The defence of the Kenosha killer

[westwall]

So you goofy Trumpers are really going to say that, if you were on trial for your lives for two murders, and an attorney wanted to take your case, and he said he was really famous but had never participated in a criminal trial, much less a murder trial...

...you would hire this lawyer?

westwall Tipsycatlover


LIARS

If he had the track record of Lin Wood and came with Fight Back Foundation lawyers, sure.

You are dismissing the entire case or you simply don't know. Kyle Rittenhouse didn't hire anyone. His entire case was taken by the Fight Back Foundation. His bail was paid by donations through the Fight Back Foundation. They are supplying their own lawyers. They accepted the offer of Lin Wood to be lead.

I'm going with you don't know so made it all up.

No you would not. You shameless liar.

The problem here is that the Rittenhouse defense team will need hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight these False Charges. And the kid is only 17 and doesn't have that kind of scratch.

I suppose that Rittenhouse could go with a public defender instead, would that be more or less likely (in your opinion) of resulting in exoneration than a high profile lawyer like Lin Wood?

So you goofy Trumpers are really going to say that, if you were on trial for your lives for two murders, and an attorney wanted to take your case, and he said he was really famous but had never participated in a criminal trial, much less a murder trial...

...you would hire this lawyer?

westwall Tipsycatlover


LIARS

If he had the track record of Lin Wood and came with Fight Back Foundation lawyers, sure.

You are dismissing the entire case or you simply don't know. Kyle Rittenhouse didn't hire anyone. His entire case was taken by the Fight Back Foundation. His bail was paid by donations through the Fight Back Foundation. They are supplying their own lawyers. They accepted the offer of Lin Wood to be lead.

I'm going with you don't know so made it all up.

No you would not. You shameless liar.

The problem here is that the Rittenhouse defense team will need hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight these False Charges. And the kid is only 17 and doesn't have that kind of scratch.

I suppose that Rittenhouse could go with a public defender instead, would that be more or less likely (in your opinion) of resulting in exoneration than a high profile lawyer like Lin Wood?

Thats what these asshats hope for. PD's with rare exceptions, are simply not very good.

There is a reason for that. Really good lawyers go into the prosecutors office. That's the path to a judgeship and politics. Defense goes noplace.

Wrong, prosecutors in general are awful. They are C+ students for the most part. Defence attorneys make far more money.

 

[westwall]

Vigilantism is taking the law into your own hands.

Exactly what the kid did, and exactly what the other poster described. You people are just so bizarre.

Wrong. He did EXACTLY what pelousi's armed guards do. He guarded property and when he attempted to extinguish a arson fire the arsonists attacked him.

THAT'S when he shot violent felons in defence of his life.

It takes a special breed of stupid, or an outright scumbag to charge him with a crime in that situation.

Like I said, these asshole prosecutors come from the mike nifong school of law.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He guarded property

Vigilantism. His "guarding of property" was to threaten people with a deadly weapon. An illegal weapon, at that. An illegal weapon, being used in an illegal endeavor. So he isn't getting out of this one with no convictions. Sorry.

 

[westwall]

He guarded property

Vigilantism. His "guarding of property" was to threaten people with a deadly weapon. An illegal weapon, at that. An illegal weapon, being used in an illegal endeavor. So he isn't getting out of this one with no convictions. Sorry.

He threatened no one. He was eyes and ears and hands on fire suppression. He never brandished the weapon. It was slung until he needed it.

And I have seen no substantive evidence the gun was illegal.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He threatened no one.

Of course, the illegal, deadly weapon was, in fact, a threat. Unless you are saying he was "protecting property" with funny voices and shadow puppets.

 

[westwall]

He threatened no one.

Of course, the illegal, deadly weapon was, in fact, a threat. Unless you are saying he was "protecting property" with funny voices and shadow puppets.

No. It's not. No more so than th he deadly skateboard is a threat until it is used to attack someone.

And no evidence I have seen says it was illegal.

Present some if you have any, merely stating your opinion isn't evidence.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Vigilantism is taking the law into your own hands.

Exactly what the kid did, and exactly what the other poster described. You people are just so bizarre.

Which law was he trying to enforce?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Vigilantism is taking the law into your own hands.

Exactly what the kid did, and exactly what the other poster described. You people are just so bizarre.

Which law was he trying to enforce?

Apparently vandalism...? Rioting? Arson? But remember, he is a child. So in his mind, he probably thought he was enforcing the law against the attempted takeover by communist rioters who want to come to his suburb and rape his girlfriend.

 

[westwall]

Vigilantism is taking the law into your own hands.

Exactly what the kid did, and exactly what the other poster described. You people are just so bizarre.

Which law was he trying to enforce?

Apparently vandalism...? Rioting? Arson? But remember, he is a child. So in his mind, he probably thought he was enforcing the law against the attempted takeover by communist rioters who want to come to his suburb and rape his girlfriend.

So, in your warped mind all armed security guards are vigilante's. Is that correct?

 

[Turtlesoup]

Lin Wood is a tremendous attorney, with impeccable credentials.

Lin Wood has no experience with murder trials (or criminal law in general) and is clearly the wrong choice to defend this child. I fear this child is being poorly represented and is having poor decisions made for him by his clearly incompetent family, who put him in this position to begin with.

I blame the racist abusive DA-------------this child only defended himself from violent criminals that the DA and the rest of that corrupt government failed to control.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Vigilantism is taking the law into your own hands.

Exactly what the kid did, and exactly what the other poster described. You people are just so bizarre.

Which law was he trying to enforce?

Apparently vandalism...? Rioting? Arson? But remember, he is a child. So in his mind, he probably thought he was enforcing the law against the attempted takeover by communist rioters who want to come to his suburb and rape his girlfriend.

When he was jogging toward the police line and was struck from behind and knocked to the ground, which law was he trying to enforce?

 

[Polishprince]

He threatened no one.

Of course, the illegal, deadly weapon was, in fact, a threat. Unless you are saying he was "protecting property" with funny voices and shadow puppets.

The arsonists, looters and child molesters didn't know that Rittenhouse's weapon was considered "illegal"at all, so they weren't "enforcing the law" at all by attacking him.

However, everyone on both sides knew that arson, looting and child molestation were illegal.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Vigilantism is taking the law into your own hands.

Exactly what the kid did, and exactly what the other poster described. You people are just so bizarre.

Which law was he trying to enforce?

Apparently vandalism...? Rioting? Arson? But remember, he is a child. So in his mind, he probably thought he was enforcing the law against the attempted takeover by communist rioters who want to come to his suburb and rape his girlfriend.

So, in your warped mind all armed security guards are vigilante's. Is that correct?

No. In your obviously ignorant little mind, you apparently did not know that they actually are following laws and regulations for security guards. What a fucking idiotic comment. Damn dude. You are waaaay over your skis at this point. Go have a drink, take a break.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When he was jogging toward the police line and was struck from behind and knocked to the ground, which law was he trying to enforce?

Oh, he was done doing that, at that point. At that point, he was a scared little child in waaay over his head. But thanks for the mind-numbingly stupid question. You are good for at least one a day.

 

[westwall]

Vigilantism is taking the law into your own hands.

Exactly what the kid did, and exactly what the other poster described. You people are just so bizarre.

Which law was he trying to enforce?

Apparently vandalism...? Rioting? Arson? But remember, he is a child. So in his mind, he probably thought he was enforcing the law against the attempted takeover by communist rioters who want to come to his suburb and rape his girlfriend.

So, in your warped mind all armed security guards are vigilante's. Is that correct?

No. In your obviously ignorant little mind, you apparently did not know that they actually are following laws and regulations for security guards. What a fucking idiotic comment. Damn dude. You are waaaay over your skis at this point. Go have a drink, take a break.

Oh? Describe in detail the laws and regs they have to follow.

Be specific.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

When he was jogging toward the police line and was struck from behind and knocked to the ground, which law was he trying to enforce?

Oh, he was done doing that, at that point. At that point, he was a scared little child in waaay over his head. But thanks for the mind-numbingly stupid question. You are good for at least one a day.

Oh, he was done doing that, at that point.

After not trying to enforce a law, at that point he's allowed to defend himself?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Vigilantism is taking the law into your own hands.

Exactly what the kid did, and exactly what the other poster described. You people are just so bizarre.

Which law was he trying to enforce?

Apparently vandalism...? Rioting? Arson? But remember, he is a child. So in his mind, he probably thought he was enforcing the law against the attempted takeover by communist rioters who want to come to his suburb and rape his girlfriend.

So, in your warped mind all armed security guards are vigilante's. Is that correct?

No. In your obviously ignorant little mind, you apparently did not know that they actually are following laws and regulations for security guards. What a fucking idiotic comment. Damn dude. You are waaaay over your skis at this point. Go have a drink, take a break.

Oh? Describe in detail the laws and regs they have to follow.

Be specific.

Tell us all how they don't have any laws or regulations. Be specific.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When he was jogging toward the police line and was struck from behind and knocked to the ground, which law was he trying to enforce?

Oh, he was done doing that, at that point. At that point, he was a scared little child in waaay over his head. But thanks for the mind-numbingly stupid question. You are good for at least one a day.

Oh, he was done doing that, at that point.

After not trying to enforce a law, at that point he's allowed to defend himself?

That's the real question. Was he in the process of committing a crime? If the jury thinks he was, then the self-defense defense is moot in court. As it turns out, he was illegally possessing a weapon and was illegally there after curfew. I don't think the kid's defense team is going to get around that one.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Was he in the process of committing a crime?

Defending yourself against one guy trying to hit you with a skateboard and another trying to shoot you.....looks like self-defense.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Was he in the process of committing a crime?

Defending yourself against one guy trying to hit you with a skateboard and another trying to shoot you.....looks like self-defense.

Well, i guess that defense rests on the jury being able to consider.literally no other information whatsoever.