innocent remark that starts a war....grow up man....take the loss like a grown up and work against Trump if you want but to make shit up and turn common presidential practice illegal is dangerous....Refusing all document requests and witness testimony. It’s almost as if there’s something Trump doesn’t want us to know.
You idiot. I'm not saying there was no phone call. Trump himself released the transcript immediately, when Democrats started this laughingstock scam. We all saw it.That's what You're doing . Bad acting. They couldn't come up with something more believable than this ridiculous farce ?Nobody said he had to. But an innocent person would readily do this, at trialAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
But Trump is guilty as shit, and everyone knows this. Even you cultists, who are just bad actors.
Come up with? We didn't make this shit up you baffoon. Some whistleblower who worked inside the whitehouse told on him after he heard the inappropriate call. Then a dozen people showed up to testify that it's true. Trump did what we say he did.
But now you want to say it's not illegal? Well it's impeachable dipshit.
The only reason Trump is safe is because the Republicans senators are afraid if they do the right thing they'll lose their next elections. We're hoping that happens because they are defending this criminal.
No witnesses? They don't want to call any witnesses? What a sham.
The point is there's no wrongdoing. Trump enquired about Ukrainian corruption, clearly with good reason, and acted appropriately, as is required of a POTUS. Good job, Mr President.
As for his phone call being impeachable, kids in the 5th grade would day that doesn't even deserve the dignity of a response, except for this -
Not hardly . Zelensky himself has said all along, that he wasn't pressured, and even if he had been, that would be a good thing. Keeping U S aid $$$ away from corrupt regimes.You idiot. I'm not saying there was no phone call. Trump himself released the transcript immediately, when Democrats started this laughingstock scam. We all saw it.That's what You're doing . Bad acting. They couldn't come up with something more believable than this ridiculous farce ?Nobody said he had to. But an innocent person would readily do this, at trialAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
But Trump is guilty as shit, and everyone knows this. Even you cultists, who are just bad actors.
Come up with? We didn't make this shit up you baffoon. Some whistleblower who worked inside the whitehouse told on him after he heard the inappropriate call. Then a dozen people showed up to testify that it's true. Trump did what we say he did.
But now you want to say it's not illegal? Well it's impeachable dipshit.
The only reason Trump is safe is because the Republicans senators are afraid if they do the right thing they'll lose their next elections. We're hoping that happens because they are defending this criminal.
No witnesses? They don't want to call any witnesses? What a sham.
The point is there's no wrongdoing. Trump enquired about Ukrainian corruption, clearly with good reason, and acted appropriately, as is required of a POTUS. Good job, Mr President.
As for his phone call being impeachable, kids in the 5th grade would day that doesn't even deserve the dignity of a response, except for this -
It wasn't a transcript, it was a summary which is different. A transcript is an official record of exactly what was said, word for word. A summary is a briefing which does not contain a word for word account. In other words, there is missing information that could change the meaning of the conversation.
It was only impeachable w/o a crime when Clinton was in the dock.Not without Due Process, and you have violated Due Process since day 1.Because civil officers can be Impeached. I also included the VP.Irrelevant, we're talking about the president.
Then why did you bring it up?
.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
But we're talking about the president.
That and you have no actual evidence to even prove your non impeachable non existent crimes which are no where found in US Code.
There doesn't have to be a crime. It may not be a "crime" to try to get a foreign country to make up fake dirt on your political opponent but it's certainly an impeachable offense.
Republicans are going with the defense that while it was wrong for him to do that, it's not a high crime or misdemeanor. But they know that's a lie. And if or when they let him get away with it, Trump will do it again and much worse. What's to stop him?
If not the Senate then us voters will stop him.
I know this wasn't part of his impeachment proceedings, but few people in America have broken the law more then the Clintons. They are serial killers, and have been for 40 years.It was only impeachable w/o a crime when Clinton was in the dock.Not without Due Process, and you have violated Due Process since day 1.Because civil officers can be Impeached. I also included the VP.Then why did you bring it up?
.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
But we're talking about the president.
That and you have no actual evidence to even prove your non impeachable non existent crimes which are no where found in US Code.
There doesn't have to be a crime. It may not be a "crime" to try to get a foreign country to make up fake dirt on your political opponent but it's certainly an impeachable offense.
Republicans are going with the defense that while it was wrong for him to do that, it's not a high crime or misdemeanor. But they know that's a lie. And if or when they let him get away with it, Trump will do it again and much worse. What's to stop him?
If not the Senate then us voters will stop him.
???
Clinton admittedly broke the law.
Open/shut case. We're Trump anyone but the president, he would have been indicted.They couldn't come up with something more believable than this ridiculous farce
Not facts that support your nutsack theory, there aren't.There is a longgggg list of murders and facts
Right, and I remember all the rightwingers cackling and mewling that it was just a "process crime".Clinton admittedly broke the law.
You idiot. I'm not saying there was no phone call. Trump himself released the transcript immediately, when Democrats started this laughingstock scam. We all saw it.That's what You're doing . Bad acting. They couldn't come up with something more believable than this ridiculous farce ?Nobody said he had to. But an innocent person would readily do this, at trialAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
But Trump is guilty as shit, and everyone knows this. Even you cultists, who are just bad actors.
Come up with? We didn't make this shit up you baffoon. Some whistleblower who worked inside the whitehouse told on him after he heard the inappropriate call. Then a dozen people showed up to testify that it's true. Trump did what we say he did.
But now you want to say it's not illegal? Well it's impeachable dipshit.
The only reason Trump is safe is because the Republicans senators are afraid if they do the right thing they'll lose their next elections. We're hoping that happens because they are defending this criminal.
No witnesses? They don't want to call any witnesses? What a sham.
The point is there's no wrongdoing. Trump enquired about Ukrainian corruption, clearly with good reason, and acted appropriately, as is required of a POTUS. Good job, Mr President.
As for his phone call being impeachable, kids in the 5th grade would day that doesn't even deserve the dignity of a response, except for this -
It wasn't a transcript, it was a summary which is different. A transcript is an official record of exactly what was said, word for word. A summary is a briefing which does not contain a word for word account. In other words, there is missing information that could change the meaning of the conversation.
No, that was spot on. What's your problem?Bullshit! You lie!
In lib la la land you have to prove he’s innocentFaun is innocent.I accuse you of violation of US Code 8 Section 1324. I also accuse you of 10 other things. You are accused.Impeached Trump was accused of pedophilia by Katie Johnson.Its a lib lie accusing trump of being a pedophileAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
democrats have been looking for dirt on trump since the day he walked down the escalator in trump tower
does anyone really believe they hated trump before he beat queen hillary?
Yes we've been looking for dirt and we actually found some. Republicans have been looking for dirt on Obama/Hillary and they've found nothing. Doesn't stop them from looking.
And even when it's a fact that the Biden's are innocent, you right wing cock suckers keep pushing the narrative that there is something there. That's because you don't care if there is actually something there. You just want to smear your opponent. I already see you doing to Biden what you did to Hillary.
Well you can't talk abut creepy Joe when you have pedophile Trump running your party. I bet Trump misses Jeff Epstein.
Libs are getting desperate
Your response:Nobody said he had to. But an innocent person would readily do this, at trialAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
But Trump is guilty as shit, and everyone knows this. Even you cultists, who are just bad actors.
Excuse you. I didn't say that, nor would I say that.Your response:Nobody said he had to. But an innocent person would readily do this, at trialAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
But Trump is guilty as shit, and everyone knows this. Even you cultists, who are just bad actors.
“its true trump does not have to prove his innocence”
“but till he does he is presumed guilty”
At best all she can prove is that they may have had a sexual encounterCan we get a sample of his DNA?She can accuse all she wantsImpeached Trump was accused of pedophilia by Katie Johnson.Its a lib lie accusing trump of being a pedophileAgain, trump does not have to prove his innocence to a bullshit charge
democrats have been looking for dirt on trump since the day he walked down the escalator in trump tower
does anyone really believe they hated trump before he beat queen hillary?
Yes we've been looking for dirt and we actually found some. Republicans have been looking for dirt on Obama/Hillary and they've found nothing. Doesn't stop them from looking.
And even when it's a fact that the Biden's are innocent, you right wing cock suckers keep pushing the narrative that there is something there. That's because you don't care if there is actually something there. You just want to smear your opponent. I already see you doing to Biden what you did to Hillary.
Well you can't talk abut creepy Joe when you have pedophile Trump running your party. I bet Trump misses Jeff Epstein.
Libs are getting desperate
that does not make it so
E. Jean Carroll, Who Says Trump Raped Her, Seeks His DNA
Lawyers want to determine whether Trump’s genetic material is on a dress that the advice columnist says she wore during the encounter.
Lawyers for a woman who accuses President Donald Trump of raping her in the 1990s are asking for a DNA sample, seeking to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she wore during the encounter.
Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll’s lawyers served notice to a Trump attorney Thursday for Trump to submit a sample on March 2 in Washington for “analysis and comparison against unidentified male DNA present on the dress.”
Remember Monica's dress?
E. Jean Carroll, Who Says Trump Raped Her, Seeks His DNA | HuffPost
