The Demise of the American Consensus

[Rustic]

Socialism is the largest fuck up the human race ever thought up…

 

[NYcarbineer]

2. Last month, Charles Murray expounded on what was once a consensus in the nation, a consensus that made us great, and the basis of American exceptionalism.
If Americans were still in agreement about this view, many corrupt politicians who have found success at the polls...rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans.....would never have been elected to high office.


.

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

I'll name the one closest for you...

...conservative hero Jefferson Davis.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Socialism is the largest fuck up the human race ever thought up…

Why? Because the poor should die in the streets in places past and present where there is no socialism?

 

[jillian]

In the 1960's the lunatics took over the asylum.

The spoiled, self-aggrandizing twits who spearheaded the wrong-headed protests against the Vietnam War camped out in our colleges and universities, and happily discovered that they were welcome there. So they stayed (what the hell, it was better than actually working for a living), and became the professors who taught today's teachers (who also are not particularly interested in the idea of working for a living).

And so we have had an unprecedented campaign of liberal indoctrination, lasting two-plus generations, wherein our children have been subjected to 12-16 years of constant liberal propaganda, paid for by the American taxpayers.

Is it any wonder that The Young are overwhelmingly liberal? It is only after having had to work for a living for a period of time that it dawns on many of them that what they have been taught about government "compassion," about America's role in the world, and about the "deserving poor," is nothing but nonsense, intended mainly to cement the entitlement of millions and millions of government bureaucrats to a lifetime of risk-free, work-free privilege.

How to explain the dramatic reversal in the views of the electorate, from that which made us great....individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, to the collectivism of the Sinister Sextuplets?


6. Steve Malanga of City Journal has written about it, and attributes much of same to the huge increase in the post-war population.

The explanation involves the numbers of individual coming of age at the time, who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches. A particularly large wave swamped the institutions responsible for teaching traditions and standards.

a. “Rathenau called [this] ‘the vertical invasion of the barbarians.’” Jose Ortega y Gasset, “The Revolt of the Masses,” p. 53.


The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture. The generation from 1922-1947 numbered 43.6 million, while that of 1946-1964 had 79 million.

Would it surprise anyone if this culture was opposed to that of their parents?

And, therefore, opposed to the creed by which their parents lived?

what "creed"? what consensus?

the only individualism you believe in is if the individuals share your limited and extreme radical right views..... as cut and pasted all day long for everyone's general amusement.

She's talking about the consensus in America's past that was so strong that it made such things as a civil war impossible.

you mean prior to 1865?

not so much......

and when, as the rabid right does, try to de-legitimize the federal government constantly, they are responsible for their own disrespect and inability to work with anyone who doesn't toe their radical line.

 

[NYcarbineer]

2. Last month, Charles Murray expounded on what was once a consensus in the nation, a consensus that made us great, and the basis of American exceptionalism.
If Americans were still in agreement about this view, many corrupt politicians who have found success at the polls...rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans.....would never have been elected to high office.


.

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

I look forward to seeing her lie about this one.

Since she believes in guilty until proven innocent, you shouldn't have to wait long.

 

[NYcarbineer]

In the 1960's the lunatics took over the asylum.

The spoiled, self-aggrandizing twits who spearheaded the wrong-headed protests against the Vietnam War camped out in our colleges and universities, and happily discovered that they were welcome there. So they stayed (what the hell, it was better than actually working for a living), and became the professors who taught today's teachers (who also are not particularly interested in the idea of working for a living).

And so we have had an unprecedented campaign of liberal indoctrination, lasting two-plus generations, wherein our children have been subjected to 12-16 years of constant liberal propaganda, paid for by the American taxpayers.

Is it any wonder that The Young are overwhelmingly liberal? It is only after having had to work for a living for a period of time that it dawns on many of them that what they have been taught about government "compassion," about America's role in the world, and about the "deserving poor," is nothing but nonsense, intended mainly to cement the entitlement of millions and millions of government bureaucrats to a lifetime of risk-free, work-free privilege.

How to explain the dramatic reversal in the views of the electorate, from that which made us great....individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, to the collectivism of the Sinister Sextuplets?


6. Steve Malanga of City Journal has written about it, and attributes much of same to the huge increase in the post-war population.

The explanation involves the numbers of individual coming of age at the time, who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches. A particularly large wave swamped the institutions responsible for teaching traditions and standards.

a. “Rathenau called [this] ‘the vertical invasion of the barbarians.’” Jose Ortega y Gasset, “The Revolt of the Masses,” p. 53.


The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture. The generation from 1922-1947 numbered 43.6 million, while that of 1946-1964 had 79 million.

Would it surprise anyone if this culture was opposed to that of their parents?

And, therefore, opposed to the creed by which their parents lived?

what "creed"? what consensus?

the only individualism you believe in is if the individuals share your limited and extreme radical right views..... as cut and pasted all day long for everyone's general amusement.

She's talking about the consensus in America's past that was so strong that it made such things as a civil war impossible.

you mean prior to 1865?

not so much......

and when, as the rabid right does, try to de-legitimize the federal government constantly, they are responsible for their own disrespect and inability to work with anyone who doesn't toe their radical line.

She's conjured up some mythical grand consensus that never existed.

 

[NYcarbineer]

That thread also documented the corresponding and complimentary aspects of the six 'shameful sisters'....Fascism, Nazism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism and Progressivism.
All six function via similar methods, and have the same ultimate aims: big, unlimited government collectivism.

Fascism and Liberalism 'sisters'? Similar methods and aims?

Then tell us, what were the similar methods and aims of Mussolini's fascism and John Kennedy's liberalism?

 

[NYcarbineer]

In the 1960's the lunatics took over the asylum.

The spoiled, self-aggrandizing twits who spearheaded the wrong-headed protests against the Vietnam War camped out in our colleges and universities, and happily discovered that they were welcome there. So they stayed (what the hell, it was better than actually working for a living), and became the professors who taught today's teachers (who also are not particularly interested in the idea of working for a living).

And so we have had an unprecedented campaign of liberal indoctrination, lasting two-plus generations, wherein our children have been subjected to 12-16 years of constant liberal propaganda, paid for by the American taxpayers.

Is it any wonder that The Young are overwhelmingly liberal? It is only after having had to work for a living for a period of time that it dawns on many of them that what they have been taught about government "compassion," about America's role in the world, and about the "deserving poor," is nothing but nonsense, intended mainly to cement the entitlement of millions and millions of government bureaucrats to a lifetime of risk-free, work-free privilege.

How to explain the dramatic reversal in the views of the electorate, from that which made us great....individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, to the collectivism of the Sinister Sextuplets?


6. Steve Malanga of City Journal has written about it, and attributes much of same to the huge increase in the post-war population.

The explanation involves the numbers of individual coming of age at the time, who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches. A particularly large wave swamped the institutions responsible for teaching traditions and standards.

a. “Rathenau called [this] ‘the vertical invasion of the barbarians.’” Jose Ortega y Gasset, “The Revolt of the Masses,” p. 53.


The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture. The generation from 1922-1947 numbered 43.6 million, while that of 1946-1964 had 79 million.

Would it surprise anyone if this culture was opposed to that of their parents?

And, therefore, opposed to the creed by which their parents lived?

what "creed"? what consensus?

the only individualism you believe in is if the individuals share your limited and extreme radical right views..... as cut and pasted all day long for everyone's general amusement.

She's talking about the consensus in America's past that was so strong that it made such things as a civil war impossible.

you mean prior to 1865?

not so much......

and when, as the rabid right does, try to de-legitimize the federal government constantly, they are responsible for their own disrespect and inability to work with anyone who doesn't toe their radical line.

Ironically the conservative 'consensus' is that one's highest calling as an American is to serve one's country IN government,

aka the military.

 

[PoliticalChic]

2. Last month, Charles Murray expounded on what was once a consensus in the nation, a consensus that made us great, and the basis of American exceptionalism.
If Americans were still in agreement about this view, many corrupt politicians who have found success at the polls...rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans.....would never have been elected to high office.


.

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

Sure....if you can find any quote of my stating "Democratic president who was convicted of treason."
...In that case I would do so, NYLiar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

2. Last month, Charles Murray expounded on what was once a consensus in the nation, a consensus that made us great, and the basis of American exceptionalism.
If Americans were still in agreement about this view, many corrupt politicians who have found success at the polls...rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans.....would never have been elected to high office.


.

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

I look forward to seeing her lie about this one.

Gads, he really made you look like a fool.

I wrote this to the NYLiar..
"Sure....if you can find any quote of my stating "Democratic president who was convicted of treason."
...In that case I would do so, NYLiar."


He lies on purpose....you're simply not bright enough to read with the same precision with which I write.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the 1960's the lunatics took over the asylum.

The spoiled, self-aggrandizing twits who spearheaded the wrong-headed protests against the Vietnam War camped out in our colleges and universities, and happily discovered that they were welcome there. So they stayed (what the hell, it was better than actually working for a living), and became the professors who taught today's teachers (who also are not particularly interested in the idea of working for a living).

And so we have had an unprecedented campaign of liberal indoctrination, lasting two-plus generations, wherein our children have been subjected to 12-16 years of constant liberal propaganda, paid for by the American taxpayers.

Is it any wonder that The Young are overwhelmingly liberal? It is only after having had to work for a living for a period of time that it dawns on many of them that what they have been taught about government "compassion," about America's role in the world, and about the "deserving poor," is nothing but nonsense, intended mainly to cement the entitlement of millions and millions of government bureaucrats to a lifetime of risk-free, work-free privilege.

How to explain the dramatic reversal in the views of the electorate, from that which made us great....individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, to the collectivism of the Sinister Sextuplets?


6. Steve Malanga of City Journal has written about it, and attributes much of same to the huge increase in the post-war population.

The explanation involves the numbers of individual coming of age at the time, who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches. A particularly large wave swamped the institutions responsible for teaching traditions and standards.

a. “Rathenau called [this] ‘the vertical invasion of the barbarians.’” Jose Ortega y Gasset, “The Revolt of the Masses,” p. 53.


The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture. The generation from 1922-1947 numbered 43.6 million, while that of 1946-1964 had 79 million.

Would it surprise anyone if this culture was opposed to that of their parents?

And, therefore, opposed to the creed by which their parents lived?

what "creed"? what consensus?

the only individualism you believe in is if the individuals share your limited and extreme radical right views..... as cut and pasted all day long for everyone's general amusement.

"what "creed"? what consensus?"

Is yours a short term memory problem?

This was posted earlier....

3. "What does this ideology—Huntington called it the “American creed”—consist of? Its three core values may be summarized as

egalitarianism,

liberty

and individualism.


From these flow other familiar aspects of the national creed that observers have long identified: equality before the law, equality of opportunity, freedom of speech and association, self-reliance, limited government, free-market economics, decentralized and devolved political authority.

 

[PoliticalChic]

2. Last month, Charles Murray expounded on what was once a consensus in the nation, a consensus that made us great, and the basis of American exceptionalism.
If Americans were still in agreement about this view, many corrupt politicians who have found success at the polls...rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans.....would never have been elected to high office.


.

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

I'll name the one closest for you...

...conservative hero Jefferson Davis.

I wrote this to highlight your lie...
"As soon as you find a quote of mine stating that a Democratic president who was convicted of treason."

You made it up, of course...and this post of yours is the attempt to hide the lie.

You fooled Jillian....but that is hardly a high bar.

 

[NYcarbineer]

2. Last month, Charles Murray expounded on what was once a consensus in the nation, a consensus that made us great, and the basis of American exceptionalism.
If Americans were still in agreement about this view, many corrupt politicians who have found success at the polls...rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans.....would never have been elected to high office.


.

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

Sure....if you can find any quote of my stating "Democratic president who was convicted of treason."
...In that case I would do so, NYLiar.

Why would I ask if I had a quote?

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the 1960's the lunatics took over the asylum.

The spoiled, self-aggrandizing twits who spearheaded the wrong-headed protests against the Vietnam War camped out in our colleges and universities, and happily discovered that they were welcome there. So they stayed (what the hell, it was better than actually working for a living), and became the professors who taught today's teachers (who also are not particularly interested in the idea of working for a living).

And so we have had an unprecedented campaign of liberal indoctrination, lasting two-plus generations, wherein our children have been subjected to 12-16 years of constant liberal propaganda, paid for by the American taxpayers.

Is it any wonder that The Young are overwhelmingly liberal? It is only after having had to work for a living for a period of time that it dawns on many of them that what they have been taught about government "compassion," about America's role in the world, and about the "deserving poor," is nothing but nonsense, intended mainly to cement the entitlement of millions and millions of government bureaucrats to a lifetime of risk-free, work-free privilege.

How to explain the dramatic reversal in the views of the electorate, from that which made us great....individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, to the collectivism of the Sinister Sextuplets?


6. Steve Malanga of City Journal has written about it, and attributes much of same to the huge increase in the post-war population.

The explanation involves the numbers of individual coming of age at the time, who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches. A particularly large wave swamped the institutions responsible for teaching traditions and standards.

a. “Rathenau called [this] ‘the vertical invasion of the barbarians.’” Jose Ortega y Gasset, “The Revolt of the Masses,” p. 53.


The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture. The generation from 1922-1947 numbered 43.6 million, while that of 1946-1964 had 79 million.

Would it surprise anyone if this culture was opposed to that of their parents?

And, therefore, opposed to the creed by which their parents lived?

what "creed"? what consensus?

the only individualism you believe in is if the individuals share your limited and extreme radical right views..... as cut and pasted all day long for everyone's general amusement.

She's talking about the consensus in America's past that was so strong that it made such things as a civil war impossible.

you mean prior to 1865?

not so much......

and when, as the rabid right does, try to de-legitimize the federal government constantly, they are responsible for their own disrespect and inability to work with anyone who doesn't toe their radical line.

Have you ever heard of the Constitution?

Federalism???

Have you graduated high school yet???

 

[NYcarbineer]

2. Last month, Charles Murray expounded on what was once a consensus in the nation, a consensus that made us great, and the basis of American exceptionalism.
If Americans were still in agreement about this view, many corrupt politicians who have found success at the polls...rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans.....would never have been elected to high office.


.

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

I'll name the one closest for you...

...conservative hero Jefferson Davis.

I wrote this to highlight your lie...
"As soon as you find a quote of mine stating that a Democratic president who was convicted of treason."

You made it up, of course...and this post of yours is the attempt to hide the lie.

You fooled Jillian....but that is hardly a high bar.

So you can't name any Democratic president who was a traitor? Okay. Why are you accusing Democrats of being traitors?

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the 1960's the lunatics took over the asylum.

The spoiled, self-aggrandizing twits who spearheaded the wrong-headed protests against the Vietnam War camped out in our colleges and universities, and happily discovered that they were welcome there. So they stayed (what the hell, it was better than actually working for a living), and became the professors who taught today's teachers (who also are not particularly interested in the idea of working for a living).

And so we have had an unprecedented campaign of liberal indoctrination, lasting two-plus generations, wherein our children have been subjected to 12-16 years of constant liberal propaganda, paid for by the American taxpayers.

Is it any wonder that The Young are overwhelmingly liberal? It is only after having had to work for a living for a period of time that it dawns on many of them that what they have been taught about government "compassion," about America's role in the world, and about the "deserving poor," is nothing but nonsense, intended mainly to cement the entitlement of millions and millions of government bureaucrats to a lifetime of risk-free, work-free privilege.

How to explain the dramatic reversal in the views of the electorate, from that which made us great....individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, to the collectivism of the Sinister Sextuplets?


6. Steve Malanga of City Journal has written about it, and attributes much of same to the huge increase in the post-war population.

The explanation involves the numbers of individual coming of age at the time, who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches. A particularly large wave swamped the institutions responsible for teaching traditions and standards.

a. “Rathenau called [this] ‘the vertical invasion of the barbarians.’” Jose Ortega y Gasset, “The Revolt of the Masses,” p. 53.


The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture. The generation from 1922-1947 numbered 43.6 million, while that of 1946-1964 had 79 million.

Would it surprise anyone if this culture was opposed to that of their parents?

And, therefore, opposed to the creed by which their parents lived?

what "creed"? what consensus?

the only individualism you believe in is if the individuals share your limited and extreme radical right views..... as cut and pasted all day long for everyone's general amusement.

She's talking about the consensus in America's past that was so strong that it made such things as a civil war impossible.

you mean prior to 1865?

not so much......

and when, as the rabid right does, try to de-legitimize the federal government constantly, they are responsible for their own disrespect and inability to work with anyone who doesn't toe their radical line.

She's conjured up some mythical grand consensus that never existed.

Another dolt who's never read the Constitution.

 

[NYcarbineer]

In the 1960's the lunatics took over the asylum.

The spoiled, self-aggrandizing twits who spearheaded the wrong-headed protests against the Vietnam War camped out in our colleges and universities, and happily discovered that they were welcome there. So they stayed (what the hell, it was better than actually working for a living), and became the professors who taught today's teachers (who also are not particularly interested in the idea of working for a living).

And so we have had an unprecedented campaign of liberal indoctrination, lasting two-plus generations, wherein our children have been subjected to 12-16 years of constant liberal propaganda, paid for by the American taxpayers.

Is it any wonder that The Young are overwhelmingly liberal? It is only after having had to work for a living for a period of time that it dawns on many of them that what they have been taught about government "compassion," about America's role in the world, and about the "deserving poor," is nothing but nonsense, intended mainly to cement the entitlement of millions and millions of government bureaucrats to a lifetime of risk-free, work-free privilege.

How to explain the dramatic reversal in the views of the electorate, from that which made us great....individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, to the collectivism of the Sinister Sextuplets?


6. Steve Malanga of City Journal has written about it, and attributes much of same to the huge increase in the post-war population.

The explanation involves the numbers of individual coming of age at the time, who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches. A particularly large wave swamped the institutions responsible for teaching traditions and standards.

a. “Rathenau called [this] ‘the vertical invasion of the barbarians.’” Jose Ortega y Gasset, “The Revolt of the Masses,” p. 53.


The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture. The generation from 1922-1947 numbered 43.6 million, while that of 1946-1964 had 79 million.

Would it surprise anyone if this culture was opposed to that of their parents?

And, therefore, opposed to the creed by which their parents lived?

what "creed"? what consensus?

the only individualism you believe in is if the individuals share your limited and extreme radical right views..... as cut and pasted all day long for everyone's general amusement.

She's talking about the consensus in America's past that was so strong that it made such things as a civil war impossible.

you mean prior to 1865?

not so much......

and when, as the rabid right does, try to de-legitimize the federal government constantly, they are responsible for their own disrespect and inability to work with anyone who doesn't toe their radical line.

Have you ever heard of the Constitution?

Federalism???

Have you graduated high school yet???

Was Lincoln following the Constitution when he made his Supremacy Clause argument to defend preserving the Union?

 

[NYcarbineer]

How to explain the dramatic reversal in the views of the electorate, from that which made us great....individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, to the collectivism of the Sinister Sextuplets?


6. Steve Malanga of City Journal has written about it, and attributes much of same to the huge increase in the post-war population.

The explanation involves the numbers of individual coming of age at the time, who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches. A particularly large wave swamped the institutions responsible for teaching traditions and standards.

a. “Rathenau called [this] ‘the vertical invasion of the barbarians.’” Jose Ortega y Gasset, “The Revolt of the Masses,” p. 53.


The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture. The generation from 1922-1947 numbered 43.6 million, while that of 1946-1964 had 79 million.

Would it surprise anyone if this culture was opposed to that of their parents?

And, therefore, opposed to the creed by which their parents lived?

what "creed"? what consensus?

the only individualism you believe in is if the individuals share your limited and extreme radical right views..... as cut and pasted all day long for everyone's general amusement.

She's talking about the consensus in America's past that was so strong that it made such things as a civil war impossible.

you mean prior to 1865?

not so much......

and when, as the rabid right does, try to de-legitimize the federal government constantly, they are responsible for their own disrespect and inability to work with anyone who doesn't toe their radical line.

She's conjured up some mythical grand consensus that never existed.

Another dolt who's never read the Constitution.

Was there a North/South 'consensus' over what the Constitution meant in 1860?

 

[PoliticalChic]

2. Last month, Charles Murray expounded on what was once a consensus in the nation, a consensus that made us great, and the basis of American exceptionalism.
If Americans were still in agreement about this view, many corrupt politicians who have found success at the polls...rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans.....would never have been elected to high office.


.

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

Sure....if you can find any quote of my stating "Democratic president who was convicted of treason."
...In that case I would do so, NYLiar.

Why would I ask if I had a quote?

Because you're a congenital liar.

I never said any Democrat President was convicted of treason....did I

 

[NYcarbineer]

Like who? Lincoln?

lol

The specific reference was "....rapists, traitors, murderers, anti-Americans...."

Now....which Democrat would you like me to identify?

Yes, name the Democratic president who was convicted of treason.

Sure....if you can find any quote of my stating "Democratic president who was convicted of treason."
...In that case I would do so, NYLiar.

Why would I ask if I had a quote?

Because you're a congenital liar.

I never said any Democrat President was convicted of treason....did I

No one said you did. I asked you if there ever was one. Your answer is no. Case closed.