Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where the fuck do you get the idea that the real world data says there's no AGW?
Here's some real world data that says you need to think again (or perhaps for the first time):
You let off the chart of the Deep Pacific Ocean Warming
Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?
How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's added 10x10e22 joules just since 2000 added heat and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?
Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?
How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's added 10x10e22 joules just since 2000 added heat and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?
...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after
So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.
Uh huh.
Sure, it did. Sure
Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?
How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's added 10x10e22 joules just since 2000 added heat and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?
...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after
So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.
Uh huh.
Sure, it did. Sure
Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.
Like this one from NOAA/NCDC?
How is it you can look at these data and the numerous other datasets displaying the ocean's added 10x10e22 joules just since 2000 added heat and claim "no warming in the last 17 years?" Doesn't it ever bother you to be that dishonest?
...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after
So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.
Uh huh.
Sure, it did. Sure
Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.
No, Frank. Show us ocean heat content data that does NOT display a 10x10e22 joules of heating since 2000.
...and that's how atmospheric CO2 turned the ocean to warm gastric juice. And they lived carbon free and happily ever after
So, 120PPM of CO2, warmed the planet 2-8 degrees, turned the oceans acidic and warmed them in the process.
Uh huh.
Sure, it did. Sure
Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.
That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?
And you might try to get a better handle on that whole "prove a negative" issue. That's about the sixth time in the last week that idea's been badly abused.
Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.
That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?
Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.
And you might try to get a better handle on that whole "prove a negative" issue. That's about the sixth time in the last week that idea's been badly abused.
Don't be such a fucking idiot Frank. If you think it didn't, SHOW US THE GODDAMNED DATA THAT SAYS IT DIDN'T.
That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?
Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.
That chart doesn't say that it did...that chart shows 0 to 700m which is not the deep ocean...and considering the amount of data tampering going on in government climate science what makes you think that chart is accurate?
Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.
And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature
How do you measure heat content without measuring temperature?
Three different studies have found the same ocean heating. And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature, the fact that the full ocean depth isn't included indicates this is very likely an understatement of actual ocean heating, Mr Science-Whiz.
And since the dependent variable is heat content and not temperature
How do you measure heat content without measuring temperature?
You missed the point. Given the data shows heat content, the addition of the rest of the ocean depth would, if anything, ADD to the measured parameter.
